- linaro-toolchain - lists.linaro.org

by Will Newton

== Progress == * Two day week * Catching up on email etc. after break (0.5/10) * Investigate setjmp/longjmp SystemTap probe support in ARM glibc (1/10, TCWG-378) * Investigate toolchain bug reports for ARM and AArch64 (0.5/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * Resume QEMU ARMv8 AArch32 work * Hopefully push glibc ARM pointer encryption fix for 2.19 -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

11 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 6-10 January 2014

by Christophe Lyon

- 2013.12 releases (1/10) * Sent announcements for 4.7 and 4.8 releases. - 2014.01 releases (2/10) * Created 4.7 and 4.8 branch merge requests (had handle some conflicts in 4.8) * Looked at backporting the crypto intrinsics support into 4.8, but there are dependencies with several other patches we haven't backported yet. - cross validation (4/10) * Restarted them since I had to stop them during the holidays. Still catching up with the backlog, should be OK during the week-end. * Analyzed and reported several regressions or new tests failing in some configurations. - Neon intrinsics tests (1/10) * Looked at Rob's neon-intrinsics branch and sent him some feedback. - misc (2/10): conf-calls and meetings. == Next == - 2014.01 releases - cross-validation: look at results and report regressions if any - resume libsanitizer work for AArch64

11 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] Week 01

by Renato Golin

== Progress == * Release 3.4 went out * Buildbots - Using powered USB hub for the external harddrive, but all boards fail one time or another... - Maybe it's the hard-drive type (mobile, power-saving), reverting to USB sticks for now - Leaving an odroid U2 running on USB stick for a week, used to work... - C++11 features will need GCC 4.7+, looking for an easy way to upgrade the Chromebooks * MCJIT - Finished work on remote MCJIT to re-enable the failing tests - http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2527 * Pragma Vectorize - New discussions hint that my parser patch is moot, for now - Agreement is to use C++11 attributes for now, and add pragmas later - I can't continue implementing them, though... * Background - Huge number of patch reviews during holidays & this week - Good progress on new features for the IAS - More progress on EHABI, including IAS support * Time - CARD-862 8/10 - Others 2/10 == Plan == * Continue reviewing IAS features, maybe implement some * Work out how to create a libcxx bot * re-introduce llvm-chrome-01 as second self-host * Migrate all buildbots to GCC 4.7+ * Check out EHABI tests and assess progress

11 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

miscompilation of unsigned comparison on aarch64

by Michael Hudson-Doyle

Hi, I filed this on bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59744 but I thought I'd mention it here too. This slightly strangely written program (it's distilled down from frame_offset_overflow in the gcc source itself) should print "bigger" if the first argument is bigger than 10 (or negative, but let's ignore that please): #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> int a[2] = { 10, 20 }; int is_bigger (long offset, int index) { unsigned long size = -offset; if (size > a[index]) { printf("bigger\n"); return 1; } return 0; } int main (int argc, char** argv) { long v; v = atol(argv[1]); is_bigger(-v, 0); return 0; } When compiled at -O1 or above (and with inlining disabled at -O2 and above), though, it bungles the 0 case: (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ gcc-4.9 -O3 test.c -o test -fno-inline -Wall (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ ./test 1 (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ ./test 11 bigger (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ ./test 0 bigger (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ gcc-4.9 -O0 test.c -o test -Wall (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ ./test 1 (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ ./test 11 bigger (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ ./test 0 (t-doko)mwhudson@arm64:~$ What's going on? Here's the disassembly of is_bigger (at O3): 0000000000400608 <is_bigger>: 400608: b0000082 adrp x2, 411000 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x28> 40060c: 91010042 add x2, x2, #0x40 400610: a9bf7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp,#-16]! 400614: 52800003 mov w3, #0x0 // #0 400618: 910003fd mov x29, sp 40061c: b8a1d841 ldrsw x1, [x2,w1,sxtw #2] 400620: ab00003f cmn x1, x0 400624: 540000a2 b.cs 400638 <is_bigger+0x30> 400628: 90000000 adrp x0, 400000 <_init-0x3f8> 40062c: 911b6000 add x0, x0, #0x6d8 400630: 97ffff90 bl 400470 <puts@plt> 400634: 52800023 mov w3, #0x1 // #1 400638: 2a0303e0 mov w0, w3 40063c: a8c17bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp],#16 400640: d65f03c0 ret Basically it seems that the condition "-offset > val" is being compiled as "val + offset does not overflow", which is not valid for offset == 0. This seems to me to be the underlying cause behind https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.8/+bug/1263806 ("gccgo fails to compile tomb.go on arm64"). Cheers, mwh

11 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

help on linaro android toolchain 13.12 (arm-v7)

by Sandeepa Prabhu

Hi, We are trying to build android Kitkat (for our own platform) using linaro android toolchain version 4.7.4 from 13.12 release. We are observing following while compiling some shared libraries: ~arm-linux-androideabi-4.7/bin/../libexec/gcc/arm-linux-androideabi/4.7.4/real-ld: warning: shared library text segment is not shareable ~arm-linux-androideabi-4.7/bin/../libexec/gcc/arm-linux-androideabi/4.7.4/real-ld: error: treating warnings as errors We tried to suppress thisn warning by setting LDFLAGS but the tool-chain does not seem to identify this flag: LOCAL_LDFLAGS := --no-warn-shared-textrel We need some help to fix this, so posting on both android and tool-chain mailing lists. Thanks, Sandeepa

11 years, 6 months

2
1
0 0

LLVM and GCC working together

by Renato Golin

Hi folks, As most of you are on the GNU side of the fence, I believe this is the right crowd to first ask this question, before attempting a wider audience. For a while, Clang/LLVM wasn't in any position to add unheard-of features, and most of what we needed would be covered by something GCC already did. But in the last year or so, there were a number of "features" we'd like to add that aren't present in GCC (like pragmas, attributes, asm directives) which is neither part of the language specifications, nor something that another standard (like OpenMP or ABIs) already support. As a concrete example, we're trying to come up with some vectorisation annotation and there is a heated discussion on whether it should be C++11 attributes, pragmas, or changing the __attribute__ semantics to allow it to be used in lexical blocks, not just declarations. Any of that, but most strikingly the latter, would add Clang-specific behaviour which GCC probably won't implement, and we all know how that feels. In this discussion, and others regarding ARM-specific behaviour (notably about assembly directives), I have used the same argument twice already, so it's time to ask the GCC crowd once and for all: For non-standard, domain or platform specific changes, do we want to have a joint task force, GCC+LLVM, to homogenize the efforts in extending the languages we support in the same say, so that we can call it the "OSS Compiler Extensions" (or whatever) instead of two separate GCC-extensions and Clang-extensions? Historically, GCC has *a lot* more extensions, so this new standard would probably be 99% GCC, but the goals of such a task force for the future would be to: 1. Make sure all OSS compilers implement the same extensions, when they so chose. So, extensions to the language should go in a shared forum, and not to Clang/GCC lists. 2. Document each extension and record all discussions (threads, bugs, etc), so that new compilers can have an easier time implementing them. 3. Reason about the existing hazardous or redundant extensions, and mark them for deprecation. This is also pertinent to the Linux kernel, which is driving its own task force to compiler the kernel with Clang, so that it can rid itself from outdated GNU extensions that lingered for far too long in their code. I appreciate the size of this proposal, the political issues and the endless discussions, but this is the same on every standard committee, and I'd rather have something than nothing at all. Perhaps, as it happened before, some of these changes could be more easily persuaded to move back to the language standards and platforms ABIs, than if it's just implemented, undocumented, by one compiler. So, ignoring just for a moment the political side of it, would that make technical sense for the GCC community as well? cheers, --renato

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Stable GCC

by Renato Golin

Folks, Since LLVM is moving on to C++11, I need to replace our buildbot GCCs with 4.7+ (the new minimum requirement), but I'd like to use whatever is the most stable and modern GCC version for native compilation. I could get the latest and greatest on our repository, but I know how compilers are written, and pardon me if I don't trust new releases... ;) Does any one have an opinion on which is the most stable, preferably 4.8, release of native ARMv7 GCC binaries? For some odd reason, we just release cross-compilers, so, in that case, where would I look for a native GCC, other than in my Ubuntu/Arch repositories? ARM? CodeSourcery? I *really* don't want to compile it myself... My lack of available fast ARM hardware is disturbing, and I don't want to spend a week cross-compiling GCC. cheers, --renato

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro GCC 4.8 and 4.7 2013.12 released

by Christophe Lyon

The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release of both Linaro GCC 4.8 and Linaro GCC 4.7. Linaro GCC 4.7 2013.12 is the twentiy first release in the 4.7 series. Based off the latest GCC 4.7.4+svn205768 release, this is the eighth release after entering maintenance. Interesting changes include: * Updates to GCC 4.7.4+svn205768 * Fixed MULTILIB_DEFAULTS in linux-eabi case. Linaro GCC 4.8 2013.12 is the ninth release in the 4.8 series. Based off the latest GCC 4.8.3+svn205577 release, it includes performance improvements and bug fixes. Interesting changes include: * Updates to GCC 4.8.3+svn205577 * AArch64: enable build of libjava and libatomic. Change frame growth direction, thus enabling libssp build. The source tarballs are available from: http://releases.linaro.org/13.12/components/toolchain/gcc-linaro/4.7 http://releases.linaro.org/13.12/components/toolchain/gcc-linaro/4.8 Downloads are available from the Linaro Releases website: http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ More information on the features and issues are available from the release pages: https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.7/4.7-2013.12 https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.8/4.8-2013.12 Mailing list: http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/ Questions? https://ask.linaro.org/ Interested in commercial support? Inquire at support(a)linaro.org

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[Activity] 30 DEC-03 Jan 2013

by Venkataramanan Kumar

== Progress == * Pointer mangling Aarch64 glibc. Worked on review comments from Maintainer. Rebased and posted the patch. Upstream completed and closed the card. https://cards.linaro.org/browse/TCWG-373 * Experimented with Cbuildv2 native building. == Plan == - Continue Cbuildv2. - Investigate PGO for Aarch64. == Issues == Waiting for feedback on libssp machine descriptions changes.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] Week 01

by Zhenqiang Chen

== Issues == * None == Progress == * One day off (Jan. 1) * Do some basic validations for 2013.12 toolchain binaries release. * R/M Mac toolchain validation * Branch-cost related tuning for Cortex-M. == Plans == * Continue on branch-cost related tuning.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 30 December 2013 - 3rd January 2014

by Kugan

== Progress == - Short week (4 Days) - TCWG-291 zero/sign extension elimination 4/10 - made re-factoring and ran the regression - benchmarking in progress - TCWG-134 divmod 4/10 - converted into latest pass structure and re-based the patch - found some regression failures and fixed them - regression testing ongoing == Plan == - post divmod and vrp patches

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 30 December 2013 - 3rd January 2014

by Omair Javaid

== Progress == * ARM Process Record: [TCWG-336] [TCWG-338] [TCWG-339][TCWG-317] [TCWG-315] - Configured and learnt to use git format-patch and git send-email. [1/10] - Incorporated and tested changes suggested by maintainers in previous arm process record patches. [2/10] - Created a new patch series indicating bug fixes separate from features. [1/10] - Submitted version 2 of arm process record replay improvements. * Debugging of stepping over and single stepping heurisitic code. [TCWG-315] [4/10] * Review of open JIRA cards and pending patches [1/10] * Time off for setting up new office space. [0.5/10] * Macau visa information gathering and document preparation [0.5/10] == Plan == * Reverse engineering stepping code heuristics in gdb to find a fix for reverse debugging of solib code on arm. [TCWG-315] * Find and submit a new fix for TCWG-267. * New office space setup and Macau visa application, will be away from my desk for few hours.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro Toolchain Binaries 2013.12 released

by Bernhard Rosenkränzer

Just before having to rename it to 2014, the Linaro Toolchain and Builds and Baselines Working Groups are pleased to announce the 2013.12 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build. Uses include: * Cross compiling ARM applications from your laptop * Remote debugging * Build the Linux kernel for your board What's included: * Linaro GCC 4.8 2013.12 * Linaro GDB 7.6.1 2013.12 * Linaro Binutils 2.24 2013.12 * A statically linked gdbserver * A system root * Manuals under share/doc/ The system root contains the basic header files and libraries to link your programs against. Interesting changes include: * Binutils has been updated to 2.24, bringing many improvements * Various bugs have been fixed The Linux version is supported on Ubuntu 10.04.3 and 12.04, Debian 6.0.2, Fedora 16, openSUSE 12.1, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 5.7 and later, and should run on any Linux Standard Base 3.0 compatible distribution. Please see the README about running on x86_64 hosts. The Windows version is supported on Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Vista Business SP2, and Windows 7 Pro SP1. The binaries and build scripts are available from: https://releases.linaro.org/13.10/components/toolchain/binaries/ Need help? Ask a question on https://ask.linaro.org/ Already on Launchpad? Submit a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries On IRC? See us on #linaro on Freenode. Other ways that you can contact us or get involved are listed at https://wiki.linaro.org/GettingInvolved.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[Activity] 23-27 DEC 2013

by Venkataramanan Kumar

== Progress == * Pointer mangling Aarch64 glibc. Posted patch on pointer mangling. Worked on review comments from maintainer. Tested on V8 foundation model. == Plan == - Continue working on review comments for Pointer Guard support in Aarch64 glibc, - Continue Cbuildv2. - Investigate PGO for Aarch64. == Issues == Waiting for feedback on libssp machine descriptions changes.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] Week 52

by Zhenqiang Chen

== Issues == * None == Progress == * One day off (Dec. 27). * Prepare toolchain binaries release - Backport the newlib patches for ftruncate() and truncate() stubs - Test and update binutils version to linaro-2.24-2013.12 and workaround gold compile fail issue. * Retest -fira-loop-pressure performance on cortex-m4. But get regression in several suites of eembc-v1. Will re-investigate it when aarch64 performance test is ready since it is enabled in ia64 and rs6000, and the comment says: /* Numerous experiment shows that IRA based loop pressure calculation works better for RTL loop invariant motion on targets with enough (>= 32) registers. It is an expensive optimization. So it is on only for peak performance. */ * R/M toolchain related work. == Plan == * Linaro toolchain binaries 2013.12 release

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 23 - 27 December 2013

by Kugan

== Progress == - Short week (25th and 26th public holidays) - Integrate benchmarking into Cbuildv2 (TCWG-360 4/10) - First cut implementation complete and ready for review - Binutils Bug 16340 (2/10) - Posted modified patch after regression testing and analysing the results == Plan == - ping modified zero/sign extension patch with benchmarking - set-up trunk daily regression testing - start TCWG-238

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 23 - 27 December 2013

by Omair Javaid

== Progress == * ARM Process Record made the changes pointed out in maintainers comments. [3/10] [TCWG-336] [TCWG-338] [TCWG-339] - Put the new bug fixes patches on hold as they can be sent in the same series.[TCWG-317] [TCWG-315] * Time off for setting up new office space. [4/10] - Found a good room for office in a central location, need to get internet and other stuff working before shifting. I will get started on that once I get the possession of the space next week. * Time off for Macau visa information [1/10] * 25th December Public Holiday [2/10] == Plan == * ARM Process Record: - Create new patches as per maintainers suggestions, incorporating bug fixes as separate patches in the list. - Test and send all patches upstream. * New office space setup, will be away from my desk for few hours.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

bad code generation on aarch64 in aarch64_output_mi_thunk

by Matthias Klose

Hi, seen in a segfault running the tests in the coinor-osi package, https://launchpad.net/bugs/1263576, both in saucy and trusty, version 0.106.4 and 0.106.5. Version 0.103 doesn't show the issue. both the 4.7 and 4.8 linaro branches show this behaviour, and trunk 20131121 (didn't build a newer one yet). William Grant tracked that down to a bug with very negative vcall_offsets in aarch64 multiple inheritance thunks. The example below has two consecutive thunks, with the second adding 263 instead of subtracting 264. aarch64_build_constant seems to not handle negative integers. He tried a quick gcc patch to avoid using aarch64_build_constant, and the coinor-osi tests succeed. 0000000000401ca4 <_ZTv0_n256_N1C2adEv>: 401ca4: f9400010 ldr x16, [x0] 401ca8: f8500211 ldr x17, [x16,#-256] 401cac: 8b110000 add x0, x0, x17 401cb0: 17fffff9 b 401c94 <_ZN1C2adEv> [...] 0000000000401cc4 <_ZTv0_n264_N1C2aeEv>: 401cc4: f9400010 ldr x16, [x0] 401cc8: d28020f1 mov x17, #0x107 // #263 401ccc: f8716a11 ldr x17, [x16,x17] 401cd0: 8b110000 add x0, x0, x17 401cd4: 17fffff8 b 401cb4 <_ZN1C2aeEv> Any chance for a quick 2013 review? Thanks, Matthias --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c @@ -2540,8 +2540,8 @@ addr = plus_constant (Pmode, temp0, vcall_offset); else { - aarch64_build_constant (IP1_REGNUM, vcall_offset); - addr = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, temp0, temp1); + aarch64_add_constant (IP0_REGNUM, IP1_REGNUM, vcall_offset); + addr = temp0; } aarch64_emit_move (temp1, gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode,addr));

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[Activity] Dec 16-26

by Rob Savoye

== Progress == * Lots of little changes to the Jenkins configure files and Cbuildv2 so Jenkins can do a builds in a 32 bit chroot. (4/10) * Misc - meetings and misc tasks (2/10). * Helped with binutils & GCC releases. 4/10) * New Arndale Octa arrived. == Plan == * Get back to adding the neon intrinsics tests to the GCC testsuite. * More Jenkins hacking for 32bit chroot builds. * More hacking on binary release automation. * Review Kugan's benchmarking support in Cbuildv2. == Issues == * Loosing ssh access to many of the machines we work on is a problem... == Leave == * A bit complicated. On the road till Jan 13, offline some, mixed with some work days depending on the weather. Should have email access most nights.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

Binutils fails to build

by Venkataramanan Kumar

Hi All, I am getting a weird error while building binutils from http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/snapshots/Latest/binutils-linaro-2.23.2… GCC version gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu9) Ubuntu 13.10 Steps: 1) /work/sources/binutils/configure --target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu --prefix=/work/builds/gcc-fsf-trunk/tools --with-sysroot=/work/builds/gcc-fsf-trunk/sysroot-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu 2) make (Snip) gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I. -I/work/sources/binutils/libiberty/../include -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wc++-compat -Wstrict-prototypes -pedantic /work/sources/binutils/libiberty/regex.c -o regex.o In file included from /work/sources/binutils/libiberty/regex.c:128:0: /usr/include/stdlib.h:510:35: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘__attribute_alloc_size__’ __THROW __attribute_malloc__ __attribute_alloc_size__ ((2)) __wur; ^ make[2]: *** [regex.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/work/builds/gcc-fsf-trunk/obj-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/binutils/libiberty' (Snip) Can anyone point me what is going wrong here. regards, Venkat,

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro binutils 2.24 2013.12 released

by Victor Chong

### About Linaro binutils Linaro binutils is a release of the GNU binutils with bug fixes and enhancements for ARM platforms. GNU binutils is a collection of tools including the ld linker and as assembler. ### Linaro binutils 2.24 2013.12 The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2013.12 release of Linaro binutils 2.24. This release is based on the latest GNU binutils 2.24 stable branch, but with additional features and bug fixes. ### Additional Features * Support for GNU indirect functions ### Bug Fixes * Fixed miscalculation of GOTPLT offset for ifunc syms * Handle static links with ifunc correctly * Fixup IFUNC tests to work on all targets ### Source ### Release Tarball * https://releases.linaro.org/13.12/components/toolchain/binutils-linaro ### Development Tree * git://git.linaro.org/toolchain/binutils-gdb.git This release was built from the linaro_binutils-2_24-2013_12_release tag. ### Feedback and Support Subscribe to the important Linaro mailing lists and join our IRC channels to stay on top of Linaro development. * Linaro Toolchain Development [mailing list](http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain) * Linaro Toolchain IRC channel on irc.freenode.net at `#linaro-tcwg` * Questions? [ask Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:support@linaro.org)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] Week 51

by Yvan Roux

== Issues == * none == Progress == * LRA on AArch32: o TCWG-343 : Make LRA the default for the ARM backend (8/10) - Validated and committed a fix from Vladimir for Thumb1 issues. - iWMMXT issue : Tried a fix without success, continue working on it. o TCWG-345 : Analyse performance of LRA for ARM. (0/10) - No progress this week. * Various meetings. (2/10) == Next == * Vacation

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] 16 - 19 December 2013

by Omair Javaid

== Progress == * Debugged and Fixed process record memory corruption problem. [TCWG-315][TCWG-317][8/10] * Sick Time off [2/10] == Plan == * Send patches for bug fixes and look into remaining arm-native gdb issues. * Respond to maintainer's suggestion on process record patches. * Public Holiday on 25th * Time off for setting up new office space.

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[Activity] 16-19 DEC 2013

by Venkataramanan Kumar

== Progress == * Libssp GCC patch Replied to Marcus comments on libssp machine description support for stack protect and test. Analyzed other ports implementations on clearing register that loaded canary value. Waiting for his feedback. * Pointer mangling Aarch64 glibc. Investigated mangling support and implemented a patch. Testing glibc test suites in V8 Foundation model is in progress. * Attend Linaro Tool chain status meeting. * Attend 1-1 with Christophe (Linaro). * Attend 1-1 with Matt (Linaro) . == Plan == - Pointer Guard support in Aarch64 glibc - Continue tesing Cbuildv2

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[ACTIVITY] Week 51

by Zhenqiang Chen

== Issues == * None. == Progress == * Rebase aarch64 build scripts to crosstool-ng upstream, test and send out the patch for community review (2/10). * Investigate https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/job/openembedded-armv8b-rootfs/gcc_version=4.…. It seams build configure issue. Some MICRO is not correctly defined. Can not follow-up it due to no access to the build system. * Continue on "uninit warning testsuite failures" (CARD 304 7/10) - Identify another reason why uninit-pred-8_b.c FAIL: The control flow is too complex, it can not normalize the condition at line 22 to ( n < 10 || m > 100 || r < 10 ). - Work on patch to fix PHI issue to make uninit-pred-9_b.c PASS. * Test builds for backporting "ftruncate() and truncate() stubs" related patches in Linaro newlib. == Plan == * Linaro toolchain binaries 2013.12 release.

11 years, 6 months

2
2
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain