- linaro-toolchain - lists.linaro.org

[automated CI mails] Need help with a regression Linaro CI notified me of

by Filip Kastl

Hi all. I got an automated mail about this GCC regression related to one of my commits. https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1578 The mail itself mentioned only a testsuite regression. I fixed that. However, this was also linked in the mail: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_build--master-arm-bootstrap_profil… That looks like a different regression. As far as I can tell, `make profiledbootstrap` is failing on arm. I have only very limited access to arm machines. I tried to reproduce this on an Aarch64 machine and didn't succeed. Could you check that this regression is still present on current trunk and/or help me reproduce it? Btw the "Instructions to reproduce the build" link doesn't work for me. I get "Request is not authorized". https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Thanks, Filip Kastl

3 days, 1 hour

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-372-g064cac730f8: 18 regressions on aarch64

by Sam James

See PR119930, PR120098, PR120101, PR120099.

1 week, 2 days

1
0
0 0

Windows builder issues

by Aaron Ballman

It looks like https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/workers/149 is having problems: FAILED: bin/clang.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe /C "cd . && C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\cmake\3.30.1\bin\cmake.exe -E vs_link_exe --intdir=tools\clang\tools\driver\CMakeFiles\clang.dir --rc=C:\PROGRA~2\WI3CF2~1\10\bin\100226~1.0\x64\rc.exe --mt=C:\PROGRA~2\WI3CF2~1\10\bin\100226~1.0\x64\mt.exe --manifests -- C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\llvm-arm64\current\bin\lld-link.exe /nologo @CMakeFiles\clang.rsp /out:bin\clang.exe /implib:lib\clang.lib /pdb:bin\clang.pdb /version:0.0 /machine:ARM64 /STACK:10000000 /INCREMENTAL:NO /subsystem:console && C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe /C "cd /D C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\clang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\clang\tools\driver && C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\cmake\3.30.1\bin\cmake.exe -E copy C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/clang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/bin/clang.exe C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/clang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/./bin/clang++.exe && cd /D C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\clang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\clang\tools\driver && C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\cmake\3.30.1\bin\cmake.exe -E copy C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/clang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/bin/clang.exe C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/clang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/./bin/clang-cl.exe && cd /D C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\clang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\clang\tools\driver && C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\cmake\3.30.1\bin\cmake.exe -E copy C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/clang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/bin/clang.exe C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/clang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/./bin/clang-cpp.exe"" LINK: command "C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\llvm-arm64\current\bin\lld-link.exe /nologo @CMakeFiles\clang.rsp /out:bin\clang.exe /implib:lib\clang.lib /pdb:bin\clang.pdb /version:0.0 /machine:ARM64 /STACK:10000000 /INCREMENTAL:NO /subsystem:console /MANIFEST:EMBED,ID=1" failed (exit code 1) with the following output: lld-link: error: failed to write output 'bin\clang.exe': permission denied Any chance you can look into it? Thanks! ~Aaron

1 week, 2 days

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #111247: 90 regressions on arm

by Stefan Liebler

Hi, For this V2-patch, I got the same "Operation not permitted" errors as for the V1 one: https://lists.linaro.org/archives/list/linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org/th… @Adhemerval: have you had a look? The only non-s390x changes of my patch are in: elf/Makefile elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-cache.script => There the libmarkermod6 libraries are added. As I don't have an arm, I've checked on x86_64, that the testcase elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-cache.c contains the libmarkermod6.so files in glibc-hwcaps/z13-z17 directories by adding a "ldconfig -p" to the test. Any idea why those "Operation not permitted" regressions hits my patch, but no others? Bye, Stefan On 4/30/25 20:19, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In glibc_check master-arm, after: > | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/111247 > | Author: Stefan Liebler <stli(a)linux.ibm.com> > | Date: Tue Apr 29 13:28:58 2025 +0200 > | > | [PATCH v2] S390: Add new s390 platform z17. > | > | Hi, > | need a V2: stfle_bits on stack in init_cpu_features_no_tunables() needs to be > | zeroed before usage. If there is no more feedback, I will commit this patch shortly. > | ... 41 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 84977600dac math: Fix UB on sinpif (BZ 32925) > > Produces 90 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running glibc:debug ... > | FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-syslog > | Running glibc:dirent ... > | FAIL: dirent/tst-readdir-long > | FAIL: dirent/tst-readdir-zero-inode > | ... and 99 more > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artif… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artif… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artif… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artif… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2743/artifact/… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 week, 5 days

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #111028: 2 regressions on arm

by Tom de Vries

On 4/30/25 06:18, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gdb_check master-arm, after: > | gdb patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/111028 > | Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries(a)suse.de> > | Date: Fri Apr 25 17:13:32 2025 +0200 > | > | [PATCH v2] [gdb/testsuite] Simplify gdb.tui/tui-layout-asm.exp > | > | On x86_64-cygwin, with test-case gdb.tui/tui-layout-asm.exp I run into: > | ... > | WARNING: The following failure is probably due to the TUI window > | ... 49 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 48d0ac705c4 Handle base type without DW_AT_byte_size > > Produces 2 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gdb:gdb.python/py-missing-objfile.exp ... > | FAIL: gdb.python/py-missing-objfile.exp: initial sanity check: whatis global_exec_var > | FAIL: gdb.python/py-missing-objfile.exp: initial sanity check: whatis global_lib_var > The FAILs are obviously unrelated to the patch which modifies a different test-case. But anyway, this a know PR ( https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32445 ). I've just committed a fix. Thanks, - Tom > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gdb_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/4439/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/4439/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/4439/artifac… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/4439/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/2666/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-142-g01e5ef3e8b9: 2 regressions on arm

by Tomasz Kaminski

Hi, I have just pushed the following fix on trunk, that fixes a similar issue for 32bit x86_64. https://gcc.gnu.org/cgit/gcc/commit/?id=2ca5725e104d432317a44ad45183a4f555d… Please let me know if the build failure is addressed. Regards, Tomasz On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:14 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-16-142-g01e5ef3e8b9 > | Author: Tomasz Kamiński <tkaminsk(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Wed Apr 23 13:17:09 2025 +0200 > | > | libstdc++: Minimalize temporary allocations when width is > specified [PR109162] > | > | When width parameter is specified for formatting range, tuple or > escaped > | presentation of string, we used to format characters to temporary > string, > | and write produce sequence padded according to the spec. However, > once the > | ... 53 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > | FAIL: std/format/debug.cc -std=gnu++23 execution test > | FAIL: std/format/debug.cc -std=gnu++26 execution test > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on > armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1571. Please let us know if you > have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways > to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3771/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > make commands are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3771/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3771/artifact/ar… > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3771/artifact/ar… > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3770/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=01e5ef3e8b91288f5d387a277…

2 weeks, 1 day

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb-16-branchpoint-1244-g5ea1eec52f4: 4 regressions 4 fixes on arm

by Tom de Vries

On 4/26/25 22:38, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In master-arm, after: > | commit gdb-16-branchpoint-1244-g5ea1eec52f4 > | Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries(a)suse.de> > | Date: Wed Apr 9 08:59:42 2025 +0200 > | > | [gdb/tdep] Handle ldaex and stlex in {thumb,arm}_deal_with_atomic_sequence_raw > | > | The Linaro CI reported a regression [1] in test-case > | gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp due to commit 674d4856730 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix > | gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp with glibc 2.41"). > | ... 100 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 4 regressions 4 fixes: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gdb:gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp ... > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: check_pc_after_cross_syscall: single step over fork final pc > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: pc after stepi matches insn addr after syscall > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=on: check_pc_after_cross_syscall: single step over fork final pc > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=on: pc after stepi matches insn addr after syscall > | > | fixes.sum: > | Running gdb:gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp ... > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: continue to syscall insn fork (the program exited) > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: find syscall insn in fork > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: single step over fork (the program is no longer running) > | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: break on syscall insn > Hi, I've looked at this, and AFAICT this is PR32817 ( https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32817 ). This is unrelated to the mentioned commit. Thanks, - Tom > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1570. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1993/… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1993/… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1993/… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1993/… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-arm-build/1991/… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gdb/sh… > > Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=5ea1eec52f47f…

2 weeks, 3 days

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-275-ge04afb7177: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-275-ge04afb7177 | Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa(a)zytor.com> | Date: Fri Apr 25 07:30:59 2025 +0200 | | linux/termio: remove <termio.h> and struct termio | | The <termio.h> interface is absolutely ancient: it was obsoleted by | <termios.h> already in the first version of POSIX (1988) and thus | predates the very first version of Linux. Unfortunately, some constant | ... 15 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe stage1 --: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 3 | # build_abe glibc: | 4 | # build_abe stage2 --: | # FAILED | # build_abe gdb: | # build_abe qemu: | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:08:58 /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp:489:31: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘__sanitizer::termio’ | # 00:08:58 make[4]: *** [Makefile:627: sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.lo] Error 1 | # 00:08:58 make[3]: *** [Makefile:533: all-recursive] Error 1 | # 00:08:58 make[2]: *** [Makefile:420: all] Error 2 | # 00:08:58 make[1]: *** [Makefile:12800: all-target-libsanitizer] Error 2 | # 00:08:58 make: *** [Makefile:1064: all] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe stage1 --: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 3 | # build_abe glibc: | 4 | # build_abe stage2 --: | 5 | # build_abe gdb: | 6 | # build_abe qemu: | 7 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1569. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/1084/a… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/1084/a… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/1084/a… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/1083/a… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e04afb71771710cdc602…

2 weeks, 5 days

2
1
0 0

Adjust 'libgomp.c++/target-exceptions-pr118794-1.C' for 'targetm.arm_eabi_unwinder' [PR118794] (was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-9463-gaa3e72f9430: 2 regressions on arm)

by Thomas Schwinge

Hi! On 2025-04-17T18:15:50+0000, ci_notify--- via Gcc-regression <gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In bootstrap_check master-arm-check_bootstrap, after: > | commit gcc-15-9463-gaa3e72f9430 > | Author: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge(a)baylibre.com> > | Date: Thu Mar 27 23:06:37 2025 +0100 > | > | Add test cases for exception handling constructs in dead code for GCN, nvptx target and OpenMP 'target' offloading [PR118794] > | > | PR target/118794 > | gcc/testsuite/ > | * g++.target/gcn/exceptions-pr118794-1.C: New. > | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running libgomp:libgomp.c++/c++.exp ... > | FAIL: libgomp.c++/target-exceptions-pr118794-1.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gimple_call <__builtin_eh_pointer, " 1 > | FAIL: libgomp.c++/target-exceptions-pr118794-1.C scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gimple_call <__builtin_unwind_resume, " 1 Ah, sorry for that. This is due to 'targetm.arm_eabi_unwinder', as per: gcc/config/arm/arm.cc:#define TARGET_ARM_EABI_UNWINDER true gcc/config/c6x/c6x.cc:#define TARGET_ARM_EABI_UNWINDER true ..., which for ARM is conditional to '#if ARM_UNWIND_INFO' (defined in 'gcc/config/arm/bpabi.h', used for various GCC configurations), and for C6x unconditional. This gets us: --- target-exceptions-pr118794-1.C.269t.optimized +++ target-exceptions-pr118794-1.C.270t.optimized [...] __attribute__((omp declare target)) void f () [...] gimple_call <__dt_comp , NULL, &c> - gimple_call <__builtin_eh_pointer, _7, 2> - gimple_call <__builtin_unwind_resume, NULL, _7> + gimple_call <__builtin_cxa_end_cleanup, NULL> } [...] There doesn't appear to be an effective-target keyword for 'targetm.arm_eabi_unwinder' specifically, do we need to add one? Or, other test cases appear to use effective-target 'arm_eabi' to disambiguate the two variants; is that the right thing to use here, too? (..., plus 'tic6x-*-*' in this case?) OK to push the attached "Adjust 'libgomp.c++/target-exceptions-pr118794-1.C' for 'targetm.arm_eabi_unwinder' [PR118794]"? (Could Arm/C6x maintainers please test this for me?) Grüße Thomas > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_bootstrap_check master-arm-check_bootstrap > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1562. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap-… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap-… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap-… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap-… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap-… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=aa3e72f943032e5f074b2bd2f…

3 weeks, 1 day

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #110503: 90 regressions on arm

by Stefan Liebler

Hi, I've looked into tests.log.1.xz and there are plenty of "Operation not permitted" errors. I don't think that this has something to do with my patch? Can you please check on your side, if there was a change/issue on the build system? Bye, Stefan On 4/16/25 13:32, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In glibc_check master-arm, after: > | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/110503 > | Author: Stefan Liebler <stli(a)linux.ibm.com> > | Date: Tue Apr 15 16:52:17 2025 +0200 > | > | [PATCH] S390: Add new s390 platform z17. > | > | The glibc-hwcaps subdirectories are extended by "z17". Libraries are loaded if > | the z17 facility bits are active: > | - Miscellaneous-instruction-extensions facility 4 > | ... 35 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | ceeffd970c5 aarch64: Add back non-temporal load/stores from oryon-1's memset > > Produces 90 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running glibc:debug ... > | FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-syslog > | Running glibc:dirent ... > | FAIL: dirent/tst-readdir-long > | FAIL: dirent/tst-readdir-zero-inode > | ... and 99 more > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3528/artif… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3528/artif… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3528/artif… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3528/artif… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2681/artifact/… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

3 weeks, 6 days

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-8019-g0ae9bb96d5af: 86 regressions 14 fixes on aarch64

by Peter Klausler

The HTML links in your mail aren’t usable in my locked-down corporate e-mail environment. If you could just send me a list of the names of the 83 failing Fujitsu tests, I’ll look at them immediately. (The initial ones that are quoted in the mail are working now with llvm-project/main, but I’d like to check the others.) From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 at 20:36 To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>, itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>, t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>, Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-8019-g0ae9bb96d5af: 86 regressions 14 fixes on aarch64 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-8019-g0ae9bb96d5af | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> | Date: Wed Apr 9 12:30:33 2025 -0700 | | [flang][OpenMP] Fix regression in !$\ continuation (#134756) | | A recent patch that obviated the need to use -fopenmp when using the | compiler to preprocess in -E mode broke a case of Fortran line | continuation when using OpenMP conditional compilation lines (!$\) when | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 86 regressions 14 fixes: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/1008 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/1008/Fujitsu-Fortran-1008_0001.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/1008/Fujitsu-Fortran-1008_0002.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/1008/Fujitsu-Fortran-1008_0006.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/1008/Fujitsu-Fortran-1008_0008.test | ... and 84 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | | fixes.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0213 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0213/Fujitsu-Fortran-0213_0029.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0213/Fujitsu-Fortran-0213_0023.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0213/Fujitsu-Fortran-0213_0018.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0213/Fujitsu-Fortran-0213_0024.test | ... and 10 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro.at…<https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1665>. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Fujitsu testsuite : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/> Current build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Reference build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit-us.li…<https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s…> Full commit : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ae9bb96d5af47a2426596dbd0c35e3…>

4 weeks, 1 day

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-7332-g3295970d846b: 1 regression on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Dear contributor, This FAIL is a floating-point precision error. Please ignore this mail. We'll update the test. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-7332-g3295970d846b > | Author: Iris <0.0(a)owo.li> > | Date: Thu Apr 3 14:34:09 2025 +0800 > | > | [ConstantFolding] Add support for `sinh` and `cosh` intrinsics in constant folding (#132671) > | > | Closes #132503. > > Produces 1 regression: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0360 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0360/Fujitsu-Fortran-0360_0286.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1653. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3295970d846b0d820b863f9eeac559b…

1 month, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR85836: Implement the F2018 reduce intrinsic

by Christophe Lyon

Hi! On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 19:22, Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Andre, > > Thanks for the review - I'll act on the points that you raised. > > The Linaro people reported a failure in reduce_1.f90 execution, which I believe is due to incorrect casting of 'dim' and a wrong specification of its kind. I am waiting to hear back from them as to whether or not I have fixed the failure. > Sorry I notice this message just today, so it's a bit outdated... I've looked at bugzilla, so I've noticed that the are proper bug reports about this now (and I've just checked, the problem is still present on arm). When you say you are "waiting to hear back from them as to whether or not I have fixed the failure", did you contact us directly? (I'm trying to understand if we missed your message, or how we could improve communication). Thanks, Christophe > Cheers > > Paul > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 12:39, Andre Vehreschild <vehre(a)gmx.de> wrote: >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I took a look at your patch and think I found some improvements needed. In >> >> +bool >> +gfc_check_reduce (gfc_expr *array, gfc_expr *operation, gfc_expr *dim, >> + gfc_expr *mask, gfc_expr *identity, gfc_expr *ordered) >> +{ >> >> ... >> >> + if (formal->sym->attr.allocatable || formal->sym->attr.allocatable >> + || formal->sym->attr.pointer || formal->sym->attr.pointer >> + || formal->sym->attr.optional || formal->sym->attr.optional >> + || formal->sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS || formal->sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS) >> + { >> + gfc_error ("Each argument of OPERATION at %L shall be a scalar, " >> + "non-allocatable, non-pointer, non-polymorphic and " >> + "nonoptional", &operation->where); >> + return false; >> + } >> >> The if is only looking at the first formal argument. The right-hand sides >> of the || miss a ->next-> to look at the second formal argument, right? >> >> May be you also want to extend the tests!? >> >> Without having looked at it, but can't you extract the whole block of >> >> + if (array->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER) >> + { >> + unsigned long actual_size, formal_size1, formal_size2, result_size; >> ... >> + return false; >> + } >> + } >> >> and share it with the checks for co_reduce? I figure way to many DRY principle >> violations are in gfortran. So when we can start this, why not do it? And a >> call to a routine, like check_char_arg_conformance() speaks way better, then >> having to read all that code ;-) >> >> In gfc_resolve_reduce() identity and ordered are marked as UNUSED. Should these >> not a least be resolved? >> >> Please run contrib/check_GNU_style on your patch. It reports several issues >> (haven't look into their validity). >> >> In the Changelog: >> >> - (gfc_check_rename): Add prototype for intrinsic with 6 arguments. >> + * gfortran.h: Add prototype for intrinsic with 6 arguments. >> >> s/discription/description/ >> >> I also encountered that nit with the executable stack when working in >> OpenCoarrays, but haven't had time (or desire) to look into it. I will put >> myself into CC of the pr Jerry mentioned. >> >> Besides the mentions above, this looks good to me. >> >> Thanks for the patch and >> >> Regards, >> Andre >> >> >> >> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 17:26:55 +0000 >> Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> > >> > This version of the REDUCE intrinsic patch has evolved somewhat since the >> > posting on 2nd March. The most important changes are to the wrapper >> > function and the addition of two testsuite entries. >> > >> > The wrapper function now effects: >> > subroutine wrapper (a, b, c) >> > type_of_ARRAY, intent(inout) :: a, c >> > type_of_ARRAY, intent(inout), optional :: b >> > if (present (b)) then >> > c = OPERATION (a,b ) >> > else >> > c = a >> > end if >> > end subroutine >> > >> > The reason for wrapping OPERATION in a subroutine is to allow pointer >> > arithmetic to be used throughout in the library function. The only thing >> > that needs to be known about the type and kind of ARRAY is the element >> > size. The second branch in the wrapper allows deep copies to be done in the >> > library function, such that derived types with allocatable components do >> > not leak memory. This is needed at the final step of the algorithm to copy >> > the result from each iteration to the result and then nullify it. >> > >> > This is undoubtedly a bit heavy going for intrinsic types and so, one day >> > soon I will possibly do a bit of M4ery. That said, the present version >> > works for all types of ARRAY and I worry a bit about how much this >> > intrinsic will be used. Thoughts? >> > >> > A slight niggle is the linker error that comes up if compiled without any >> > optimization: >> > /usr/bin/ld: warning: /tmp/cc9cx9Rw.o: requires executable stack (because >> > the .note.GNU-stack section is executable) >> > I think that this is unlikely to present a security issue, however, since >> > it disappears at -O1, I went through each of the options triggered by -O1 >> > but couldn't make it go away. Does anybody know why this is? >> > >> > Regtests OK with FC41/x86_64 - OK for mainline? >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > Paul >> >> >> -- >> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de

1 month, 1 week

2
4
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #109371: 5 regressions on aarch64

by Martin Simmons

>>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:58:18 +0000 (UTC), ci notify said: > ... > In gdb_check master-aarch64, after: > | gdb patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109371 > ... > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gdb_check master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/4627/art… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/4627/art… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/4627/art… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/4627/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-build/2461/artifac… In https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/4627/art… it appears that the "info set" test started at line 1159 and failed with FAIL: gdb.base/default.exp: info set (timeout) at line 1533. Then a few more tests failed with timeout and finally over 100 tests failed with no obvious reason. Was this caused by a problem on the CI machine?

1 month, 1 week

3
3
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 5 patches in binutils: Success on arm

by Jens Remus

Hello! On 03.04.2025 14:32, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. Could you please help me understand what the detected problem(s) are? The mail subject suggests that everything may actually be fine? > In binutils_build master-arm, after: > | 5 patches in binutils > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109718 > | cde90675110 [PATCH 5/8] s390: Represent FP without RA saved in SFrame > | fa5be46ad1a [PATCH 4/8] s390: Represent FP/RA saved in register in SFrame > | b029a0bbe60 [PATCH 3/8] s390: Initial support to generate .sframe from CFI directives in assembler > | d40f1518ae8 [PATCH 2/8] s390: Explicitly list linker dump tests > | 45da7966615 [PATCH 1/8] sframe: Ignore section padding when converting endianness > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | abf215a338f ld/testsuite/ld-pe: Escape dots in regular expressions My series consists of 8 patches. Could it be that they appeared in Patchworks in a bad order, e.g. due to in what order my company's mail server delivered them to the list, and this now confuses the CI? https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/binutils/list/?series=45805 > Produces Success: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe binutils: > | 1 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe binutils: > | 1 The results appear to be unchanged to me. > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_binutils_build master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/3765/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/3765/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/3765/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-build/2375/artifa… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. Thanks and regards, Jens -- Jens Remus Linux on Z Development (D3303) +49-7031-16-1128 Office jremus(a)de.ibm.com IBM IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/

1 month, 1 week

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-229-g7f163bd2106: 1 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-229-g7f163bd2106 | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Tue Apr 1 12:44:26 2025 +0000 | | Update syscall lists for Linux 6.14 | | Linux 6.14 has no new syscalls. Update the version number in | syscall-names.list to reflect that it is still current for 6.14. | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running glibc:misc ... | FAIL: misc/tst-glibcsyscalls Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1557. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/112… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/112… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/112… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/112… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/111… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7f163bd2106f96e2925e…

1 month, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81: 5 regressions 4 improvements on master-thumb_m33_hard_eabi

by Sam James

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after: > | commit gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81 > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Sat Mar 29 21:09:25 2025 +0000 > | > | testsuite: arm: fixup more dg-final syntax > | > | ... as Richard E mentioned on the ML. Followup to r15-8956-ge90d6c2639c392. > | > | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 5 regressions 4 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times sxth\\tr[0-9]+,r[0-9]+ 2 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\\.f32\\.s32\\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\\.s32\\.f32\\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vmov\\tr[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 > | ... and 1 more This one may need an ARM person to take a look at. (The issue was latent, and the test wasn't being run fully before.)

1 month, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-6480-g529c5b71c608: 3 regressions 2 improvements on aarch64

by Kajetan Puchalski

Hi, I'm not familiar with the test suite in question, does it seem related to the test issue addressed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133128? Or does it seem like it's caused by enabling the slp-vectorizer pass in the O3 pipeline where it was not enabled previously? ________________________________ Von: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Gesendet: Freitag, März 28, 2025 1:21:30 AM An: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: Kajetan Puchalski <Kajetan.Puchalski(a)arm.com>; maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org> Betreff: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-6480-g529c5b71c608: 3 regressions 2 improvements on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-6480-g529c5b71c608 | Author: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski(a)arm.com> | Date: Wed Mar 26 16:10:35 2025 +0000 | | [flang] Add -f[no-]slp-vectorize flags (#132801) | | Add -f[no-]slp-vectorize to the flang driver. | Add corresponding -fvectorize-slp to the flang frontend. | | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 3 regressions 2 improvements: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0105 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0105/Fujitsu-Fortran-0105_0223.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0631 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0631/Fujitsu-Fortran-0631_0051.test | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0631/Fujitsu-Fortran-0631_0054.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one | | improvements.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0347 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0347/Fujitsu-Fortran-0347_0083.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0675 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0675/Fujitsu-Fortran-0675_0315.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1644. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/529c5b71c608c18141432e6fd0ae892… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

1 month, 2 weeks

3
4
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-6604-gc6406c8dba33: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Dear contributor, This FAIL is a floating-point precision error caused by the -ffast-math flag. Please ignore this mail. We'll update the test. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-6604-gc6406c8dba33 > | Author: David Green <david.green(a)arm.com> > | Date: Thu Mar 27 17:25:02 2025 +0000 > | > | [AArch64] Add getVectorInstrCost Codesize costs handling. (#130946) > | > | We have a lot of missing Codesize costs for vector operations. This > | patch starts things off by adding codesize costs for getVectorInstrCost, > | returning a single cost instead of the VectorInsertExtractBaseCost > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0351 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0351/Fujitsu-Fortran-0351_0105.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1647. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c6406c8dba33d4cf8495257f70f52a2…

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109240: 2 regressions 2 improvements on arm

by Christophe Lyon

On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 at 22:07, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109240 > | Author: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha(a)arm.com> > | Date: Wed Mar 26 17:19:11 2025 +0000 > | > | [PATCH] arm: don't vectorize fmaxf() unless unsafe math opts are enabled > | > | This test has presumably been failing since vectorization was enabled > | at -O2. I suspect part of the reason this wasn't picked up sooner is > | that the test is a hybrid execution/scan-assembler test and the > | ... 29 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 876a521a198 OpenMP: Fix declaration in append-args-interop.c test case > > Produces 2 regressions 2 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/vect-fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vmaxnm.f32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 1 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/vect-fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vminnm.f32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 1 > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vmaxnm.f32\ts[0-9]+, s[0-9]+, s[0-9]+ 1 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vminnm.f32\ts[0-9]+, s[0-9]+, s[0-9]+ 1 > Hi Richard, I suspect the scripts were confused because there were some bugs in dg-directives during a few days, leading to random Tcl errors. You've committed your patch by now anyway, just mentioning in case you are confused. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience, Christophe > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifa… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifa… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifa… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifa… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3611/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8965-gb631ff45f23: 2 regressions 2 improvements on arm

by Richard Earnshaw (lists)

On 29/03/2025 23:18, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-15-8965-gb631ff45f23 > | Author: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha(a)arm.com> > | Date: Wed Mar 26 15:56:18 2025 +0000 > | > | arm: don't vectorize fmaxf() unless unsafe math opts are enabled > | > | This test has presumably been failing since vectorization was enabled > | at -O2. I suspect part of the reason this wasn't picked up sooner is > | that the test is a hybrid execution/scan-assembler test and the > | ... 29 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions 2 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/vect-fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vmaxnm.f32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 1 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/vect-fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vminnm.f32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 1 > | Fixed with r15-9064-gf30e180194bfbc R. > | improvements.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vminnm.f32\ts[0-9]+, s[0-9]+, s[0-9]+ 1 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vmaxnm.f32\ts[0-9]+, s[0-9]+, s[0-9]+ 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1553. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1998/a… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1998/a… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1998/a… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1998/a… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1997/a… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=b631ff45f231db55b28b4c92c…

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8956-ge90d6c2639c: 8 regressions on aarch64

by Sam James

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: > | commit gcc-15-8956-ge90d6c2639c > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Thu Mar 27 00:21:43 2025 +0000 > | > | testsuite: more (mostly cosmetic) dg- whitespace fixes > | > | Some of these are harmless but still inconsistent (and asking for trouble > | given it may give people the wrong idea about similar "style"). > | > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 8 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/aarch64.exp ... > | ERROR: tcl error code NONE > | ERROR: tcl error sourcing gcc.target/aarch64/aarch64.exp. > | UNRESOLVED: testcase gcc.target/aarch64/aarch64.exp' aborted due to Tcl error > | ERROR: unmatched open brace in list > | ... and 5 more Should be fixed with r15-8981-g176c7a2f751e04, thanks!

1 month, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

[committed] gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/append-args-8.C: Fix scan-dump-tree (was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8972-g7e286b56545: 3 regressions on aarch64)

by Tobias Burnus

The tree dump had bogus tailing numbers: interop.[0-9]+3, interop.[0-9]+2 This happened to work with x86-64 (-m32, -m64) but not with aarch64. I committed inr15-9033-ge0886d8ad4c519 the obvious fix: remove the 3 and 2 after the '+' Tobias ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: > | commit gcc-15-8972-g7e286b56545 > > We track this bug report underhttps://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1554. Please let us know if you have a fix.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-6198-g9694844d7e36: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 03:28:46PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-6198-g9694844d7e36 > | Author: Henry Jiang <h243jian(a)uwaterloo.ca> > | Date: Mon Mar 24 09:49:31 2025 -0400 > | > | Reland "[Transforms] LoopIdiomRecognize recognize strlen and wcslen #108985" (#132572) > | > | Reland https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108985 > | > | Extend `LoopIdiomRecognize` to find and replace loops of the form > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. Thanks a lot for the report. I sent the third version of the patchset that should resolve this issue this morning so I hope it will be moved on soon: https://lore.kernel.org/20250328-string-add-wcslen-for-llvm-opt-v3-0-a180b4… Cheers, Nathan

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8947-g8ed2d5d219e: 5 regressions on master-thumb_m23_soft_eabi

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 14:24, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m23 soft, after: > | commit gcc-15-8947-g8ed2d5d219e > | Author: Jørgen Kvalsvik <j(a)lambda.is> > | Date: Tue Jun 4 14:13:22 2024 +0200 > | > | Add prime path coverage to gcc/gcov > | > | This patch adds prime path coverage to gcc/gcov. First, a quick > | introduction to path coverage, before I explain a bit on the pieces of > | the patch. > | ... 404 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 5 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running g++:g++.dg/gcov/gcov.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-22.C -std=gnu++17 gcov failed: spawn failed > | FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-22.C -std=gnu++26 gcov failed: spawn failed > | FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-22.C -std=gnu++98 gcov failed: spawn failed > | Running gcc:gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp ... > | ... and 2 more > I've given a quick look at the logs, and gcov-22.C says: spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/gcov --prime-paths gcov-22.C FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-22.C -std=gnu++98 gcov failed: spawn failed I believe that rather than "dg-compile", it should use "dg-do run { target native }" like almost all other gcov tests? For the other errors: FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-31.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-32.c (test for excess errors) the log actually says: /gcov-31.c:12:8: error: unknown type name 'sigjmp_buf'; did you mean 'jmp_buf'? /gcov-31.c: In function 'run_pending_traps': /gcov-31.c:22:5: error: implicit declaration of function '__sigsetjmp' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] /gcov-32.c:6:8: error: unknown type name 'sigjmp_buf'; did you mean 'jmp_buf'? /gcov-32.c:21:19: error: passing argument 1 of 'setjmp' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] I haven't looked further, but does this indicate a dependency on glibc? (this target "arm-none-eabi" uses newlib) Thanks, Christophe > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv8-m.base -mtune=cortex-m23 -mfloat-abi=soft -mfpu=auto > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-eabi --disable-multilib --with-mode=thumb --with-cpu=cortex-m23 --with-float=soft --target_board=-mthumb/-march=armv8-m.base/-mtune=cortex-m23/-mfloat-abi=soft/-mfpu=auto qemu_cpu=cortex-m33 > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1551. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ed2d5d219e999aee42015a0d…

1 month, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-6320-ga8373e160b7: 1 regressions 1 improvements on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In binutils_check master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-6320-ga8373e160b7 | Author: Jens Remus <jremus(a)linux.ibm.com> | Date: Fri Mar 21 15:29:03 2025 +0100 | | ld: Correct test pr19719 naming mix-up | | The suffix "defined/undefined" in the ld test pr19719 name specifies | whether weak fun() is defined or undefined is mixed up. | | ... 19 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions 1 improvements: | | regressions.sum: | Running ld:ld-elf/shared.exp ... | XPASS: Run pr19719 fun defined | | improvements.sum: | Running ld:ld-elf/shared.exp ... | XPASS: Run pr19719 fun undefined Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_binutils_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1549. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2381/artifa… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=a8373e160b791…

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Jonathan Wakely

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 00:55, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: > | commit gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 13:24:08 2025 +0000 > | > | libstdc++: Optimize std::vector construction from input iterators [PR108487] > | > | LWG 3291 make std::ranges::iota_view's iterator have input_iterator_tag > | as its iterator_category, even though it satisfies the C++20 > | std::forward_iterator concept. This means that the traditional > | ... 41 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump gimple "_M_range_initialize<const char\\* const\\*>" > | FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt2.C -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump gimple "_M_range_initialize<const char\\* const\\*>" > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1548. Please let us know if you have a fix. I have a fix: --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ // { dg-skip-if "requires hosted libstdc++ for string" { ! hostedlib } } // Test that we do range-initialization from const char *. -// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {_M_range_initialize<const char\* const\*>} "gimple" } } +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {_M_range_initialize_n<const char\* const\*} "gimple" } } // { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {static const char.*72} "gimple" } } #include <string> > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3490/artifac… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e200f53a5556516ec831e6b7a…

1 month, 2 weeks

1
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109136: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:22, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109136 > | Author: Hu, Lin1 <lin1.hu(a)intel.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 15:44:51 2025 +0800 > | > | [PATCH] i386: Add "s_" as Saturation for AVX10.2 Converting Intrinsics. > | > | Hi, all > | > | This patch aims to add "s_" after 'cvt' represent saturation. > | ... 21 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 7679b826840 opcodes: fix wrong code in expand_binop_directly [PR117811] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17123/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17123/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17123/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3294/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109150: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:10, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109150 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 10:24:01 2025 +0000 > | > | [committed] libstdc++: Cast -1 to size_t in <format> [PR119429] > | > | This avoids a runtime error from Clang's annoying -fsanitize=integer > | (even though it's not undefined and behaves correctly). > | > | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 4d1b1969566 libstdc++: Fix handling of common cpp20-only ranges for flat sets [PR119415] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109141: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:24, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109141 > | Author: Tobias Burnus <tburnus(a)baylibre.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 10:32:08 2025 +0100 > | > | [Patch] omp-general.cc: Remove 'if' around call to always 'true' returning function [PR118627] > | > | I intent to commit this a bit later today as obvious, > | unless there are comments. > | > | ... 35 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 7679b826840 opcodes: fix wrong code in expand_binop_directly [PR117811] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17126/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17126/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17126/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3294/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109137: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:22, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109137 > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 07:54:09 2025 +0000 > | > | [PATCH] testsuite: add testcase for recent alias fix > | > | r15-7961-gdc47161c1f32c3 fixes a typo in ao_compare::compare_ao_refs > | but there wasn't a testcase available at the time. Now there is. > | > | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 7679b826840 opcodes: fix wrong code in expand_binop_directly [PR117811] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17124/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17124/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17124/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3294/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Request to update Clang in libc++ pre-commit CI

by Mark de Wever

Hi, Clang 20 has been released and per libc++ policy we want to remove support for Clang 18. While testing a patch to remove Clang 18 support [1] I noticed the ARM buildbots you maintain failed [2] since they use Clang 18. Would it be possible to update these bots to Clang 20 or Clang 19? [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130142 [2] https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/builds/41081 Kind regards, Mark

1 month, 2 weeks

2
3
0 0

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131921

by Louis Dionne

Hi, We have encountered a CI failure on a libc++ CI bot owned by this list. I am seeking assistance to help debug the issue since it's a bit difficult to do without having access to that platform. This is time sensitive for us, since the patch fixes a real issue we encountered and we'd like to get it fixed in the LLVM 20 release. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131921#issuecomment-2737539434 for more details. Thanks, Louis

1 month, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850: 1 regressions on arm

by Richard Earnshaw (lists)

On 21/03/2025 20:36, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850 > | Author: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha(a)arm.com> > | Date: Fri Mar 21 15:20:03 2025 +0000 > | > | arm: testsuite: make unaligned-memcpy-*.c executable tests [PR91614] > | > | These tests have been looking for a very specific instruction sequence > | which has the tendency to be fairly unstable as a result. But what is > | more interesting is that the the tests must not contain instructions > | ... 22 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-4.c scan-assembler-not unaligned Should be fixed now. The scanner was matching 'unaligned' in a .file directive containing the test name. R. > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1545. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3579/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1d2257dc850d088f6d9267b46…

1 month, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8650-g94fa9f4d27b: 6 regressions on arm

by Paul Richard Thomas

Hello there, You had previously warned me of the problem with the pre-commit patch, from which I was able to identify the problem. Unfortunately, I screwed up by only correcting the cast of 'dim' in three out of four places. Hans-Peter Nilsson has put it right and I believe that the regression will disappear. Thanks for your help on this. Paul

1 month, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8035-g7ee31bc9276: 2 regressions on master-thumb_m23_soft_eabi

by Jonathan Wakely

On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 13:16, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m23 soft, after: > | commit gcc-15-8035-g7ee31bc9276 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Thu Mar 13 13:34:55 2025 +0000 > | > | libstdc++: Implement <stdbit.h> for C++26 (P3370R1) > | > | This is the first part of the P3370R1 proposal just approved by the > | committee in Wrocław. This adds C++ equivalents of the functions added > | to C23 by WG14 N3022. > | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > | FAIL: 20_util/stdbit/1.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) > | UNRESOLVED: 20_util/stdbit/1.cc -std=gnu++26 compilation failed to produce executable > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv8-m.base -mtune=cortex-m23 -mfloat-abi=soft -mfpu=auto > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-eabi --disable-multilib --with-mode=thumb --with-cpu=cortex-m23 --with-float=soft --target_board=-mthumb/-march=armv8-m.base/-mtune=cortex-m23/-mfloat-abi=soft/-mfpu=auto qemu_cpu=cortex-m33 > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1543. Please let us know if you have a fix. All the errors are of the form: error: 'ULLONG_MAX' was not declared in this scope but the test includes <limits.h>. So this target doesn't support long long? Or just doesn't define ULLONG_MAX?

1 month, 3 weeks

2
5
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-4020-gf01e760c0836: 6235 regressions on aarch64

by Ricardo Jesus

Hi, Sorry for this issue, I've reverted this in: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/21610e3ecc8bc727f99047e544186b3… Before I start digging into it further, could you please let me know what hardware is used to run these tests? I just thought I'd double-check that the requested -msve-vector-bits=256 does match the hardware SVE length. Thanks very much, Ricardo On 3/7/25 09:03, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > [You don't often get email from ci_notify(a)linaro.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-4020-gf01e760c0836 > | Author: Ricardo Jesus <rjj(a)nvidia.com> > | Date: Thu Mar 6 09:27:07 2025 +0000 > | > | [AArch64][SVE] Improve fixed-length addressing modes. (#129732) > | > | When compiling VLS SVE, the compiler often replaces VL-based offsets > | with immediate-based ones. This leads to a mismatch in the allowed > | addressing modes due to SVE loads/stores generally expecting immediate > | ... 29 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 6235 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0000 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0003.test > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0004.test > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0008.test > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0009.test > | ... and 6513 more > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1592 Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…>> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…>> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…>> > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/>> > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…>> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…>> > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s…>> > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f01e760c08365426de95f02dc2c2dc6…>

1 month, 3 weeks

2
6
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-173-g997f49fbadf: 1 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-173-g997f49fbadf | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Mon Mar 17 19:08:22 2025 +0000 | | elf: Fix tst-origin make rules | | Add tests-special before include Rules and compile liborigin.os with | MODULE_NAME set to testsuite instead of libc. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running glibc:. ... | FAIL: lint-makefiles Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1544. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2594/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2594/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2594/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2594/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2592/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=997f49fbadf892136c77…

1 month, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-168-g9b646f5dc93: 3 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-168-g9b646f5dc93 | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Tue Feb 18 15:58:16 2025 -0500 | | elf: Canonicalize $\ORIGIN in an explicit ld.so invocation [BZ 25263] | | When an executable is invoked directly, we calculate $\ORIGIN by calling | readlink on /proc/self/exe, which the Linux kernel resolves to the | target of any symlinks. However, if an executable is run through ld.so, | ... 24 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 3 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running glibc:elf ... | UNRESOLVED: elf/tst-origin | Running glibc:malloc ... | FAIL: malloc/tst-mallocfork2 | FAIL: malloc/tst-mallocfork3 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1540. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2551/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2551/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2551/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2551/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2550/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b646f5dc933dfa019f2…

2 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8025-g7dae3f64c069: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig, after: | commit gcc-15-8025-g7dae3f64c069 | Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford(a)arm.com> | Date: Thu Mar 13 12:03:04 2025 +0000 | | match.pd: Fold ((X >> C1) & C2) * (1 << C1) | | Using a combination of rules, we were able to fold | | ((X >> C1) & C2) * (1 << C1) --> X & (C2 << C1) | ... 22 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # build_abe binutils: | -9 | # build_abe stage1: | -5 | # build_abe qemu: | -2 | # linux_n_obj: | 8743 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # build_abe binutils: | -9 | # build_abe stage1: | -5 | # build_abe qemu: | -2 | # linux_n_obj: | 10059 | # linux build successful: | all | # linux boot successful: | boot Used configuration : tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1539. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7dae3f64c069b942b9abd768f…

2 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-149-g77261698b4e: 8 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-149-g77261698b4e | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Fri Mar 7 19:15:26 2025 +0000 | | Implement C23 rsqrt | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the rsqrt functions (1/sqrt(x)). The test inputs are | taken from those for sqrt. | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 8 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-rsqrt | FAIL: math/test-float-rsqrt | FAIL: math/test-float128-rsqrt | FAIL: math/test-float32-rsqrt | ... and 4 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1533. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2559/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2559/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2559/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2559/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2557/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=77261698b4e938020a1b…

2 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-7765-g3866ca796d5: 8 regressions on master-thumb_m7_hard_eabi

by Jonathan Wakely

On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 02:42, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m7 hard, after: > | commit gcc-15-7765-g3866ca796d5 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Thu Feb 27 13:27:17 2025 +0000 > | > | libstdc++: Fix ranges::move and ranges::move_backward to use iter_move [PR105609] > | > | The ranges::move and ranges::move_backward algorithms are supposed to > | use ranges::iter_move(iter) instead of std::move(*iter), which matters > | for an iterator type with an iter_move overload findable by ADL. > | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 8 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > | FAIL: 25_algorithms/move/constrained.cc -std=gnu++20 (test for excess errors) > | UNRESOLVED: 25_algorithms/move/constrained.cc -std=gnu++20 compilation failed to produce executable > | FAIL: 25_algorithms/move/constrained.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) > | UNRESOLVED: 25_algorithms/move/constrained.cc -std=gnu++26 compilation failed to produce executable > | ... and 4 more It looks like thumb has some unusual linking requirements that I'm not familiar with, so undefined functions (which are never actually called in the test) cause linker errors: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/iterator_concepts.h:155:(.text._Z6test06N8pr1056091IE+0x6): undefined reference to `pr105609::iter_move(pr105609::I const&)' /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/bin/ld: (_ZN8pr1056099iter_moveERKNS_1IE): Unknown destination type (ARM/Thumb) in /tmp/ccqKQGzN.o /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/iterator_concepts.h:155:(.text._Z6test06N8pr1056091IE+0x6): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ranges_algobase.h:326:(.text._Z6test06N8pr1056091IE+0xc): undefined reference to `pr105609::I::operator++()' /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/bin/ld: (_ZN8pr1056091IppEv): Unknown destination type (ARM/Thumb) in /tmp/ccqKQGzN.o /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ranges_algobase.h:326:(.text._Z6test06N8pr1056091IE+0xc): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/bin/ld: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ranges_algobase.h:323:(.text._Z6test06N8pr1056091IE+0x16): undefined reference to `pr105609::I::operator==(pr105609::I) const' /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/bin/ld: (_ZNK8pr1056091IeqES0_): Unknown destination type (ARM/Thumb) in /tmp/ccqKQGzN.o /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ranges_algobase.h:323:(.text._Z6test06N8pr1056091IE+0x16): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation I think I should be able to workaround this.

2 months, 1 week

2
5
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-7853-gde231924b73: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 23:55, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Gcc-regression <gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On 06/03/2025 20:29, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > This has been fixed on trunk by r15-7863-gd2b022e38a778d. > Indeed I can see the test now passes. Thanks, Christophe > Thank you, > -- > Giuseppe D'Angelo

2 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5934-gb8189cf9e40: 3 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5934-gb8189cf9e40 | Author: Richard Allen <rsaxvc(a)gmail.com> | Date: Sun Feb 16 16:50:05 2025 -0600 | | gprof: only process line numbers for intersection of vmas and histograms | | Some programs like RTOS firmware may have a large number of symbols. | | By loading the histograms before loading symbols, we can look up | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 3 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running glibc:gmon ... | FAIL: gmon/tst-gmon-gprof | FAIL: gmon/tst-gmon-pie-gprof | FAIL: gmon/tst-gmon-static-gprof Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1527. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/107… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/107… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/107… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/107… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/107… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=b8189cf9e40bd…

2 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Fwd: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107213: Failure on aarch64

by Jan Dubiec

Hello, I have recived the email quoted below. I wonder how my patch could have caused an issue when the only file it touches is related to H8/300 target, not ARM. As far as I can see in the logs you are not building an H8/300 toolchain. Best regards, /J.D. PS. I am not subscribed so please CC me. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107213: Failure on aarch64 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 02:06:28 +0000 (UTC) From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org Reply-To: linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org To: jdx(a)o2.pl Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap, after: | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107213 | Author: Jan Dubiec <jdx(a)o2.pl> | Date: Thu Feb 27 22:42:20 2025 +0100 | | [PATCH] H8/300: PR target/109189 Silence -Wformat warnings on Windows | | This patch fixes annoying -Wformat warnings when gcc is built | on Windows/MinGW64. Instead of %ld it uses HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC | macro, just like many other targets do. | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 8371e7f240c gimple-fold: Fix a pasto in fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine [PR119030] Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe bootstrap: | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe bootstrap: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.

2 months, 1 week

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-7709-gc2ece13931d: 1 regressions 10 improvements on aarch64

by Iain Buclaw

Excerpts from ci_notify(a)linaro.org's message of Februar 27, 2025 7:38 pm: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In master-aarch64, after: > | commit gcc-15-7709-gc2ece13931d > | Author: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw(a)gdcproject.org> > | Date: Tue Feb 25 21:01:23 2025 +0100 > | > | libphobos: Generate test files for phobos testsuite > | > | Extracts all public unittests from libphobos/src and emits them as > | standalone tests in the testsuite using the tests_extractor script. > | > | ... 132 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regressions 10 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running libphobos:libphobos.phobos/phobos.exp ... > | FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std_math_hardware.d execution test > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running libphobos:libphobos.phobos/shared/phobos-shared.exp ... > | FAIL: libphobos.phobos/shared/std/format/internal/floats.d execution test > | ... and 10 more > This just a test that was already failing, it's been renamed from std/math/hardware.d to std_math_hardware.d in the logs. Iain.

2 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107194: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, Sorry for this spurious notification, it seems we had a "disk full" issue on the build machine. You can ignore this error message. Christophe On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 03:12, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107194 > | Author: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Thu Feb 27 13:43:37 2025 -0500 > | > | [pushed][PR118940][LRA]: Add a test > | > | The following patch adds a test for > | > | https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118940 > | ... 17 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 8371e7f240c gimple-fold: Fix a pasto in fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine [PR119030] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

2 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107213: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, Sorry for this spurious notification, it seems we had a "disk full" issue on the build machine. You can ignore this error message. Christophe On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 03:06, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107213 > | Author: Jan Dubiec <jdx(a)o2.pl> > | Date: Thu Feb 27 22:42:20 2025 +0100 > | > | [PATCH] H8/300: PR target/109189 Silence -Wformat warnings on Windows > | > | This patch fixes annoying -Wformat warnings when gcc is built > | on Windows/MinGW64. Instead of %ld it uses HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC > | macro, just like many other targets do. > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 8371e7f240c gimple-fold: Fix a pasto in fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine [PR119030] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

2 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107058: Failure on arm

by Jakub Jelinek

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:13:10PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107058 > | Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Feb 25 13:31:29 2025 +0100 > | > | [PATCH] simplify-rtx: Fix up simplify_logical_relational_operation [PR119002] > | > | Hi! > | > | The following testcase is miscompiled on powerpc64le-linux starting with > | ... 45 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | af73228fdb2 Fortran: Fix detection of descriptor arrays in coarray [PR107635] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:07:45 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:1306:3: internal compiler error: in reverse_condition, at jump.cc:536 > | # 00:07:46 make[5]: *** [Makefile:587: floating_to_chars.lo] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[4]: *** [Makefile:797: all-recursive] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[3]: *** [Makefile:577: all-recursive] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[2]: *** [Makefile:502: all] Error 2 > | # 00:07:46 make[1]: *** [Makefile:12256: all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2 > | # 00:07:46 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2 Wonder how is that possible, the patch uses REVERSE_CONDITION on GT and that is handled by both reverse_condition and reverse_condition_maybe_unordered. Can I ask for preprocessed source + cc1plus command line + what -march= etc. options one needs if it is just implied by configure, so that I can have a look in a cross-compiler? I really don't have access to 32-bit arm anymore. Jakub

2 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Fw: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #106762: Failure on aarch64

by James K. Lowden

Hello, I seem to have begun receiving CI/CD patch notifications from ci_notify(a)linaro.org. I don't understand them, and they might be premature. I don't want to ignore them, though, if they do matter. I am supplying a 100,000 line patch, roughly, to add a COBOL front-end to gcc. As of now, there is no libgcobol or gcc/cobol directory in the master branch. The supplied patch came most recently in 14 "easy pieces". To be applied successfully, the patches to the Python scripts that create those directories must be applied first. The URLs at the end of the mail come up 404. I suppose they are ephemeral. I haven't been able to look at a complete log to understand the basis of the report. The mail says to ask here, so here I be. Please advise. I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks, --jkl Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:10:38 +0000 (UTC) From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org To: jklowden(a)schemamania.org Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #106762: Failure on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106762 | Author: James K. Lowden <jklowden(a)schemamania.org> | Date: Tue Feb 18 18:37:13 2025 -0500 | | [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery | | From f89a50238de62b73d9fc44ee7226461650ab119d Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:19:10 PM EST | From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden(a)symas.com> | Date: Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:19:10 PM EST | ... 27 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 427386042f0 LoongArch: Use normal RTL pattern instead of UNSPEC for {x,}vsr{a,l}ri instructions Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:03:17 make[1]: *** [Makefile:4720: all-gcc] Error 2 | # 00:03:17 make: *** [Makefile:1063: all] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3164/artifac… Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.

2 months, 3 weeks

3
4
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-97-gad9c4c53611: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-97-gad9c4c53611 | Author: Carlos O'Donell <carlos(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Feb 13 14:27:55 2025 -0500 | | manual: Document setlogmask as MT-safe. | | setlogmask(3) was made MT-safe in glibc-2.33 with the fix for | bug 26100. | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:04:01 make[2]: *** [Makefile:90: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/manual/stamp-summary] Error 1 | # 00:04:01 make[1]: *** [Makefile:470: info] Error 2 | # 00:04:01 make: *** [Makefile:20: info] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1515. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2497/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ad9c4c536115ba38be3e…

2 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gcc: Failure on arm

by H.J. Lu

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:03 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-arm, after: > | 2 patches in gcc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106412 > | de53b4c527f [PATCH 2/2] x86: Fold sibcall targets into jump table > | 54322404f4b [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add a pass to fold tail call > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 2f33fa09aab Daily bump. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:05:34 make[2]: *** [Makefile:512: _mulsc3.o] Error 1 This is an arm bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118866 > | # 00:05:34 make[1]: *** [Makefile:14340: all-target-libgcc] Error 2 > | # 00:05:34 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/3189/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #106352: Failure on aarch64

by H.J. Lu

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1:17 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. Which version of GCC is your IC using? My patch raises the minimum GCC version to 12.1. > In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: > | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106352 > | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Wed Feb 12 12:53:09 2025 +0800 > | > | [PATCH] Raise the minimum GCC version to 12.1 [BZ #32539] > | > | For all Linux distros with glibc 2.40 which I can find, GCC 14.2 is used > | to compile glibc 2.40: > | > | ... 52 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 392261a2b6 hurd: Replace char foo[1024] with string_t > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2468/artif… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

3 months

2
3
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-262-gcff0a460ae86: Failure on arm

by Nathan Chancellor

On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 10:30:18AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-262-gcff0a460ae86 > | Author: Bill Wendling <morbo(a)google.com> > | Date: Thu Jan 30 15:36:13 2025 -0800 > | > | [Clang][counted_by] Refactor __builtin_dynamic_object_size on FAMs (#122198) > | > | Refactoring of how __builtin_dynamic_object_size() is calculated for > | flexible array members (in preparation for adding support for the > | 'counted_by' attribute on pointers in structs). > | ... 86 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 22473 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 22474 > > Used configuration : > tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1541. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig-… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig-… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cff0a460ae864505bc2a064c269ebe5… Thanks, I think Bill fixed this with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eb44aa0a94a8d4230c1c9a0c306af1… Cheers, Nathan

3 months

3
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-1026-ga5fc7c3ac153: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-1026-ga5fc7c3ac153 | Author: David Pagan <dave.pagan(a)amd.com> | Date: Thu Feb 6 12:41:10 2025 -0800 | | [clang][OpenMP] New OpenMP 6.0 assumption clause, 'no_openmp_constructs' (#125933) | | Add initial parsing/sema support for new assumption clause so clause can | be specified. For now, it's ignored, just like the others. | | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | 1 Used configuration : tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1548. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3161/artifac… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a5fc7c3ac153bddab7c9d3464f17037…

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-888-gdf1bee03de1c: 1 regressions 2 improvements on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Hi, The detected problem is probably caused by a precision error of floating-point arithmetic by the fast-math flag. No need to investigate. Sorry for the noise. Thanks. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-888-gdf1bee03de1c > | Author: Paul Carabas <paulcaraa(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Thu Feb 6 02:02:29 2025 +0200 > | > | [mlir] Add math to LLVM lowering support for missing trigonometric & hyperbolic ops (#125753) > | > | The patch adds support for math -> LLVM dialect lowering for TanOp, > | Sinh, Cosh, Tanh > > Produces 1 regressions 2 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0344 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0344/Fujitsu-Fortran-0344_1090.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0338 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0338/Fujitsu-Fortran-0338_0146.test > | ... and 2 more > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1547. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df1bee03de1cdc1505a4e9dde3ed064…

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Tom Eccles

Thanks for the email, The regression in 0688_0041 is expected and documented in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124019. Codegen for that test was already broken before my patch, we just got luckier with undefined behavior before my changes. The regression in 0688_0041 should go away after https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125307. Please do reach out if you have any questions, Tom ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2025 2:54 PM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; Tom Eccles <Tom.Eccles(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447: 1 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447 | Author: Tom Eccles <tom.eccles(a)arm.com> | Date: Fri Jan 31 09:35:26 2025 +0000 | | [mlir][OpenMP][flang] make private variable allocation implicit in omp.private (#124019) | | The intention of this work is to give MLIR->LLVMIR conversion freedom to | control how the private variable is allocated so that it can be | allocated on the stack in ordinary cases or as part of a structure used | ... 54 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0688 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0688/Fujitsu-Fortran-0688_0041.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1540. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/438/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aeaafce4644788963d9823067e46b50… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5595-g99b90c46110: 76 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5595-g99b90c46110 | Author: Andrew Carlotti <andrew.carlotti(a)arm.com> | Date: Thu Jan 30 19:14:46 2025 +0000 | | aarch64: Fix fp8 feature dependencies | | We agreed with LLVM that we shouldn't enforce the architectural | dependencies between fp8 muliplication features, so remove them. | | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 76 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/aarch64-sve2-acle-asm.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O0 -DSTREAMING_COMPATIBLE -DTEST_FULL (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O0 -DSTREAMING_COMPATIBLE -DTEST_OVERLOADS (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O2 -g -DTEST_FULL (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O2 -g -DTEST_OVERLOADS (test for excess errors) | ... and 73 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1509. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=99b90c46110df…

3 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105574: 1 regressions 1 improvements on arm

by Siddhesh Poyarekar

Has the bisect somehow failed in this? It's highly unlikely that a test macro would cause an ICE, unless it somehow exposed a latent bug, which also seems very unlikely in this context. Sid On 2025-01-28 20:48, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/105574 > | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh(a)gotplt.org> > | Date: Tue Jan 28 12:43:50 2025 -0500 > | > | [PATCH v3] testsuite/118127: Pass fortran tests on ppc64le for IEEE128 long doubles > | > | Denormal behaviour is well defined for IEEE128 long doubles, so don't > | XFAIL some gfortran tests on ppc64le when configured with the IEEE128 > | long double ABI. > | ... 13 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 2abc555a80b Daily bump. > > Produces 1 regressions 1 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at config/arm/arm.md:7450) > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:7450) > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3358/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

3 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18802-gee99c4d4845d: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:55:49AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-18802-gee99c4d4845d > | Author: SivanShani-Arm <sivan.shani(a)arm.com> > | Date: Thu Jan 23 09:46:59 2025 +0000 > | > | [LLVM][Clang][AArch64] Implement AArch64 build attributes (#123990) > | > | - Added support for AArch64-specific build attributes. > | - Print AArch64 build attributes to assembly. > | - Emit AArch64 build attributes to ELF. > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 40 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 25849 > > Used configuration : > tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodconfig > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1530. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodcon… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodcon… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee99c4d4845db66c4daa2373352133f… Thanks for the report, this change needs adaption on the kernel side: https://lore.kernel.org/20250124-arm64-handle-arm-attributes-in-linker-scri… Cheers, Nathan

3 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Qadeer, Hafiz Abid

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] Thanks for bringing this to my notice. I have opened upstream issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123960 to track this. I am working on a fix and will update when a PR is opened. Thanks Abid ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 6:43 AM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: Qadeer, Hafiz Abid <HafizAbid.Qadeer(a)amd.com>; maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561: 1 regressions on aarch64 Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561 | Author: Abid Qadeer <haqadeer(a)amd.com> | Date: Mon Jan 20 12:03:59 2025 +0000 | | [flang][debug] Improve handling of cyclic derived types. (#122770) | | When `RecordType` is converted to corresponding `DIType`, we cache the | information to avoid doing the conversion again. | | ... 66 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0394 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0394/Fujitsu-Fortran-0394_0031.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1528. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/382/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af91372b75613d5654e68d393477e86…

3 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5490-g50505c486ed: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5490-g50505c486ed | Author: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> | Date: Tue Jan 21 10:48:02 2025 +0000 | | More updated translations Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | # build_abe linux: | # build_abe glibc: | # build_abe gdb: | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:36:56 make[2]: [Makefile:1835: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/largefile-config.h] Error 1 (ignored) | # 00:36:56 make[2]: [Makefile:1836: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/largefile-config.h] Error 1 (ignored) | # 00:47:24 make[7]: [Makefile:850: stamp-modules-bits] Error 1 (ignored) | # 02:07:45 make[2]: [/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:995: gnat-install-tools] Error 1 (ignored) | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 4 | # build_abe glibc: | 5 | # build_abe gdb: | 6 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1505. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/927/a… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=50505c486ed26…

3 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

is anybody using QEMU's iwmmxt/xscale emulation for toolchain testing?

by Peter Maydell

Hi; I'm wondering if anybody is using QEMU's iwmmxt/xscale emulation for toolchain testing. (My suspicion is the answer is "no".) This emulation isn't enabled by default, so to use it you would have to explicitly select an iwmmxt capable CPU (with -cpu or the QEMU_CPU environment variable). The relevant CPU types are anything beginning "pxa" (pxa250, pxa255, pxa260, pxa261, pxa262, pxa270-a0, pxa270-a1, pxa270, pxa270-b0, pxa270-b1, pxa270-c0, pxa270-c5). The context for this is that I'm considering deprecate-and-drop for this emulation. (We already dropped all the system emulation of boards that use these CPUs, so the only thing remaining is their support via QEMU's user-mode emulation.) If there's still somebody using this then I'm OK keeping it in QEMU a bit longer, but if as I suspect it's all entirely unused then we might as well start the process of dropping it. (I'm aware that GCC is in the process of dropping its iwmmxt codegen support. I also didn't find anything particularly with a web search with examples of users using it.) thanks -- PMM

3 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-770-gc36fc507819: 189 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-770-gc36fc507819 | Author: Malte Skarupke <malteskarupke(a)fastmail.fm> | Date: Wed Dec 4 07:56:38 2024 -0500 | | nptl: Remove g_refs from condition variables | | This variable used to be needed to wait in group switching until all sleepers | have confirmed that they have woken. This is no longer needed. Nothing waits | on this variable so there is no need to track how many threads are currently | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 189 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running g++:g++.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ... | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 12 (test for warnings, line 11) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 17 (test for warnings, line 10) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 18 (test for warnings, line 11) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 19 (test for warnings, line 11) | ... and 192 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1504. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1822/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=c36fc50781995e6758ca…

3 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a: 9 regressions on aarch64

by Tom Eccles

Hi thanks for the report. I think it has already been fixed upstream by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122550<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122550?notification_referrer_id=N…>. Please let me know if this was not the case. Kind regards, Tom ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 10:57 PM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; Tom Eccles <Tom.Eccles(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a: 9 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a | Author: Tom Eccles <tom.eccles(a)arm.com> | Date: Wed Jan 8 10:05:21 2025 +0000 | | [flang][StackArrays] track pointers through fir.convert (#121919) | | This does add a little computational complexity because now every | freemem operation has to be tested for every allocation. This could be | improved with some more memoisation but I think it is easier to read | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 9 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0073 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0073/Fujitsu-Fortran-0073_0018.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0487 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0487/Fujitsu-Fortran-0487_0035.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0487/Fujitsu-Fortran-0487_0036.test | ... and 7 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1515. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/303249c4490a7777a744d9afd449b64… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

3 months, 4 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15150-gb3cba9be41bf: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Mel Chen

Hi, Florian Hahn and I landed 2 patches for fixing FindLastIV reductions idiom. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e528ac404e13ed2d952a2d83aaf838… https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3397950f2d21426c7520d114a125881… I think those can fix the issue you are facing. Please try them, and let me know if you still have regression on it. Mel On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:11 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-15150-gb3cba9be41bf > | Author: Mel Chen <mel.chen(a)sifive.com> > | Date: Thu Dec 12 16:48:31 2024 +0800 > | > | [LoopVectorize] Vectorize select-cmp reduction pattern for > increasing integer induction variable (#67812) > | > | Consider the following loop: > | ``` > | int rdx = init; > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0365 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0365/Fujitsu-Fortran-0365_0185.test > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0365/Fujitsu-Fortran-0365_0186.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output > of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm > "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install > "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" > -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" > -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= > -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math > -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm > -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve > -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve > -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu > "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1482. Please let us know if you > have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways > to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > make commands are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3cba9be41bfa89bc0ec212706c6028…

4 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 8 patches in glibc: Failure on aarch64

by Michael Jeanson

On 2025-01-09 12:16, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: > | 8 patches in glibc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/104425 > | b2d4876946 [PATCH v16 8/8] Linux: Update internal copy of '<sys/rseq.h>' > | cdd3e61830 [PATCH v16 7/8] nptl: Remove the rseq area from 'struct pthread' > | a673377e3d [PATCH v16 6/8] nptl: Move the rseq area to the 'extra TLS' block > | 86803776b0 [PATCH v16 5/8] nptl: Introduce <rseq-access.h> for RSEQ_* accessors > | 928c07fc09 [PATCH v16 4/8] nptl: add rtld_hidden_proto to __rseq_size and __rseq_offset > | ... and 3 more patches in glibc > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | e41aabcc93 tests: Verify inheritance of cpu affinity > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:00:59 ../csu/libc-tls.c:221:64: error: ‘TLS_TP_OFFSET’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘TLS_DTV_OFFSET’? > | # 00:00:59 make[2]: *** [/home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/sysd-rules:451: /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/csu/libc-tls.o] Error 1 > | # 00:00:59 make[1]: *** [Makefile:484: csu/subdir_lib] Error 2 > | # 00:00:59 make: *** [Makefile:20: all] Error 2 Is there a way to re-trigger this job on the current master branch without posting a new patchset? I sent this by mistake before Florian's TLS_TP_OFFSET patch was pushed to master but it is now. Thanks, Michael

4 months

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5322-gfd7728c8a4a: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5322-gfd7728c8a4a | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> | Date: Sun Jan 12 15:14:38 2025 +0800 | | ld: Update function prototypes for compilers defaulting to -std=gnu23 | | Since GCC 15 defaults to -std=gnu23, update function prototypes in linker | tests for compilers defaulting to -std=gnu23. | | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running ld:ld-vsb/vsb.exp ... | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC) | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset) | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main, non PIC so) | XPASS: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC) | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1502. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd7728c8a4aa7…

4 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in binutils: 1 regressions on aarch64

by H.J. Lu

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:42 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In binutils_check master-aarch64, after: > | 2 patches in binutils > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/104601 > | 795205673be [PATCH v3 2/4] ld: Document mixing IR and non-IR objects for -r > | a8d189da9d5 [PATCH v3 1/4] ld: Add lto and none-lto output support for ld -r > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 338e0b05d8f Fix grammar in "Debug Names" node of the manual > > Produces 1 regressions: > | Running ld:ld-plugin/plugin.exp ... > | FAIL: nm --plugin I can't reproduce it on cfarm185.cfarm.net: /home/hjl/build/binutils/build-aarch64-linux/ld/../binutils/nm-new --plugin /home/hjl/build/binutils/build-aarch64-linux/ld/.libs/libldtestplug2.so.0 /home/hjl/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c 00000000 T _func 00000000 T func PASS: nm --plugin It has GCC 13.3.1. I saw you were using GCC 11.4.0. Please try GCC 11.5.0. > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_binutils_check master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/2093/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

4 months

1
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6774-g740c84975ceb: Failure on arm

by Sam James

This is definitely https://gcc.gnu.org/PR118409 (indeed the ifcombine change). We had PR118417 too which I suspect is the same.

4 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-734-g93d0bfbe8f: 2 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-734-g93d0bfbe8f | Author: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson(a)efficios.com> | Date: Wed Jul 10 15:48:49 2024 -0400 | | nptl: Move the rseq area to the 'extra TLS' block | | Move the rseq area to the newly added 'extra TLS' block, this is the | last step in adding support for the rseq extended ABI. The size of the | rseq area is now dynamic and depends on the rseq features reported by | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 2 regressions: | Running glibc:elf ... | FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-extern-static | FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-static Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1497. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2301/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=93d0bfbe8ffa9c3dcbfc…

4 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6566-g804e9d55d9e: 5 regressions on arm

by Sam James

This is being worked on at https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/328b6145af0d5c1d2c3fc5ef44cb7b74717…. See also https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/fcdbc863-3ad7-de56-6076-85948d03046…. thanks, sam

4 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-16411-gccfe0de0e1e3: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Hassnaa Hamdi

Hello everyone. Is that regression is definitely caused by my patch ? Best Regards, Hassnaa. From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Saturday, 28 December 2024 at 5:41 AM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>, itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>, t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>, Hassnaa Hamdi <Hassnaa.Hamdi(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-16411-gccfe0de0e1e3: 1 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-16411-gccfe0de0e1e3 | Author: Hassnaa Hamdi <hassnaa.hamdi(a)arm.com> | Date: Fri Dec 27 12:42:07 2024 +0000 | | [LV]: Teach LV to recursively (de)interleave. (#89018) | | Currently available intrinsics are only ld2/st2, which don't support interleaving factor > 2. | This patch teaches the LV to use ld2/st2 recursively to support high | interleaving factors. Produces 1 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0341 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0341/Fujitsu-Fortran-0341_0409.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1494. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccfe0de0e1e37ed369c9bf89dd0188b… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

4 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-670-ge5ca265a9c9: 28 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-670-ge5ca265a9c9 | Author: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann(a)inria.fr> | Date: Fri Dec 20 10:41:38 2024 +0100 | | new inputs with large errors for [a]cospi, [a]sinpi, [a]tanpi, atan2pi | | These inputs were generated with the programs from | https://gitlab.inria.fr/zimmerma/math_accuracy, | with rounding to nearest: | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 28 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-acospi | FAIL: math/test-double-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-double-cospi | FAIL: math/test-double-sinpi | ... and 24 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1482. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2266/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e5ca265a9c9054c01c78…

4 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-4788-gd5cbf916be4: 14 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-4788-gd5cbf916be4 | Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich(a)suse.com> | Date: Mon Nov 18 11:35:57 2024 +0100 | | gas/ELF: also reject merge entity size being zero | | This won't have any useful effect, so is at best marginally less bogus | than a negative value. | | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 14 regressions: | Running ld:ld-elf/compress.exp ... | FAIL: Build zlibbegin.o with zlib compressed debug sections | FAIL: Build gnubegin.o with zlib-gnu compressed debug sections | FAIL: Build gabiend.o with zlib-gabi compressed debug sections | FAIL: Link -r with zlib compressed debug output | ... and 10 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1427. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=d5cbf916be4a0…

4 months, 2 weeks

5
12
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-564-ge79e5c4899e: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-564-ge79e5c4899e | Author: DJ Delorie <dj(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Nov 14 15:12:57 2024 -0500 | | assert: ensure posix compliance, add tests for such | | Fix assert.c so that even the fallback | case conforms to POSIX, although not exactly the same as | the default case so a test can tell the difference. | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:01:09 assert.c:120:14: error: ignoring return value of ‘writev’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result] | # 00:01:09 make[2]: *** [../o-iterator.mk:9: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/assert/assert.o] Error 1 | # 00:01:09 assert.c:120:14: error: ignoring return value of ‘writev’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result] | # 00:01:09 make[2]: *** [../o-iterator.mk:9: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/assert/assert.os] Error 1 | # 00:01:09 make[1]: *** [Makefile:484: assert/subdir_lib] Error 2 | # 00:01:09 make: *** [Makefile:21: all] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1473. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2252/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e79e5c4899e82eff1032…

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5150-g9f2e3c21f65: Failure on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5150-g9f2e3c21f65 | Author: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Dec 19 09:59:11 2024 +0000 | | Fix the handling or arguments and macro pseudo-variables inside nested assembler macros. | | PR 32391 Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # build_abe binutils: | -9 | # build_abe stage1: | -5 | # build_abe qemu: | -2 | # linux_n_obj: | 557 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # build_abe binutils: | -9 | # build_abe stage1: | -5 | # build_abe qemu: | -2 | # linux_n_obj: | 618 | # linux build successful: | all Used configuration : tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1470. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig-… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig-… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f2e3c21f6506…

4 months, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] v6.13-rc2-20-gce8fd0500b741: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

Thanks for the report! On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 04:05:00AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-defconfig, after: > | commit v6.13-rc2-20-gce8fd0500b741 > | Author: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski(a)linaro.org> > | Date: Tue Dec 3 10:19:35 2024 +0100 > | > | crypto: qce - use __free() for a buffer that's always freed > | > | The buffer allocated in qce_ahash_hmac_setkey is always freed before > | returning to use __free() to automate it. > | > | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. I have sent a revert of that change: https://lore.kernel.org/20241218-crypto-qce-sha-fix-clang-cleanup-error-v1-… Cheers, Nathan

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15723-gb2c363e2616d: 7 regressions on aarch64

by Peter Klausler

Fixed by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120614. From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 at 21:27 To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>, itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>, t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>, Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15723-gb2c363e2616d: 7 regressions on aarch64 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-15723-gb2c363e2616d | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> | Date: Tue Dec 17 12:10:29 2024 -0800 | | [flang] Fix generic resolution with actual/dummy procedure incompatib… (#120105) | | …ility | | We generally allow any legal procedure pointer target as an actual | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 7 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0249 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0023.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0024.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0025.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0026.test | ... and 4 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro.at…<https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1486>. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Fujitsu testsuite : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/> Current build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Reference build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit-us.li…<https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s…> Full commit : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2c363e2616dc6ac6ee76c223d84ec5…>

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 4 patches in gcc: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 12:58, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | 4 patches in gcc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/103420 > | 3a8cf3dce8f [PATCH 4/4] aarch64: Add mf8 data movement intrinsics > | afa8fb3b8b4 [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Add missing makefile dependency > | 7120f3c23db [PATCH 2/4] aarch64: Use mf8 instead of f8 in builtin definitions > | 0cc75ba5a1a [PATCH 1/4] aarch64: Macroise simd_type definitions > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | b117201385d testsuite: Fix toplevel-asm-1.c failure for riscv > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > Hi Richard, Since the message is not very clear, your patches break the build. The log contains these errors: aarch64-sve2.md: In function ‘insn_code maybe_code_for_aarch64_cm(rtx_code, machine_mode, int, int)’: aarch64-sve2.md:7205:12: error: ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le_vec_concatz_be’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le’? (and many other similar entries) HTH Christophe > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/2917/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

4 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-526-g66fa7ad437a: 2 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-526-g66fa7ad437a | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Fri Oct 18 16:04:30 2024 -0300 | | math: Use acosf from CORE-MATH | | The CORE-MATH implementation is correctly rounded (for any rounding mode) | and shows slight better performance to the generic acosf. | | ... 26 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 2 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-float-acos | FAIL: math/test-float32-acos Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1468. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2199/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=66fa7ad437affc64b3a8…

4 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-455-g3374de90386: 8 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-455-g3374de90386 | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Dec 12 20:57:44 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 atan2pi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the atan2pi functions (atan2(y,x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 8 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-atan2pi | FAIL: math/test-float-atan2pi | FAIL: math/test-float128-atan2pi | FAIL: math/test-float32-atan2pi | ... and 4 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1461. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2210/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=3374de90386f1814cec5…

5 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-450-gffe79c446ce: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-450-gffe79c446ce | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Dec 11 21:51:49 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 atanpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the atanpi functions (atan(x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-float-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-atanpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1460. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2175/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ffe79c446ced76d7c1a7…

5 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-444-gf962932206e: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-444-gf962932206e | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Tue Dec 10 20:42:20 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 asinpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the asinpi functions (asin(x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-asinpi | FAIL: math/test-float-asinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-asinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-asinpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1458. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2167/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f962932206eca2cfed0a…

5 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6063-g6c41a912f5e: 1 regressions on arm

by Jonathan Wakely

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 14:21, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-15-6063-g6c41a912f5e > | Author: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo(a)kdab.com> > | Date: Mon Dec 9 01:28:08 2024 +0100 > | > | libstdc++: deprecate is_trivial for C++26 (P3247R2) > | > | This actually implements P3247R2 by deprecating the is_trivial type > | trait. > | > | ... 17 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regressions: > | Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/trivial1.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1457. Please let us know if you have a fix. Fixed at r15-6080-g7aab1271b4afb6 > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3144/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c41a912f5e654a1b6f7cf8d6…

5 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6060-ge4a0157c2397: 3 regressions on arm

by Jonathan Wakely

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 08:48, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-15-6060-ge4a0157c2397 > | Author: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo(a)kdab.com> > | Date: Mon Dec 9 02:11:19 2024 +0100 > | > | libstdc++: port bitwise relocatable away from is_trivial > | > | In preparation for the deprecation of is_trivial (P3247R2). > | "bitwise relocation" (or "trivial relocation" à la P1144/P2786) > | doesn't need the full-fledged notion of triviality, just checking for a > | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 3 regressions: > | Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) > | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1456. Please let us know if you have a fix. Fixed at r15-6073-g4b9e1db1a14dbf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3140/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4a0157c2397c9b582cff71d1…

5 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-442-g28d102d15c: 8 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-442-g28d102d15c | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Mon Dec 9 23:01:29 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 acospi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the acospi functions (acos(x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 8 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-acospi | FAIL: math/test-float-acospi | FAIL: math/test-float128-acospi | FAIL: math/test-float32-acospi | ... and 4 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1455. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2193/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=28d102d15c6af7f80cb1…

5 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-421-gf9e90e4b4ce: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-421-gf9e90e4b4ce | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Dec 5 21:42:10 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 tanpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the tanpi functions (tan(pi*x)). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-tanpi | FAIL: math/test-float-tanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-tanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-tanpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1453. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2143/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f9e90e4b4ce71f88470c…

5 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-409-g776938e8b8d: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-409-g776938e8b8d | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Dec 4 20:04:04 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 sinpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the sinpi functions (sin(pi*x)). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-sinpi | FAIL: math/test-float-sinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-sinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-sinpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1450. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2135/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=776938e8b8dcf2b59998…

5 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Fwd: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 7 patches in gcc: 1 regressions on arm

by H.J. Lu

gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 is ----------- ! { dg-do compile } ! { dg-options "-Os" } program test use iso_c_binding, only: c_short interface subroutine foo(a) bind(c) import c_short integer(kind=c_short), intent(in), value :: a end subroutine foo end interface integer(kind=c_short) a(5); call foo (a(3)) end ! { dg-final { scan-assembler "movswl\t10\$%rsp\$, %edi" { target { { *-*-linu x* *-*-gnu* } && { ! ia32 } } } } } ! { dg-final { scan-assembler "movswl\t-14\$%ebp\$, %eax" { target { { *-*-lin ux* *-*-gnu* } && { ia32 } } } } } ---------- Why does it fail FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 -O scan-assembler movswl\t10\$%rsp\$, %edi on arm-linux-gnueabihf? H.J. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 7:26 PM Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 7 patches in gcc: 1 regressions on arm To: <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_check master-arm, after: | 7 patches in gcc | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/102351 | 97708c5e402 [PATCH v5 7/7] ssa-fre-4.c: Enable for all targets and adjust scan match | 9c6ba8e5347 [PATCH v5 6/7] scev-cast.c: Enable for all targets and adjust scan matches | d78236fd00e [PATCH v5 5/7] vect-simd-clone-1[6-8][cd].c: Expect in-branch clones for x86 | a9ef03a445d [PATCH v5 4/7] i386: Adjust apx-ndd.c for frontend promotion removal | 14ece135ff9 [PATCH v5 3/7] Use incoming small integer argument type if possible | ... and 2 more patches in gcc | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | fb64a7b0e1d RISC-V: Add assert for insn operand out of range access [PR117878][NFC] Produces 1 regressions: | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 -O scan-assembler movswl\t10\$%rsp\$, %edi Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3116/artifact/ar… Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files. -- H.J.

5 months, 1 week

2
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-408-g0ae0af68d8f: 8 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-408-g0ae0af68d8f | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Dec 4 10:20:44 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 cospi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the cospi functions (cos(pi*x)). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 8 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-cospi | FAIL: math/test-float-cospi | FAIL: math/test-float128-cospi | FAIL: math/test-float32-cospi | ... and 4 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1448. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2162/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=0ae0af68d8fa3bf6cbe1…

5 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] fujitsu_testsuite#a0e269d5d: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

Should have been reported as follows. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit fujitsu_testsuite#a0e269d5d | Author: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> | Date: Tue Nov 19 17:58:42 2024 +0900 | | Update RUN.md | | - Change the Flang command name | - Add a notice about `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` | - Explain about `NOEXE` Produces 2 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0106 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0106/Fujitsu-Fortran-0106_0033.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0106/Fujitsu-Fortran-0106_0034.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1451. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/90/a… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/fujits… Full commit : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/commit/a0e269d5d279c3a0781bb… On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 04:54, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

5 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] fujitsu_testsuite#471c71be0: 19 regressions141 improvements on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

Should have been reported as follows. Some regressions and some improvements after this commit in fujitsu testsuite. Regards, Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit fujitsu_testsuite#471c71be0 | Author: Ichinose, Katsumi <1nose(a)jp.fujitsu.com> | Date: Wed Nov 27 18:43:38 2024 +0900 | | Add test programs for the 2024-11 release Produces 19 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0068 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0068/Fujitsu-C-0068_0113.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0068/Fujitsu-C-0068_0115.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0072 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0072/Fujitsu-C-0072_0006.test | ... and 22 more 141 improvements : | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0070 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0070/Fujitsu-Fortran-0070_0185.test | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0070/Fujitsu-Fortran-0070_0184.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0080 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0080/Fujitsu-Fortran-0080_0008.test | ... and 179 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1449. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/fujits… Full commit : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/commit/471c71be0fe507ecb02b5… On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 17:08, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

5 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-13176-gb8703369daf7: 654.roms_s failed to build on aarch64 O3 -LTO

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Alexey, It seems your patch below causes build failure of 654.roms_s for "-O3 -flto" on aarch64-linux-gnu. Has this been reported already? Let me know if not, and I'll help with the reporting and reproduction. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Nov 26, 2024, at 12:32, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017fast/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-13176-gb8703369daf7 > | Author: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev(a)outlook.com> > | Date: Fri Nov 22 16:10:17 2024 -0500 > | > | [SLP] Match poison as instruction with the same opcode > | > | Patch allows to vector scalar instruction + poison values as if poisons > | are instructions with the same opcode. It allows better vectorization of > | the repeated values, reduces number of insertelement instructions and > | ... 54 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 654.roms_s failed to build: > | the following benchmarks now fails : > | - 654.roms_s failed to build > > Used configuration : > Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection. Naturally, the scripts will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don\'t have access to Linaro TCWG CI. > > Configuration: > - Benchmark: SPEC CPU2017 > - Toolchain: Clang + Glibc + LLVM Linker > - Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk > - Target: aarch64-linux-gnu > - Compiler flags: O3 -LTO > - Hardware: <unknown> > > This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and suggestions at linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org . In our improvement plans is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf report/annotate" data behind these reports. > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1448. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017fast--llvm-aarch64-mast… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017fast--llvm-aarch64-mast… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8703369daf777706196ff914c0376c…

5 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

LLVM-1446

by Peter Klausler

The results now produced by flang(-new) for Fujitsu Fortran test 0676_0160 are better than the desired results of the test. The test uses the SUM intrinsic function to compute the sum of 100 complex numbers. These values are all identical. The new results from the SUM intrinsic function match the value of 100 times this value exactly. The expected value used by the test does not, and perhaps it reflects the result of a compiler using a less accurate summation method than flang is now using.

5 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-13009-g3f594741cf8e: 1 regressions1 improvements on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

Should have been reported as below. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-13009-g3f594741cf8e | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> | Date: Thu Nov 21 10:47:21 2024 -0800 | | [flang] Fix implementation of Kahan summation (#116897) | | In the runtime's implementation of floating-point SUM, the | implementation of Kahan's algorithm for increased precision is | incorrect. The running correction factor should be subtracted from each | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions1 improvements: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0676 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0676/Fujitsu-Fortran-0676_0160.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0366 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0366/Fujitsu-Fortran-0366_0097.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1446. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f594741cf8e1537fb25f84ef3cf224…

5 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-19.1.1-16-g9f743a87e: 30 regressions on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

It should have been reported as below. This is after this commit in llvm-test-suite. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-19.1.1-16-g9f743a87e | Author: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> | Date: Fri Nov 22 10:41:14 2024 +0900 | | [cmake] Support more Fortran filename suffixes (#180) | | These Fortran suffixes are aligned with the `lookupTypeForExtension` | function in `clang/lib/Driver/Types.cpp`. Produces 30 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0647 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0001.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0002.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0004.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0006.test | ... and 27 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1447. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm_t… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-test-suite/commit/9f743a87e20346070725bd1f06cc… On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 at 11:20, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

5 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-13065-g1a08b155899e: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-13065-g1a08b155899e | Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek <Krzysztof.Parzyszek(a)amd.com> | Date: Thu Nov 21 17:51:01 2024 -0600 | | [flang][OpenMP] Avoid early returns, NFC (#117231) | | Frontend code is generally nested. | Follow-up to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116658. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | 1 Used configuration : tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1445. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2012/artifac… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a08b155899ee3ed6a6c441799991a8…

5 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-12914-g5d38e6e42a90: 32 regressions on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

This report should have been as below. We are checking what went wrong on our side. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-12914-g5d38e6e42a90 | Author: Ivan R. Ivanov <ivanov.i.aa(a)m.titech.ac.jp> | Date: Wed Nov 20 10:49:34 2024 +0900 | | [flang] Introduce hlfir.elemental lowerings to omp.workshare_loop_nest (#104748) | | This patch adds parallelization support for the following expression in OpenMP | workshare constructs: | | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 32 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0398 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0000.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0001.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0002.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0003.test | ... and 28 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1444. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d38e6e42a90f5d469b5ff9e25e5e88… On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 14:39, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

5 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-12823-g8c56dd3040f2: 544.nab_r failed to build on arm O3

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Sergei, It seems your patch below breaks build of several SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks on 32-bit ARM. Could you please investigate? Please let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing build failures. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Nov 21, 2024, at 20:22, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate/llvm-arm-master-O3, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-12823-g8c56dd3040f2 > | Author: Sergei Barannikov <barannikov88(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Wed Nov 20 16:07:05 2024 +0300 > | > | [ARM] Stop gluing FP comparisons to FMSTAT (#116676) > | > | Following #116547, this changes the result of `ARMISD::CMPFP*` and the > | operand of `ARMISD::FMSTAT` from a special `Glue` type to a normal type. > | > | ... 20 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 544.nab_r failed to build: > | the following benchmarks now fails : > | - 544.nab_r failed to build > | - 538.imagick_r failed to build > | - 526.blender_r failed to build > | - 525.x264_r failed to build > > Used configuration : > Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection. Naturally, the scripts will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don\'t have access to Linaro TCWG CI. > > Configuration: > - Benchmark: SPEC CPU2017 > - Toolchain: Clang + Glibc + LLVM Linker > - Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk > - Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf > - Compiler flags: O3 > - Hardware: <unknown> > > This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and suggestions at linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org . In our improvement plans is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf report/annotate" data behind these reports. > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1443. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate--llvm-arm-master-O… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate--llvm-arm-master-O… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c56dd3040f295874e3d5742b5dfc10…

5 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain