linaro-toolchain

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

7 participants
5664 discussions

How the NI CLAD Certification Boosts Your Career in Engineering and Automation

by David Gibbs

Earning the NI Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer (CLAD) certification is a practical step for engineers and automation professionals aiming to prove hands-on LabVIEW competence. Employers value the problem-solving and system-design skills demonstrated by candidates who pass NI Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer CLAD Exam Questions, because the credential signals consistent coding practices and real-world application ability. The CLAD credential accelerates career growth by opening roles in test engineering, instrumentation, robotics, and industrial automation. With a firm foundation in graphical programming, certified professionals can contribute to project efficiency, reduce development time, and improve system reliability. Preparing with focused resources for NI Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer CLAD Exam Questions helps candidates master core topics such as dataflow, debugging, and modular design—skills directly transferable to workplace challenges. I selected Certboosters because it provides structured study plans, realistic practice tests, and expert feedback to increase confidence and exam readiness; their materials are tailored to practical outcomes and mirror exam style while reinforcing applied LabVIEW techniques. In short, the NI CLAD certification strengthens résumés, accelerates promotions, and equips engineers with an industry-recognized proof of LabVIEW proficiency that employers seek in automation and control-system roles. Use the link below to check the practice test questions: https://www.certboosters.com/ni/path/clad

1 month, 3 weeks

Fwd: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): flang-arm64-windows-msvc - failed build (failure) (main)

by Mehdi AMINI

Hi folks, I have a strong suspicion that this bot has an incremental build issue right now. Can someone trigger a clean build please? Thanks! Mehdi ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 12:51 AM Subject: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): flang-arm64-windows-msvc - failed build (failure) (main) To: Mehdi Amini <joker.eph(a)gmail.com> Cc: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder flang-arm64-windows-msvc while building flang,mlir. Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/207/builds/9096 Worker for this Build: linaro-armv8-windows-msvc-01 Blamelist: Mehdi Amini <joker.eph(a)gmail.com> BUILD FAILED: failed build (failure) Step 5 (build-unified-tree) failure: build (failure) ... 359 | return {APFloat(*smt, value.real()), APFloat(*smt, value.imag())}; | ^ c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\complex(1315,5): note: 'complex' has been explicitly marked deprecated here 1315 | _DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX | ^ c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\yvals_core.h(1450,7): note: expanded from macro '_DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX' 1450 | [[deprecated("warning STL4037: " \ | ^ 1 warning generated. 84.583 [1719/10/276] Building CXX object tools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/CMakeFiles/obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir/MemRefDialect.cpp.obj FAILED: tools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/CMakeFiles/obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir/MemRefDialect.cpp.obj C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\shims\ccache.exe C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\llvm-arm64\current\bin\clang-cl.exe /nologo -TP -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -DUNICODE -D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE -D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0 -D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -D_UNICODE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR -IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR -IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include -IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include -IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/include -IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/llvm/include /DWIN32 /D_WINDOWS /Zc:inline /Zc:__cplusplus /Oi /Brepro /bigobj /permissive- -Werr or=unguarded-availability-new /W4 -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wstring-conversion -Wno-pass-failed -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported /Gw -Wundef -Werror=mismatched-tags -Werror=global-constructors /O2 /Ob2 -std:c++17 -MD /EHs-c- /GR- -UNDEBUG /showIncludes /Fotools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/CMakeFiles/obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir/MemRefDialect.cpp.obj /Fdtools\mlir\lib\Dialect\MemRef\IR\CMakeFiles\obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir\ -c -- C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefDialect.cpp In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefDialect.cpp:9: In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Conversion/ConvertToEmitC/ToEmitCInterface.h:14: In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OpDefinition.h:22: In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/Dialect.h:17: In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OperationSupport.h:19: C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/BuiltinAttributes.h(359,14): warning: 'complex' is deprecated: warning STL4037: The effect of instantiating the template std::complex for any type other than float, double, or long double is unspecified. You can define _SILENCE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX_DEPRECATION_WARNING to suppress this warning. [-Wdeprecated-declarations] 359 | return {APFloat(*smt, value.real()), APFloat(*smt, value.imag())}; | ^ c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\complex(1315,5): note: 'complex' has been explicitly marked deprecated here 1315 | _DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX | ^ c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\yvals_core.h(1450,7): note: expanded from macro '_DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX' 1450 | [[deprecated("warning STL4037: " \ | ^ In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefDialect.cpp:12: In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRef.h:13: In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Dialect/Arith/IR/Arith.h:17: In file included from C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h:371: C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h.inc(1118,84): error: no viable conversion from '::mlir::RegionSuccessor' to '::mlir::RegionBranchPoint' 1118 | return (llvm::cast<ConcreteOp>(tablegen_opaque_val)).getMutableSuccessorOperands(point); | ^~~~~ C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h.inc(435,23): note: in instantiation of member function 'mlir::detail::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>::getMutableSuccessorOperands' requested here 435 | Model() : Concept{getMutableSuccessorOperands, getSuccessorRegions} {} | ^ C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Support/InterfaceSupport.h(238,46): note: in instantiation of member function 'mlir::detail::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>::Model' requested here 238 | new (malloc(sizeof(InterfaceModel))) InterfaceModel(); | ^ C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Support/InterfaceSupport.h(225,7): note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'mlir::detail::InterfaceMap::insertModel<mlir::detail::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>>' requested here 225 | insertModel<typename T::ModelT>(); | ^ C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Support/InterfaceSupport.h(199,10): note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'mlir::detail::InterfaceMap::insertPotentialInterface<mlir::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>>' requested here 199 | (map.insertPotentialInterface<Types>(), ...); | ^ C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OpDefinition.h(1877,43): note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'mlir::detail::InterfaceMap::get<mlir::OpTrait::ZeroRegions<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::ZeroResults<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::ZeroSuccessors<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::OneOperand<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::HasParent<mlir::memref::GenericAtomicRMWOp>::Impl<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::OpInvariants<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::ConditionallySpeculatable::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::AlwaysSpeculatableImplTrait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::MemoryEffectOpInterface::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::IsTerminator<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>, mlir::OpTrait::ReturnLike<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>>' requested he re 1877 | return detail::InterfaceMap::template get<Traits<ConcreteType>...>(); | ^ C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OperationSupport.h(533,55): note: in instantiation of member function 'mlir::Op<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp, mlir::OpTrait::ZeroRegions, mlir::OpTrait::ZeroResults, mlir::OpTrait::ZeroSuccessors, mlir::OpTrait::OneOperand, mlir::OpTrait::HasParent<mlir::memref::GenericAtomicRMWOp>::Impl, mlir::OpTrait::OpInvariants, mlir::ConditionallySpeculatable::Trait, mlir::OpTrait::AlwaysSpeculatableImplTrait, mlir::MemoryEffectOpInterface::Trait, mlir::OpTrait::IsTerminator, mlir::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface::Trait, mlir::OpTrait::ReturnLike>::getInterfaceMap' requested here Sincerely, LLVM Buildbot

1 month, 3 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] v6.17.3-130-g86f364ee5842: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 05:01:16PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allnoconfig, after: > | commit v6.17.3-130-g86f364ee5842 > | Author: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy(a)kernel.org> > | Date: Thu Sep 18 10:05:46 2025 +0200 > | > | kbuild: always create intermediate vmlinux.unstripped > | > | [ Upstream commit 0ce5139fd96e9d415d3faaef1c575e238f9bbd67 ] > | > | Generate the intermediate vmlinux.unstripped regardless of > | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted. This is reproducible for me locally with: $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm64 CC=clang CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- HOSTCC=clang LD=ld.lld clean allnoconfig all aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy: vmlinux: file format not recognized ... This does not occur with llvm-objcopy via LLVM=1 nor does it happen with an all GNU setup. This feels like a bug in GNU objcopy though, as this is reproducible with: $ aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy --set-section-flags .modinfo=noload vmlinux.unstripped vmlinux.objcopy $ file vmlinux.unstripped vmlinux.objcopy vmlinux.unstripped: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=18512f67dae70a7fae145b34514054a8b8b3c105, not stripped vmlinux.objcopy: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=18512f67dae70a7fae145b34514054a8b8b3c105, not stripped $ aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy --remove-section=.modinfo -w --strip-unneeded-symbol='__mod_device_table__*' vmlinux.objcopy aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy: vmlinux.objcopy: file format not recognized $ aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy --version | head -1 GNU objcopy (GNU Binutils) 2.45.50.20251028 Cheers, Nathan

1 month, 3 weeks

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.42.9000-284-g27effb3d50: 9 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.42.9000-284-g27effb3d50 | Author: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev(a)arm.com> | Date: Thu Sep 25 15:54:36 2025 +0100 | | aarch64: clear ZA state of SME before clone and clone3 syscalls | | This change adds a call to the __arm_za_disable() function immediately | before the SVC instruction inside clone() and clone3() wrappers. It also | adds a macro for inline clone() used in fork() and adds the same call to | ... 129 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 9 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running gdb:gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp ... | FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=auto: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=auto: bt | FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=auto: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=off: bt | FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=auto: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=on: bt | FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=off: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=auto: bt | ... and 5 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1706. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=27effb3d50424fb9634b…

1 month, 3 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-4604-g8b9cd6490ce5: Failure on aarch64

by Sam James

This is now https://gcc.gnu.org/PR122456.

1 month, 3 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-12058-ge6af0a40acc6: 26 regressions on aarch64

by Parzyszek, Krzysztof

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] Hi, I put out a PR with the fix: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165250 Sorry about the breakage. -Krzysztof ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2025 8:51 AM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: Parzyszek, Krzysztof <Krzysztof.Parzyszek(a)amd.com>; maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-12058-ge6af0a40acc6: 26 regressions on aarch64 Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: | commit llvmorg-22-init-12058-ge6af0a40acc6 | Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek <Krzysztof.Parzyszek(a)amd.com> | Date: Wed Oct 22 11:46:11 2025 -0500 | | [flang][OpenMP] Keep track of scoping units in OmpStructureChecker (#164419) | | Introduce a stack of scopes to OmpStructureChecker for scoping units, | plus function/subroutine entries in interfaces. | | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 26 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0156 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0156/Fujitsu-Fortran-0156_0011.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0391 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0391/Fujitsu-Fortran-0391_0023.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0401 ... | ... and 32 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2106. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6af0a40acc6d244b6862142829274e…

1 month, 3 weeks

How Business Analysts Drive Organizational Success and Innovation

by David Gibbs

Business analysts are the bridge between strategy and execution, turning data into decisions that drive organizational success and innovation. By gathering stakeholder requirements, analyzing processes, and prioritizing solutions, they reduce waste, improve customer experiences, and accelerate time-to-market. Their expertise in mapping workflows and identifying opportunities for automation enables teams to focus on high-impact work while minimizing risk. Leveraging structured methodologies and modern analytics, business analysts translate complex information into clear, actionable roadmaps. This fosters cross-functional collaboration, supports data-driven culture, and uncovers new revenue streams. When aligned with leadership, their insights guide product strategy, operational improvements, and digital transformation initiatives that keep organizations competitive. Preparing for certification strengthens these capabilities. The PeopleCert Business Analysis Exam Questions help candidates master core techniques, from requirements elicitation to stakeholder management, ensuring they can contribute measurable value from day one. Employers value certified analysts who demonstrate proficiency; practicing with PeopleCert Business Analysis Exam Questions signals readiness and commitment to continuous improvement. Why I choose Certboosters: it offers focused practice tests, clear explanations, and realistic exam simulators tailored to real-world scenarios, making it easier to retain knowledge and build confidence before taking your exam. Start practicing today to accelerate your impact, career growth, and professional credibility. Use the link below to check the practice test questions: https://www.certboosters.com/peoplecert/path/peoplecert-business-analysis

1 month, 4 weeks

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.42.9000-337-g1b657c53c21: 4 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.42.9000-337-g1b657c53c21 | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh(a)sourceware.org> | Date: Fri Oct 10 20:21:13 2025 -0400 | | Simplify powl computation for small integral y [BZ #33411] | | The powl implementation for x86_64 ends up multiplying X once more than | necessary and then throwing away that result. This results in an | overflow flag being set in cases where there is no overflow. | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 4 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-pow | FAIL: math/test-float32x-pow | FAIL: math/test-float64-pow | FAIL: math/test-ldouble-pow Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1714. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3173/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b657c53c21a100082b0…

1 month, 4 weeks

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.42.9000-338-g324084649b2: Failure on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.42.9000-338-g324084649b2 | Author: DJ Delorie <dj(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Oct 15 21:37:56 2025 -0400 | | sprof: check pread size and offset for overflow | | Add a bit of descriptive paranoia to the values we read from | the ELF headers and use to access data. | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 4 | # build_abe glibc: | # FAILED | # build_abe gdb: | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 4 | # build_abe glibc: | 5 | # build_abe gdb: | 6 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_build master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1709. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1225/arti… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=324084649b2da2f6840e…

1 month, 4 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-11449-ga6181dc84b79: 3 regressions on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Hi, These errors are probably caused by incorrect test programs. Please ignore the mail. We'll update the tests. I apologize for the false detection. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: > | commit llvmorg-22-init-11449-ga6181dc84b79 > | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> > | Date: Thu Oct 16 12:20:53 2025 -0700 > | > | [flang] Refine checks for NULL() in expressions (#163655) > | > | Fix a false positive "NULL can't be an operand here" error message > | arising in a defined generic interface for an intrinsic operator (==) > | with multiple spellings. > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 3 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0573 ... > | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0001.test > | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0002.test > | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0009.test > | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2097. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a6181dc84b79dd368c7a43ef4f6f164…

2 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain