linaro-toolchain

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

1 participants
5655 discussions

by Peter Maydell

Progress: * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - sent patch fixing some regexes in our documentation - patch review and queueing up an arm pull request - Investigated the mps3-an536 Cortex-R52 FPGA image to see what work would be required to implement a QEMU model of it, wrote a draft of a jira epic issue for this * QEMU-530 [QEMU ARM v9.4 Baseline CPU for TCG] - FEAT_MOPS: * Implemented and tested the memcpy/memmove insns CPY* * Got the whole patchseries into good enough shape to send out for review -- PMM

2 years, 1 month

[ACTIVITY] Report for week #35

by Thiago Jung Bauermann

Hello, # [GNU-767] Support changing SVE vector length in remote debugging - Resumed working on new approach to support changing SVE vector length in remote debugging. I was able to use DWARF location expressions in the target description to express the SVE vector register sizes in terms of the VG register. Also adapted the regcache to support variable-length registers, and removed the VQ value from the target description and from aarch64_gdbarch_tdep, making GDB use one target description regardless of the vector length size. Still ironing out some bugs, and haven't tackled gdbserver yet. -- Thiago

2 years, 2 months

Re: [EXT] [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gcc: FAIL: 1 regressions

by Andrew Pinski

Just FYI. This test is just bogus and fixing it might be simple as using -fsanitize=undefined to check at runtime there is no undefined behavior being hit. In this case even if we do the comparison in `signed` and do the negate in `unsigned` types. we can still remove the negate in this case since we know the only value that will be still negative in that branch is LONG_MIN. So my patch just simplifies the inner comparison to that instead of `a < 0` and then be able to remove the neg. Someone else will have to fix the testcase since it is a testcase issue ... ________________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 3:07 PM To: Andrew Pinski Subject: [EXT] [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gcc: FAIL: 1 regressions External Email ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. In CI config tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64 after: | 2 patches in gcc | Patchwork URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.sourceware.o… | 504821491ff VR-VALUES: Rewrite test_for_singularity using range_op_handler | f6d1540c3e0 VR-VALUES: Rename op0/op1 to op1/op2 for test_for_singularity | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | b0d75f7d3bb libstdc++: Fix debug-mode tests for constexpr algorithms FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === gcc tests === Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/aarch64.exp ... FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vnegd_s64.c scan-assembler-times neg\\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+ 1 === Results Summary === -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ci.linaro.org_job_tcwg… Reference build : https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ci.linaro.org_job_tcwg…

2 years, 2 months

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 1 Sep

by Peter Maydell

Progress (short week, 3 days): * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - code review: + RTH's linux-user ESR signal frame patchset + iMX6/7 cleanup patchset + some other minor bits and pieces * QEMU-530 [QEMU ARM v9.4 Baseline CPU for TCG] - FEAT_MOPS: * SETG* instructions (memset + MTE tag setting) implemented and given some basic testing -- PMM

2 years, 2 months

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: regressions after gcc commit 0c78240fd7d519fc27ca822f66a92f85edf43f70

by Adhemerval Zanella Netto

Hi Jan, Your patch caused a regression [1] on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you please investigate? I am having some trouble to reproduce it outside our CI environment, but it has been hitting this issues consistently and it does seems related to your patch. Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these. Thanks! [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootstrap_pr…

2 years, 2 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 2 regressions after gcc commit 27de9aa152141e7f3ee66372647d0f2cd94c4b90

by Adhemerval Zanella Netto

Hi Richard, Your patch caused a regression [1] on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you please investigate? I did a quick analysis and it seems that for test_copy_lane_f32, test_copy_lane_s32, test_copy_lane_u32, gcc is now generating zip1 instead of a ins; which does not seem fully correct. Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these. Thanks! [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/91…

2 years, 2 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 1 regressions after glibc-2.38.9000-71-g7086332e06 elf: Check that --list-diagnostics output has the expected syntax

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

> On Aug 25, 2023, at 19:18, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch. > Please find below some details about it. If you have any questions, please > follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > In CI config tcwg_glibc_check/master-aarch64 after: > > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/871qfr9te6.fsf@oldenbu… > | commit 7086332e068cbe778cb47a9baf23cd1d2401444a > | Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Aug 25 14:52:01 2023 +0200 > | > | elf: Check that --list-diagnostics output has the expected syntax > | > | Parts of elf/tst-rtld-list-diagnostics.py have been copied from > | scripts/tst-ld-trace.py. > | > | The abnf module is entirely optional and used to verify the > | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === glibc tests === > > Running glibc:elf ... > FAIL: elf/tst-rtld-list-diagnostics Hi Florian, Output of failed test is in [1]. [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/597/ar… . Regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > > === Results Summary === > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/597/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/622/artifa… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/sha… > > Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7086332e068cbe778cb4… > > Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-692 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_glibc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 1 regressions > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/597/

2 years, 2 months

[ACTIVITY] Report for week #34

by Thiago Jung Bauermann

Hello, # TCWG CI - GCC regression GNU-884: Prathamesh confirmed that the new generated code is better so I posted a patch adjusting the testcase. - GCC regression GNU-885: Confirmed that the problem is still present in trunk as of commit 829c0c06fe7b from yesterday, so opened bugzilla 111125 and copied the patch author. He fixed the regression. - Posted Gerrit review request to increase timeout for GDB check jobs to accommodate longer times for Armv8l builds. # GDB Upstream - Reviewed v4 of Luis' patch series adding SME support to GDB and gdbserver. -- Thiago

2 years, 2 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 1 regressions after gcc commit

by Adhemerval Zanella Netto

Hi Andrew, Your patch caused a regression [1] on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you please investigate? I did a quick analysis and it seems that the expected 18 for aarch64 is now 17: $ grep "Jumps threaded" a-ssa-dom-thread-7.c.197t.thread2 Jumps threaded: 17 Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these. Thanks! [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/5…

2 years, 2 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 6 regressions after basepoints/gcc-14-3441-ga1558e9ad85 tree-optimization/111115 - SLP of masked stores

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Richard, Your patch below ICEs on aarch64-linux-gnu. Should reproduce easily on native or cross aarch64-linux-gnu build. Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing this. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 24, 2023, at 22:03, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch. > Please find below some details about it. If you have any questions, please > follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > In CI config tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64 after: > > | commit a1558e9ad856938f165f838733955b331ebbec09 > | Author: Richard Biener <rguenther(a)suse.de> > | Date: Wed Aug 23 14:28:26 2023 +0200 > | > | tree-optimization/111115 - SLP of masked stores > | > | The following adds the capability to do SLP on .MASK_STORE, I do not > | plan to add interleaving support. > | > | PR tree-optimization/111115 > | ... 21 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 6 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/aarch64-sve.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c (internal compiler error: in get_group_load_store_type, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:2121) > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2b\\t.z[0-9] > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2d\\t.z[0-9] > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2h\\t.z[0-9] > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2w\\t.z[0-9] > > ... and 1 more entries > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/857/artifact… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/856/artifact… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a1558e9ad856938f165f838733955b331e… > > Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-893 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 6 regressions > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/857/

2 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain