On 2/29/24 6:05 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
The variable mask is being assigned and bit-set but it is never being used apart from this. The variable is redundant and can be removed.
Cleans up clang scan build warning: drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c:764:15: warning: variable 'mask' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com
This is a reasonable change, but I don't know this code that well and would like to hear from Vaibhav (if possible) or someone else whether they think the mask value *should* have been used in this spot. It doesn't look like it to me, but I'd like you to get a second opinion...
-Alex
drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c index 08e6a807c132..5dc4721105d4 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c @@ -761,7 +761,6 @@ static int gbcodec_enum_dapm_ctl_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, { int ret, wi, ctl_id; unsigned int val, mux, change;
- unsigned int mask; struct snd_soc_dapm_widget_list *wlist = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *widget = wlist->widgets[0]; struct gb_audio_ctl_elem_value gbvalue;
@@ -802,7 +801,6 @@ static int gbcodec_enum_dapm_ctl_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, mux = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; val = mux << e->shift_l;
- mask = e->mask << e->shift_l;
if (le32_to_cpu(gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[0]) != ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]) { @@ -815,7 +813,6 @@ static int gbcodec_enum_dapm_ctl_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] > e->items - 1) return -EINVAL; val |= ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] << e->shift_r;
mask |= e->mask << e->shift_r;