The pwm framework already asserts to only pass a hwpwm value (= which) less than npwm (= pwmc->pwm_max + 1). So there is no need to recheck this condition. Drop the respective checks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de --- drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c index 0cd1dab2d888..3099c2a3611c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c @@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ static int gb_pwm_activate_operation(struct pwm_chip *chip, u8 which) struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev; int ret;
- if (which > pwmc->pwm_max) - return -EINVAL; - request.which = which;
gbphy_dev = to_gbphy_dev(pwmchip_parent(chip)); @@ -71,9 +68,6 @@ static int gb_pwm_deactivate_operation(struct pwm_chip *chip, u8 which) struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev; int ret;
- if (which > pwmc->pwm_max) - return -EINVAL; - request.which = which;
gbphy_dev = to_gbphy_dev(pwmchip_parent(chip)); @@ -97,9 +91,6 @@ static int gb_pwm_config_operation(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev; int ret;
- if (which > pwmc->pwm_max) - return -EINVAL; - request.which = which; request.duty = cpu_to_le32(duty); request.period = cpu_to_le32(period); @@ -125,9 +116,6 @@ static int gb_pwm_set_polarity_operation(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev; int ret;
- if (which > pwmc->pwm_max) - return -EINVAL; - request.which = which; request.polarity = polarity;
@@ -151,9 +139,6 @@ static int gb_pwm_enable_operation(struct pwm_chip *chip, u8 which) struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev; int ret;
- if (which > pwmc->pwm_max) - return -EINVAL; - request.which = which;
gbphy_dev = to_gbphy_dev(pwmchip_parent(chip)); @@ -176,9 +161,6 @@ static int gb_pwm_disable_operation(struct pwm_chip *chip, u8 which) struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev; int ret;
- if (which > pwmc->pwm_max) - return -EINVAL; - request.which = which;
ret = gb_operation_sync(pwmc->connection, GB_PWM_TYPE_DISABLE,