I have noticed gcc has a preference for generating UXTB instructions
when an AND with #255 would do the same thing. This is bad, because
on A9 UXTB has two cycles latency compared to one cycle for AND. On
A8 both instructions have one cycle latency.
--
Mans Rullgard / mru
== GCC ==
* Checked in patch to change vector alignment to 8
to GCC mainline.
* Started investigating benchmark regressions with
Linaro GCC 4.7 backport of vector alignment patch.
== GDB ==
* Checked in patch to fix hardware breakpoints on
non-4-byte aligned (Thumb) instructions.
* Checked in patch to properly report unsupported
watchpoint address/length combinations in gdbserver.
* Checked in patch to fix regression accessing /proc
files on older Linux kernels.
* Checked in 5 more patches to fix miscellaneous
test suite regressions.
* Re-tested GDB 7.5 pre-release on multiple platforms.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
[ Also posted to debian-arm; not cross-posted to avoid subscription
complaints... ]
Hi folks,
We're currently carrying patches in glibc in Debian (and Ubuntu) that
I wrote which are used to work out whether an ELF binary is hard-float
or soft-float. We're using these to allow us to do the right thing on
a multi-arch system, which is to pick a consistent set of binaries
(programs and libraries) at runtime; if you try to mix binaries using
different ABIs, you're prone to all kinds of weird and wonderful
results but generally badness occurs.
Upstream glibc have generally not been welcoming of these patches, and
I understand this; the approach taken (reading ARM-specific build
attributes) is far from clean and doesn't fit well in the design of
ld.so in particular. So, I've been looking into alternative methods
for achieving the goal of identifying ABI. After a couple of false
starts and discussion with some of the helpful toolchain and ABI folks
in ARM, I think we have a solution that will work well in the long
term. I just wish we'd thought about this *way* back when we first
started the armhf port, as it would have been much easier to work on
and standardise this back then. Modulo availability of time machines,
there's not much we can do on that front... :-)
What I'm proposing is to use two new values in the OSABI field in the
ELF header:
#define ELFOSABI_LINUX_ARM_AEABI_SF 65
#define ELFOSABI_LINUX_ARM_AEABI_HF 66
and use these values in the future for soft- and hard-float binaries
so that can unambiguously identify them.
There's already precedent for binaries using different values in this
field, with support in glibc for parsing and understanding
them. Adding more possible values is quite easy, assuming that the
maintainers are amenable. I'm about to post a similar message there.
I have a plan of attack for how to make a staged switch over,
deliberately to minimise any potential compatibility problems. See the
attached doc for that. It's deliberately not very specific in terms of
timeline, as that's something I'm hoping to get feedback
about. Comments very welcome; please point out if you think there are
problems with this approach, or if there are any more implementations
of toolchain / linker that will need to be addressed.
Cheers,
--
Steve McIntyre steve.mcintyre(a)linaro.org
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
For reference, if you see link time errors about a missing
'__dso_handle' symbol when building Android, then check if you're
using any global class instances in your multimedia libraries.
Each shared library has a __dso_handle symbol which is filled in on
load by the dynamic loader. Global class instances use this unique
value to make sure the destructor is called when the library is
unloaded. The symbol itself is defined in crtbegin_so.o, but the
multimedia rules forbid using this for an unknown reason. Either
create your global instances in a different way or change the
multimedia rules :)
-- Michael
== Progress ==
* Fixed PR54051
* Improved neon intrinsics testsuite. While still not an execution
based testsuite atleast we get compile time tests that are sensible C.
Exposed issues - wrote patches.
that improve vabal , vaba intrinsics. Fix an issue with costs,
fixed an issue with splitters for large mode moves for Neon with
hardfp port etc.
* Some upstream patch and bug review.
* Fixed a minor testism for vld1q_s64 tests.
== Plans ==
* Write a patch to check md5sums between local tarball and uploaded
tarball in the release script.
* Look at auto-inc-dec patches more and investigate benchmark results.
* Submit intrinsics work upstream and sheperd it through.
* Finish looking at PR53664 and clean up testsuite further.
* Follow-up on my intrinsics patches upstream.
== Absences ==
* 17th Sept - 5th Oct - Vacation approved.
== GCC ==
* Checked in fix fix for incorrect pool placement with -O0
by splitting all insns in machine-dependent reorg.
* Created blueprint to investigate -funroll-loops and
-fvariable-expansion-in-unroller.
* Took over patch to change vector alignment to 8 from
Richard; reworked according to review comments; found
and fixed two vectorizer bugs triggered by the change;
submitted for mainline approval.
* Continued investigation of reload bug reported by ARM.
Posted potential fix to gcc-patches for discussion.
== GDB ==
* Worked on fixing HW breakpoint/watchpoint regressions.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || 2012-06-24 ||
||a15-lpae-support || 2012-07-13 || 2012-07-20 || 2012-07-20 ||
||clean-up-kvm-patches || || || ||
||track-kvm-abi-changes || || || ||
||fake-trustzone || || || ||
Overall KVM plan for 'do by end August': QEMU parts of this are a mix
of clean-up-kvm-patches and track-kvm-abi-changes blueprints, mostly.
http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-167
== clean-up-kvm-patches ==
* sent patch series to try to clean up some QEMU kvm x86isms
that block cleanup of some of the ARM KVM support code;
dealt with review comments and sent v2
== other ==
* started on cleaning up the QEMU benchmarking setup so we
can put it on a server machine somewhere
* fixed a crash in the QEMU ARMv7M models which was introduced
by one of my earlier GIC/NVIC refactoring series
* upstream review/maintainer duties
KVM blueprint progress tracker:
http://apus.seabright.co.nz/helpers/backlog?group_by=topic&colour_by=state&…
-- PMM
FYI GCC trunk r189808 fails to build with a bootstrap comparison error:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
arm-linux-gnueabi/libgcc/unwind-arm.o differs
arm-linux-gnueabi/libgcc/unwind-arm_s.o differs
189575 was fine on hard float. 189745 is fine on softfp.
-- Michael
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Linaro Toolchain Builder <michael.hope+cbuild(a)linaro.org>
Date: 25 July 2012 15:59
Subject: [cbuild] gcc-4.8~svn189808 armv7l failed
To: "michael.hope+notify(a)linaro.org" <michael.hope+notify(a)linaro.org>
ursa3 finished running job gcc-4.8~svn189808 on
armv7l-precise-cbuild348-ursa3-cortexa9hfr1.
The results are here:
http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/gcc-4.8~svn189808
This email is sent from a cbuild (https://launchpad.net/cbuild) based
bot which is administered by Michael Hope <michael.hope(a)linaro.org>.
Hello Ramana,
For your PGO list:
* please note that I've been working on PGO for switch code, and also
for chains of if-statements with a common condition variable (with Tom
de Vries)
* turning conditional execution off will not make a difference, your
profile information will be exactly the same. Profile instrumentation
happens very early in the pipe line (on purpose, PGO is more
accurately "coverage guided optimization", not profiling in the
prof/gprof/oprofile sense). And the parts of the CFG that have profile
instrumentation cannot be if-converted anyway.
* you can use the script "analyze_brprob" in contrib/ to measure the
accuracy of the branch predictors. The script needs some TLC, fixing
it is on my TODO list but let me know if linaro folks are going to
take care of that. You'll find that the predictors are heavily tuned
towards the original Opteron, I'm not aware of much tuning for other
architectures.
* The heuristics for profile-guided optimizations are also not tuned
for arm. In the past we found that some params have more influence
than others (the TRACER* parameters for example).
Hope this helps,
What do you mean with "Only conditionalise those parts that benefit"?
Ciao!
Steven
== Progress ==
* Looking at auto-inc-dec patches.
* sched-pressure now on by default in FSF 4.8
* Background look into neon costs and vdup improvements.
* Some upstream patch review.
* Discovered http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54051 while testing a neon
intrinsics patch and wrote a patch to fix it.
== Plans ==
* Write a patch to check md5sums between local tarball and uploaded
tarball in the release script.
* Look at auto-inc-dec patches more and investigate benchmark results.
* Finish submitting PR54051 patch upstream.
* Finish vdup folding patch.
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.07
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM applications from your laptop
* Remote debugging
* Build the Linux kernel for your board
What's included:
* Linaro GCC 4.7 2012.07
* Linaro GDB 7.4 2012.06
* A statically linked gdbserver
* A system root
* Manuals under share/doc/
The system root contains the basic header files and libraries to link
your programs against.
Interesting changes include:
* Change c++, gcc and ld to symlinks in Linux package
The Linux version is supported on Ubuntu 10.04.3 and 12.04, Debian
6.0.2, Fedora 16, openSUSE 12.1, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation
5.7 and later, and should run on any Linux Standard Base 3.0
compatible distribution. Please see the README about running on
x86_64 hosts.
The Windows version is supported on Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Vista
Business SP2, and Windows 7 Pro SP1.
The binaries and build scripts are available from:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/trunk/2012.07
Need help? Ask a question on https://ask.linaro.org/
Already on Launchpad? Submit a bug at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries
On IRC? See us on #linaro on Freenode.
Other ways that you can contact us or get involved are listed at
https://wiki.linaro.org/GettingInvolved.
We've just started running a weekly benchmark of GCC trunk and Linaro
GCC tip. I've written a short script that compares against a baseline
and spits out a graph:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-4.8~svn.pnghttp://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr.png
I'll switch the baseline to GCC 4.7.0 once the build and benchmark run
completes. The gcc-linaro results need more data before they'll make
sense.
Part way there. An automatic email would be next. We should check
the graphs before each performance call.
-- Michael, who needs to get moving on LAVA
== GCC ==
* Checked in fix to LP bug 1020601 (missed optimization with
multiple __builtin_unreachable calls) to Linaro GCC 4.7.
* Implemented and tested alternative fix for incorrect pool
placement with -O0 by splitting all insns in machine-
dependent reorg.
* Continued investigation of reload bug reported by ARM.
== GDB ==
* Tested GDB 7.5 branch on ARM, found a couple of regressions.
Worked on fixing HW breakpoint/watchpoint regressions.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || 2012-06-24 ||
||a15-lpae-support || 2012-07-13 || 2012-07-20 || 2012-07-20 ||
||clean-up-kvm-patches || || || ||
||track-kvm-abi-changes || || || ||
||fake-trustzone || || || ||
Overall KVM plan for 'do by end August': QEMU parts of this are a mix
of clean-up-kvm-patches and track-kvm-abi-changes blueprints, mostly.
http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-167
== a15-lpae-support ==
* LPAE patches now merged upstream
* v2 of vexpress-large-ram-size sent upstream, code reviewed
and put into arm-devs pullreq. Hasn't hit master yet but
I expect that to happen over the next week.
== clean-up-kvm-patches ==
* squashed together some kvm patches in the qemu-linaro tree
* sent upstream a few patches where we can avoid an ARM-KVM
specific change by instead generalising the upstream code not
to have an explicit list of KVM supporting architectures
* started looking at how best to clean up some working-but-ugly
code handling interrupts in the QEMU KVM-ARM patchset. Among
other problems, this is messy to fix because at the moment
upstream is overloading "is there an in kernel irqchip?" to
mean both "should we use QEMU's irqchip model or not?" and
"is the interrupt injection model synchronous or asynchronous?"
because on x86 they are (for historical reasons) the same.
For ARM we only want to decide which irqchip model to use,
not anything else...
== other ==
* upstream review (various exynos patches, mostly)
* some patches fixing problems with compiler warnings in
configure test fragments
* arm-devs pullreq
KVM blueprint progress tracker:
http://apus.seabright.co.nz/helpers/backlog?group_by=topic&colour_by=state&…
-- PMM
Hi Ramana, Ulrich. Could I have some help with an unexpected
testsuite failure while backporting Carrot's adddi patch?
testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-7.c builds and runs but aborts during
leave() due to unexpected results.
The merge request is here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~michaelh1/gcc-linaro/core-adddi/+merge/113111
The testsuite diff is here:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115001~michaelh1~core-add…
The build tree is at:
cbuild@tcpanda02.v:/scratch/cbuild/slave/slaves/tcpanda02/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115001~michaelh1~core-adddi/gcc/default/build
The failing and working versions are on tcpanda02 as ~/gcov-7.exe and
~/gcov-7-ok.
Here's the details:
* The test is fine when built from the command line
* The test is fine on the hard float Precise build
* The failing binary works fine when run on Precise
* The disassembled body (not libraries) is identical modulo changes
in addresses
* The fault goes away with a static linking via adding "--tool_opts '-static'"
* The fault persists with binutils 2.22
* The fault persists with the eglibc 2.15 loader
I assume the testsuite picks up a different libgcc and libgcov somehow
which gives a different executable. It's strange that the static
linked version is fine, and that the failing binary works fine on a
different host.
Could you have a poke in the build tree?
-- Michael
== GCC ==
* Tom de Vries fixed root cause of LP bug 1020601 (missed
optimization with multiple __builtin_unreachable calls)
on mainline. Backported to Linaro GCC 4.7 and tested.
Fixed bug exposed by backport (latent in mainline).
* Continued investigation of reload bug reported by ARM.
== Misc ==
* Attended GNU Tools Cauldron in Prague. Presented on
GDB remote/native feature parity work.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || 2012-06-24 ||
||a15-lpae-support || 2012-07-13 || 2012-07-20 || ||
||clean-up-kvm-patches || || || ||
||track-kvm-abi-changes || || || ||
||fake-trustzone || || || ||
Overall KVM plan for 'do by end August': QEMU parts of this are a mix
of clean-up-kvm-patches and track-kvm-abi-changes blueprints, mostly.
http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-167
== a15-lpae-support ==
* LPAE patchset in latest target-arm pullreq sent upstream
* Kernel patch to get it not to throw away high bits of RAM
size Acked by Will and sent to RMK's patch system
* vexpress patchset for large RAM sizes had a few review
issues which I think I've sorted; need to roll a v2
* push back estimate date a week to account for: large-ram-size
work wasn't in my original list of work here; code review wait
times [ie not much real work remaining, but some time delay]
== other ==
* updated to new fast model and kernel and rechecked that my local
setup still works OK
* qemu-linaro 2012.07 released
* usual upstream patch review
* finally bit the bullet and upgraded my ancient Ubuntu desktop
KVM blueprint progress tracker:
http://apus.seabright.co.nz/helpers/backlog?group_by=topic&colour_by=state&…
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.07
release of both Linaro GCC 4.7 and Linaro GCC 4.6.
Linaro GCC 4.7 2012.07 is the fourth release in the 4.7 series. Based
off the latest GCC 4.7.0+svn189098 release, it includes performance
improvements around choice of auto-increment based addressing modes
for floating point values.
Interesting changes include:
Updates to GCC 4.7.0+svn189098
Implements improvements to ivopts selection of addressing modes of
floating point values.
Fixes:
LP: #1010826 - Invalid unaligned loads in vectorized code.
Linaro GCC 4.6 2012.07 is the seventeenth release in the 4.6 series.
Based off the latest GCC 4.6.3+svn189058 release, this is the fourth
release after entering maintenance.
Interesting changes include:
Updates to 4.6.3+svn189058
Fixes:
LP: #1010826 - Invalid unaligned loads in vectorized code. LP:
#1013209 - Internal compiler error when building neon intrinsics.
The source tarballs are available from:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+milestone/4.7-2012.07https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+milestone/4.6-2012.07
Downloads are available from the Linaro GCC page on Launchpad:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro
More information on the features and issues are available from the release page:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.7/4.7-2012.07https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.6/4.6-2012.07
Mailing list: http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/
Questions? https://ask.linaro.org/
Interested in commercial support? Inquire at support(a)linaro.org
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release of
Linaro QEMU 2012.07.
Linaro QEMU 2012.07 is the latest monthly release of qemu-linaro. Based
off upstream (trunk) QEMU, it includes a number of ARM-focused bug fixes
and enhancements.
There are no major changes in this month's release, though
it has been updated to track the latest upstream QEMU changes.
Known issues:
- Graphics do not work for OMAP3 based models (beagle, overo)
with 11.10 Linaro images.
- Audio may not work on Versatile Express models with the latest
Linaro kernel/hardware packs (LP:977610).
The source tarball is available at:
https://launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+milestone/2012.07
More information on Linaro QEMU is available at:
https://launchpad.net/qemu-linaro
== GCC ==
* Investigated bootstrap comparison failure with neon-shifts
branch; tracked down root cause to pre-existing bug in GCC
common code. Fix checked in to FSF mainline and 4.7 branch.
* Investigated di-sync-multithread test case failure with
neon-shifts branch; root cause was missing length attributes
for sync.md insn&split patterns. Implemented fix and
restarted tests.
* Investigated LP bug 1020601, missed optimization with multiple
__builtin_unreachable calls. Tracked down root cause and
started discussion of possible fixes on gcc-patches.
* Investigated potential reload bug reported by ARM.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
RAG
Amber: 4.7 2012.07 source release for reasons described below.
Green : 4.6 2012.07 source release done.
== Progress ==
* Worked on auto-inc-dec scheduler changes.First cut patch looking reasonable.
* Committed the neon permute intrinsics upstream.
* Release week : release tarballs prepared for 4.6 . The 4.6 release
is GREEN. I will upload the release on Thursday morning after I am
back in the office.
The 4.7 release had some issues - I had to rerun the release script
because the merge contained some artifacts which were a result of
merge conflicts. Having respun the release it turned out that the
rsync from my machine to cbuild failed, which meant that I ended up
testing the same snapshot twice.Given that the 2 tarballs only differ
in the .rej and the .orig files and nothing more I'm not too worried
about this because it should ideally just work. The good news is that
ubutest and everything else went through ok. The bad news is that the
oe build appears to be borked. We need to investigate that further.
Having looked inside the tarballs and seen that the .rej and .orig
files were the only things different between the 2 tarballs I don't
think it's a huge problem for the release. I;ve spawned off another
set of builds to be absolutely sure .
* Looked at neon costs and vdup improvements . The neon cost changes
could cause regressions with 64 bit arithmetic and hence need to be
looked at carefully. The vdup improvements cause carnage in
gcc.target/arm/neon and tests for intrinsics have to be improved.
== Plans ==
* GNU Tools cauldron next week.
* Deal with release week fall-out.
* Write a patch to check md5sums between local tarball and uploaded
tarball in the release script.
* Look at auto-inc-dec patches more.
* Background look into improving some of the tests that now fail with
the vdup patches.
== Absences ==
* 8th - 11th July - GNU Tools Cauldron.
* 17th Sept - 5th Oct - Vacation planned, yet to be approved.
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || 2012-06-24 ||
||a15-lpae-support || 2012-07-13 || 2012-07-13 || ||
||clean-up-kvm-patches || || || ||
||track-kvm-abi-changes || || || ||
||fake-trustzone || || || ||
Overall KVM plan for 'do by end August': QEMU parts of this are a mix
of clean-up-kvm-patches and track-kvm-abi-changes blueprints, mostly.
http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-167
== a15-lpae-support ==
* did the basic benchmarking of the LPAE series; using 64 bits for
guest physical addresses has between 0 and 0.5% hit to performance,
which IMHO is sufficiently minimal that it is not a problem.
* wrote a set of follow-up patches which allow the vexpress-a15
model to accept large RAM sizes (mostly turning off the "too big"
user-error message, fixing some over-small types in the QEMU boot
loader and adding support for handling device tree blobs with
64 bit address/size fields).
* discovered that Linux will happily throw away the top 32 bits
of a device tree memory node's size field. Wrote a patch for this,
which works but needs redoing to fix in a cleaner way.
== other ==
* qemu-linaro 2012.07 release prep: bug triage, investigation,
rolling tarball, testing
* arm-devs pullreq
KVM blueprint progress tracker:
http://apus.seabright.co.nz/helpers/backlog?group_by=topic&colour_by=state&…
-- PMM
Hi,
I didn't look if the files were correctly merged or not. but the .orig and .rej
files don't belong here.
It might be worth to update the merge to r189186, reverting the c++98/c++11 ABI
incompatibility in std::list.
Matthias
revno: 115001 [merge]
committer: Michael Hope <michael.hope(a)linaro.org>
branch nick: 4.7
timestamp: Tue 2012-07-03 20:16:55 +1200
message:
Merge from FSF (GCC SVN branches/gcc-4_7-branch:189098)
added:
gcc/config.gcc.rej
gcc/config/arm/arm.c.orig
gcc/config/arm/arm.c.rej
gcc/config/avr/avr-stdint.h
gcc/configure.ac.rej
gcc/configure.rej
[...]
== Progress ==
* Testing costs changes for Neon intrinsics.
* Fixed the regression I added to the Linaro 4.6 tree - committed
there. Looked at a few vagaries around testresults.
* Started looking at auto-inc-dec scheduler changes.
* 1/2 a day lost to visa application process
* Usual 1:1s .
* Upstream patch review.
== Plans ==
* Work on auto-inc-dec scheduler changes.
* Ping current neon intrinsics patches and get them in.
* Release week dry-run to be done next week - and finish creating the
release tarballs by 6th of July
* Upstream patch review.
* Collect passport on Tuesday / Wed afternoon.
== Absences ==
* 8th - 12th July - GNU Tools Cauldron.
* 17th Sept - 5th Oct - Vacation planned, yet to be approved.
We've had a few testsuite failures recently which were due to the auto
builder itself. I've started a log at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/CBuild/FailureLog
so we can track the incident rate and see if there's a pattern.
Zhenqiang, if you see an unexpected failure could you respawn the
build and notify me?
-- Michael
Hi all,
Right now, it's impossible to merge from lp:gcc/4.7 to
lp:gcc-linaro/4.7. This is due to a BZR bug of some kind, so hopefully
we won't have to work around it for too much longer.
According to the nice folks at #bzr, here's how to do the same merge
manually:
bzr branch lp:gcc-linaro/4.7
cd gcc-linaro
bzr log | less
# find the last merge revision (it should be clear from the message)
# grab the *SVN* revision number
bzr log --show-ids lp:gcc/4.7 | less
# search for the *SVN* revision number
# (it should appear on the end of a "revision-id" line, not "parent")
# grab the corresponding *BZR* revision number ("revno")
bzr diff -r <bzr-revno> lp:gcc/4.7 > ../patch
patch -p0 -i ../patch
# resolve conflicts, rejected hunks, etc.
bzr add --file-ids-from lp:gcc/4.7
# if it's doing the right thing you'll get messages like:
# "adding <file> w/ file id from <file>"
# if it just says "adding file" then you got something wrong
# edit Changelog.linaro, as usual
bzr ci
bzr push lp:~.........gcc-linaro/merge-from....
After all that, a future "bzr merge" should just work (once the bug has
been fixed).
Anyway, I doubt there's anybody else needs to know this: I've just
posted it in case I get hit by a bus before next month.
Andrew
== GCC ==
* GCC PR 53636 fix caused regression on powerpc64 and sparc64;
committed fix upstream and to Linaro GCC 4.7.
* Backported GCC PR 53636 fix --including regression fix--
to Linaro GCC 4.6.
* Reworked Andrew's neon-shifts branch to reliably use NEON
for "left shift by register"; fix typo in "left shift by 1";
overall simplification of implementation. Tests restarted.
== GDB ==
* Investigated remaining GDB/Android work; reviewed card.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || 2012-06-24 ||
||a15-lpae-support || 2012-07-13 || 2012-07-13 || ||
||clean-up-kvm-patches || || || ||
||track-kvm-abi-changes || || || ||
||fake-trustzone || || || ||
The blueprints clean-up-kvm-patches and track-kvm-abi-changes include
dependencies on kernel side work which makes it hard to set a date;
however I'm hoping to get them either done or mostly done within the
next two months.
== cp15-rework ==
* patches were committed to master, blueprint complete
== a15-lpae-support ==
* worked on a set of patches to lay groundwork for this: mostly
this is extending the size of QEMU's 'target physical address'
type to 64 bits for ARM (potentially a small perf hit for the
32 bit only ARM cores; benchmarking still to be done)
* wrote patches to implement all the various pieces of LPAE,
confirmed that Linux with LPAE enabled boots, sent patches to list
* started looking into whether there are any bits of LAVA that make
sense to use for QEMU benchmarking
== other ==
* fixed a missing Makefile line that meant qemu-linaro wouldn't build
on ARM targets with KVM enabled
* reviewed a pile of outstanding patches (including SDHCI, i.MX31)
and am now caught up with the post-holiday backlog
KVM blueprint progress tracker:
http://apus.seabright.co.nz/helpers/backlog?group_by=topic&colour_by=state&…
-- PMM
Hello,
I tried codesourcy
arm-2012.03-57-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2, and get
below err infos.
Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `sdiv R2,R0,R1'
Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `udiv R2,R0,R1'
Does it mean this toolchain version don't support both instructions? and
which toolchain can support them?
Thanks a lot!
Xiao
== GCC ==
* GCC PR 53636 fix caused regression on powerpc64 and sparc64;
investigated, determined root cause, and implemented fix.
== GDB ==
* Took over remaining GDB/Android work from Thiago.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.06
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM applications from your laptop
* Remote debugging
* Build the Linux kernel for your board
What's included:
* Linaro GCC 4.7 2012.06
* Linaro GDB 7.4 2012.06
* A statically linked gdbserver
* A system root
* Manuals under share/doc/
The system root contains the basic header files and libraries to link
your programs against.
Interesting changes include:
* Refine the system root
The Linux version is supported on Ubuntu 10.04.3 and 12.04, Debian
6.0.2, Fedora 16, openSUSE 12.1, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation
5.7 and later, and should run on any Linux Standard Base 3.0
compatible distribution. Please see the README about running on
x86_64 hosts.
The Windows version is supported on Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Vista
Business SP2, and Windows 7 Pro SP1.
The binaries and build scripts are available from:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/trunk/2012.06
Need help? Ask a question on https://ask.linaro.org/
Already on Launchpad? Submit a bug at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries
On IRC? See us on #linaro on Freenode.
Other ways that you can contact us or get involved are listed at
https://wiki.linaro.org/GettingInvolved.
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || ||
||clean-up-kvm-patches || || || ||
||track-kvm-abi-changes || || || ||
||fake-trustzone || || || ||
||a15-lpae-support || || || ||
(dates to come next week)
== cp15-rework ==
* sent out pull request including these patches, so it should get
committed to master in the next few days
== a15-lpae-support ==
* started on getting ARM qemu to work with 64 bit physaddrs
(first stage mostly a tedious code audit)
== other ==
* email catchup following holiday
* rebased various trees, sent out pullreqs for outstanding ARM
QEMU patches
Michael H has set up a web page which tracks progress on KVM related
blueprints here:
http://apus.seabright.co.nz/helpers/backlog?group_by=topic&colour_by=state&…
This includes QEMU blueprints related to KVM.
-- PMM
I've gone through and checked the 64 bit operation improvements that
Andrew has made to GCC. For everything but the Cortex-A8, GCC uses
the NEON unit for 64 bit operations and Andrew's improvements mean we
can stay on NEON for longer without having an expensive transfer back
and forth to the core registers.
The results are here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/64BitOperations
Once we've fixed the shift-left-by-n pattern I'll turn this into an
Outputs[1] page.
Benchmark results have been sent to the linaro-toolchain-benchmarks list.
-- Michael
Hi,
OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro:
* updated OE-Core cbuild to pick up a recent snapshot of meta-linaro
* verified the release candidate of the Linaro binary toolchain 12.06
* prepared meta linaro for the upcoming release of our binary toolchain
* started on a linaro-qemu recipe but didn't finish it
misc:
* boot Linaro Android using QEMU:
https://wiki.linaro.org/KenWerner/Sandbox/AndroidQEMU
Regards,
Ken
== Progress ==
* Tried a number of testcases for the shuffles . Needed to add
support to the C++ frontend for the __builtin_shuffle support.
Fortunately there existed a patch - I tested it and it looked good.
Committed upstream. However the original author had some concerns
whether it would work in C++ or not but we shall see. The OP is
concerned that it might break C++11 and constexpr which need to be
looked at .
* Briefly investigated a regression with Linaro GCC 4.6 with Neon
intrinsics. It looks like my patch to allow LTO to proceed has had
some fall out . We really need some good tests in the GCC testsuite
for intrinsics.
* Looked at the Android documents and commented.
* Some upstream patch review.
== Plans ==
* Follow on the C++11 issues with the __builtin_shuffle patch if any.
* Commit the __builtin_shuffle variation of the neon intrinsics
patch into FSF 4.8. The improvements obtained are real and nice
atleast for the testcases that we could see after finishing up the
testcases.
* There is some follow-up work which should tie in nicely with costs
rework - lower-subreg ends up splitting things a bit badly in some
cases with vld4 style intrinsics and for V4SF copies. So it's better
we try to get the costs right. I suspect this might be harming us in a
few cases with auto-vectorized code as well. Especially where we
vectorize with the large vldn instructions.
* Investigate the 4.6 regression with Neon intrinsics.
* Auto-inc-dec scheduler work.
Hi,
I'm trying to build some shared libraries with the Linaro Android
toolchain.
For all of my libraries I get the following errors from the linker:
|BlaBla.cpp.o: requires unsupported dynamic reloc R_ARM_REL32; recompile with -fPIC
/home/dev/android/android_linaro_toolchain/libexec/gcc/arm-linux-androideabi/4.7.1/real-ld: error: hidden symbol '__dso_handle' is not defined locally
|
I'm using -fPIC in the compiler's flags so I'm not sure why the linker
is complaining.
The |__dso_handle| error is supposed to have been fixed in the NDKr6. I
tried the
Linaro 4.7.1(2012.05) toolchain, the one available for download, one of
the daily
builds from Linaro of the same toolchain(the one from Friday last week)
and I also
rebuilt entirely the toolchain from source but with the same results. I
found a bug
report in the
launchpad(https://bugs.launchpad.net/igloocommunity/+bug/1000200)
which pretty much describes exactly the same problem but unfortunately
none of the
observations made there helped(I do have -fPIC in the compilation flags,
I do not
have any assembly source and I rebuilt the toolchain from source).
Does anyone have any hints on how to fix or overcome the problem?
Thanks,
Marius
== GCC ==
* Fixed vectorizer bug causing unaligned memory accesses
(LP 1010826 / GCC PR 53636); checked in to GCC mainline
and Linaro GCC 4.7. Backports to FSF 4.7 and Linaro
GCC 4.6 are under way.
* Investigated vectorizer performance regression reported
by Mans; main problem seems to be lack of use of the
vectorizer cost model by default on ARM, but other
aspects of the vectorized code could be improved as well.
* Created blueprint to tune vectorizer cost mode on ARM
and enable it by default.
* Ongoing work on reassociation pass.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release of
Linaro QEMU 2012-06.
Linaro QEMU 2012.06 is the latest release of qemu-linaro. Based off
upstream qemu, it includes a number of ARM-focused bug fixes and
enhancements.
There are no major changes with this release, though it has been updated
to the latest (1.1.0) qemu.
The source tarball is available at:
https://launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+milestone/2012.06
More information on Linaro QEMU is available at:
https://launchpad.net/qemu-linaro
We talked at Connect about finishing up the cortex-strings work by
upstreaming them into Bionic, Newlib, and GLIBC. I've written up one
of our standard 'Output' pages:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Outputs/CortexStrings
with a summary of what we did, what else exists, benchmark results,
and next steps. This can be used to justify the routines to the
different upstreams.
The Android guys are going to upstream these to Bionic. I need a
volunteer to do Newlib and GLIBC.
One surprise was that the Newlib plain C routines are very good on
strings - probably due to a good end of string detector.
-- Michael
Hi,
OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro:
* worked on building oe-core+meta-linaro using the 2012.05 release of
the binary toolchain
* minimal sysroot contains libraries that reference the old
ld-linux.so.3 loader
* created #1011671
* otherwise works fine for oe-core+meta-linaro
* setup the build env on tcserver01
* verified the 2012.06 RC of linaro GCC 4.7 and 4.6
* 4.7 looks good
* 4.6 has ICE when building Qt -mfpu=neon
* reduced testcase available at bug #1013209
* updated meta-linaro (master) to pull in version 2012.06 of Linaro
GCC 4.6/4.7
Regards,
Ken
Hello,
I am wondering if there is support for gettext in the linaro toolchain?
How can I check it if it should work or not?
I can compile and link the "setlocale()" and "bindtextdomain()" and
"textdomain()" functions, however, the translation doesn't work.
Best regards
Tom,
--
*Tom Deblauwe*
*R&D Engineer*
Traficon International N.V.
Vlamingstraat 19
B-8560 Wevelgem
Belgium
Tel.: +32 (0)56 37.22.00
Fax: +32 (0)56 37.21.96
URL: www.traficon.com <http://www.traficon.com>
I noticed this bug upstream about C++11 and C++98 ABI
incompatibilities , in case someone is using the C++11 features,
please be aware that there is an ABI bug lurking.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646
Ramana
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release of
Linaro GDB 7.4 2012.06.
Linaro GDB 7.4 2012.06 is the third release in the 7.4 series. Based off
the latest GDB 7.4.1, it includes a number of bug fixes.
Interesting changes include:
* GDB now expands tildes in solib-search-path entries.
* Updated to the GDB 7.4.1 code base.
https://launchpad.net/gdb-linaro/+milestone/7.4-2012.06
More information on Linaro GDB is available at:
https://launchpad.net/gdb-linaro
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Linaro Toolchain Working Group
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.06
release of both Linaro GCC 4.7 and Linaro GCC 4.6.
Linaro GCC 4.7 2012.06 is the third release in the 4.7 series. Based
off the latest GCC 4.7.0+svn188038 release, it includes performance
improvements especially around 64 bit operations.
Interesting changes include:
* Updates to GCC 4.7.0+svn188038
* Adds multilib support for use in the binary builds
* Improves performance of 64 bit shifts in core registers
Fixes:
* LP: #949805 GCC doesn't by default use %gnu_unique_object
* LP: #990530 internal compiler error: in convert, at lto/lto-lang.c:1292
* An off-by-one error in vrev
Linaro GCC 4.6 2012.06 is the sixteenth release in the 4.6 series.
Based off the latest GCC 4.6.3+svn188320 release, this is the third
release after entering maintenance.
Interesting changes include:
* Updates to 4.6.3+svn188320
* Uses the new /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 loader for hard float binaries
Fixes:
* LP: #949805 GCC doesn't by default use %gnu_unique_object
* LP: #990530 internal compiler error: in convert, at lto/lto-lang.c:1292
The source tarballs are available from:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+milestone/4.7-2012.06https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+milestone/4.6-2012.06
Downloads are available from the Linaro GCC page on Launchpad:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro
More information on the features and issues are available from the
release page:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.7/4.7-2012.06
Mailing list: http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/
Questions? https://ask.linaro.org/
Interested in commercial support? Inquire at support(a)linaro.org
-- Michael
On 12 June 2012 18:53, Akash D <akashd(a)renuelectronics.com> wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> The required information is mentioned below.
>
> Compiler Used --->
>
> http://launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded
>
> Version number ---->
>
> arm-none-eabi-gcc (GNU Tools for ARM Embedded Processors) 4.6.2 20110921
> (release) [ARM/embedded-4_6-branch revision 182083]
Yip, this is ARM's Cortex-R & M bare metal toolchain. It doesn't come
directly from Linaro but we've got a good relationship with them.
I'll ping them and see the best place to ask this question.
> The link file is attached with this mail.
I only had a quick read, but you're missing a capture for the
'.text.startup' section in the linker script. You might need
something like:
*(.text.startup)
before the one.o(.text) line or to change the *(.text) capture to
*(.text*). The startup section might need to be at a fixed address.
Please check your chip and toolchain documentation to confirm.
-- Michael
While benchmarking the auto-vectoriser on Libav, I noticed a performance
regression in gcc 4.7 (both FSF and Linaro) compared to gcc 4.6 in the AAC
decoder. I narrowed it down to this function:
static void ps_hybrid_analysis_ileave_c(float (*out)[32][2],
float L[2][38][64],
int i, int len)
{
int j;
for (; i < 64; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < len; j++) {
out[i][j][0] = L[0][j][i];
out[i][j][1] = L[1][j][i];
}
}
}
While gcc 4.6 does not attempt to vectorise this at all, 4.7 goes crazy
with a massive slowdown, about 20x slower than non-vectorised with Linaro
4.7 and much worse with FSF 4.7.
Let me know if you need more information.
--
Mans Rullgard / mru
== Progress ==
* Connect last week.
* Worked through the open issues and open work items related to
performance and we've got a clear list of things that are currently in
flight. Now to keep track of this better.
https://wiki.linaro.org/RamanaRadhakrishnan/Sandbox//RRQ212ConnectNotes
and move this away from the wiki page in a form that we can use to
talk during our regular performance meetings.
* Created blueprints, closed down old issues and reprioritized
issues with Ulrich and others.
* A number of interesting conversations during Connect for a number
of compiler related issues.
* Other sessions that I attended included the Android optimizations
sessions - while there was quite a bit about toolchain performance it
is important that we keep looking out for the performance profiles and
find areas where the toolchain can be improved. However this can't be
done without getting more testcases from other groups. There were a
couple of interesting comments made that skia is CPU bound which would
indicate that the paint function is CPU bound. But why and how ?
Someone should look at reproducing these numbers and see where we get
to in this area. Pointed out that cortex-strings might be good to make
it into bionic ?
* Fixed the vrev off by one error and committed to FSF trunk .
However it couldn't make it in time for FSF 4.7.1 as the merge window
had closed by then.
* Set up my panda board to be identical to what runs on our
validation labs etc.
* This week
* Worked through the merge requests and moved some patches
upstream away from the "toreview" state.
* Landed a few merge requests that were approved but hadn't been
done so. Took care of merging the upstream 4.7 branch.
* Given I only had a few hours back in the office this week I
worked on regenerating arm_neon.h to use __builtin_shuffle with
vrev64, vrev32, vtrn , vzip and vuzp. A follow up patch needs to do
the same for vext but that needs generic support also in
vec_perm_const_ok .Once that is done I think we can safely start
rewriting . It still needs some more testing and polishing up but the
initial results on the testcase from PR48941 is kind of neat. The
result for some of the other testcases that I've looked at also looks
much better than where we were a few weeks back. So all in all nice
progress on that front. However we have to also find a way of getting
these generated at O0 which they don't appear to do so cleanly enough
with this approach.
for one example it does look like this below: Notice those spills
beginning to disappear .... :)
New :
sqrlen4D_16u8:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
vabd.u8 q1, q0, q1
vmull.u8 q0, d2, d2
vmull.u8 q8, d3, d3
vuzp.32 q0, q8
vpaddl.u16 q0, q0
vpadal.u16 q0, q8
bx lr
Old :
sqrlen4D_16u8:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 1, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
vabd.u8 q1, q0, q1
stmfd sp!, {r4, fp}
add fp, sp, #4
sub sp, sp, #48
add r3, sp, #15
vmull.u8 q0, d2, d2
bic r3, r3, #15
vmull.u8 q8, d3, d3
vuzp.32 q0, q8
vstmia r3, {d0-d1}
vstr d16, [r3, #16]
vstr d17, [r3, #24]
vpaddl.u16 q0, q0
vpadal.u16 q0, q8
sub sp, fp, #4
ldmfd sp!, {r4, fp}
bx lr
* Attended platform / WG sync-up.
== Plans ==
* Cleanup the ml bits of rewiring the intrinsics and try some proper testcases.
* Work on the auto-inc-dec scheduler patches.
* Rework the sched-pressure patch upstream .
* Review the Android benchmarking writeups.
Summary:
* Bug fixes.
* Tune ivopt for code size.
Details:
1. Reproduce lp:1007353 "kernel build fails with 12.04 and 12.05
toolchain released" and workout a patch to fix it; reopen the related
binutils/gas bug http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12698
and propose the patch to it; push the patch to linaro crosstool-ng to
make sure lp:1007353 is fixed for next binary toolchain release.
2. Setup the SPEC build env and reproduce lp: 886124 "using LDR from
literal pool rather than MOVW/MOVT". After cprop1 replaces lo_sum
(high: symbol_ref bloc) (symbol_ref (block)) with a (symbol_ref
(block)), no later optimization can split it. The solution in linaro
4.5 is to add a split (porting from codesourcery) in arm.md. Then
split1 can split the (symbol_ref (block)). The split is:
(define_split
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arm_general_register_operand" "")
(match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" ""))]
"TARGET_32BIT
&& TARGET_USE_MOVT && GET_CODE (operands[1]) == SYMBOL_REF
&& !flag_pic && !target_word_relocations
&& !arm_tls_referenced_p (operands[1])"
[(clobber (const_int 0))]
{
arm_emit_movpair (operands[0], operands[1]);
DONE;
})
3. Tune ivopt for code size. Try to set avg_loop_niter to 1 since loop
iterator number does not impact code size. But test shows there is no
improvement. Need more tuning.
Plans:
* Analyze the failed cases in arm-linux-gnueabihf regression test.
* Tune code size for M0.
Best regards!
-Zhenqiang
Hello Sir/Madam,
I am using MK60FN1M0VLQ12 (COTREX-M4) processor for my development.
I am using float and double data types in my code. When I perform any
mathematical operation on these variables, the processor goes to Hard Fault
Exception.
Earlier I have used GCC 4.5.2 compiler for my compilation
So now I am using Linaro's GNU-GCC Toolchain 4.6.2 for compiling my code
with following command.
arm-none-eabi-gcc -Wall -mfpu=fpv4-sp-d16 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mcpu=cortex-m4
-mthumb -Qn -Os -mlong-calls -c main.c -o main.o
But I am getting following error while linking my code
ld: section .text.startup loaded at [00032258,000331cb] overlaps section
.InitializedVariables loaded at [00032258,00032787]
The link file is attached with this mail.
Can you please suggest me some solution for this problem.
Can you also suggest some compiler commands to support float and double data
type using software.
Awaiting for your reply,
Thanks & Regards,
Akash
== GCC ==
* Worked on reimplementing reassociation pass based on
review comments I had received.
* Identified root cause and worked on fix for vectorizer
bug causing unaligned memory accesses (reported by Mans).
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Hi,
OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro:
* fixed the binary toolchain support on master (still 2012.03)
* fixed armhf support for Linaro GCC 4.6 on master
* backport of Linaro GCC 4.7 r114985
* tested the images using QEMU - no failures
* now the master branch supports building images for ARM, MIPS, PPC,
X86 and X86_64 using the latest (2012.05) releases of Linaro GCC
4.6 or 4.7
* add tags on meta-linaro to easily find the revision for a particular
Linaro GCC
* changed cbuild to pull in the master branches of OE-Core and
meta-linaro
* merged the branch that allows to build OpenEmbedded-Core using cbuild
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kwerner/cbuild/oecore/changes/
* updated docs on the wiki
Misc:
* public holiday on Thu, vacation on Fri
* I'll be back on Monday : )
Regards,
Ken
Hi,
GDB for Android:
* Submitted and committed trivial patch to gdbserver which made it
compile again on Android. A patch had been added which made gdbserver
use a MIPS-related constant which Android doesn't provide.
* Compared testsuite results of GDB on Android vs regular Linux.
Unfortunately there's a lot of noise because the GCC 4.4 used by
the Android SDK generates bad debuginfo which confuses GDB and breaks
a lot of tests. Overall, it seems GDB on Android is in a generally
good
shape. Still need to run the testsuite again with an Android based on
a newer compiler to have a better comparison.
* Mozilla has a GDB patch to call gdbarch_addr_bits_remove before
comparing PCs in breakpoint handling which seems like a sensible thing
to do. Still, running the testsuite with and without this patch didn't
make a difference on Android or regular Linux.
* Remotely attended the GDB for Android session at Connect. Prepared
the following page to go with it:
https://wiki.linaro.org/ThiagoBauermann/Sandbox/AndroidGDBConnectSession
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Linaro Toolchain Working Group
Hi,
GDB for Android:
* Created patch to expand the ~ in "set solib-search-path". Despite
doing the right thing in other commands, GDB doesn't understand ~ in
solib-search-path, which made me lose some time in a debugging session
trying to figure out what was going on. Committed upstream.
* Looked into AOSP patch which hardcodes use of fork tracing instead of
thread events. Found out that gdbserver actually already prefers fork
tracing on both Linux and Android (tested on ICS and Linaro 12.04).
This must have been a problem in some earlier version, and the patch
is
unnecessary now.
* Set up a QEMU instance with Linaro Android 12.04. Got dropbear ssh
on it and ran the GDB testsuite remotely on the VM.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Linaro Toolchain Working Group
Hi,
OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro:
* added a default xorg.conf for the qemuarmv7a MACHINE
* necessary because OE-Core master switched from Xfbdev to Xorg
* noticed that hard float with Linaro GCC 4.6 works on denzil but is
broken on master
due to differences on the requested/provided interpreter
* it used to (accidentally?) work when /lib/ld-linux.so.3 was used
even for armhf
* need to check out what loader name OE-Core really wants to use
* worked on getting OE-Core to build with Linaro GCC 4.7
* verified that the recipes for Linaro GCC 4.7 are working for ARM,
MIPS, PPC, X86, X86_64
* all images are working!
* updated the wiki pages
Regards,
Ken
Linaro Connect edition...
RAG:
GREEN: productive Connect, hammered out a KVM TODO list
* As usual, most sessions don't really intersect with KVM/QEMU work,
so the bulk of the benefit of the week was in informal discussions
and hacking sessions. Useful outcomes there:
* Dragged Rusty through some of the more obscure corners of the
ARM architecture, in the course of doing a review of all the
A15 cp15 registers and how KVM should handle them
* Thrashed out a todo list for getting to "initial upstreamable
patchset" for KVM:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TSpDKQZ-6u-HH_2BNY_85jDStI2YDhENf5-z8Nb…
* Nailed down a few decisions we'd left hanging for a bit
* A few sessions that seem worth mentioning:
* Enterprise bootloaders
Jon M definitely pushing the idea that servers will want ACPI,
UEFI, etc all to look as consistent and like x86 as possible. This
includes a desire for UEFI in the virtual environment provided by
QEMU/KVM. We've been aware we might want to do that, but there is
definitely some work to do to get UEFI running (probably a combo of
QEMU bugfixes/feature work and patching UEFI). Total work required
hard to estimate because you just have to keep fixing bugs until it
works... (The push for UEFI was repeated in a couple of other
sessions too.)
* v8 discussion
The question of whether there will be a v8 QEMU was raised (again).
There do seem to be enough people interested that we should be able
to collaborate on a user-mode emulator, which I think is a good
outcome. This will obviously depend on release of enough public
info on the architecture.
* KVM performance
Bit of a null session, as it turns out that we aren't really ready
to think about performance. We believe there aren't any obvious
areas requiring optimisation in the current KVM patchset. Virtio is
the only thing to be added later, and this is really just missing
QEMU side rather than needing specific kernel support. We did take
the opportunity to go through our TODO list for KVM functionality;
nobody raised anything we'd missed, so that's good.
-- PMM
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.05
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM applications from your laptop
* Remote debugging
* Build the Linux kernel for your board
What's included:
* Linaro GCC 2012.05
* Linaro GDB 2012.04
* A statically linked gdbserver
* A system root
* Manuals under share/doc/
The system root contains the basic header files and libraries to link
your programs against.
Interesting changes include:
* Updates the system root to Ubuntu Precise
* Switches to the arm-linux-gnueabihf triplet
* Compiles programs for hard float by default
* Includes soft float support for ARMv4T and later systems
* Includes debug symbols for debugging and backtracing the C library
The Linux version is supported on Ubuntu 10.04.3 and 12.04, Debian
6.0.2, Fedora 16, openSUSE 12.1, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation
5.7 and later, and should run on any Linux Standard Base 3.0
compatible distribution. Please see the README about running on
x86_64 hosts.
The Windows version is supported on Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Vista
Business SP2, and Windows 7 Pro SP1.
The binaries and build scripts are available from:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/trunk/2012.05
Need help? Ask a question on https://ask.linaro.org/
Already on Launchpad? Submit a bug at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries
On IRC? See us on #linaro on Freenode.
Other ways that you can contact us or get involved are listed at
https://wiki.linaro.org/GettingInvolved.
Thanks to the change in the schedule the agenda is here.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2012-05-28
If there are any topics folks would like to add to this for today
please feel free to do so now given we have a session in under 2
hours.
regards,
Ramana
Progress
* Fixed PR53334 upstream - something that broke eembc builds.
* Usual meetings.
* Work through some of the speed tickets and upstream bugzilla perf
tickets in preparation for connect.
* Prepared for connect. Looked through some open issues and
investigating PR48941 patch. Uli and I had some discussions around the
patches for this and I had an idea later this evening to try out
something with __builtin_shuffle which certainly looks interesting and
is effectively what we came up with . It's probably better to use
__builtin_shuffle rather than inventing something on our own. In the
process found a bug with automatic rev generation from vec_perm
expressions and that should now be fixed.
* Worked through the auto-inc-dec stuff. Still needs some work and
looks unlikely to complete before connect and that's something I need
to keep working through.
* Prepared for connect.
Plans
* Connect next week !
Absences:
28 May - 1 June : Linaro Connect
Committed my core-shifts patch into Linaro GCC.
Checked and posted my (newly rebased) neon-shifts patch upstream for review.
Continued work on my brain-dump of work in progress. Cleaned up, tested
and posted example testcases and before/after compiler output for all my
work-in-progress patches.
Looked at LaunchPad bug #851258. It's a miss-optimization bug that would
take some effort to fix.
Discovered that my lower-subreg build had failed due to Werror. Fixed
the warning, reuploaded the sources, and relaunched the build.
Prepared for travel to Connect.
== GCC ==
* Followed up on review comments on reassociation pass.
* Analyzed performance headroom of Linaro GCC 4.7 compared
to various other compilers and identified several missing
optimisations.
== Misc ==
* Prepared for Linaro Connect Hong Kong.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || ||
== other ==
* preparation for Connect
* wrote up and sent out proposal about handling TrustZone for KVM
* investigated some issues Riku found when testing his packaged
version of KVM (one model issue, one kernel-too-old issue)
* usual upstream maintainer duties
-- PMM
Hi,
OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro:
* cbuild enhancements:
* debugged failures till I noticed cbuild was pulling in the wrong
branch of meta-linaro (now fixed)
* added support for checking the oe-core build prerequisites
* the images are now automatically bootet using qemu
* sizes of the images and package sizes are now recorded
* update to Linaro GCC 4.6 2012.05 (denzil) and Linaro GCC 4.7 2012.05
(master)
* debugged build failure when using Linaro GCC 4.6 in a hard float
configuration
* turns out that OE expects the GCC to respect the
ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET env variable
to build libgcc and friends properly for the given target
(another missing patch to build the GCC the OE-Core way)
* fix tested and checked in (denzil)
* created/updated wiki pages:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Outputs/OpenEmbedded-Corehttps://wiki.linaro.org/KenWerner/Sandbox/OpenEmbedded-Core
Regards,
Ken
Hi,
GDB for Android:
* Fixed the PC offset in jmp_buf but the patch still wasn't working.
It turns out that GDB wasn't loading the libc6.so symbols even though
I set both sysroot *and* solib-search-path. Copied libc6.so to GDB's
cwd and the patch worked (will investigate this next week).
Submitted upstream, currently under review.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Linaro Toolchain Working Group
Hi,
GDB for Android:
* Worked on patch which uses the correct offset for finding the PC value
inside the jmp_buf on Android binaries. Things weren't working though,
and in the end it turns out that the value used in AOSP's patch is
wrong.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Linaro Toolchain Working Group
Hi Zhenqiang. I've had a look at the difference between testsuite
results on our current softfp Natty builders and the new hard float
Precise builders. The diff and notes is at:
http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/hard-float-builder-diff.txt
There's a lot of commonality:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find {S,g}crt1.o: builder fault. I've fixed this.
sorry, unimplemented: Thumb-1 hard-float VFP ABI errors: tests where
they set the architecture to ARMv5T and use our default Thumb mode.
This causes the compiler to fail as it doesn't support Thumb-1 with
hard float.
arm_iwmmxt_ok5222.c:1:0: sorry, unimplemented: iWMMXt and hardware
floating point
Some are real:
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/sync-3.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
/tmp/cc3ufndj.s:436: Error: co-processor offset out of range
+FAIL: gcc.dg/pr48335-2.c (test for excess errors)
pr48335-2.c:19:30: internal compiler error: in
expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7527
+FAIL: gcc.dg/pr48335-5.c (test for excess errors)
pr48335-5.c:17:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 11 10 12 3 (set (reg:DI 141)
(unspec:DI [
(mem/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 129 virtual-stack-vars)
(const_int -8 [0xfffffffffffffff8])) [2 S8 A32])
] UNSPEC_MISALIGNED_ACCESS))
/cbuild/slaves/ursa2/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114988~zhenqiang-chen~gnueabihf/gcc/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48335-5.c:16
-1
(nil))
+FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -O0 execution test
Some are marked as unsupported but shouldn't be:
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11a.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-25.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-28.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-2.c
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-32.c
Could you look into the unsupported ones please? I'll fix the crt1
problems and respin the build.
-- Michael
The Precise based hard float auto builders are now online. Every
merge request and commit to gcc-linaro will now be built build both on
a Natty softfp system and a Precise hard float. Let's run this in
parallel for a while before updating the validation lab.
I've also updated the x86 cloud builders from Natty to Precise. A
quick test showed no regressions but I want to run them in parallel
for a bit to be sure.
-- Michael
Progress
* Proposed backport for vfp addressing modes patch.
* Investigated the build issue with EEMBC and have a candidate patch
for upstream trunk. (PR53334)
* Investigated auto-inc-dec sched changes.
* Some upstream patch review.
Plans
* Work on auto-inc-dec sched changes.
* Finish PR53334 patch upstream.
* Work through some of the speed tickets and upstream bugzilla perf
tickets in preparation for connect.
Remerged the GCC 4.7 branch from upstream. I had previously
misunderstood how to resolve a conflict where Uli had committed a
different version of the same patch upstream.
Spun the GCC 4.6 and 4.7 release tarballs and passed them to Michael for
testing.
Continued work on improving code generation for 64-bit and/or/not/xor. I
now have this working to the point where it would be ready to post
upstream .... except that it depends on my other patches that are not
yet committed (or even reviewed) upstream.
Rebased and modified my core-shifts patch following Ramana's code
review. Then regression tested it - no regressions - and committed the
patch upstream. I've also updated the launchpad branch and resubmitted
the merge request with the finalized upstream patch.
Rebased the neon-shifts patch. I'll repost this upstream as soon as I'm
happy it still works correctly.
Worked on a brain-dump of all I have been working on recently. This will
hopefully help others take over my tasks after the contract expires. I
still need to put together all the test-cases and examples that Ramana
requested.
Summary:
* Linaro binary toolchain 2012.05 release.
* Code size benchmark analysis.
Details:
1. Linaro binary toolchain 2012.05 release
* Check-in the patches to support multilib and arm-linux-gnueabihf
in linaro crosstool.
* Update config to 2012.05 release, which will build multilib toolchain:
default option: -mthumb -march=armv7-a -mfloat-api=hard
-mtune=cortex-a9 -mfpu=vfpv3-d16
armv4t option: -marm -march=armv4t -mfloat-api=soft
* Try u-boot build with the armv4t option.
* Add arm-linux-gnueabihf.mpi for windows installer.
* Tests and regression analysis.
2. During code size regression analysis, we find postreload can not
optimize some cases when spilling happens, reassociation for PHI note
might lead to spilling, expand generates inefficient codes which can
not be optimized by later passes and poor code layout introduces more
branch instructions.
Plans:
* Linaro binary toolchain 2012.05 release.
* Investigate other code size regressions in 4.7.
Best regards!
-Zhenqiang
== GCC ==
* Completed implementation of new optimization sub-pass to improve
re-association of plus/minus chains for types with undefined
overflow (to improve end-of-loop value computation);
posted to gcc-patches for review.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || ||
Historical Milestones:
||initial-a15-system-model || 2012-01-27 || 2012-01-27 || 2012-01-17 ||
||qemu-kvm-getting-started || 2012-03-04?|| 2012-03-04 || 2012-02-01 ||
== cp15-rework ==
* fixed various issues, sent out v2 series, looks good to me
== other ==
* qemu-linaro 2012.05 released
* thinking about how to handle TrustZone in the context of QEMU/KVM
(we're not going to try to do a full emulation, but we need to
define a coherent line for how we support running guests that
are expecting to run as either S or NS PL1/0 kernels)
* had a play with booting UEFI on QEMU -- fails early on trying
to use the TrustZone-only VBAR register
* usual upstream maintainer duties
-- PMM
On 17 May 2012 18:23, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.chen(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>> Some are marked as unsupported but shouldn't be:
>>
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11a.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-25.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-28.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-2.c
>> +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-32.c
>
> The root cause is "target vect_cmdline_needed". For those cases, they
> have notes as:
>
> /* { dg-do run { target vect_cmdline_needed } } */
>
> In function "check_effective_target_vect_cmdline_needed" of
> lib/target-supports.exp, it check_effective_target_arm_neon.
>
> For our build, it is arm neon,
> check_effective_target_vect_cmdline_needed return 0.
>
> A quick fix is to add another dg-do run like:
> /* { dg-do run { target arm*-*-*eabihf } } */
I've looked into this further and the tests make no sense. The test
themselves are turned off unless the compiler needs extra command line
arguments to enable some type of SIMD. See PR21292. Let's discuss
this on Monday.
I've put an updated list at:
http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/hard-float-builder-diff-2.txt
The interesting ones below. They're a mix of assembler faults, ICEs,
and testisims. None are due to the change in triplet so please
propose your patch upstream.
-- Michael
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/sync-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/sync-3.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
/tmp/ccGuCO1R.s:463: Error: co-processor offset out of range
** Doesn't happen with a natty sysroot. Assembler fault?
+FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c execution test
** Testism. Skips if an explicit float-abi=hard is passed.
+FAIL: gcc.dg/pr48335-5.c (test for excess errors)
(insn 11 10 12 3 (set (reg:DI 141)
(unspec:DI [
(mem/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 129 virtual-stack-vars)
(const_int -8 [0xfffffffffffffff8])) [2 S8 A32])
] UNSPEC_MISALIGNED_ACCESS))
/cbuild/slaves/ursa2/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114985~michaelh1~hard-builder-test/gcc/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48335-5.c:16
-1
(nil))
** The unaligned access support doesn't include an unaligned DI pattern?
+FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -Os execution test
** Testism. Assumes doubles are passed in core registers.
+UNSUPPORTED: gcc.target/arm/mmx-1.c
/cbuild/slaves/ursa2/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114985~michaelh1~hard-builder-test/gcc/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/g2.c:12:1:
sorry, unimplemented: Thumb-1 hard-float VFP ABI
** Various forms. Needs thought.
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release of
Linaro QEMU 2012.05.
Linaro QEMU 2012.05 is the latest monthly release of qemu-linaro. Based
off upstream (trunk) QEMU, it includes a number of ARM-focused bug fixes
and enhancements.
New in this month's release:
- Beagle bootrom emulation now correctly handles FAT12/FAT16
images (thanks to Peter Chubb for the bug report and patch).
- We now support running ARM BE8 userspace binaries (ie
byte-invariant big-endian data and little-endian code).
Known issues:
- Graphics do not work for OMAP3 based models (beagle, overo)
with 11.10 Linaro images.
- Audio may not work on Versatile Express models with the latest
Linaro kernel/hardware packs (LP:977610).
The source tarball is available at:
https://launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+milestone/2012.05
More information on Linaro QEMU is available at:
https://launchpad.net/qemu-linaro
There will be no release of Linaro GDB this month. We're busy working
on upstreaming Android support and will backport them as they come
ready.
-- Michael
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.05
release of both Linaro GCC 4.7 and Linaro GCC 4.6.
Linaro GCC 4.7 2012.05 is the second release in the 4.7 series. Based
off the latest GCC 4.7.0+svn187448 release, it includes performance
improvements especially around 64 bit operations.
Interesting changes include:
* Updates to GCC 4.7.0+svn187448
* Uses the new /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 loader for hard float binaries
* Adds support for negating 64 bit values in NEON
* Improves loading of 64 bit immediate values in NEON
Fixes:
* LP: #959242 ICE: in vect_is_simple_use_1, at tree-vect-stmts.c
* LP: #968766 GCC 4.6.3 (cc1) crashes when compiling MPFR 3.1.0
Linaro GCC 4.6 2012.05 is the fifteenth release in the 4.6 series.
Based off the latest GCC 4.6.3+svn187273 release, this is the second
release after entering maintenance.
Interesting changes include:
* Updates to 4.6.3+svn187273
Fixes:
* LP: #959242 ICE: in vect_is_simple_use_1, at tree-vect-stmts.c
* LP: #968766 GCC 4.6.3 (cc1) crashes when compiling MPFR 3.1.0
* LP: #972648 ICE (segfault) in gsi_for_stmt
The source tarballs are available from:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+milestone/4.7-2012.05https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+milestone/4.6-2012.05
Downloads are available from the Linaro GCC page on Launchpad:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro
More information on the features and issues are available from the
release page:
https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.7/4.7-2012.05
Mailing list: http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/
Questions? https://ask.linaro.org/
Interested in commercial support? Inquire at support(a)linaro.org
-- Michael
Hi,
OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro:
* reverted the gcc 4.7 support from the denzil branch as it's causing
too much trouble
* instead we'll use a oe-core master snaphsot for 4.7
* committed a fix to our kernel bbappend
* started to look into cbuild
* added configurations to support building the images for all
oe-core targets
* created lp:~kwerner/cbuild/oecore
* kicked off a build for ARM, MIPS, PPC, X86, X86_64 using Linaro
GCC 4.6 2012.04
Misc:
* IBM internal meetings
* public holiday on Thu, vacation on Fri
I'll be back on monday
Regards,
Ken
Hi Ramana. FYI, gcc trunk fails to bootstrap with:
../../../../gcc-4.8~/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__mulvdi3':
../../../../gcc-4.8~/libgcc/libgcc2.c:397:1: internal compiler error:
in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3179
A cross compiler fails when building EEMBC with:
(insn 1166 1165 1167 155 (set (reg:CC 24 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 2148 [ D.6766 ])
(const_int 5000 [0x1388]))) iirflt01/bmark.c:501 -1
(nil))
iirflt01/bmark.c:1138:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
recog.c:2131
The last revision that bootstrapped was 187203. 187223 and 187275 failed.
-- Michael
The GCC 4.7 merge testing is currently in progress. We're a little late
with it, so I'm spinning the release speculatively. This being the case
I've made the lp:gcc-linaro branch read-only, just in case.
This shouldn't prevent anybody from reading the branch with
"lp:gcc-linaro", but the "lp:~linaro-toolchain-dev/gcc-linaro/4.7" name
will be broken for a while, so you may find "bzr pull" broken. (The
reason being that the only way to make a bzr branch read-only is to
change its owner.)
I will put the branch back to its normal state as soon as the release is
done.
Andrew
Hi there. We'd like to run a Fast Model in the validation lab for KVM
testing. Is there a blueprint for this? What's the status?
Paul and I discussed a rough plan a few months ago. It was along the lines of:
* A x86 machine as the Fast Model host
* An emulated vexpress-a15 as the KVM host
* A vexpress-a15 as the KVM guest
* LAVA treats the Fast Model as a board
* Jobs are spawned into the LAVA scheduler
* Once the KVM host is running, everything else is toolchain specific
and done via shell scripts
The dispatcher would:
* Grab the hwpack
* Grab the nano rootfs
* Build the rootfs with separate kernel, initrd, and dtb using
linaro-media-create
* Start the Fast Model with the boot wrapper, kernel, and rootfs
* Use the console to run the test script
There's more information on the steps required at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/KVMUseCase
-- Michael
== GCC ==
* Checked in patch to fix LP #959242 (GCC PR tree-optimization/52633)
to Linaro GCC 4.7 and 4.6.
* Completed design of new optimization sub-pass to improve
re-association of plus/minus chains for types with undefined
overflow (to improve end-of-loop value computation);
started implementation.
* Investigated GCC PR target/44141.
* Started investigation of TSVC vectorizer test kernels.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand | Phone: +49-7031/16-3727
STSM, GNU compiler and toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell/B.E.
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter | Geschäftsführung: Dirk
Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen | Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Stuttgart, HRB 243294
* Linaro GCC
Did the merges from upstream ahead of the Linaro releases next week.
Unfortunately, with the Linaro office move the test system is running
slowly, and it took a long while for Uli's concerns about the 4.7 merge
to be confirmed, so this might cause a bit of delay while I remerge, and
retest.
Begun looking at a solution for GCC Bugzilla pr53189. I've rewritten the
anddi3, iordi3 and xordi3 patterns to avoid the problems when NEON is
not available, and also improved the situation when NEON is enabled.
There are still a few kinks that need to be ironed out with poorly
optimized extend-and-operate sequences, and then I'm done, I hope.
* Other
Public holiday on Monday.
Summary:
* arm-linux-gnueabihf and multilib support for linaro toolchain.
Details:
1. Make arm-linux-gnueabihf and multilib work together for linaro toolchain
* Tuning the include and link path and order.
* The build requires a sysroot with both soft and hard float support
(Refer precise-sysroot-armhf-r0c.tar.bz2 at
http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/). With the sysroot, a
reference multilib toolchain build is at
http://people.linaro.org/~zhenqiangchen/
* Update the Makefiles in tests to support armv4t build.
* Setup a pandaboard and run some tests.
Plans:
* Investigate other code size regressions in 4.7.
* Prepare for linaro binary toolchain 2012.05 release.
Best regards!
-Zhenqiang
<Short week given bank holiday>
Progress
* Committed the VFP addressing modes patch.
* Investigated PR48941 patch a bit more - looks like an issue with the
register allocator around vzip and vuzp patterns and not sure what the
easiest way of sorting this really is. I wonder if we should be
looking at some of the issues around secondary reloads or friends for
this particular patch - we generate too many vmov's for my liking and
with more complex code this ends up as spills !
* Backported gnu_unique_objects patch. Need approval to commit in Linaro tree.
Plans
* Backport VFP addressing patch to Linaro tree.
* Finish smin-umin idiom patch in the backend.
* smin - umin idiom patch in middle-end - investigate further.
Absences:
* May 28- June 3 : Away to Linaro Connect.
(short week, bank holiday)
Current Milestones:
|| || Planned || Estimate || Actual ||
||cp15-rework || 2012-01-06 || 2012-06-23 || ||
Historical Milestones:
||initial-a15-system-model || 2012-01-27 || 2012-01-27 || 2012-01-17 ||
||qemu-kvm-getting-started || 2012-03-04?|| 2012-03-04 || 2012-02-01 ||
== cp15-rework ==
* various fixes following Rusty's review
* attempted to fix an issue where we would leak the hashtable
every time a new thread is created in linux-user mode. This
has run into the problem that qemu's current "copy this cpu
object" function has no place to insert cpu-specific code to
handle state which can't be simply shallow copied. This might
introduce a dependency on some object model rework, though
I'd prefer to avoid that.
== other ==
* put together and tested qemu-linaro 2012.05 prerelease tarball
* usual upstream review: couple of ARM fixes sent in for 1.1
-- PMM
