- linaro-toolchain - lists.linaro.org

RE: windows binary builds with gdb-python enabled?

by duane＠duaneellis.com

>> Using Python to script GDB makes it much more efficient to do testing. >> Having a Python-disabled build of GDB prevents this. I use the example of the gdb-python scripts for the linux kernel. They are very useful, these do not work when using GDB from windows. -Duane

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

windows binary builds with gdb-python enabled?

by duane＠duaneellis.com

It seems the prebuilt windows releases of GDB do not enable Python. Are there plans to release a python-enabled-gdb in the windows builds? If not, what are the roadblocks to this? Thanks Example: $ ./aarch64-linux-gnu-gdb.exe GNU gdb (Linaro GDB 2015.02-3) 7.8-2014.09-1-git Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "--host=i686-w64-mingw32 --target=aarch64-linux-gnu" Type "show configuration" for configuration details. For bug reporting instructions, please see: <https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro>. Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. For help, type "help". Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word". (gdb) python > >Scripting in the "Python" language is not supported in this copy of GDB. (gdb) quit

10 years, 2 months

3
2
0 0

[Weekly] 15-19 JUNE 2015

by Michael Collison

== This week == * Sprint recovery day (2/10) * TCWG-140 - Transform end of loop conditions to min_expr (6/10) - Investigated match.pd change added by Andrew Pinski * TCWG-734 - GCC Autovectorization (1/10) - EPIC Review * Misc (1/10) - Conference calls == Next week == - Call with Charles and Prathamesh for Autovectorization planning - Begin developing patch for TCWG-140 - Benchmark TCWG-146 patch - TCWG-832 investigation

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 15-19 June

by Kugan

== Progress == * Upstream GCC Bugs(5/10) - PR66554 - PR64130 - PR60001 * Misc (3/10) - Started experimenting with TACT - gcc-patches, gcc-bugs list - Meetings * Sprint recovery (2/10) == Plan == - GCC Bugs - TACT driven optimization exploration for gcc

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 15-19 June

by Prathamesh Kulkarni

== This week == * cfgloop.h flatten (2/10) - Rebased and tested on top of Andrew's patch - bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu - building on all targets in config-list.mk in progress * TCWG-777 (2/10) - Problem is still present on trunk - Original test-case: http://pastebin.com/UTv8g3aA - Original test-case assembly for -O1: http://pastebin.com/815TgDjV - Possibly reduced test-case: http://pastebin.com/UGUteX4a - Assembly for reduced test-case for -O1: http://pastebin.com/edKu6CxH - x86 assembly for reduced test-case for -O1: http://pastebin.com/9APbJeLr - Workaround: To disable CSE in branch conditions make flags volatile. This prevents storing result of ands to temporary but leads to worse code-gen. - Possible approaches from (https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/851258): a) teach PRE not to fold in such cases ? I don't know how. b) Write a new tree-ssa pass that "unfolds" cse on result of test conditions. Check if operand in if (operand != 0) is a result of test condition. eg: _8 = flags & 1; if (_8 != 0) goto true_branch else goto false_branch In this case we could add an attribute to _8 say "unfold". If we again come across if (_8 != 0) at a later point, and it's marked with "unfold", we can create a new ssa var with definition of _8. so it becomes: _9 = flags & 1; if (_9 != 0) ... which will "undo" CSE on test conditions. Does this sounds reasonable ? Should we do it on all test conditions ? I don't understand "suitable compare insn" a target should have in above link. * TCWG-145 (2/10) - Optimization is already implemented in PRE pass. - Verified for various test-cases in eembc. - Currently gcc does not convert global statics to locals - remove-local-statics-7.c not handled currently by gcc: (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01007.html) - Desirable to have ipa dead-store analysis to avoid stores to static vars: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01609.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01602.html - continuing to look for cases where static-to-locals wins over PRE. * Misc (4/10) - Built firefox on x86 non-LTO - Read thru tree-ssa-dse.c, IPA, LTO doc - US Visa application - Setting up home office == Issues == Not able to connect to #linaro-tcwg thru ircproxy.linaro.org , password invalid. == Next Week == - TCWG-830 - TCWG-835 - TCWG-844 - continue investigating branch out of range error issue. - Work towards committing cfgloop.h patch

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 15-19 June

by Charles Baylis

== Progress == Sprint recovery [2/10] (TCWG-775) NEON intrinsics error messages [7/10] . familiarisation with differences between ARM and AArch64 NEON/SIMD backends . started porting error reporting changes to ARM NEON backend . pinged patch for AArch64 work Misc [1/10] == Plans == continue NEON error messages vectorization work discussions

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY]

by Renato Golin

== Progress == * Maintenance (CARD-1833 1/10) - Looking at AArch64 ADD->SUB a bit more * Buildbots (CARD-1823 6/10) - Moving LNT bot to CMake - Setting up LLD and LLDB buildbots - Investigating LNT instability / Perf buildbot * Background (3/10) - Code review, meetings, discussions, etc. - Reviewing more stride vectorizer patches (back-end) == Plan == * Try to get some development going back again...

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 15 - 19 June 2015

by Yao Qi

# Progress # * Linaro GDB [7/10] ** TCWG-805, aarch64 native debugging multi-arch support. Aarch64 GDB works well debugging Aarch32 programs, except on handling fork/vfork and watchpoint. Test harness uses ldd which doesn't handle aarch32 too. Report a kernel issue that it doesn't get TLS base right through ptrace in compat mode. Got a patch to fix it. * FSF GDB [3/10] ** Push in a fix to unbreak arm native gdb build. ** Post a patch to fix a bug on using PTRACE_GETREGSET on arm-linux. ** GDB 7.10 release. Branch isn't created. Test results of arm and aarch64 look good. # Plan # * TCWG-805, start to push some preparatory patches upstream. * Off on Thu. -- Yao

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

new gas feature: section name substitution sequence

by Nicolas Pitre

Hello toolchain people, I created a patch on top of upstream binutils for a feature I need which should be universally useful as well. Now I have 3 questions for you: 1) Does it look sane enough? 2) If so, could you integrate it in the Linaro release? 3) Would you be willing to promote it upstream? Comments appreciated. Here's the patch: ----- >8 Subject: [PATCH] gas: introduce section name substitution support When gas is invoked with --sectname-subst, the occurrence of %S in a section name will be substituted by the name of the current section. For example: .macro exception_code .pushsection %S.exception [exception code here] .popsection .endm .text [code] exception_code [...] .section .init [init code] exception_code [...] In the first exception_code invocation the .text.exception section is created while in the second invocation it is the .init.exception section that is created. This is useful e.g. to discriminate between anciliary sections that are tied to .init code and can be discarded at run time when initialization is over vs anciliary sections tied to .text sections that need to stay resident. This would also allow for actually omitting __exit sections from the Linux kernel binary when modules are configured in even when exit marked code generates exception table entries. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico(a)linaro.org> diff --git a/gas/ChangeLog b/gas/ChangeLog index 57fc30a..0189bb2 100644 --- a/gas/ChangeLog +++ b/gas/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2015-06-03 Nicolas Pitre <nico(a)linaro.org> + + * as.c (show_usage): Document --sectname-subst. + (parse_args): Add --sectname-subst. + * as.h (flag_sectname_subst): New. + * config/obj-elf.c (obj_elf_section_name): Add %S substitution. + * doc/as.texinfo: Document it. + 2015-06-03 Matthew Wahab <matthew.wahab(a)arm.com> * config/tc-arm.c (arm_archs): Add "armv8.1-a". diff --git a/gas/as.c b/gas/as.c index 2a8923f..fecfcd2 100644 --- a/gas/as.c +++ b/gas/as.c @@ -284,6 +284,8 @@ Options:\n\ fprintf (stream, _("\ --size-check=[error|warning]\n\ ELF .size directive check (default --size-check=error)\n")); + fprintf (stream, _("\ + --sectname-subst enable section name substitution sequences\n")); #endif fprintf (stream, _("\ -f skip whitespace and comment preprocessing\n")); @@ -447,6 +449,7 @@ parse_args (int * pargc, char *** pargv) OPTION_EXECSTACK, OPTION_NOEXECSTACK, OPTION_SIZE_CHECK, + OPTION_SECTNAME_SUBST, OPTION_ALTERNATE, OPTION_AL, OPTION_HASH_TABLE_SIZE, @@ -481,6 +484,7 @@ parse_args (int * pargc, char *** pargv) ,{"execstack", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_EXECSTACK} ,{"noexecstack", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_NOEXECSTACK} ,{"size-check", required_argument, NULL, OPTION_SIZE_CHECK} + ,{"sectname-subst", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_SECTNAME_SUBST} #endif ,{"fatal-warnings", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_WARN_FATAL} ,{"gdwarf-2", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_GDWARF2} @@ -848,6 +852,10 @@ This program has absolutely no warranty.\n")); else as_fatal (_("Invalid --size-check= option: `%s'"), optarg); break; + + case OPTION_SECTNAME_SUBST: + flag_sectname_subst = 1; + break; #endif case 'Z': flag_always_generate_output = 1; diff --git a/gas/as.h b/gas/as.h index 6de319e..635b2c5 100644 --- a/gas/as.h +++ b/gas/as.h @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ COMMON enum size_check_warning } flag_size_check; + +/* If section name substitution sequences should be honored */ +COMMON int flag_sectname_subst; #endif #ifndef DOLLAR_AMBIGU diff --git a/gas/config/obj-elf.c b/gas/config/obj-elf.c index 4d7a8a7..78dc6d9 100644 --- a/gas/config/obj-elf.c +++ b/gas/config/obj-elf.c @@ -917,6 +917,27 @@ obj_elf_section_name (void) name = (char *) xmalloc (end - input_line_pointer + 1); memcpy (name, input_line_pointer, end - input_line_pointer); name[end - input_line_pointer] = '\0'; + + while (flag_sectname_subst) + { + char *subst = strchr (name, '%'); + if (subst && subst[1] == 'S') + { + int oldlen = strlen (name); + int substlen = strlen (now_seg->name); + int newlen = oldlen - 2 + substlen; + char *newname = (char *) xmalloc (newlen + 1); + int headlen = subst - name; + memcpy (newname, name, headlen); + strcpy (newname + headlen, now_seg->name); + strcat (newname + headlen, subst + 2); + xfree (name); + name = newname; + } + else + break; + } + #ifdef tc_canonicalize_section_name name = tc_canonicalize_section_name (name); #endif diff --git a/gas/doc/as.texinfo b/gas/doc/as.texinfo index 5710e1c..be13b6a 100644 --- a/gas/doc/as.texinfo +++ b/gas/doc/as.texinfo @@ -6259,6 +6259,36 @@ For ELF targets, the @code{.section} directive is used like this: .section @var{name} [, "@var{flags}"[, @@@var{type}[,@var{flag_specific_arguments}]]] @end smallexample +@cindex --sectname-subst +If the @samp{--sectname-subst} command-line option is provided, the @var{name} +argument may contain a substitution sequence. Only @code{%S} is supported +at the moment, and substitutes the current section name. For example: + +@smallexample +.macro exception_code +.section %S.exception +[exception code here] +.previous +.endm + +.text +[code] +exception_code +[...] + +.section .init +[init code] +exception_code +[...] +@end smallexample + +The two @code{exception_code} invocations above would create the +(a)code{.text.exception} and @code{.init.exception} sections respectively. +This is useful e.g. to discriminate between anciliary sections that are +tied to setup code to be discarded after use from anciliary sections that +need to stay resident without having to define two @code{exception_code} +macros just for that purpose. + The optional @var{flags} argument is a quoted string which may contain any combination of the following characters: @table @code Nicolas

10 years, 2 months

5
17
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 15-19 June 2015

by Christophe Lyon

* 1 day off (2/10) == Progress == * Neon intrinsics tests - committed last batch of tests - need to think about tests for vget_lane which are still missing, but not high priority * linaro-gcc-5.1-2015.06 snapshot (4/10) - committed branch merge with upstream gcc-5-branch - prepared snapshot & updated release scripts * Upstream maintenance (1/10) - backported a fix from Michael to 4.8 and 4.9 branches - backported fix for PR62308 to 4.9 branch - most of the time spent on bootstrapping on aarch64 HW - started looking at some recent new tests having trouble dealing with some multilib variants * Misc (3/10) - meetings, conf-calls, emails, ... == Next == * linaro-gcc-5.1-2015.06 snapshot - build release notes - create a proper tag * backports, release, validation: - update doc according to our new process * validation: - take unstable tests into account * upstream maintenance: - check recent regressions

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY]

by Renato Golin

== Progress == * Maintenance (CARD-1833 2/10) - Initial work on ADD<->SUB for negative imm in asm * Buildbots (CARD-1823 6/10) - Adding test-suite to CMake buildbot (D10244) - Bisecting broken self-hosting vfp3 bots * Background (2/10) - Code review, meetings, discussions, etc. - Some more meetings about infrastructure... - LLVM status and plan for next half * Sprint Week in Grenoble == Plan == * Continue with CMake LNT changes * Carry on with ADD/SUB change * Revive ASM warnings discussion

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

mfpu=neon and -march=native on aarch64-linux-gnu toolchain

by Virendra Kumar Pathak

Hi Linaro Toolchain Group, I have questions regarding -mfpu=neon and -march=native w.r.t aarch64 linaro native toolchain (aarch64-linux-gnu) I found gcc is not accepting these flags. On juno Board: gcc -mfpu=neon hello.c -o hello gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mfpu=neon' gcc -march=native hello.c -o hello hello.c:1:0: error: unknown value 'native' for –march Am I missing something ? Please help. Below is the machine details uname -a Linux juno 3.10.55.0-1-linaro-lt-vexpress64 #1ubuntu1~ci+141022094025 SMP Wed Oct 22 09:41:06 UTC 2014 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/apps/gcc-native/gcc-linaro-5.1-2015.06.06.native-i686-mingw32_aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/../libexec/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/5.1.1/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-linux-gnu Configured with: '/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/snapshots/gcc.git~linaro-4.9-branch/configure' SHELL=/bin/sh --with-bugurl=https://bugs.linaro.org --with-mpc=/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu --with-mpfr=/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu --with-gmp=/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libmudflap --with-cloog=no --with-ppl=no --with-isl=no --disable-nls --enable-multiarch --disable-multilib --enable-c99 --with-arch=armv8-a --disable-shared --enable-static --with-build-sysroot=/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/sysroots/aarch64-linux-gnu --enable-lto --enable-linker-build-id --enable-long-long --enable-shared --with-sysroot=/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 --enable-checking=release --disable-bootstrap --with-bugurl= https://bugs.linaro.org --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=aarch64-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-linux-gnu --prefix=/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 5.1.1 (GCC) Thanks. -- with regards, Virendra Kumar Pathak

10 years, 3 months

2
3
0 0

gcc-5 git branch

by Virendra Kumar Pathak

Hi Linaro Toolchain Group, I see two git branches for GCC-5 at https://git.linaro.org 1. https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/gcc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/gcc-5-branch 2. https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/gcc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linaro/gcc-5-b… What is the difference between these two branches ? Which branch should be used for development ? Is it branch (1) refers to GCC upstream branch for GCC5 & branch (2) is linaro version of branch (1). Please comment. -- with regards, Virendra Kumar Pathak

10 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 1st-5th June

by Bernie Ogden

Holiday [2/10] Benchmark Automation - TCWG-360 [4/10] * Learned about central Jenkins instance * Considered ways of integrating benchmark scripts with said instance * Considered alternative way for benchmark scripts to interoperate with LAVA Misc [4/10] * Large mail backlog * Travel prep =Plan= Team sprint

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 01 - 06 June 2015

by Yao Qi

# Progress # * Linaro GDB [4/10] ** TCWG-805, aarch64 native debugging multi-arch support. aarch64 native gdb is able to debug arm program now, but with some problems on coredump. Patches are not posted. ** Give my input on GDB kernel awareness too, and the proposal finally is posted upstream. * FSF GDB [1/10] ** Patches review. * Misc [5/10] ** Attend an internal ARM Debug/Tracing summit. ** Prepare for the France travel. # Plan # * Sprint in Grenoble. -- Yao

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

abe: cross native toolchain compilation for aarch64-linux-gnu

by Virendra Kumar Pathak

Hi Linaro Toolchain Group, I am trying to build a cross-native toolchain for AARCH64 using ABE build framework. By cross native I mean that toolchain will be build on 0x86 (Red hat Santiago 6.4), it will run on AARCH64 (Juno) and will produce binaries to be run on AARCH64 (Juno) (If I am not mistaked) --build=0x86, --host=AARCH64, --target=AARCH64 Steps followed: 1. I built a cross toolchain first ../abe/configure ../abe/abe.sh --target aarch64-linux-gnu --build all --release 2015.05.29 --tarbin --disable update 2. Added the above cross toolchain (bin path) in the PATH 3. To build to cross-native ../abe/configure ../abe/abe.sh --host aarch64-linux-gnu --target aarch64-linux-gnu --build all --release 2015.06.01.native --tarbin --disable update But after some time, I got following error and compilation hanged. make: Leaving directory `/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/aarch64-linux-gnu/aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc.git~linaro-4.9-branch-stage1' RUN: copy_gcc_libs_to_sysroot "/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc --sysroot=/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/sysroots/aarch64-linux-gnu" /home/user_name/vpathak/abe/lib/make.sh: line 962: ./builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc: cannot execute binary file Am I missing something ? Please help. However with the following hack in the abe, I am able to compile cross-native toolchain for aarch64-linux-gnu. In the abe code base: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lib/make.sh Function copy_gcc_libs_to_sysroot() gcc_exe="`find -name ${target}-gcc`" - libgcc="`${gcc_exe} -print-file-name=${libgcc}`" + #libgcc="`${gcc_exe} -print-file-name=${libgcc}`" + libgcc="/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/4.9.3/libgcc.a" Since './builds/destdir/aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc' is native toolchain it will not run on 0x86. Thus libgcc will be empty. Therefore I hard-coded libgcc path. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I had to disable gdb compilation. This error I faced while compiling cross-native compilation only. Cross compilation is successful on the same 0x86 machine. checking for library containing waddstr... no configure: error: no enhanced curses library found; disable TUI make: *** [configure-gdb] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/home/user_name/vpathak/build_abe/builds/aarch64-linux-gnu/aarch64-linux-gnu/binutils-gdb.git~linaro_gdb-7.8-branch-gdb' WARNING: Make had failures! ERROR (#159): build_all (Failed building .) hacked patch --- a/lib/make.sh +++ b/lib/make.sh @@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ build_all() # to rebuilt the sysroot. local builds="infrastructure binutils libc stage2 gdb" else - local builds="infrastructure binutils stage1 libc stage2 gdb" + local builds="infrastructure binutils stage1 libc stage2" fi if test "`echo ${target} | grep -c -- -linux-`" -eq 1; then - local builds="${builds} gdbserver" + local builds="${builds}" fi --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks. -- with regards, Virendra Kumar Pathak

10 years, 3 months

3
2
0 0

Tool for checking coding style in Linaro Toolchain

by Virendra Kumar Pathak

Hi Linaro Toolchain Group, Is there any tool for checking coding style of the patches submitted to the Linaro Toolchain ? In other word is there any equivalent of Linux checkpatch.pl in Linaro Toolchain (GCC, Binutils etc) ? If yes, please let me know. If not, then in general how people check the coding style of the patches they submit to Linaro Toolchain (GCC, Binutils etc). I assume manual inspection (line by line) may be very tedious thing to do. Thanks. -- with regards, Virendra Kumar Pathak

10 years, 3 months

5
4
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 25 - 29 May 2015

by Kugan

== Progress == * Upstream GCC (8/10) - TCWG-486 - Optimize Constant Uses in Loops. - Jeff reviewed it and asked for some minor changes - Rebased and redid full testing and posted it - TCWG-555 - Complete re-write of widening pass based on review comments - Getting ready to post for review * Misc (2/10) - Reading TACT User Manual - gcc-patches, gcc-bugs list - Meetings == Plan == - Continue with gcc stage1 activities

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[Weekly] 25-29 MAY 2015

by Michael Collison

== This week == * Bug 539 - .LTHUNK symbols are surviving (2/10) - Built Qt 4.8 using 4.9 and 4.9 toolchain and verified fix identified by Jim Wilson - Plan to close as fixed * Bug 535 - static cast from float to int not working on ARM hardfp (2/10) - Investigation * TCWG-140 - Transform end of loop conditions to min_expr (1/10) - Investigation into blueprint and patch * TCWG-146 - Detect smin/umin idiom (2/10) - After investigation no patch deemed necessary for aarch64 * Misc (1/10) - Conference calls * US Holiday - Memorial Day, May 25th (2/10) == Next week == - Submit Aarch32 patch for TCWG-146 upstream - TCWG-140 investigation

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] Week 22

by Prathamesh Kulkarni

== This week == * TCWG-619 (4/10) - Chromium builds with LTO single-partition with gold by changing arm_is_long_call_p() to always return true, thereby disabling short calls. - Fails to build with ld.bfd for single partiition with the following error: obj/third_party/webrtc/base/rtc_base.ipaddress.o: In function `rtc::IPAddress::IPAddress(unsigned int)': ipaddress.cc:(.text._ZN3rtc9IPAddressC2Ej[_ZN3rtc9IPAddressC5Ej]+0x28): undefined reference to `vtable for rtc::IPAddress' - gas debug for "Thumb2 branch out of range" in config/tc-arm.c: Fails in md_apply_fix at following condition: if ((value & ~0x3fffff) && ((value & ~0x3fffff) != ~0x3fffff)) { if (!(ARM_CPU_HAS_FEATURE (cpu_variant, arm_arch_t2))) as_bad_where (fixP->fx_file, fixP->fx_line, BAD_RANGE); else if ((value & ~0x1ffffff) && ((value & ~0x1ffffff) != ~0x1ffffff)) as_bad_where (fixP->fx_file, fixP->fx_line, _("Thumb2 branch out of range")); } The condition became true for value == fffffda Backtrace: http://pastebin.com/QZqbwNCy Options passed to as: -march=armv7-a -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=neon -mfpu=neon -meabi=5 - Disabling the above condition results in: arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program lto1) * PR49551 (2/10) - Modified patch and retested on x86 and arm. - Submitted patch upstream for review. * Misc (4/10) - Exams ended on Monday. - College Annual day. == Next Week == - Work towards getting the patch approved. - Continue investigating "Thumb2 branch out of range" error. - Begin with TCWG-777. - Submit cfgloop.h flattening patch upstream.

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

question on bfd - arch & mach

by Virendra Kumar Pathak

Hi Linaro Toolchain Group, I am going through the binutils code base specific to arm & aarch64. Please give some insight on below questions. 1. In the struct bfd_arch_info {...} (in bfd/bfd-in2.h) there are two fields 'enum bfd_architecture arch' and 'unsigned long mach'. I went trough the binutils porting guide (by MR.Swami.Reddy(a)nsc.com) which says 'arch' is for architecture & 'mach' is for machine value. At present in the bfd/bfd-in2.h :- arch = bfd_arch_aarch64 and mach = bfd_mach_aarch64 or bfd_mach_aarch64_ilp32. But what these fields really means ? What is the difference between 'arch' and 'mach'? Lets say instruction set architecture is ARMv8 (also known as aarch64 for 64 bit- if I am not wrong). Then we have specific implementation of this like cortex53, cortex57, Cavium ThunderX etc. With respect to this what will be the value of arch = ? and mach = ? 2. In the include/opcode/arm.h the 'arm_feature_set' is defined as a structure where as in include/opcode/aarch64.h 'aarch64_feature_set' is defined as unsigned long. Is there any specific reason for this? Why structure definition was not followed in aarch64 ? typedef struct { unsigned long core; unsigned long coproc; } arm_feature_set; typedef unsigned long aarch64_feature_set; 3. Also I see that in the case of arm, 'mach' values are derived from cpu extension value specified in that 'arm_feature_set' structure. For example. if (ARM_CPU_HAS_FEATURE (cpu_variant, arm_cext_iwmmxt2)) mach = bfd_mach_arm_iWMMXt2; Whereas in aarch64 mach is derived based on API type (64 or 32). Any reason for this ? mach = ilp32_p ? bfd_mach_aarch64_ilp32 : bfd_mach_aarch64; Thanks in advance. -- with regards, Virendra Kumar Pathak

10 years, 3 months

2
2
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 25-29 May

by Charles Baylis

== Progress == TCWG-775 NEON error messages (2/10) . wrote new patch for Aarch64 . tried to test it, but GCC testsuite stopped working on my laptop (random failures with "test for errors, tests randomly being marked UNSUPPORTED) Bank Holiday [2/10] Bug #1599 [1/10] . reproduced bug on Linaro GCC 4.9 , bisected both the cause and the trunk fix Misc [5/10] . attempted to diagnose GCC testsuite problems. Seems to be related to kernel version somehow. . Erratum workaround stuff (bug 1550, bug 1596) == Plans == Find working kernel for laptop Cleanup/submit patch for TCWG-775 Create JIRA cards following vectorization study (TCWG-735)

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 25 May -- 29 May

by Yao Qi

Bank holiday on Monday. [2/10] # Issue # No. Ubuntu is successfully installed on my chromebook. # Progress # * Linaro GDB [4/10] ** TCWG-517, GDB AAarch64 record/replay. Done. Patches are committed upstream. Fix one build failure caused these patches. ** TCWG-805, aarch64 native debugging multi-arch support. *** Switch to PTRACE_GETREGSET and PTRACE_SETREGSET. Patches are posted upstreams. *** Get ubuntun 14.02 running on chrombook successfully. ** Give my input on GDB kernel awareness too. * FSF GDB [3/10] ** PR 18392, review the fix and understand the code about tail call unwinding. ** Approve and commit some tiny patches. * Misc [1/10] ** Prepare for incoming France travel. ** Book flight and hotel for GNU Tools Cauldron. Next week: * TCWG-805, aarch64 native debugging multi-arch support. -- Yao

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY]

by Renato Golin

== Progress == * Bank Holiday (2/10) * Maintenance (CARD-1833 6/10) - Finished all FIXMEs in LLVM and Clang - Working on ASM warnings * Background (2/10) - Code review, meetings, discussions, etc. - Updated arm-bots.html to account for build num, commit range == Plan == * Continue working on ASM warnings * Move a few left-overs in ARMAsmParser to use ARMTargetParser If time allows... * Check the ADD -> SUB change in the assembler * Try to get the test-suite running on a CMake buildbot Background * Check the progress of some Android bugs

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 25-29 May 2015

by Christophe Lyon

* 1 day off * Neon intrinsics tests (4/10) - submitted last set for review * Misc (4/10) - meetings, conf-calls, emails, ... - checks for our new GCC mirror == Next == * Neon intrinsics tests: work on vget_lane test. * linaro-gcc-5.1-2015.06 release: - start working on backports

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain