This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.18-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.15.18-rc1
Russell King russell.king@oracle.com arm64/bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs
Harry Wentland harry.wentland@amd.com drm/amdgpu: Use correct VIEWPORT_DIMENSION for DCN2
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks
Shakeel Butt shakeelb@google.com memcg: better bounds on the memcg stats updates
Shakeel Butt shakeelb@google.com memcg: unify memcg stat flushing
Shakeel Butt shakeelb@google.com memcg: flush stats only if updated
Manish Chopra manishc@marvell.com bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs
Manish Chopra manishc@marvell.com bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0
Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com io_uring: fix not released cached task refs
Mario Limonciello mario.limonciello@amd.com drm/amd/display: reset dcn31 SMU mailbox on failures
Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h | 9 -- arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 5 +- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/mm/extable.c | 13 ++- arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c | 2 - arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 14 ++- .../drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn31/dcn31_smu.c | 6 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 10 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 26 +++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h | 11 ++- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c | 6 +- .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h | 3 +- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 75 ++++++++++----- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c | 13 ++- fs/io_uring.c | 34 ++++--- fs/select.c | 63 +++++++------ kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +- mm/memcontrol.c | 99 ++++++++++++++------ 28 files changed, 396 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.18-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.18-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 1/27/22 10:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.18-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.18-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.15.18-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.15.y * git commit: 1985ebe37ea5497ded496bbf90dce6f216a0945b * git describe: v5.15.17-13-g1985ebe37ea5 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.16-842-g384933ffef76) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.16-842-g384933ffef76) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.16-842-g384933ffef76) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.16-842-g384933ffef76) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 103202, pass: 87990, fail: 1071, skip: 13242, xfail: 899
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 263 total, 261 passed, 2 failed * arm64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 40 total, 37 passed, 3 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 56 total, 50 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 28 total, 24 passed, 4 failed * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:24 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.18-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.18-rc1-g1985ebe37ea5 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:24PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/667 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/671 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/672
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:24PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:24 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.18 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.18-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.15.18-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
-
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Ron Economos -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee