== Last week ==
* Investigated the CoreMark numbers posted by Michael Hope, mainly the
oddities of a significant Linaro 4.6 regression versus FSF 4.6. Later
verified to be a false alarm.
* Pushed a merge of some of my upstream CoreMark patches to Linaro 4.6.
* Did archeology for PR42017. Traced some history of the ARM prologue
from 2000 to 2007 (DF branch), posted upstream. Hope this clarification
gets my patch an approval soon.
* Tried the above PR42017 patch (which is supposed to release the use of
LR as a general register in leaf functions) on CoreMark, using Linaro
4.6, and was surprised to find that despite many reductions in spill
code and epilogue (now more often directly return by ldmfd), the
generated code still regresses in performance (!).
* Continuing above, suspecting something from experience (cough) added
-falign-functions=8 to the CoreMark compile options. Finally produced a
small improvement, while causing a regression for the
without-PR42017-patch case (victory?).
* Worked on PR48808, PR48792 over the weekend, which are cases where
paradoxical subregs caused ICE in reload. Posted an ARM backend patch
upstream, though now mostly taken over by Richard Sandiford :)
== This week ==
* Some other PRs, ideas, still work in progress.
* Started using the porter boards, will try to get LP:689887 over with
this week.
* Set-up SPEC2006 profile runs on PowerPC with trunk.
* Looked at SPEC2006's 462.libquantum.
* PR745743 - compared different versions mentioned in the PR.
* Wrote a patch to fix another issue related to how SMS handles debug_insn.
== String routines ==
* Finally finished the ltrace analysis of the whole of SPEC 2k6 and
have written it up - I'll proof read it next week and then send it out
to the benchmark list.
* Ran memset and memcpy benchmarks of larger than cache sizes on A9
* memcpy on larger than cache sizes (or probably mainly cache miss
data) does come back to Neon winning over ARM; my suspicion is that
with cache hits we run out of bandwidth on Neon, but that doesn't
happen in the cache miss case; why it's faster in that case I'm not
sure yet.
* memset is still not faster for Neon even on large sizes where
the destination isn't in the cache.
== Other ==
* Started looking at 64 bit atomics
* Looking at the pot of QEmu work with Peter.
Dave
Hi,
* the overhead of the ARM specific unwind tables for some binaries:
https://wiki.linaro.org/KenWerner/Sandbox/libunwind#overhead_of_the_ARM_spe…
* sometimes the size of the .text section differs which worries me a
bit (not necessarily a GCC issue, could be related to the build system)
* tested a couple of linaro-android images on my panda board
* ran into a l-i-t issue (now fixed) and discussed with asac and friends
* and finally got the network up and running :)
* some 11.11 cycle planning (libunwind work items, "in distributions"
spec)
Regards
Ken
RAG:
Red:
Amber:
Green: 1111 QEMU planning complete
Current Milestones:
| Planned | Estimate | Actual |
complete 1111 planning | 2011-05-28 | 2011-05-28 | 2011-05-27 |
qemu-linaro-2011-06 | 2011-06-16 | 2011-06-16 | |
Historical Milestones:
finish qemu-cont-integration | 2011-01-25 | 2011-01-25 | handed off |
first qemu-linaro release | 2011-02-08 | 2011-02-08 | 2011-02-08 |
qemu-linaro 2011-03 | 2011-03-08 | 2011-03-08 | 2011-03-08 |
qemu-linaro 2011-04 | 2011-04-21 | 2011-04-21 | 2011-04-21 |
qemu-linaro 2011-05 | 2011-05-19 | 2011-05-19 | n/a |
close out 1105 blueprints | 2011-05-28 | 2011-05-28 | 2011-05-19 |
== other ==
* Completed planning work for 1111; all blueprints now created, fleshed
out with work items and assigned:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/qemu-linaro
[Note that as expected some items under consideration have not made
the list; this includes the trustzone work]
* Some interesting upstream QEMU discussions (list and IRC) on
(a) performance improvements [good to see general interest in
this] and (b) overhauling the memory API [very long thread
but I think the proposed API should be OK for ARM system emulation
purposes]
* LP:768650: QEMU warnings on recent Linaro OMAP3 kernels: tracked down
to the kernel deliberately reading a register it knows doesn't exist
on OMAP2/3. Sent a query via Arnd about whether we can get this changed.
* rebased linaro-qemu to current master
* Sent patchset which starts ARM QEMU moving towards getting rid of the
implicit global CPUState pointer
* sent patch fixing a configure bug causing it to create recursive
symlinks
* sent a patchset which tightens up the compile time TCG value type
checking; this would have detected the build-breaking patch I sent
earlier this week...
* sent patch adding support for active-low interrupts to the LAN9118
model; this is needed when it is used in the Overo OMAP3 board model
Meetings: toolchain, standup, GSoC student, doughnuts
Current qemu patch status is tracked here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/PeterMaydell/QemuPatchStatus
Absences:
1-5 August: Linaro sprint 1111
(maybe) 15-16 August: QEMU/KVM strand at LinuxCon NA, Vancouver
[LinuxCon proper follows on 17-19th]
Hi,
* PR 49087 - fixed
* PR 49038 - opened by Richard - fixed on 4.7, to be backported to 4.5 and 4.6
* working on widening multiplication for unsigned types and constants
(the signed case works fine)
Ira
Posted a new patch for 16 -> 64 bit multiply and accumulate:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg05794.html
Pushed the same patch to a Launchpad branch for testing.
Pinged my addw/subw patch as a review didn't seem forthcoming.
Worked on a canonical form for HImode to DImode multiple-and-accumulate.
The problem isn't too hard to fix, but it's hard to do it in a nice way.
Attended Nathan S's reorg call. Followed up by talking to Nathan F about
what he's been working on with Wind River. Read up on the Wiki.
Looked at why the ARM smlal{tb,bt,tt} instructions are not generated.
I've added the proper patterns, but combine doesn't match them, and I've
run out of time this week to check why.
----
Upstream patched requiring review:
* NEON scheduling patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01431.html
* ARM Thumb2 addw/subw support.
http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg03783.html
* Multiply and accumulate:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg05794.html
