On mercoledì 13 aprile 2022 08:16:20 CEST Julia Lawall wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
On martedì 12 aprile 2022 21:59:15 CEST Jaehee Park wrote:
An empty function with void return type does not need an explicit return. Issue found by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Jaehee Park jhpark1013@gmail.com
drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c b/drivers/staging/
greybus/audio_codec.c
index 0f50d1e51e2c..3e3a16568def 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c @@ -1032,7 +1032,6 @@ static int gbcodec_probe(struct
snd_soc_component
*comp)
static void gbcodec_remove(struct snd_soc_component *comp) { /* Empty function for now */
- return;
}
static int gbcodec_write(struct snd_soc_component *comp, unsigned
int
reg,
-- 2.25.1
Hi Jaehee,
If I recall it correctly, Dan Carpenter suggested to remove this empty function.
When developers remove lines of code from a function which becomes
empty
after the removals, they also remove the resulting empty function and delete all the calls (if there are any left) at the same time.
It's probably not relevant in this case,
No, it's relevant :) I should have been more exhaustive :(
but the function could be needed if it is a branch of an ifdef. Also if it is stored in a structure field and the user of the structure does not check for NULL.
Here we have one of special cases you've mentioned. The pointer to the function is stored in a structure field _but_ we know that the user does check for NULL.
Thanks,
Fabio
julia