On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 12:24:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 02:48:40PM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
Adhere to linux coding style, added parentheses around macro argument 'gcam'. CHECK: Macro argument 'gcam' may be better as '(gcam)' to avoid precedence issues
Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram nandhakumar.singaram@gmail.com
drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c index cdbb42cd413b..ae49e37a87e9 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c @@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ static const struct gb_camera_fmt_info *gb_camera_get_format_info(u16 gb_fmt) #define GB_CAMERA_MAX_SETTINGS_SIZE 8192 -#define gcam_dbg(gcam, format...) dev_dbg(&gcam->bundle->dev, format) -#define gcam_info(gcam, format...) dev_info(&gcam->bundle->dev, format) -#define gcam_err(gcam, format...) dev_err(&gcam->bundle->dev, format) +#define gcam_dbg(gcam, format...) dev_dbg(&(gcam)->bundle->dev, format) +#define gcam_info(gcam, format...) dev_info(&(gcam)->bundle->dev, format) +#define gcam_err(gcam, format...) dev_err(&(gcam)->bundle->dev, format)
Sorry, but checkpatch is wrong here, this is not a problem at all. Look at what you changed and think about if the macro argument could actually be anything other than a pointer.
thanks,
greg k-h
Thanks, I will check it out.
Regards, Nandha Kumar