- linaro-toolchain - lists.linaro.org

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107213: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, Sorry for this spurious notification, it seems we had a "disk full" issue on the build machine. You can ignore this error message. Christophe On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 03:06, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107213 > | Author: Jan Dubiec <jdx(a)o2.pl> > | Date: Thu Feb 27 22:42:20 2025 +0100 > | > | [PATCH] H8/300: PR target/109189 Silence -Wformat warnings on Windows > | > | This patch fixes annoying -Wformat warnings when gcc is built > | on Windows/MinGW64. Instead of %ld it uses HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC > | macro, just like many other targets do. > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 8371e7f240c gimple-fold: Fix a pasto in fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine [PR119030] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107058: Failure on arm

by Jakub Jelinek

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:13:10PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107058 > | Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Feb 25 13:31:29 2025 +0100 > | > | [PATCH] simplify-rtx: Fix up simplify_logical_relational_operation [PR119002] > | > | Hi! > | > | The following testcase is miscompiled on powerpc64le-linux starting with > | ... 45 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | af73228fdb2 Fortran: Fix detection of descriptor arrays in coarray [PR107635] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:07:45 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:1306:3: internal compiler error: in reverse_condition, at jump.cc:536 > | # 00:07:46 make[5]: *** [Makefile:587: floating_to_chars.lo] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[4]: *** [Makefile:797: all-recursive] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[3]: *** [Makefile:577: all-recursive] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[2]: *** [Makefile:502: all] Error 2 > | # 00:07:46 make[1]: *** [Makefile:12256: all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2 > | # 00:07:46 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2 Wonder how is that possible, the patch uses REVERSE_CONDITION on GT and that is handled by both reverse_condition and reverse_condition_maybe_unordered. Can I ask for preprocessed source + cc1plus command line + what -march= etc. options one needs if it is just implied by configure, so that I can have a look in a cross-compiler? I really don't have access to 32-bit arm anymore. Jakub

6 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Fw: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #106762: Failure on aarch64

by James K. Lowden

Hello, I seem to have begun receiving CI/CD patch notifications from ci_notify(a)linaro.org. I don't understand them, and they might be premature. I don't want to ignore them, though, if they do matter. I am supplying a 100,000 line patch, roughly, to add a COBOL front-end to gcc. As of now, there is no libgcobol or gcc/cobol directory in the master branch. The supplied patch came most recently in 14 "easy pieces". To be applied successfully, the patches to the Python scripts that create those directories must be applied first. The URLs at the end of the mail come up 404. I suppose they are ephemeral. I haven't been able to look at a complete log to understand the basis of the report. The mail says to ask here, so here I be. Please advise. I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks, --jkl Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:10:38 +0000 (UTC) From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org To: jklowden(a)schemamania.org Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #106762: Failure on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106762 | Author: James K. Lowden <jklowden(a)schemamania.org> | Date: Tue Feb 18 18:37:13 2025 -0500 | | [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery | | From f89a50238de62b73d9fc44ee7226461650ab119d Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:19:10 PM EST | From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden(a)symas.com> | Date: Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:19:10 PM EST | ... 27 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 427386042f0 LoongArch: Use normal RTL pattern instead of UNSPEC for {x,}vsr{a,l}ri instructions Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:03:17 make[1]: *** [Makefile:4720: all-gcc] Error 2 | # 00:03:17 make: *** [Makefile:1063: all] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3164/artifac… Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.

6 months, 3 weeks

3
4
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-97-gad9c4c53611: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-97-gad9c4c53611 | Author: Carlos O'Donell <carlos(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Feb 13 14:27:55 2025 -0500 | | manual: Document setlogmask as MT-safe. | | setlogmask(3) was made MT-safe in glibc-2.33 with the fix for | bug 26100. | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:04:01 make[2]: *** [Makefile:90: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/manual/stamp-summary] Error 1 | # 00:04:01 make[1]: *** [Makefile:470: info] Error 2 | # 00:04:01 make: *** [Makefile:20: info] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1515. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2497/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ad9c4c536115ba38be3e…

6 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gcc: Failure on arm

by H.J. Lu

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:03 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-arm, after: > | 2 patches in gcc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106412 > | de53b4c527f [PATCH 2/2] x86: Fold sibcall targets into jump table > | 54322404f4b [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add a pass to fold tail call > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 2f33fa09aab Daily bump. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:05:34 make[2]: *** [Makefile:512: _mulsc3.o] Error 1 This is an arm bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118866 > | # 00:05:34 make[1]: *** [Makefile:14340: all-target-libgcc] Error 2 > | # 00:05:34 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/3189/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

7 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #106352: Failure on aarch64

by H.J. Lu

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1:17 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. Which version of GCC is your IC using? My patch raises the minimum GCC version to 12.1. > In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: > | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106352 > | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Wed Feb 12 12:53:09 2025 +0800 > | > | [PATCH] Raise the minimum GCC version to 12.1 [BZ #32539] > | > | For all Linux distros with glibc 2.40 which I can find, GCC 14.2 is used > | to compile glibc 2.40: > | > | ... 52 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 392261a2b6 hurd: Replace char foo[1024] with string_t > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2468/artif… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

7 months

2
3
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-262-gcff0a460ae86: Failure on arm

by Nathan Chancellor

On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 10:30:18AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-262-gcff0a460ae86 > | Author: Bill Wendling <morbo(a)google.com> > | Date: Thu Jan 30 15:36:13 2025 -0800 > | > | [Clang][counted_by] Refactor __builtin_dynamic_object_size on FAMs (#122198) > | > | Refactoring of how __builtin_dynamic_object_size() is calculated for > | flexible array members (in preparation for adding support for the > | 'counted_by' attribute on pointers in structs). > | ... 86 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 22473 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 22474 > > Used configuration : > tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1541. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig-… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig-… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cff0a460ae864505bc2a064c269ebe5… Thanks, I think Bill fixed this with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eb44aa0a94a8d4230c1c9a0c306af1… Cheers, Nathan

7 months

3
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-1026-ga5fc7c3ac153: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-1026-ga5fc7c3ac153 | Author: David Pagan <dave.pagan(a)amd.com> | Date: Thu Feb 6 12:41:10 2025 -0800 | | [clang][OpenMP] New OpenMP 6.0 assumption clause, 'no_openmp_constructs' (#125933) | | Add initial parsing/sema support for new assumption clause so clause can | be specified. For now, it's ignored, just like the others. | | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | 1 Used configuration : tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1548. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3161/artifac… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a5fc7c3ac153bddab7c9d3464f17037…

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-888-gdf1bee03de1c: 1 regressions 2 improvements on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Hi, The detected problem is probably caused by a precision error of floating-point arithmetic by the fast-math flag. No need to investigate. Sorry for the noise. Thanks. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-888-gdf1bee03de1c > | Author: Paul Carabas <paulcaraa(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Thu Feb 6 02:02:29 2025 +0200 > | > | [mlir] Add math to LLVM lowering support for missing trigonometric & hyperbolic ops (#125753) > | > | The patch adds support for math -> LLVM dialect lowering for TanOp, > | Sinh, Cosh, Tanh > > Produces 1 regressions 2 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0344 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0344/Fujitsu-Fortran-0344_1090.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0338 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0338/Fujitsu-Fortran-0338_0146.test > | ... and 2 more > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1547. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df1bee03de1cdc1505a4e9dde3ed064…

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Tom Eccles

Thanks for the email, The regression in 0688_0041 is expected and documented in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124019. Codegen for that test was already broken before my patch, we just got luckier with undefined behavior before my changes. The regression in 0688_0041 should go away after https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125307. Please do reach out if you have any questions, Tom ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2025 2:54 PM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; Tom Eccles <Tom.Eccles(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447: 1 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447 | Author: Tom Eccles <tom.eccles(a)arm.com> | Date: Fri Jan 31 09:35:26 2025 +0000 | | [mlir][OpenMP][flang] make private variable allocation implicit in omp.private (#124019) | | The intention of this work is to give MLIR->LLVMIR conversion freedom to | control how the private variable is allocated so that it can be | allocated on the stack in ordinary cases or as part of a structure used | ... 54 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0688 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0688/Fujitsu-Fortran-0688_0041.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1540. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/438/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aeaafce4644788963d9823067e46b50… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5595-g99b90c46110: 76 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5595-g99b90c46110 | Author: Andrew Carlotti <andrew.carlotti(a)arm.com> | Date: Thu Jan 30 19:14:46 2025 +0000 | | aarch64: Fix fp8 feature dependencies | | We agreed with LLVM that we shouldn't enforce the architectural | dependencies between fp8 muliplication features, so remove them. | | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 76 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/aarch64-sve2-acle-asm.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O0 -DSTREAMING_COMPATIBLE -DTEST_FULL (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O0 -DSTREAMING_COMPATIBLE -DTEST_OVERLOADS (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O2 -g -DTEST_FULL (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O2 -g -DTEST_OVERLOADS (test for excess errors) | ... and 73 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1509. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=99b90c46110df…

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105574: 1 regressions 1 improvements on arm

by Siddhesh Poyarekar

Has the bisect somehow failed in this? It's highly unlikely that a test macro would cause an ICE, unless it somehow exposed a latent bug, which also seems very unlikely in this context. Sid On 2025-01-28 20:48, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/105574 > | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh(a)gotplt.org> > | Date: Tue Jan 28 12:43:50 2025 -0500 > | > | [PATCH v3] testsuite/118127: Pass fortran tests on ppc64le for IEEE128 long doubles > | > | Denormal behaviour is well defined for IEEE128 long doubles, so don't > | XFAIL some gfortran tests on ppc64le when configured with the IEEE128 > | long double ABI. > | ... 13 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 2abc555a80b Daily bump. > > Produces 1 regressions 1 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at config/arm/arm.md:7450) > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:7450) > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3358/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

7 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18802-gee99c4d4845d: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:55:49AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-18802-gee99c4d4845d > | Author: SivanShani-Arm <sivan.shani(a)arm.com> > | Date: Thu Jan 23 09:46:59 2025 +0000 > | > | [LLVM][Clang][AArch64] Implement AArch64 build attributes (#123990) > | > | - Added support for AArch64-specific build attributes. > | - Print AArch64 build attributes to assembly. > | - Emit AArch64 build attributes to ELF. > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 40 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 25849 > > Used configuration : > tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodconfig > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1530. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodcon… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodcon… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee99c4d4845db66c4daa2373352133f… Thanks for the report, this change needs adaption on the kernel side: https://lore.kernel.org/20250124-arm64-handle-arm-attributes-in-linker-scri… Cheers, Nathan

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Qadeer, Hafiz Abid

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] Thanks for bringing this to my notice. I have opened upstream issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123960 to track this. I am working on a fix and will update when a PR is opened. Thanks Abid ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 6:43 AM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: Qadeer, Hafiz Abid <HafizAbid.Qadeer(a)amd.com>; maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561: 1 regressions on aarch64 Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561 | Author: Abid Qadeer <haqadeer(a)amd.com> | Date: Mon Jan 20 12:03:59 2025 +0000 | | [flang][debug] Improve handling of cyclic derived types. (#122770) | | When `RecordType` is converted to corresponding `DIType`, we cache the | information to avoid doing the conversion again. | | ... 66 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0394 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0394/Fujitsu-Fortran-0394_0031.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1528. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/382/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af91372b75613d5654e68d393477e86…

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5490-g50505c486ed: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5490-g50505c486ed | Author: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> | Date: Tue Jan 21 10:48:02 2025 +0000 | | More updated translations Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | # build_abe linux: | # build_abe glibc: | # build_abe gdb: | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:36:56 make[2]: [Makefile:1835: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/largefile-config.h] Error 1 (ignored) | # 00:36:56 make[2]: [Makefile:1836: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/largefile-config.h] Error 1 (ignored) | # 00:47:24 make[7]: [Makefile:850: stamp-modules-bits] Error 1 (ignored) | # 02:07:45 make[2]: [/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:995: gnat-install-tools] Error 1 (ignored) | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 4 | # build_abe glibc: | 5 | # build_abe gdb: | 6 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1505. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/927/a… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=50505c486ed26…

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

is anybody using QEMU's iwmmxt/xscale emulation for toolchain testing?

by Peter Maydell

Hi; I'm wondering if anybody is using QEMU's iwmmxt/xscale emulation for toolchain testing. (My suspicion is the answer is "no".) This emulation isn't enabled by default, so to use it you would have to explicitly select an iwmmxt capable CPU (with -cpu or the QEMU_CPU environment variable). The relevant CPU types are anything beginning "pxa" (pxa250, pxa255, pxa260, pxa261, pxa262, pxa270-a0, pxa270-a1, pxa270, pxa270-b0, pxa270-b1, pxa270-c0, pxa270-c5). The context for this is that I'm considering deprecate-and-drop for this emulation. (We already dropped all the system emulation of boards that use these CPUs, so the only thing remaining is their support via QEMU's user-mode emulation.) If there's still somebody using this then I'm OK keeping it in QEMU a bit longer, but if as I suspect it's all entirely unused then we might as well start the process of dropping it. (I'm aware that GCC is in the process of dropping its iwmmxt codegen support. I also didn't find anything particularly with a web search with examples of users using it.) thanks -- PMM

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-770-gc36fc507819: 189 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-770-gc36fc507819 | Author: Malte Skarupke <malteskarupke(a)fastmail.fm> | Date: Wed Dec 4 07:56:38 2024 -0500 | | nptl: Remove g_refs from condition variables | | This variable used to be needed to wait in group switching until all sleepers | have confirmed that they have woken. This is no longer needed. Nothing waits | on this variable so there is no need to track how many threads are currently | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 189 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running g++:g++.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ... | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 12 (test for warnings, line 11) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 17 (test for warnings, line 10) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 18 (test for warnings, line 11) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 19 (test for warnings, line 11) | ... and 192 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1504. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1822/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=c36fc50781995e6758ca…

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a: 9 regressions on aarch64

by Tom Eccles

Hi thanks for the report. I think it has already been fixed upstream by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122550<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122550?notification_referrer_id=N…>. Please let me know if this was not the case. Kind regards, Tom ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 10:57 PM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; Tom Eccles <Tom.Eccles(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a: 9 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a | Author: Tom Eccles <tom.eccles(a)arm.com> | Date: Wed Jan 8 10:05:21 2025 +0000 | | [flang][StackArrays] track pointers through fir.convert (#121919) | | This does add a little computational complexity because now every | freemem operation has to be tested for every allocation. This could be | improved with some more memoisation but I think it is easier to read | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 9 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0073 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0073/Fujitsu-Fortran-0073_0018.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0487 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0487/Fujitsu-Fortran-0487_0035.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0487/Fujitsu-Fortran-0487_0036.test | ... and 7 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1515. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/303249c4490a7777a744d9afd449b64… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

8 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15150-gb3cba9be41bf: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Mel Chen

Hi, Florian Hahn and I landed 2 patches for fixing FindLastIV reductions idiom. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e528ac404e13ed2d952a2d83aaf838… https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3397950f2d21426c7520d114a125881… I think those can fix the issue you are facing. Please try them, and let me know if you still have regression on it. Mel On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:11 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-15150-gb3cba9be41bf > | Author: Mel Chen <mel.chen(a)sifive.com> > | Date: Thu Dec 12 16:48:31 2024 +0800 > | > | [LoopVectorize] Vectorize select-cmp reduction pattern for > increasing integer induction variable (#67812) > | > | Consider the following loop: > | ``` > | int rdx = init; > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0365 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0365/Fujitsu-Fortran-0365_0185.test > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0365/Fujitsu-Fortran-0365_0186.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output > of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm > "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install > "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" > -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" > -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= > -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math > -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm > -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve > -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve > -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu > "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1482. Please let us know if you > have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways > to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > make commands are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3cba9be41bfa89bc0ec212706c6028…

8 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 8 patches in glibc: Failure on aarch64

by Michael Jeanson

On 2025-01-09 12:16, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: > | 8 patches in glibc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/104425 > | b2d4876946 [PATCH v16 8/8] Linux: Update internal copy of '<sys/rseq.h>' > | cdd3e61830 [PATCH v16 7/8] nptl: Remove the rseq area from 'struct pthread' > | a673377e3d [PATCH v16 6/8] nptl: Move the rseq area to the 'extra TLS' block > | 86803776b0 [PATCH v16 5/8] nptl: Introduce <rseq-access.h> for RSEQ_* accessors > | 928c07fc09 [PATCH v16 4/8] nptl: add rtld_hidden_proto to __rseq_size and __rseq_offset > | ... and 3 more patches in glibc > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | e41aabcc93 tests: Verify inheritance of cpu affinity > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:00:59 ../csu/libc-tls.c:221:64: error: ‘TLS_TP_OFFSET’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘TLS_DTV_OFFSET’? > | # 00:00:59 make[2]: *** [/home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/sysd-rules:451: /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/csu/libc-tls.o] Error 1 > | # 00:00:59 make[1]: *** [Makefile:484: csu/subdir_lib] Error 2 > | # 00:00:59 make: *** [Makefile:20: all] Error 2 Is there a way to re-trigger this job on the current master branch without posting a new patchset? I sent this by mistake before Florian's TLS_TP_OFFSET patch was pushed to master but it is now. Thanks, Michael

8 months

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5322-gfd7728c8a4a: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5322-gfd7728c8a4a | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> | Date: Sun Jan 12 15:14:38 2025 +0800 | | ld: Update function prototypes for compilers defaulting to -std=gnu23 | | Since GCC 15 defaults to -std=gnu23, update function prototypes in linker | tests for compilers defaulting to -std=gnu23. | | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running ld:ld-vsb/vsb.exp ... | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC) | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset) | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main, non PIC so) | XPASS: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC) | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1502. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd7728c8a4aa7…

8 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in binutils: 1 regressions on aarch64

by H.J. Lu

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:42 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In binutils_check master-aarch64, after: > | 2 patches in binutils > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/104601 > | 795205673be [PATCH v3 2/4] ld: Document mixing IR and non-IR objects for -r > | a8d189da9d5 [PATCH v3 1/4] ld: Add lto and none-lto output support for ld -r > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 338e0b05d8f Fix grammar in "Debug Names" node of the manual > > Produces 1 regressions: > | Running ld:ld-plugin/plugin.exp ... > | FAIL: nm --plugin I can't reproduce it on cfarm185.cfarm.net: /home/hjl/build/binutils/build-aarch64-linux/ld/../binutils/nm-new --plugin /home/hjl/build/binutils/build-aarch64-linux/ld/.libs/libldtestplug2.so.0 /home/hjl/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c 00000000 T _func 00000000 T func PASS: nm --plugin It has GCC 13.3.1. I saw you were using GCC 11.4.0. Please try GCC 11.5.0. > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_binutils_check master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/2093/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

8 months

1
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6774-g740c84975ceb: Failure on arm

by Sam James

This is definitely https://gcc.gnu.org/PR118409 (indeed the ifcombine change). We had PR118417 too which I suspect is the same.

8 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-734-g93d0bfbe8f: 2 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-734-g93d0bfbe8f | Author: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson(a)efficios.com> | Date: Wed Jul 10 15:48:49 2024 -0400 | | nptl: Move the rseq area to the 'extra TLS' block | | Move the rseq area to the newly added 'extra TLS' block, this is the | last step in adding support for the rseq extended ABI. The size of the | rseq area is now dynamic and depends on the rseq features reported by | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 2 regressions: | Running glibc:elf ... | FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-extern-static | FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-static Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1497. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2301/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=93d0bfbe8ffa9c3dcbfc…

8 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6566-g804e9d55d9e: 5 regressions on arm

by Sam James

This is being worked on at https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/328b6145af0d5c1d2c3fc5ef44cb7b74717…. See also https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/fcdbc863-3ad7-de56-6076-85948d03046…. thanks, sam

8 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-16411-gccfe0de0e1e3: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Hassnaa Hamdi

Hello everyone. Is that regression is definitely caused by my patch ? Best Regards, Hassnaa. From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Saturday, 28 December 2024 at 5:41 AM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>, itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>, t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>, Hassnaa Hamdi <Hassnaa.Hamdi(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-16411-gccfe0de0e1e3: 1 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-16411-gccfe0de0e1e3 | Author: Hassnaa Hamdi <hassnaa.hamdi(a)arm.com> | Date: Fri Dec 27 12:42:07 2024 +0000 | | [LV]: Teach LV to recursively (de)interleave. (#89018) | | Currently available intrinsics are only ld2/st2, which don't support interleaving factor > 2. | This patch teaches the LV to use ld2/st2 recursively to support high | interleaving factors. Produces 1 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0341 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0341/Fujitsu-Fortran-0341_0409.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1494. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccfe0de0e1e37ed369c9bf89dd0188b… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

8 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-670-ge5ca265a9c9: 28 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-670-ge5ca265a9c9 | Author: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann(a)inria.fr> | Date: Fri Dec 20 10:41:38 2024 +0100 | | new inputs with large errors for [a]cospi, [a]sinpi, [a]tanpi, atan2pi | | These inputs were generated with the programs from | https://gitlab.inria.fr/zimmerma/math_accuracy, | with rounding to nearest: | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 28 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-acospi | FAIL: math/test-double-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-double-cospi | FAIL: math/test-double-sinpi | ... and 24 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1482. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2267/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2266/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e5ca265a9c9054c01c78…

8 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-4788-gd5cbf916be4: 14 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-4788-gd5cbf916be4 | Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich(a)suse.com> | Date: Mon Nov 18 11:35:57 2024 +0100 | | gas/ELF: also reject merge entity size being zero | | This won't have any useful effect, so is at best marginally less bogus | than a negative value. | | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 14 regressions: | Running ld:ld-elf/compress.exp ... | FAIL: Build zlibbegin.o with zlib compressed debug sections | FAIL: Build gnubegin.o with zlib-gnu compressed debug sections | FAIL: Build gabiend.o with zlib-gabi compressed debug sections | FAIL: Link -r with zlib compressed debug output | ... and 10 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1427. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/8… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=d5cbf916be4a0…

8 months, 2 weeks

5
12
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-564-ge79e5c4899e: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-564-ge79e5c4899e | Author: DJ Delorie <dj(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Nov 14 15:12:57 2024 -0500 | | assert: ensure posix compliance, add tests for such | | Fix assert.c so that even the fallback | case conforms to POSIX, although not exactly the same as | the default case so a test can tell the difference. | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:01:09 assert.c:120:14: error: ignoring return value of ‘writev’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result] | # 00:01:09 make[2]: *** [../o-iterator.mk:9: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/assert/assert.o] Error 1 | # 00:01:09 assert.c:120:14: error: ignoring return value of ‘writev’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result] | # 00:01:09 make[2]: *** [../o-iterator.mk:9: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/assert/assert.os] Error 1 | # 00:01:09 make[1]: *** [Makefile:484: assert/subdir_lib] Error 2 | # 00:01:09 make: *** [Makefile:21: all] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1473. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2254/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2252/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e79e5c4899e82eff1032…

8 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5150-g9f2e3c21f65: Failure on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5150-g9f2e3c21f65 | Author: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Dec 19 09:59:11 2024 +0000 | | Fix the handling or arguments and macro pseudo-variables inside nested assembler macros. | | PR 32391 Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # build_abe binutils: | -9 | # build_abe stage1: | -5 | # build_abe qemu: | -2 | # linux_n_obj: | 557 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # build_abe binutils: | -9 | # build_abe stage1: | -5 | # build_abe qemu: | -2 | # linux_n_obj: | 618 | # linux build successful: | all Used configuration : tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1470. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig-… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-mainline-allnoconfig-… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f2e3c21f6506…

8 months, 4 weeks

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] v6.13-rc2-20-gce8fd0500b741: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

Thanks for the report! On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 04:05:00AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-defconfig, after: > | commit v6.13-rc2-20-gce8fd0500b741 > | Author: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski(a)linaro.org> > | Date: Tue Dec 3 10:19:35 2024 +0100 > | > | crypto: qce - use __free() for a buffer that's always freed > | > | The buffer allocated in qce_ahash_hmac_setkey is always freed before > | returning to use __free() to automate it. > | > | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. I have sent a revert of that change: https://lore.kernel.org/20241218-crypto-qce-sha-fix-clang-cleanup-error-v1-… Cheers, Nathan

8 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15723-gb2c363e2616d: 7 regressions on aarch64

by Peter Klausler

Fixed by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120614. From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 at 21:27 To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>, itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>, t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>, Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15723-gb2c363e2616d: 7 regressions on aarch64 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-15723-gb2c363e2616d | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> | Date: Tue Dec 17 12:10:29 2024 -0800 | | [flang] Fix generic resolution with actual/dummy procedure incompatib… (#120105) | | …ility | | We generally allow any legal procedure pointer target as an actual | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 7 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0249 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0023.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0024.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0025.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0249/Fujitsu-Fortran-0249_0026.test | ... and 4 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro.at…<https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1486>. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Fujitsu testsuite : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/> Current build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Reference build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_…> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit-us.li…<https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s…> Full commit : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2c363e2616dc6ac6ee76c223d84ec5…>

8 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 4 patches in gcc: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 12:58, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | 4 patches in gcc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/103420 > | 3a8cf3dce8f [PATCH 4/4] aarch64: Add mf8 data movement intrinsics > | afa8fb3b8b4 [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Add missing makefile dependency > | 7120f3c23db [PATCH 2/4] aarch64: Use mf8 instead of f8 in builtin definitions > | 0cc75ba5a1a [PATCH 1/4] aarch64: Macroise simd_type definitions > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | b117201385d testsuite: Fix toplevel-asm-1.c failure for riscv > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > Hi Richard, Since the message is not very clear, your patches break the build. The log contains these errors: aarch64-sve2.md: In function ‘insn_code maybe_code_for_aarch64_cm(rtx_code, machine_mode, int, int)’: aarch64-sve2.md:7205:12: error: ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le_vec_concatz_be’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le’? (and many other similar entries) HTH Christophe > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/2917/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

8 months, 4 weeks

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-526-g66fa7ad437a: 2 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-526-g66fa7ad437a | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Fri Oct 18 16:04:30 2024 -0300 | | math: Use acosf from CORE-MATH | | The CORE-MATH implementation is correctly rounded (for any rounding mode) | and shows slight better performance to the generic acosf. | | ... 26 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 2 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-float-acos | FAIL: math/test-float32-acos Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1468. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2200/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2199/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=66fa7ad437affc64b3a8…

8 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-455-g3374de90386: 8 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-455-g3374de90386 | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Dec 12 20:57:44 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 atan2pi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the atan2pi functions (atan2(y,x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 8 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-atan2pi | FAIL: math/test-float-atan2pi | FAIL: math/test-float128-atan2pi | FAIL: math/test-float32-atan2pi | ... and 4 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1461. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2211/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2210/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=3374de90386f1814cec5…

9 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-450-gffe79c446ce: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-450-gffe79c446ce | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Dec 11 21:51:49 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 atanpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the atanpi functions (atan(x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-float-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-atanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-atanpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1460. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2176/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2175/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ffe79c446ced76d7c1a7…

9 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-444-gf962932206e: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-444-gf962932206e | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Tue Dec 10 20:42:20 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 asinpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the asinpi functions (asin(x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-asinpi | FAIL: math/test-float-asinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-asinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-asinpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1458. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2169/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2167/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f962932206eca2cfed0a…

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6063-g6c41a912f5e: 1 regressions on arm

by Jonathan Wakely

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 14:21, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-15-6063-g6c41a912f5e > | Author: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo(a)kdab.com> > | Date: Mon Dec 9 01:28:08 2024 +0100 > | > | libstdc++: deprecate is_trivial for C++26 (P3247R2) > | > | This actually implements P3247R2 by deprecating the is_trivial type > | trait. > | > | ... 17 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regressions: > | Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/trivial1.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1457. Please let us know if you have a fix. Fixed at r15-6080-g7aab1271b4afb6 > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3145/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3144/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c41a912f5e654a1b6f7cf8d6…

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6060-ge4a0157c2397: 3 regressions on arm

by Jonathan Wakely

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 08:48, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-15-6060-ge4a0157c2397 > | Author: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo(a)kdab.com> > | Date: Mon Dec 9 02:11:19 2024 +0100 > | > | libstdc++: port bitwise relocatable away from is_trivial > | > | In preparation for the deprecation of is_trivial (P3247R2). > | "bitwise relocation" (or "trivial relocation" à la P1144/P2786) > | doesn't need the full-fledged notion of triviality, just checking for a > | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 3 regressions: > | Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) > | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1456. Please let us know if you have a fix. Fixed at r15-6073-g4b9e1db1a14dbf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3141/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3140/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4a0157c2397c9b582cff71d1…

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-442-g28d102d15c: 8 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-442-g28d102d15c | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Mon Dec 9 23:01:29 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 acospi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the acospi functions (acos(x)/pi). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 8 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-acospi | FAIL: math/test-float-acospi | FAIL: math/test-float128-acospi | FAIL: math/test-float32-acospi | ... and 4 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1455. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2194/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2193/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=28d102d15c6af7f80cb1…

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-421-gf9e90e4b4ce: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-421-gf9e90e4b4ce | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Dec 5 21:42:10 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 tanpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the tanpi functions (tan(pi*x)). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-tanpi | FAIL: math/test-float-tanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-tanpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-tanpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1453. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2144/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2143/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f9e90e4b4ce71f88470c…

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-409-g776938e8b8d: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-409-g776938e8b8d | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Dec 4 20:04:04 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 sinpi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the sinpi functions (sin(pi*x)). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-sinpi | FAIL: math/test-float-sinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32-sinpi | FAIL: math/test-float32x-sinpi | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1450. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2137/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2135/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=776938e8b8dcf2b59998…

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Fwd: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 7 patches in gcc: 1 regressions on arm

by H.J. Lu

gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 is ----------- ! { dg-do compile } ! { dg-options "-Os" } program test use iso_c_binding, only: c_short interface subroutine foo(a) bind(c) import c_short integer(kind=c_short), intent(in), value :: a end subroutine foo end interface integer(kind=c_short) a(5); call foo (a(3)) end ! { dg-final { scan-assembler "movswl\t10\$%rsp\$, %edi" { target { { *-*-linu x* *-*-gnu* } && { ! ia32 } } } } } ! { dg-final { scan-assembler "movswl\t-14\$%ebp\$, %eax" { target { { *-*-lin ux* *-*-gnu* } && { ia32 } } } } } ---------- Why does it fail FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 -O scan-assembler movswl\t10\$%rsp\$, %edi on arm-linux-gnueabihf? H.J. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 7:26 PM Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 7 patches in gcc: 1 regressions on arm To: <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_check master-arm, after: | 7 patches in gcc | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/102351 | 97708c5e402 [PATCH v5 7/7] ssa-fre-4.c: Enable for all targets and adjust scan match | 9c6ba8e5347 [PATCH v5 6/7] scev-cast.c: Enable for all targets and adjust scan matches | d78236fd00e [PATCH v5 5/7] vect-simd-clone-1[6-8][cd].c: Expect in-branch clones for x86 | a9ef03a445d [PATCH v5 4/7] i386: Adjust apx-ndd.c for frontend promotion removal | 14ece135ff9 [PATCH v5 3/7] Use incoming small integer argument type if possible | ... and 2 more patches in gcc | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | fb64a7b0e1d RISC-V: Add assert for insn operand out of range access [PR117878][NFC] Produces 1 regressions: | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 -O scan-assembler movswl\t10\$%rsp\$, %edi Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifa… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3116/artifact/ar… Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files. -- H.J.

9 months, 1 week

2
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-408-g0ae0af68d8f: 8 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-408-g0ae0af68d8f | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Dec 4 10:20:44 2024 +0000 | | Implement C23 cospi | | C23 adds various <math.h> function families originally defined in TS | 18661-4. Add the cospi functions (cos(pi*x)). | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 8 regressions: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-cospi | FAIL: math/test-float-cospi | FAIL: math/test-float128-cospi | FAIL: math/test-float32-cospi | ... and 4 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1448. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2164/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2162/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=0ae0af68d8fa3bf6cbe1…

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] fujitsu_testsuite#a0e269d5d: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

Should have been reported as follows. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit fujitsu_testsuite#a0e269d5d | Author: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> | Date: Tue Nov 19 17:58:42 2024 +0900 | | Update RUN.md | | - Change the Flang command name | - Add a notice about `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` | - Explain about `NOEXE` Produces 2 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0106 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0106/Fujitsu-Fortran-0106_0033.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0106/Fujitsu-Fortran-0106_0034.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1451. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/95/a… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/90/a… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/fujits… Full commit : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/commit/a0e269d5d279c3a0781bb… On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 04:54, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] fujitsu_testsuite#471c71be0: 19 regressions141 improvements on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

Should have been reported as follows. Some regressions and some improvements after this commit in fujitsu testsuite. Regards, Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit fujitsu_testsuite#471c71be0 | Author: Ichinose, Katsumi <1nose(a)jp.fujitsu.com> | Date: Wed Nov 27 18:43:38 2024 +0900 | | Add test programs for the 2024-11 release Produces 19 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0068 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0068/Fujitsu-C-0068_0113.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0068/Fujitsu-C-0068_0115.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0072 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0072/Fujitsu-C-0072_0006.test | ... and 22 more 141 improvements : | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0070 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0070/Fujitsu-Fortran-0070_0185.test | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0070/Fujitsu-Fortran-0070_0184.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0080 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0080/Fujitsu-Fortran-0080_0008.test | ... and 179 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1449. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/fujits… Full commit : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/commit/471c71be0fe507ecb02b5… On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 17:08, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-13176-gb8703369daf7: 654.roms_s failed to build on aarch64 O3 -LTO

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Alexey, It seems your patch below causes build failure of 654.roms_s for "-O3 -flto" on aarch64-linux-gnu. Has this been reported already? Let me know if not, and I'll help with the reporting and reproduction. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Nov 26, 2024, at 12:32, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017fast/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-13176-gb8703369daf7 > | Author: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev(a)outlook.com> > | Date: Fri Nov 22 16:10:17 2024 -0500 > | > | [SLP] Match poison as instruction with the same opcode > | > | Patch allows to vector scalar instruction + poison values as if poisons > | are instructions with the same opcode. It allows better vectorization of > | the repeated values, reduces number of insertelement instructions and > | ... 54 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 654.roms_s failed to build: > | the following benchmarks now fails : > | - 654.roms_s failed to build > > Used configuration : > Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection. Naturally, the scripts will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don\'t have access to Linaro TCWG CI. > > Configuration: > - Benchmark: SPEC CPU2017 > - Toolchain: Clang + Glibc + LLVM Linker > - Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk > - Target: aarch64-linux-gnu > - Compiler flags: O3 -LTO > - Hardware: <unknown> > > This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and suggestions at linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org . In our improvement plans is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf report/annotate" data behind these reports. > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1448. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017fast--llvm-aarch64-mast… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017fast--llvm-aarch64-mast… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8703369daf777706196ff914c0376c…

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

LLVM-1446

by Peter Klausler

The results now produced by flang(-new) for Fujitsu Fortran test 0676_0160 are better than the desired results of the test. The test uses the SUM intrinsic function to compute the sum of 100 complex numbers. These values are all identical. The new results from the SUM intrinsic function match the value of 100 times this value exactly. The expected value used by the test does not, and perhaps it reflects the result of a compiler using a less accurate summation method than flang is now using.

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-13009-g3f594741cf8e: 1 regressions1 improvements on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

Should have been reported as below. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-13009-g3f594741cf8e | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> | Date: Thu Nov 21 10:47:21 2024 -0800 | | [flang] Fix implementation of Kahan summation (#116897) | | In the runtime's implementation of floating-point SUM, the | implementation of Kahan's algorithm for increased precision is | incorrect. The running correction factor should be subtracted from each | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions1 improvements: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0676 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0676/Fujitsu-Fortran-0676_0160.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0366 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0366/Fujitsu-Fortran-0366_0097.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1446. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f594741cf8e1537fb25f84ef3cf224…

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-19.1.1-16-g9f743a87e: 30 regressions on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

It should have been reported as below. This is after this commit in llvm-test-suite. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-19.1.1-16-g9f743a87e | Author: KAWASHIMA Takahiro <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> | Date: Fri Nov 22 10:41:14 2024 +0900 | | [cmake] Support more Fortran filename suffixes (#180) | | These Fortran suffixes are aligned with the `lookupTypeForExtension` | function in `clang/lib/Driver/Types.cpp`. Produces 30 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0647 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0001.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0002.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0004.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0647/Fujitsu-Fortran-0647_0006.test | ... and 27 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1447. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm_t… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-test-suite/commit/9f743a87e20346070725bd1f06cc… On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 at 11:20, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-13065-g1a08b155899e: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-13065-g1a08b155899e | Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek <Krzysztof.Parzyszek(a)amd.com> | Date: Thu Nov 21 17:51:01 2024 -0600 | | [flang][OpenMP] Avoid early returns, NFC (#117231) | | Frontend code is generally nested. | Follow-up to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116658. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | 1 Used configuration : tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1445. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2013/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/2012/artifac… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a08b155899ee3ed6a6c441799991a8…

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-12914-g5d38e6e42a90: 32 regressions on aarch64

by Laurent Alfonsi

This report should have been as below. We are checking what went wrong on our side. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-12914-g5d38e6e42a90 | Author: Ivan R. Ivanov <ivanov.i.aa(a)m.titech.ac.jp> | Date: Wed Nov 20 10:49:34 2024 +0900 | | [flang] Introduce hlfir.elemental lowerings to omp.workshare_loop_nest (#104748) | | This patch adds parallelization support for the following expression in OpenMP | workshare constructs: | | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 32 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0398 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0000.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0001.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0002.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0003.test | ... and 28 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1444. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d38e6e42a90f5d469b5ff9e25e5e88… On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 14:39, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-12823-g8c56dd3040f2: 544.nab_r failed to build on arm O3

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Sergei, It seems your patch below breaks build of several SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks on 32-bit ARM. Could you please investigate? Please let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing build failures. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Nov 21, 2024, at 20:22, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate/llvm-arm-master-O3, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-12823-g8c56dd3040f2 > | Author: Sergei Barannikov <barannikov88(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Wed Nov 20 16:07:05 2024 +0300 > | > | [ARM] Stop gluing FP comparisons to FMSTAT (#116676) > | > | Following #116547, this changes the result of `ARMISD::CMPFP*` and the > | operand of `ARMISD::FMSTAT` from a special `Glue` type to a normal type. > | > | ... 20 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 544.nab_r failed to build: > | the following benchmarks now fails : > | - 544.nab_r failed to build > | - 538.imagick_r failed to build > | - 526.blender_r failed to build > | - 525.x264_r failed to build > > Used configuration : > Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection. Naturally, the scripts will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don\'t have access to Linaro TCWG CI. > > Configuration: > - Benchmark: SPEC CPU2017 > - Toolchain: Clang + Glibc + LLVM Linker > - Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk > - Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf > - Compiler flags: O3 > - Hardware: <unknown> > > This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and suggestions at linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org . In our improvement plans is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf report/annotate" data behind these reports. > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1443. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate--llvm-arm-master-O… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-code_vect-cpu2017rate--llvm-arm-master-O… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c56dd3040f295874e3d5742b5dfc10…

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-12768-g40c8938ff844: 32 regressions on aarch64

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

This report should have been as per below. We'll investigate what went wrong. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-12768-g40c8938ff844 | Author: Ivan R. Ivanov <ivanov.i.aa(a)m.titech.ac.jp> | Date: Wed Nov 20 10:49:34 2024 +0900 | | [flang] Introduce hlfir.elemental lowerings to omp.workshare_loop_nest (#104748) | | This patch adds parallelization support for the following expression in OpenMP | workshare constructs: | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 32 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0398 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0000.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0001.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0002.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0398/Fujitsu-Fortran-0398_0003.test | ... and 28 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1441. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/40c8938ff8447fc46bd2aa1605e3147… -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Nov 21, 2024, at 03:10, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > [Error replacing 'FILE' - Error processing tokens]

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-5255-g7828dc070510: 33 regressions on arm

by Sam James

This is https://sourceware.org/PR32366.

9 months, 4 weeks

2
1
0 0

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4672-gdf4af89bc3e: Failure on arm

by Li, Pan2

Hi there, I can only locate the error message like "/tmp/cc4i9dn1.s:151930: Error: conditional branch out of range". But failed to reproduce this when cross build, is there anywhere to get the build option for reproducing? Thanks. Pan -----Original Message----- From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2024 9:58 AM To: Li, Pan2 <pan2.li(a)intel.com> Cc: gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4672-gdf4af89bc3e: Failure on arm Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1389 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In bootstrap_build master-arm-bootstrap_profiled after: | commit gcc-15-4672-gdf4af89bc3e | Author: Pan Li <pan2.li(a)intel.com> | Date: Thu Oct 24 21:57:04 2024 +0800 | | Match: Simplify branch form 3 of unsigned SAT_ADD into branchless | | There are sorts of forms for the unsigned SAT_ADD. Some of them are | complicated while others are cheap. This patch would like to simplify | the complicated form into the cheap ones. For example as below: | ... 65 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_abe bootstrap_profiled: # FAILED # First few build errors in logs: # 01:33:58 make[3]: *** [Makefile:1195: gimple-match-1.o] Error 1 # 01:33:58 make[2]: *** [Makefile:5220: all-stageprofile-gcc] Error 2 # 01:33:58 make[1]: *** [Makefile:26089: stageprofile-bubble] Error 2 # 01:33:58 make: *** [Makefile:26343: profiledbootstrap] Error 2 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_abe bootstrap_profiled: 1 The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_bootstrap_build master-arm-bootstrap_profiled configure and test flags: --target arm-linux-gnueabihf -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_build--master-arm-bootstrap_profil… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_build--master-arm-bootstrap_profil… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=df4af89bc3eabbeaccb16539a…

10 months

4
10
0 0

[WoA] ifunc/function multi versioning for WoA

by Daniel Kiss

Hello, Function multi versioning is a nice feature for developers to target certain architecture features easily. [1][2] This patch enables it for Windows too in Clang ( already supported on Linux, Android, Darwin ): https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111962 Please help with the review, and also happy to answer questions if you have. Thanks, Daniel [1] https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/blob/main/main/acle.md#function-multi-… [2] https://learn.arm.com/learning-paths/cross-platform/function-multiversionin… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

10 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #99988: Failure on aarch64

by Andi Kleen

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:57:21AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. All the logs seem to be truncated? What kind of failure is this? Is it a problem on the builder? Thanks, -Andi > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64 after: > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/99988 > | Author: Andi Kleen <ak(a)gcc.gnu.org> > | Date: Thu Oct 31 16:19:16 2024 -0700 > | > | [PATCH] Enable autofdo bootstrap for lto/fortran > | > | When autofdo bootstrap support was originally implemented there were > | issues with the LTO bootstrap, that is why it wasn't enabled > | for them. I retested this now and it works on x86_64-linux. > | ... 10 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | f8ae2cce23fc Support Intel AMX-MOVRS > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe gcc: > # FAILED > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe gcc: > 1 > > The configuration of this build is: > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/13759/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/2726/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

10 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-287-g5c22fd25c15: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1403 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In glibc_check master-aarch64 after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-287-g5c22fd25c15 | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Fri Oct 25 15:21:48 2024 -0300 | | math: Use exp2m1f from CORE-MATH | | The CORE-MATH implementation is correctly rounded (for any rounding mode) | and shows better performance compared to the generic exp2m1f. | | ... 41 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 2 regressions regressions.sum: | === glibc tests === | | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-float-exp2m1 | FAIL: math/test-float32-exp2m1 | The configuration of this build is: *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2032/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2032/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2032/artif… The configuration of this build is: *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2032/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2029/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5c22fd25c15ff56583ca…

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-286-g5fa89852fa1: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1401 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In glibc_check master-aarch64 after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-286-g5fa89852fa1 | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Fri Oct 25 15:21:47 2024 -0300 | | math: Use exp10m1f from CORE-MATH | | The CORE-MATH implementation is correctly rounded (for any rounding mode) | and shows better performance compared to the generic exp10m1f. | | ... 33 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 2 regressions regressions.sum: | === glibc tests === | | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-float-exp10m1 | FAIL: math/test-float32-exp10m1 | The configuration of this build is: *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2029/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2029/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2029/artif… The configuration of this build is: *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2029/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/2028/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5fa89852fa12fe56c315…

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] v9.1.0-1163-ga3c3345cac: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1398 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-aarch64 after: | commit v9.1.0-1163-ga3c3345cac | Author: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki(a)daynix.com> | Date: Tue Oct 29 12:54:43 2024 +0000 | | scripts/symlink-install-tree.py: Fix MESONINTROSPECT parsing | | The arguments in MESONINTROSPECT are quoted with shlex.quote() so it | must be parsed with shlex.split(). Otherwise the script will fail if | the build directory has a character like "~" in it. | ... 21 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_abe binutils: 1 # build_abe stage1 --: 2 # build_abe linux: 3 # build_abe glibc: 4 # build_abe stage2 --: 5 # build_abe gdb: 6 # build_abe qemu: # FAILED From # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_abe binutils: 1 # build_abe stage1 --: 2 # build_abe linux: 3 # build_abe glibc: 4 # build_abe stage2 --: 5 # build_abe gdb: 6 # build_abe qemu: 7 The configuration of this build is: *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/888/ar… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/887/ar… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/qemu/s… Full commit : https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/commit/a3c3345cac7d2f9cc827d7ecce91579…

10 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-10266-g71315698c91d: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 06:06:06AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-10266-g71315698c91d > | Author: serge-sans-paille <sguelton(a)mozilla.com> > | Date: Mon Oct 28 20:40:52 2024 +0000 > | > | [clang] Warn about memset/memcpy to NonTriviallyCopyable types (#111434) > | > | This implements a warning that's similar to what GCC does in that > | context: both memcpy and memset require their first and second operand > | to be trivially copyable, let's warn if that's not the case. Thanks for the report, this should be fixed in tip of tree now: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc56a86b96d77a93f761995d50f7b2f… Cheers, Nathan

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4685-g091e45b4e97d: FAIL: 1 regressions: 23 improvements on aarch64

by Sam James

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any > questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org > mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite > Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our > CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1388 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. Should be fixed with r15-4692-g40fedaf35fa99a9728d5b84d47035f4c92e1ba90. thanks, sam

10 months, 2 weeks

2
3
0 0

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #99582: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Ijaz, Abdul B

Hi Linaro Toolchain Team, I got this regression email for one of my patch but failure does not look like related to the change. Also this look like a false positive to me as test is failing in baseline also. From the logs regression is shown in | Running gdb:gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp ... | FAIL: gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp: check for stap probe in unwinder (timeout) You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3278/artifac… But the baseline file also has the same failure in sum file and somehow not shown in xfail file: The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3278/artifac… Thanks & Best Regards Abdul Basit -----Original Message----- From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2024 4:29 AM To: Ijaz, Abdul B <abdul.b.ijaz(a)intel.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #99582: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. In gdb_check master-arm after: | gdb patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/99582 | Author: Ijaz, Abdul B <abdul.b.ijaz(a)intel.com> | Date: Fri Oct 25 16:37:46 2024 +0200 | | [PATCH v8 1/1] fortran: Fix arrays of variable length strings for FORTRAN | | Before this change resolve_dynamic_array_or_string was called for | all TYPE_CODE_ARRAY and TYPE_CODE_STRING types, but, in the end, | this function always called create_array_type_with_stride, which | ... 65 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 3d17c881721 [gdb] Handle bad alloc in gdb_rl_callback_read_char_wrapper_noexcept FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: | === gdb tests === | | Running gdb:gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp ... | FAIL: gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp: check for stap probe in unwinder (timeout) | The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-arm configure and test flags: --target arm-linux-gnueabihf You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3278/artifac… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3278/artifac… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3278/artifac… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-arm configure and test flags: --target arm-linux-gnueabihf -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3278/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/1919/artifact/ar… Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files. Intel Deutschland GmbH Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau Registered Office: Munich Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928

10 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4709-gb281e13ecad1: FAIL: 2 regressions on arm

by Jonathan Wakely

Fixed at r15-4720-ge320846fec00aa On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 01:20, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1390 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-4709-gb281e13ecad1 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Oct 8 21:15:18 2024 +0100 > | > | libstdc++: Add P1206R7 from_range members to std::vector [PR111055] > | > | This is another piece of P1206R7, adding new members to std::vector and > | std::vector<bool>. > | > | ... 40 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 2 regressions > > regressions.sum: > | === libstdc++ tests === > | > | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > | FAIL: 23_containers/vector/cons/from_range.cc -std=gnu++23 (test for excess errors) > | FAIL: 23_containers/vector/cons/from_range.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) > | > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > configure and test flags: --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2927/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2927/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2927/artifact/ar… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > configure and test flags: --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2927/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2926/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=b281e13ecad12d07209924a72…

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4377-gf9bac2388401: Failure on aarch64

by Sam James

This is https://gcc.gnu.org/PR117177 which has a patch posted by Jakub already at https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ZxArjATvc%2FnI6YiO@tucnak/.

11 months

2
1
0 0

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-8878-g367c3c968eb8: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Jean Perier

Hi there! These are legitimate regressions: the code compiled to bogus BIND(C) ABI that only worked when using with Fortran to Fortran. A TODO is now correctly emitted until the proper ABI is implemented. In Fujitsu-Fortran-0379_0074 ``` function strfunc() bind(C) type,bind(C) :: str integer :: iii end type type(str) :: strfunc end function end interface type,bind(C) :: str integer :: iii end type ```` Previously, the result was passed in as a hidden extra argument, like it is done in normal Fortran ABI. On ARM, the equivalent C code is returned in registered as far as I can see: https://godbolt.org/z/nec6jbhYM 0384_0028.f90 also has BIND(C) function returning such BIND(C) types. So, both tests should not be run on ARM, or should expect a TODO error message until the feature is implemented on ARM. Jean -----Original Message----- From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 11:23 PM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org; Jean Perier <jperier(a)nvidia.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-8878-g367c3c968eb8: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1398 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-8878-g367c3c968eb8 | Author: jeanPerier <jperier(a)nvidia.com> | Date: Mon Oct 14 09:35:29 2024 +0200 | | [flang] correctly deal with bind(c) derived type result ABI (#111969) | | Derived type results of BIND(C) function should be returned according | the the C ABI for returning the related C struct type. | | ... 15 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 2 regressions The configuration of this build is: * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" regressions.sum: | === test-suite tests === | | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0379 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0379/Fujitsu-Fortran-0379_0074.test | | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0384 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0384/Fujitsu-Fortran-0384_0028.test | | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/367c3c968eb8f29b55fb8019b2464c7…

11 months

3
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] v9.1.0-759-g07f0d32641e: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1377 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-aarch64 after: | commit v9.1.0-759-g07f0d32641e | Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Oct 3 16:28:43 2024 +0300 | | Require meson version 1.5.0 | | This is needed for Rust support. | | Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_cross_build master-aarch64 configure and test flags: --target aarch64-linux-gnu Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_abe binutils: 1 # build_abe stage1 --: 2 # build_abe linux: 3 # build_abe glibc: 4 # build_abe stage2 --: 5 # build_abe gdb: 6 # build_abe qemu: # FAILED From # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_abe binutils: 1 # build_abe stage1 --: 2 # build_abe linux: 3 # build_abe glibc: 4 # build_abe stage2 --: 5 # build_abe gdb: 6 # build_abe qemu: 7 -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/854/ar… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_build--master-aarch64-build/853/ar… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/qemu/s… Full commit : https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/commit/07f0d32641e04703e6ed9626d061790…

11 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-8119-gd2408c417cfa: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

Thanks for the report, I have opened https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/111903 for this. On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 07:40:22AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1390 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-8119-gd2408c417cfa > | Author: David Green <david.green(a)arm.com> > | Date: Sun Oct 6 10:44:21 2024 +0100 > | > | [InstCombine] Canonicalize more geps with constant gep bases and constant offsets. (#110033) > | > | This is another small but hopefully not performance negative step to > | canonicalizing towards i8 geps. We looks for geps with a constant offset > | base pointer of the form `gep (gep @glob, C1), x, C2` and expand the gep > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe binutils: > -9 > # build_kernel_llvm: > -5 > # build_abe qemu: > -2 > # linux_n_obj: > 24511 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe binutils: > -9 > # build_kernel_llvm: > -5 > # build_abe qemu: > -2 > # linux_n_obj: > 33835 > # linux build successful: > all > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d2408c417cfa71f1786c90978856037…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-232-gd40ac01cbbc: FAIL: 5 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1372 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-aarch64 after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-232-gd40ac01cbbc | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Thu Oct 3 15:41:10 2024 -0300 | | stdlib: Make abort/_Exit AS-safe (BZ 26275) | | The recursive lock used on abort does not synchronize with a new process | creation (either by fork-like interfaces or posix_spawn ones), nor it | is reinitialized after fork(). | ... 60 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 5 regressions The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb master-aarch64 configure and test flags: --target aarch64-linux-gnu regressions.sum: | === gdb tests === | | Running gdb:gdb.reverse/waitpid-reverse.exp ... | ERROR: GDB process no longer exists | UNRESOLVED: gdb.reverse/waitpid-reverse.exp: check waitpid record | UNRESOLVED: gdb.reverse/waitpid-reverse.exp: continue to breakpoint: marker2 | UNRESOLVED: gdb.reverse/waitpid-reverse.exp: reverse to marker1 | UNRESOLVED: gdb.reverse/waitpid-reverse.exp: set breakpoint at marker1 | You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=d40ac01cbbc66e6d9dbd…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-4016-gc534e37facc: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Jonathan Wakely

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 06:33, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1370 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. I'm not sure what the problem is here. It looks like the build uses --enable-clocale=gnu and so I would expect the test to PASS on this target, like it does on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Maybe it's a newlib vs glibc difference. Looking into it ... > > In arm-eabi v7-a softfp after: > > | commit gcc-15-4016-gc534e37facc > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Sep 24 23:20:56 2024 +0100 > | > | libstdc++: Populate std::time_get::get's %c format for C locale > | > | We were using the empty string "" for D_T_FMT and ERA_D_T_FMT in the C > | locale, instead of "%a %b %e %T %Y" as the C standard requires. Set it > | correctly for each locale implementation that defines time_members.cc. > | ... 18 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -marm -march=armv7-a -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -mfloat-abi=softfp > configure and test flags: --target arm-eabi --disable-multilib --with-mode=arm --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=softfp --target_board=-marm/-march=armv7-a/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16/-mfloat-abi=softfp qemu_cpu=cortex-a9 > > regressions.sum: > | === libstdc++ tests === > | > | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > | FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get/wchar_t/5.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test > | > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-arm_v7a_softfp_e… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-arm_v7a_softfp_e… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-arm_v7a_softfp_e… > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-arm_v7a_softfp_e… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-arm_v7a_softfp_e… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c534e37faccf481afa9bc28f0605ca0ec3…

11 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-226-g42c810c2cf3: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1365 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In glibc_check master-arm after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-226-g42c810c2cf3 | Author: Joseph Myers <josmyers(a)redhat.com> | Date: Mon Oct 7 19:44:25 2024 +0000 | | Add freopen special-case tests: thread cancellation | | Add tests of freopen adding or removing "c" (non-cancelling I/O) from | the mode string (so completing my planned tests of freopen with | different features used in the mode strings). Note that it's in the | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_glibc_check master-arm configure and test flags: --target arm-linux-gnueabihf regressions.sum: | === glibc tests === | | Running glibc:. ... | FAIL: lint-makefiles | You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1896/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1896/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1896/artifact/… -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1896/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1894/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=42c810c2cf3554afbdd6…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-8106-ge36a39346796: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1379 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-8106-ge36a39346796 | Author: Matthias Springer <me(a)m-sp.org> | Date: Sat Oct 5 21:46:31 2024 +0200 | | [mlir][SPIRV] Fix build error (#111264) | | Fix build error that was introduced by #111250. Also, the deleted | function is not needed at all. | | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : # FAILED From # reset_artifacts: -10 # true: 0 # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : 1 -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/1063/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/1062/artifac… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e36a39346796528f75ff01ef1084b2d…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] v6.11-rc4-291-g16531118ba63: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 07:05:02AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: ... > | commit v6.11-rc4-291-g16531118ba63 > | Author: Denis Benato <benato.denis96(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Sat Aug 24 16:11:22 2024 +0200 > | > | iio: bmi323: peripheral in lowest power state on suspend > | > | The bmi323 is mounted on some devices that are powered > | by an internal battery: help in reducing system overall power drain > | while the system is in s2idle or the imu driver is not loaded > | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. This should be fixed with https://git.kernel.org/jic23/iio/c/506a1ac4c4464a61e4336e135841067dbc040aaa which is on its way for an -rc release. Cheers, Nathan

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-7781-g0f973ac783aa: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Peter Klausler

The error message for that test is correct. From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 06:51 To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>, itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>, t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>, Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-7781-g0f973ac783aa: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64 External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinaro.at…<https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1374> , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-7781-g0f973ac783aa | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> | Date: Wed Oct 2 08:54:49 2024 -0700 | | [flang] Tag warnings with LanguageFeature or UsageWarning (#110304) | | (This is a big patch, but it's nearly an NFC. No test results have | changed and all Fortran tests in the LLVM test suites work as expected.) | | ... 24 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions The configuration of this build is: * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" regressions.sum: | === test-suite tests === | | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0384 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0384/Fujitsu-Fortran-0384_0053.test | | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build…> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build…> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build…> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build…> Reference build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.linaro…<https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build…> Fujitsu testsuite : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit-us.li…<https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s…> Full commit : https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co…<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0f973ac783aa100cfbce1cd2c6e8a3a…>

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-4424-g7ecf0250f7f: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1359 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In binutils_check master-arm after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-4424-g7ecf0250f7f | Author: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> | Date: Mon Sep 30 14:41:11 2024 +0100 | | Improve the placement of orphan note sections. | | PR 32219 FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: | === ld tests === | | Running ld:ld-elf/shared.exp ... | FAIL: Run with libfunc1.so comm1.o | | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/1679/artifa… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/1679/artifa… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/1679/artifa… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_binutils_check master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/1679/artifa… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/1678/artifa… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=7ecf0250f7f08…

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3575-gc07cf418fdde: FAIL: 2 regressions on master-thumb_m0_eabi

by Jonathan Wakely

On Mon, 30 Sept 2024 at 07:22, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1358 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m0 soft after: > > | commit gcc-15-3575-gc07cf418fdde > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Sep 10 14:25:41 2024 +0100 > | > | libstdc++: std::string move assignment should not use POCCA trait [PR116641] > | > | The changes to implement LWG 2579 (r10-327-gdb33efde17932f) made > | std::string::assign use the propagate_on_container_copy_assignment > | (POCCA) trait, for consistency with operator=(const basic_string&). > | ... 18 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 2 regressions > > regressions.sum: > | === libstdc++ tests === > | > | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > | FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/allocator/116641.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > | UNRESOLVED: 21_strings/basic_string/allocator/116641.cc -std=gnu++17 compilation failed to produce executable > | > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_eabi-bu… === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes 6036 # of unexpected failures 4689 <<< !!! Is that normal for this configuration?! The new testcase fails for the same reason as the 4000 other tests: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/bin/ld: (__deregister_frame_info): Unknown destination type (ARM/Thumb) in /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/./gcc/crtbegin.o crtstuff.c:(.text+0x5e): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation So I don't think this is a problem in the commit, I think it's just a configuration that isn't well supported. > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_eabi-bu… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_eabi-bu… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv6s-m -mtune=cortex-m0 -mfloat-abi=soft -mfpu=auto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_eabi-bu… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_eabi-bu… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c07cf418fdde0c192e370a8d76a991cc72…

11 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #97864: FAIL: 3 regressions on arm

by Jason Merrill

On 9/23/24 2:08 AM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/97864 > | Author: Jason Merrill <jason(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Mon Sep 23 11:06:11 2024 -0400 > | > | libstdc++: #ifdef out #pragma GCC system_header > | > | Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > | > | -- 8< -- > | > | In r15-3714-gd3a7302ec5985a I added -Wsystem-headers to the libstdc++ build > | ... 379 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 4700ad1c78c c++: diagnose this specifier in requires expr [PR116798] > > FAIL: 3 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === libstdc++ tests === > > Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/parallel_mode.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2014/parallel_mode.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2017/parallel_mode.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/9301/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/9301/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/9301/artifac… Thanks, I believe https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/663711.html should fix this.

11 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 29 patches in glibc: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Florian Weimer

* ci notify: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In glibc_check master-arm after: > > | 29 patches in glibc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/98131 > | 59fbaae3a6e Optimize various ways to obtain the page size using <bits/pagesize.h> > | 564bcbe0067 posix: Use <support/next_to_fault.h> in tst-fnmatch3 > | 27a360de01d malloc: Use volatile as compiler barrier in tst-memalign, tst-valloc > | e24dfc8d9a8 Linux: Optimize getpagesize using <sys/pagesize.h> > | 3283915ffd0 Install the <sys/pagesize.h> header file > | ... and 24 more patches in glibc > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 6948ee4edf0 stdio-common: Fix memory leak in tst-freopen4* tests on UNSUPPORTED > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > | === glibc tests === > | > | Running glibc:elf ... > | XPASS: elf/tst-load-alignment Does this mean that the 32-bit arm tester uses a non-default toolchain that increases page alignment to 64 KiB? With my cross-tester, elf/tst-load-alignment fails as expected because the binaries can only be loaded on 4 KiB page systems, based on the program header layout. Thanks, Florian

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Buildbot failure - clang-arm64-windows-msvc

by Julian Schmidt

Hello, a commit of mine seems to have broken your bot, but I am not sure how, because it is a timeout: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/161/builds/2385. The commit is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e42cc3f42e6a36f4dfff40827819404… and touches Clang's unit tests. The build just before mine includes the previous commit of my own change, and it was green, which points at that commit being the culprit here. The commit brings in a custom command that generates ASTMatchersDocTests.cpp in the build directory for inclusion in the ASTMatchersTests unittest target/binary, but that target gets never built, and the file never generated, according to the logs. I therefore think that my changes to clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTest.h should be the most likely to have cause this. Do you have any experience with timeouts, or do you have/can acquire additional information about what has timed out? I have left the commit in-tree as clang-arm64-windows-msvc is the only bot I broke, and it is not clear why. On the other hand, clang-x64-windows-msvc and the other Windows bots are just fine, the same goes for other ARM but non-windows bots as well. Kind regards, Julian Schmidt

11 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-213-gb300078d97a: FAIL: 4 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1357 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-aarch64 after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-213-gb300078d97a | Author: Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> | Date: Sat Sep 28 09:44:25 2024 +0200 | | Linux: Block signals around _Fork (bug 32215) | | This hides the inconsistent TCB state (missing robust mutex list) from | signal handlers. | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 4 regressions regressions.sum: | === gdb tests === | | Running gdb:gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp ... | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: find syscall insn in fork (timeout) | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=off: syscall number matches | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=on: find syscall insn in fork (timeout) | FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: fork: displaced=on: syscall number matches | | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb master-aarch64 -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=b300078d97a6892cb2fa…

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3899-g819098dc71f2: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements on aarch64

by Sam James

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any > questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org > mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite > Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our > CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1356 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-3899-g819098dc71f2 > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Thu Sep 26 15:43:33 2024 +0100 > | > | testsuite: XFAIL gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 properly > | > | The test was disabled/XFAIL'd informally in r0-100012-gcdc6637d7c78ec, > | but r15-3890-g34bf6aa41ba539 didn't realize this, causing a FAIL. > | > | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements > Thanks, this is PR116858 and I'll handle it today or tomorrow at the latest. > regressions.sum: > | === gfortran tests === > | > | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O xfail *-*-* (test for errors, line 11) > | > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > improvements.sum: > | === gfortran tests === > | > | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 -O (test for errors, line 11) > | > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifac… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2668/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2667/artifac… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/819098dc71f2079aedc15a904ab5f17f07…

11 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3607-g9a94c8ffdc8b: FAIL: 23 regressions: 22 improvements on master-thumb_m23_soft_eabi

by Richard Earnshaw (lists)

On 21/09/2024 08:49, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1349 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m23 soft after: > > | commit gcc-15-3607-g9a94c8ffdc8b > | Author: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha(a)arm.com> > | Date: Thu Sep 12 14:24:55 2024 +0100 > | > | arm: testsuite: make use of -mcpu=unset/-march=unset > | > | This patch makes use of the new ability to unset the CPU or > | architecture flags on the command line to enable several more tests on > | Arm. It doesn't cover every case and it does enable some tests that > | now fail for different reasons when the tests are no-longer skipped; > | these were failing anyway for other testsuite configurations, so it's > | ... 22 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 23 regressions: 22 improvements > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/scd42-2.c scan-assembler mov[ \t].*272 > > Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsls\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O3 -g scan-assembler lsls\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O3 -g scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > ... and 19 more entries > > improvements.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O3 -g scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O3 -g scan-assembler lsls\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsls\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-6.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-6.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsls\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-6.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O3 -g scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 > ... and 16 more entries I can't make any sense of this at all. After hours wasted trying to find the configuration information from the logs (it's there, but to the inexperienced user of your reports, it is buried far too deep), I'm still none-the-wiser. All I can see is that things like FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 have changed to FAIL: gcc.target/arm/cmse/mainline/8_1m/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O2 scan-assembler lsrs\t(r[3-9]|r10|fp|ip), \\1, #1.*blxns\t\\1 (ie that -mcpu=unset has been added to the test name). That's not a regression, it's a simple FAIL->FAIL R. > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv8-m.base -mtune=cortex-m23 -mfloat-abi=soft -mfpu=auto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/9a94c8ffdc8b554a2d95e0101e96830efe… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc > ** master-thumb_m23_soft_eabi > *** FAIL: 23 regressions: 22 improvements > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m23_soft_e…

11 months, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #97787: Failure on aarch64

by David Malcolm

On Sat, 2024-09-21 at 04:30 +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any > questions, please follow up on > linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg > channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the > usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs > or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from > our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64 after: > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/97787 > | Author: David Malcolm <dmalcolm(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Sep 20 19:05:46 2024 -0400 > | > | diagnostics: convert text hooks to use > diagnostic_text_output_format [PR116613] > | > | The diagnostic_starter and diagnostic_finalizer callbacks and > most of > | their support subroutines are only used by the "text" output > format. > | > | Emphasize this and reduce the binding with diagnostic_context > | by renaming the callbacks to add "_text" in their names, and > converting > | ... 264 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 2484ba167e1c libstdc++: fix C header include guards > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe gcc: > # FAILED > # First few build errors in logs: > # 00:06:02 /home/tcwg- > build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/diagnosti > c-format-sarif.cc:3130:8: error: ‘void > sarif_output_format::after_diagnostic(const diagnostic_info&)’ cannot > be overloaded with ‘void sarif_output_format::after_diagnostic(const > diagnostic_info&)’ > # 00:06:03 make[2]: *** [Makefile:1195: diagnostic-format-sarif.o] > Error 1 > # 00:06:03 make[1]: *** [Makefile:4701: all-gcc] Error 2 > # 00:06:03 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2 This works for me, and I've been staring at the code and can't see the issue. Any ideas what the problem is? What stage 0 compiler are you using? Thanks Dave

11 months, 3 weeks

2
4
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #97698: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements on arm

by Guinevere Larsen

I think some issue has happened in the CI. Both this and 2 patches I've sent to the mailing list (one that changes no code, only the SECURITY.txt file) say that I've introduced regressions, yet the relevant test only has "no file ID for <hex number>". Can you double check what's going on? -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen She/Her/Hers On 9/23/24 5:18 AM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gdb_check master-arm after: > > | gdb patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/97698 > | Author: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Thu Sep 19 09:42:04 2024 -0300 > | > | gdb/testsuite: rework bp-cond-failure to not depend on inlining > | > | The test gdb.base/bp-cond-failure is implicitly expecting that the > | function foo will be inlined twice and gdb will be able to find 2 > | locations to place a breakpoint. When clang is used, gdb only finds > | one location which causes the test to fail. Since the test is not > | worried about handling breakpoints on inlined functions, but rather on > | ... 11 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | d3acf3d759d Rename tui_suppress_output > > FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 improvements > > regressions.sum: > === gdb tests === > > Running gdb:gdb.base/return.exp ... > ERROR: no fileid for 5a8f76db3a07 > > > improvements.sum: > === gdb tests === > > Running gdb:gdb.base/return.exp ... > ERROR: no fileid for a55c644d3a50 > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3013/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3013/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3013/artifac… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/3013/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/1786/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

11 months, 3 weeks

2
3
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-6434-ga861ed411a35: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 09:39:09AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1362 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-6434-ga861ed411a35 > | Author: Florian Hahn <flo(a)fhahn.com> > | Date: Fri Sep 20 11:22:03 2024 +0100 > | > | [VPlan] Add initial loop-invariant code motion transform. (#107894) > | > | Add initial transform to move out loop-invariant recipes. > | > | This also helps to fix a divergence between legacy and VPlan-based cost > | model due to legacy using ScalarEvolution::isLoopInvariant in some > | cases. > | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. Thanks for the report. I suspect this should be fixed by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bd8fe9972e3f17776e4e05e69e13ab8…, based on the fact that there is a similar report on the pull request upstream. Cheers, Nathan

11 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3608-gc5009eb88791: FAIL: 4 regressions on arm

by Jason Merrill

On 9/12/24 9:13 PM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1342 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-3608-gc5009eb88791 > | Author: Jason Merrill <jason(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Aug 27 13:15:16 2024 -0400 > | > | libcpp: adjust pedwarn handling > | > | Using cpp_pedwarning (CPP_W_PEDANTIC instead of if (CPP_PEDANTIC cpp_error > | lets users suppress these diagnostics with > | #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpedantic". > | > | This patch changes all instances of the cpp_error (CPP_DL_PEDWARN to > | ... 44 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 4 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) > ... and 1 more entries > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/ar… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2696/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c5009eb887910271ea35a857aa68941c72… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** FAIL: 4 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/ar… Curious, does this resolve the problems?

11 months, 4 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3617-g4308c343b8e: FAIL: 4 regressions: 4 improvements on arm

by Alexandre Oliva

On Sep 17, 2024, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > regressions.sum: > FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-8.c -std=c++<XX> expected multiline pattern lines 20-35 > improvements.sum: > FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-8.c -std=c++<XX> expected multiline pattern lines 19-34 It's the same set of FAILs, but the line ranges got offset by 1 in the patch, and this seems to have confused your regression tester. Please mark this as all clear. Thanks for the report, -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive

11 months, 4 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3572-g2801a49d114: FAIL: 6 regressions on master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, On Fri, 20 Sept 2024 at 15:24, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1347 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m55 hard after: > > | commit gcc-15-3572-g2801a49d114 > | Author: Marek Polacek <polacek(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Thu Aug 29 15:13:03 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: mutable temps in rodata [PR116369] > | > | Here we wrongly mark the reference temporary for g TREE_READONLY, > | so it's put in .rodata and so we can't modify its subobject even > | when the subobject is marked mutable. This is so since r9-869. > | r14-1785 fixed a similar problem, but not in set_up_extended_ref_temp. > | > | ... 10 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 6 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt7.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt7.C -std=c++11 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt7.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt7.C -std=c++17 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt7.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt7.C -std=c++26 compilation failed to produce executable > The new tests introduced by this patch fail to link due a linker bug which has now been fixed. You can ignore this notification. Thanks, Christophe > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_e… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_e… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_e… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+fp.dp -mtune=cortex-m55 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=auto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_e… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_e… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/2801a49d1144bce5568b527d1972952ad3… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc > ** master-thumb_m55_hard_eabi > *** FAIL: 6 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m55_hard_e…

11 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

Lots of failing tests on arm-unknown-eabi

by Mark Wielaard

Hi, ci_notify(a)linaro.org is sending test results to gcc-restresults(a)gcc.gnu.org but recently starting to fail so many tests that they don't get accepted anymore: From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org on Tue Sep 10 02:17:32 2024 Subject: Results for 15.0.0 20240906 (experimental) [master revision gcc-15-3512-ge8378231bb8] (GCC) testsuite on arm-unknown-eabi Cause: Message body is too big: 6548864 bytes with a limit of 1000 KB From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org on Tue Sep 10 05:28:38 2024 Subject: Results for 15.0.0 20240906 (experimental) [master revision gcc-15-3512-ge8378231bb88] (GCC) testsuite on arm-unknown-eabi Cause: Message body is too big: 6559111 bytes with a limit of 1000 KB From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org on Tue Sep 10 10:55:10 2024 Subject: Results for 15.0.0 20240906 (experimental) [master revision gcc-15-3512-ge8378231bb88] (GCC) testsuite on arm-unknown-eabi Cause: Message body is too big: 6548861 bytes with a limit of 1000 KB So that is 6.5MB of results. Almost all look like: FAIL: 17_intro/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) UNRESOLVED: 17_intro/freestanding.cc -std=gnu++17 compilation failed to produce executable Could someone take a look? It seems that the compiler is just crashing on every test. Thanks, Mark

11 months, 4 weeks

4
8
0 0

LLVM community bot issues

by Aaron Ballman

Hello! It seems one of the Linaro bots has been down for the last few weeks: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/124 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/workers/88 Can you investigate what's going on? Thank you! ~Aaron

12 months

2
2
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3614-g9fe57e4879de: FAIL: 12 regressions on aarch64

by Jonathan Wakely

On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 07:09, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1344 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. This should be fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662945.html > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-3614-g9fe57e4879de > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Wed Sep 11 11:47:44 2024 +0100 > | > | c++: Make __builtin_launder reject invalid types [PR116673] > | > | The standard says that std::launder is ill-formed for function pointers > | and cv void pointers, so there's no reason for __builtin_launder to > | accept them. This change allows implementations of std::launder to defer > | to the built-in for error checking, although libstdc++ will continue to > | diagnose it directly for more user-friendly diagnostics. > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 12 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sve-sizeless-1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for errors, line 304) > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sve-sizeless-1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sve-sizeless-1.C -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 304) > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sve-sizeless-1.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sve-sizeless-1.C -std=gnu++98 (test for errors, line 304) > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sve-sizeless-1.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sve-sizeless-2.C -std=gnu++11 (test for errors, line 304) > ... and 6 more entries > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2595/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2595/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2595/artifac… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2595/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2594/artifac… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/9fe57e4879de93b6e3c7b4c226f42d5f3a… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 12 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2595/artifac…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3532-g7cebc6384a0a: FAIL: 6 regressions: 6 improvements on master-thumb_m7_eabi

by Christophe Lyon

Hi Jason, On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 00:15, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1339 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m7 hard after: > > | commit gcc-15-3532-g7cebc6384a0a > | Author: Jason Merrill <jason(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Sep 6 15:28:53 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: exception spec and stdlib specialization > | > | We were silently accepting the pr65923.C specialization of std::swap with > | the wrong exception specification; it should be declared noexcept. Let's > | limit ignoring mismatch with system headers to extern "C" functions so we > | get a diagnostic for the C++ library. > | > | ... 18 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 6 regressions: 6 improvements > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=gnu++17 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=gnu++20 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=gnu++20 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=gnu++26 compilation failed to produce executable > > > improvements.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=c++20 compilation failed to produce executable > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=c++26 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=c++17 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new3.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) This is not a regression, these tests used to fail with -std=c++XX and now they still fail with -std=gnuXX. I guess this is the effect of adding 'dg-options ""' ? And... the reason they fail to produce an executable is a recent patch of mine in the linker, which should now be fixed. Thanks, Christophe > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m7_eabi-bu… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m7_eabi-bu… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m7_eabi-bu… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv7e-m+fp.dp -mtune=cortex-m7 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=auto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m7_eabi-bu… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m7_eabi-bu… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/7cebc6384a0ad63d444029472a8ed1afe9… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc > ** master-thumb_m7_eabi > *** FAIL: 6 regressions: 6 improvements > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m7_eabi-bu…

1 year

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-4274-ga77ccc81295: FAIL: 1 regressions on master-thumb_m33_eabi

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1341 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-4274-ga77ccc81295 | Author: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon(a)linaro.org> | Date: Fri Sep 6 17:10:02 2024 +0000 | | arm: Handle undefweak with ST_BRANCH_UNKNOWN | | A previous patch made ld fail early on Thumb-only where branch_type is | ST_BRANCH_UNKNOWN. | | However, this fails erroneously when the target is undefweak: in that | case the branch should be replaced by a branch to the next instruction | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === binutils tests === Running binutils:binutils-all/objcopy.exp ... FAIL: simple objcopy of executable You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils--master-thumb_m33_e… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils--master-thumb_m33_e… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils--master-thumb_m33_e… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv8-m.main+dsp+fp -mtune=cortex-m33 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=auto -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils--master-thumb_m33_e… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils--master-thumb_m33_e… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=a77ccc81295f4… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils ** master-thumb_m33_eabi *** FAIL: 1 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_binutils--master-thumb_m33_e…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3513-g964577c31df2: FAIL: 12 regressions on master-thumb_m3_softfp_eabi

by Christophe Lyon

Hi Jakub, On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 05:17, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1338 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m3 softfp after: > > | commit gcc-15-3513-g964577c31df2 > | Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Sep 6 13:50:47 2024 +0200 > | > | c++: Partially implement CWG 2867 - Order of initialization for structured bindings [PR115769] > | > | The following patch partially implements CWG 2867 > | - Order of initialization for structured bindings. > | The DR requires that initialization of e is sequenced before r_i and > | that r_i initialization is sequenced before r_j for j > i, we already do it > | that way, the former ordering is a necessity so that the get calls are > | ... 78 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 12 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: g++.dg/DRs/dr2867-1.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/DRs/dr2867-1.C -std=gnu++11 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/DRs/dr2867-1.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/DRs/dr2867-1.C -std=gnu++14 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/DRs/dr2867-1.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/DRs/dr2867-1.C -std=gnu++17 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: g++.dg/DRs/dr2867-2.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) > ... and 6 more entries These errors in the new tests added by your patch are caused by a recent patch of mine in binutils, for which I have sent a fix proposal: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-September/136677.html Thanks, Christophe > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv7-m -mtune=cortex-m3 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=auto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/964577c31df206d780d5cc7bc07189d44d… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc > ** master-thumb_m3_softfp_eabi > *** FAIL: 12 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] v6.10-12615-g08c2182cf0b47: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 12:37:30PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1343 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-allmodconfig after: > > | commit v6.10-12615-g08c2182cf0b47 > | Author: Florian Westphal <fw(a)strlen.de> > | Date: Tue Aug 27 15:37:32 2024 +0200 > | > | xfrm: policy: use recently added helper in more places > | > | No logical change intended. > | > | Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw(a)strlen.de> > | Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert(a)secunet.com> Thanks for the report, I'll ping my fix for this now: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240829-xfrm-restore-dir-assign-xfrm_hash_rebu… Cheers, Nathan

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb-15-branchpoint-893-gdcaa85e58c4: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Andrew Burgess

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1334 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gdb-15-branchpoint-893-gdcaa85e58c4 > | Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Wed May 1 10:47:47 2024 +0100 > | > | gdb: reject inserting breakpoints between functions > | > | When debugging ROCm code, you might have something like this: > | > | __global__ void kernel () > | { > | ... > | ... 153 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gdb tests === > > Running gdb:gdb.go/max-depth.exp ... > FAIL: gdb.go/max-depth.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at 38 There's something a little weird going on here, in the log I see: (gdb) run Starting program: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/gdb-gdb.git~master/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.go/max-depth/max-depth /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/gdb-gdb.git~master/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.go/max-depth/max-depth: error while loading shared libraries: libgo.so.23: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [Inferior 1 (process 908724) exited with code 0177] (gdb) FAIL: gdb.go/max-depth.exp: runto: run to main.main break 38 No compiled code for line 38 in the current file. Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n (gdb) FAIL: gdb.go/max-depth.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at 38 So it looks like the libgo.so.23 is missing from the test machine which stop the inferior from running. That said, I'd still expect GDB to place a b/p on line 38, and indeed, when run on my local machine the b/p is placed correctly. But also, I have the correct libraries in place so the inferior starts correctly... Is it possible to see the gdb.log for the working world before this patch was applied? It would be nice to confirm that despite failing to start the inferior, GDB did manage to place the b/p correctly before this patch. > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… I did wonder if the log file I wanted was one of these, but without better descriptions it's hard to know what all these log files actually are. Thanks, Andrew > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gdb/sh… > > Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=dcaa85e58c4ef… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 1 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gdb/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3526-g113a6da9bf91: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Thomas König

I cannot reproduce the failure. Please open a PR according to the GCC bug submission guidelines.

1 year

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-4187-g31ed3a9d691: FAIL: 72074 regressions: 94 improvements on master-thumb_m33_hard_eabi

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1329 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-4187-g31ed3a9d691 | Author: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon(a)linaro.org> | Date: Wed Jun 19 12:35:30 2024 +0000 | | arm: Do not insert stubs needing Arm code on Thumb-only cores. | | We recently fixed a bug in libgcc | (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115360) | where a symbol was missing a %function .type decoration. | | This meant the linker would silently pick the wrong type of 'farcall | ... 48 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 72074 regressions: 94 improvements regressions.sum: === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ... FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/pr98580-a.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/pr98580-a.c -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/pr98580-a.c -std=c++98 (test for excess errors) Running g++:g++.dg/compat/compat.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link FAIL: g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield2 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link ... and 72156 more entries improvements.sum: === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-3.C -std=c++98 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-3.C -std=c++17 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-3.C -std=c++26 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-4.C -std=gnu++98 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-4.C -std=gnu++26 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-4.C -std=gnu++17 execution test === gcc tests === ... and 104 more entries You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m33_hard_e… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m33_hard_e… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m33_hard_e… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv8-m.main+dsp+fp -mtune=cortex-m33 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=auto -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m33_hard_e… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m33_hard_e… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=31ed3a9d69149… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc ** master-thumb_m33_hard_eabi *** FAIL: 72074 regressions: 94 improvements *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m33_hard_e…

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] v6.11-rc1-143-g4e7795eda4459: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:36:41PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1339 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-next-allyesconfig after: > > | commit v6.11-rc1-143-g4e7795eda4459 > | Author: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> > | Date: Sun Sep 1 18:08:25 2024 -0400 > | > | bcachefs: bch2_sb_member_alloc() > | > | refactoring > | > | Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> Thanks for the report, this should be fixed now: https://git.kernel.org/next/linux-next/c/da6e6a70084d99d522058bbef00b9cbe48… Cheers, Nathan

1 year

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain