This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.4.228-rc1
Yasushi SHOJI yasushi.shoji@gmail.com can: mcba_usb: Fix termination command argument
Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de can: sja1000: fix size of OCR_MODE_MASK define
Ricardo Ribalda ribalda@chromium.org pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled
Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org ASoC: ops: Check bounds for second channel in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()
Jialiang Wang wangjialiang0806@163.com nfp: fix use-after-free in area_cache_get()
Ming Lei ming.lei@redhat.com block: unhash blkdev part inode when the part is deleted
Baolin Wang baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
Lorenzo Colitti lorenzo@google.com net: bpf: Allow TC programs to call BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 2 -- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 + block/partition-generic.c | 7 +++++ drivers/net/can/usb/mcba_usb.c | 10 +++++--- .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c | 3 ++- drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 9 ++++--- include/linux/can/platform/sja1000.h | 2 +- include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 ++--- mm/gup.c | 13 +++++++++- mm/hugetlb.c | 30 +++++++++++----------- net/core/filter.c | 2 ++ sound/soc/soc-ops.c | 6 +++++ 13 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
On 12/15/22 11:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.4.228-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: e538d4b64ed30c6b7248a14b4e8641db4db16736 * git describe: v5.4.227-10-ge538d4b64ed3 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.22...
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.226-68-g8c05f5e0777d)
## Test result summary total: 114869, pass: 99876, fail: 1964, skip: 12795, xfail: 234
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 146 total, 145 passed, 1 failed * arm64: 44 total, 40 passed, 4 failed * i386: 26 total, 20 passed, 6 failed * mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed * s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * ltp[ * network-basic-tests * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:10:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.228-rc1-ge538d4b64ed3 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2361
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
On 12/15/22 10:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 447 pass: 447 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2022/12/16 2:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.228 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.228-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.4.228-rc1,
Kernel repo:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.4.y Version: 5.4.228-rc1 Commit: e538d4b64ed30c6b7248a14b4e8641db4db16736 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9017 passed: 9017 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9017 passed: 9017 failed: 0 timeout: 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) -
zhouzhixiu