On 2025-11-04 12:03, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In gcc_check master-aarch64, after:
> | commit gcc-16-5025-g0013501e462
> | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh(a)gotplt.org>
> | Date: Mon Nov 3 17:02:00 2025 -0600
> |
> | lto/122515: Fix archive offset types for i686
> |
> | On i686, offsets into object archives could be 64-bit, but they're
> | inconsistently treated across the lto, which may sometimes result in
> | truncation of those offsets for large archives.
> | ... 36 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 3 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running gcc:gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp ...
> | UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/pr122515 c_lto_pr122515_0.o-c_lto_pr122515.a execute -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects
> | UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/pr122515 c_lto_pr122515_0.o-c_lto_pr122515.a link -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects
> | FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr122515, ar returned 1: /WORKSPACE/abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/gcc-ar: Cannot find plugin 'liblto_plugin.so'
>
> Used configuration :
> *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64
> *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1744. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/4333/artifac…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/4333/artifac…
The Jenkins instance seems to be down. Is there another way to find out
how this was configured? ISTM that liblto_plugin.so may not have been
built.
Sid
Hi Linaro folks!
It seems that the system running the armv8l has a pretty old pascal
compiler. I checked the log and it seems that, with that compiler
version, using fpc -g will generate stabs information, rather than DWARF
information.
So in one sense, these regressions are expected, but more importantly,
you should take a look at updating the armv8l machine so that pascal
tests can continue working
On 10/23/25 10:42 AM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In gdb_check master-arm, after:
> | commit gdb-17-branchpoint-577-gbaeb632f1b7
> | Author: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere(a)redhat.com>
> | Date: Wed Jan 22 14:05:01 2025 -0300
> |
> | gdb: Remove stabs support from ELF files
> |
> | This commit makes it so that GDB won't read stabs information from ELF
> | files. If stabs is detected in an ELF file, the reader now warns the user
> | that stabs is not supported.
> | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 118 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running gdb:gdb.pascal/case-insensitive-symbols.exp ...
> | FAIL: gdb.pascal/case-insensitive-symbols.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at case-insensitive-symbols.pas:43
> | Running gdb:gdb.pascal/floats.exp ...
> | FAIL: gdb.pascal/floats.exp: Going to second breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
> | FAIL: gdb.pascal/floats.exp: Test sin(pi) is equal to 0
> | ... and 119 more
>
> Used configuration :
> *CI config* tcwg_gdb_check master-arm
> *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1715. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/3112/artifact/ar…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/3112/artifact/ar…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/3112/artifact/ar…
>
> Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/3112/artifact/ar…
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/3111/artifact/ar…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gdb/s…
>
> Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=baeb632f1b7ce…
--
Cheers,
Guinevere Larsen
It/she
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 12:07 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In gcc_check master-aarch64, after:
> | commit gcc-16-4667-gdcf69bdcd49
> | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com>
> | Date: Sun Oct 26 08:42:20 2025 +0800
> |
> | c: Try the type with the previous function attributes
> |
> | When there are 2 conflicting function declarations, try the new type
> | with the previous TYPE_ATTRIBUTES if the current declaration has no
> | TYPE_ATTRIBUTES to support
> | ... 44 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 19 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sme/aarch64-sme.exp ...
> | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sme/streaming_mode_1.c (test for errors, line 10)
> | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sme/streaming_mode_1.c (test for errors, line 121)
> | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sme/streaming_mode_1.c (test for errors, line 16)
> | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sme/streaming_mode_1.c (test for errors, line 30)
> | ... and 15 more
>
After
commit dcf69bdcd49bccd901bfb01db7c15530e9a70dc0
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com>
Date: Sun Oct 26 08:42:20 2025 +0800
c: Try the type with the previous function attributes
gcc no longer issues an error for:
void sc_c () [[arm::streaming_compatible]];
void sc_c () {}
Instead, the previous type attributes are applied to the current function
definition. The resulting function definition is compatible with the
previous declaration.
PR c/122427
* gcc.target/aarch64/sme/streaming_mode_1.c: Remove dg-error.
--
H.J.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 at 22:04, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In gcc_check master-aarch64, after:
> | commit gcc-16-4709-gc55c1de3a9a
> | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com>
> | Date: Tue Oct 28 12:15:52 2025 +0000
> |
> | libstdc++: Simplify std::regex_traits::value
> |
> | We don't need to use an istringstream to convert a hex digit to its
> | numerical value. And if we don't use istringstream there, we don't need
> | to include <sstream> in <regex>.
> | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 3 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ...
> | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
> | FAIL: g++.dg/warn/uninit-pr105562.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)
>
> Used configuration :
> *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64
> *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1735. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
Fixed at r16-4714-gcc78f8523832d6
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/4300/artifac…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/4300/artifac…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/4300/artifac…
>
> Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/4300/artifac…
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/4299/artifac…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/s…
>
> Full commit : See in git+ssh://linaroci@gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
Earning the NI Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer (CLAD) certification is a practical step for engineers and automation professionals aiming to prove hands-on LabVIEW competence. Employers value the problem-solving and system-design skills demonstrated by candidates who pass NI Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer CLAD Exam Questions, because the credential signals consistent coding practices and real-world application ability.
The CLAD credential accelerates career growth by opening roles in test engineering, instrumentation, robotics, and industrial automation. With a firm foundation in graphical programming, certified professionals can contribute to project efficiency, reduce development time, and improve system reliability. Preparing with focused resources for NI Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer CLAD Exam Questions helps candidates master core topics such as dataflow, debugging, and modular design—skills directly transferable to workplace challenges.
I selected Certboosters because it provides structured study plans, realistic practice tests, and expert feedback to increase confidence and exam readiness; their materials are tailored to practical outcomes and mirror exam style while reinforcing applied LabVIEW techniques.
In short, the NI CLAD certification strengthens résumés, accelerates promotions, and equips engineers with an industry-recognized proof of LabVIEW proficiency that employers seek in automation and control-system roles.
Use the link below to check the practice test questions: https://www.certboosters.com/ni/path/clad
Hi folks,
I have a strong suspicion that this bot has an incremental build issue
right now.
Can someone trigger a clean build please?
Thanks!
Mehdi
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org>
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Subject: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): flang-arm64-windows-msvc - failed
build (failure) (main)
To: Mehdi Amini <joker.eph(a)gmail.com>
Cc: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org>
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder flang-arm64-windows-msvc
while building flang,mlir.
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/207/builds/9096
Worker for this Build: linaro-armv8-windows-msvc-01
Blamelist:
Mehdi Amini <joker.eph(a)gmail.com>
BUILD FAILED: failed build (failure)
Step 5 (build-unified-tree) failure: build (failure)
...
359 | return {APFloat(*smt, value.real()), APFloat(*smt,
value.imag())};
| ^
c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\complex(1315,5):
note: 'complex' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
1315 | _DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX
| ^
c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\yvals_core.h(1450,7):
note: expanded from macro '_DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX'
1450 | [[deprecated("warning STL4037: "
\
| ^
1 warning generated.
84.583 [1719/10/276] Building CXX object
tools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/CMakeFiles/obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir/MemRefDialect.cpp.obj
FAILED:
tools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/CMakeFiles/obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir/MemRefDialect.cpp.obj
C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\shims\ccache.exe
C:\Users\tcwg\scoop\apps\llvm-arm64\current\bin\clang-cl.exe /nologo -TP
-DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -DUNICODE -D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE
-D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
-D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0
-D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -D_UNICODE
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
-IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR
-IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR
-IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include
-IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include
-IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/include
-IC:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/llvm/include
/DWIN32 /D_WINDOWS /Zc:inline /Zc:__cplusplus /Oi /Brepro /bigobj
/permissive- -Werr
or=unguarded-availability-new /W4 -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers
-Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override
-Wstring-conversion -Wno-pass-failed -Wmisleading-indentation
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported /Gw -Wundef -Werror=mismatched-tags
-Werror=global-constructors /O2 /Ob2 -std:c++17 -MD /EHs-c- /GR- -UNDEBUG
/showIncludes
/Fotools/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/CMakeFiles/obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir/MemRefDialect.cpp.obj
/Fdtools\mlir\lib\Dialect\MemRef\IR\CMakeFiles\obj.MLIRMemRefDialect.dir\
-c --
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefDialect.cpp
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefDialect.cpp:9:
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Conversion/ConvertToEmitC/ToEmitCInterface.h:14:
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OpDefinition.h:22:
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/Dialect.h:17:
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OperationSupport.h:19:
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/BuiltinAttributes.h(359,14):
warning: 'complex' is deprecated: warning STL4037: The effect of
instantiating the template std::complex for any type other than float,
double, or long double is unspecified. You can define
_SILENCE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX_DEPRECATION_WARNING to suppress this warning.
[-Wdeprecated-declarations]
359 | return {APFloat(*smt, value.real()), APFloat(*smt,
value.imag())};
| ^
c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\complex(1315,5):
note: 'complex' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
1315 | _DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX
| ^
c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.39.33519\include\yvals_core.h(1450,7):
note: expanded from macro '_DEPRECATE_NONFLOATING_COMPLEX'
1450 | [[deprecated("warning STL4037: "
\
| ^
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRefDialect.cpp:12:
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRef.h:13:
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Dialect/Arith/IR/Arith.h:17:
In file included from
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h:371:
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h.inc(1118,84):
error: no viable conversion from '::mlir::RegionSuccessor' to
'::mlir::RegionBranchPoint'
1118 | return
(llvm::cast<ConcreteOp>(tablegen_opaque_val)).getMutableSuccessorOperands(point);
|
^~~~~
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h.inc(435,23):
note: in instantiation of member function
'mlir::detail::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>::getMutableSuccessorOperands'
requested here
435 | Model() : Concept{getMutableSuccessorOperands,
getSuccessorRegions} {}
| ^
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Support/InterfaceSupport.h(238,46):
note: in instantiation of member function
'mlir::detail::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>::Model'
requested here
238 | new (malloc(sizeof(InterfaceModel))) InterfaceModel();
| ^
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Support/InterfaceSupport.h(225,7):
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'mlir::detail::InterfaceMap::insertModel<mlir::detail::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>>'
requested here
225 | insertModel<typename T::ModelT>();
| ^
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/Support/InterfaceSupport.h(199,10):
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'mlir::detail::InterfaceMap::insertPotentialInterface<mlir::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>>'
requested here
199 | (map.insertPotentialInterface<Types>(), ...);
| ^
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OpDefinition.h(1877,43):
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'mlir::detail::InterfaceMap::get<mlir::OpTrait::ZeroRegions<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::ZeroResults<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::ZeroSuccessors<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::OneOperand<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::HasParent<mlir::memref::GenericAtomicRMWOp>::Impl<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::OpInvariants<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::ConditionallySpeculatable::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::AlwaysSpeculatableImplTrait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::MemoryEffectOpInterface::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::IsTerminator<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface::Trait<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>,
mlir::OpTrait::ReturnLike<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp>>' requested he
re
1877 | return detail::InterfaceMap::template
get<Traits<ConcreteType>...>();
| ^
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/OperationSupport.h(533,55):
note: in instantiation of member function
'mlir::Op<mlir::memref::AtomicYieldOp, mlir::OpTrait::ZeroRegions,
mlir::OpTrait::ZeroResults, mlir::OpTrait::ZeroSuccessors,
mlir::OpTrait::OneOperand,
mlir::OpTrait::HasParent<mlir::memref::GenericAtomicRMWOp>::Impl,
mlir::OpTrait::OpInvariants, mlir::ConditionallySpeculatable::Trait,
mlir::OpTrait::AlwaysSpeculatableImplTrait,
mlir::MemoryEffectOpInterface::Trait, mlir::OpTrait::IsTerminator,
mlir::RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface::Trait,
mlir::OpTrait::ReturnLike>::getInterfaceMap' requested here
Sincerely,
LLVM Buildbot
On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 05:01:16PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allnoconfig, after:
> | commit v6.17.3-130-g86f364ee5842
> | Author: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy(a)kernel.org>
> | Date: Thu Sep 18 10:05:46 2025 +0200
> |
> | kbuild: always create intermediate vmlinux.unstripped
> |
> | [ Upstream commit 0ce5139fd96e9d415d3faaef1c575e238f9bbd67 ]
> |
> | Generate the intermediate vmlinux.unstripped regardless of
> | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted.
This is reproducible for me locally with:
$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm64 CC=clang CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- HOSTCC=clang LD=ld.lld clean allnoconfig all
aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy: vmlinux: file format not recognized
...
This does not occur with llvm-objcopy via LLVM=1 nor does it happen with
an all GNU setup. This feels like a bug in GNU objcopy though, as this
is reproducible with:
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy --set-section-flags .modinfo=noload vmlinux.unstripped vmlinux.objcopy
$ file vmlinux.unstripped vmlinux.objcopy
vmlinux.unstripped: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=18512f67dae70a7fae145b34514054a8b8b3c105, not stripped
vmlinux.objcopy: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=18512f67dae70a7fae145b34514054a8b8b3c105, not stripped
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy --remove-section=.modinfo -w --strip-unneeded-symbol='__mod_device_table__*' vmlinux.objcopy
aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy: vmlinux.objcopy: file format not recognized
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-objcopy --version | head -1
GNU objcopy (GNU Binutils) 2.45.50.20251028
Cheers,
Nathan
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In master-aarch64, after:
| commit glibc-2.42.9000-284-g27effb3d50
| Author: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev(a)arm.com>
| Date: Thu Sep 25 15:54:36 2025 +0100
|
| aarch64: clear ZA state of SME before clone and clone3 syscalls
|
| This change adds a call to the __arm_za_disable() function immediately
| before the SVC instruction inside clone() and clone3() wrappers. It also
| adds a macro for inline clone() used in fork() and adds the same call to
| ... 129 lines of the commit log omitted.
Produces 9 regressions:
|
| regressions.sum:
| Running gdb:gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp ...
| FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=auto: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=auto: bt
| FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=auto: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=off: bt
| FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=auto: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=on: bt
| FAIL: gdb.threads/foll-fork-other-thread.exp: fork_func=fork: follow=child: target-non-stop=off: non-stop=off: displaced-stepping=auto: bt
| ... and 5 more
Used configuration :
*CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb master-aarch64
*configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1706. Please let us know if you have a fix.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1…
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1…
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1…
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1…
Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gdb--master-aarch64-build/1…
Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc…
Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=27effb3d50424fb9634b…
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
Hi,
I put out a PR with the fix: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165250
Sorry about the breakage.
-Krzysztof
________________________________
From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2025 8:51 AM
To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com>
Cc: Parzyszek, Krzysztof <Krzysztof.Parzyszek(a)amd.com>; maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>
Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-12058-ge6af0a40acc6: 26 regressions on aarch64
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after:
| commit llvmorg-22-init-12058-ge6af0a40acc6
| Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek <Krzysztof.Parzyszek(a)amd.com>
| Date: Wed Oct 22 11:46:11 2025 -0500
|
| [flang][OpenMP] Keep track of scoping units in OmpStructureChecker (#164419)
|
| Introduce a stack of scopes to OmpStructureChecker for scoping units,
| plus function/subroutine entries in interfaces.
|
| ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted.
Produces 26 regressions:
|
| regressions.sum:
| Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0156 ...
| NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0156/Fujitsu-Fortran-0156_0011.test
| Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0391 ...
| NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0391/Fujitsu-Fortran-0391_0023.test
| Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0401 ...
| ... and 32 more
| # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled
Used configuration :
* Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
* Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite"
We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2106. Please let us know if you have a fix.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/…
Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e6af0a40acc6d244b6862142829274e…
Business analysts are the bridge between strategy and execution, turning data into decisions that drive organizational success and innovation. By gathering stakeholder requirements, analyzing processes, and prioritizing solutions, they reduce waste, improve customer experiences, and accelerate time-to-market. Their expertise in mapping workflows and identifying opportunities for automation enables teams to focus on high-impact work while minimizing risk.
Leveraging structured methodologies and modern analytics, business analysts translate complex information into clear, actionable roadmaps. This fosters cross-functional collaboration, supports data-driven culture, and uncovers new revenue streams. When aligned with leadership, their insights guide product strategy, operational improvements, and digital transformation initiatives that keep organizations competitive.
Preparing for certification strengthens these capabilities. The PeopleCert Business Analysis Exam Questions help candidates master core techniques, from requirements elicitation to stakeholder management, ensuring they can contribute measurable value from day one. Employers value certified analysts who demonstrate proficiency; practicing with PeopleCert Business Analysis Exam Questions signals readiness and commitment to continuous improvement.
Why I choose Certboosters: it offers focused practice tests, clear explanations, and realistic exam simulators tailored to real-world scenarios, making it easier to retain knowledge and build confidence before taking your exam. Start practicing today to accelerate your impact, career growth, and professional credibility.
Use the link below to check the practice test questions: https://www.certboosters.com/peoplecert/path/peoplecert-business-analysis
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In master-arm, after:
| commit glibc-2.42.9000-338-g324084649b2
| Author: DJ Delorie <dj(a)redhat.com>
| Date: Wed Oct 15 21:37:56 2025 -0400
|
| sprof: check pread size and offset for overflow
|
| Add a bit of descriptive paranoia to the values we read from
| the ELF headers and use to access data.
|
| ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted.
Produces Failure:
| Results changed to
| # reset_artifacts:
| -10
| # true:
| 0
| # build_abe binutils:
| 1
| # build_abe gcc:
| 2
| # build_abe linux:
| 4
| # build_abe glibc:
| # FAILED
| # build_abe gdb:
| # First few build errors in logs:
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
|
| From
| # reset_artifacts:
| -10
| # true:
| 0
| # build_abe binutils:
| 1
| # build_abe gcc:
| 2
| # build_abe linux:
| 4
| # build_abe glibc:
| 5
| # build_abe gdb:
| 6
Used configuration :
*CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_build master-arm
*configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1709. Please let us know if you have a fix.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti…
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti…
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti…
Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1225/arti…
Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc…
Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=324084649b2da2f6840e…
Hi,
These errors are probably caused by incorrect test programs. Please ignore the mail. We'll update the tests.
I apologize for the false detection.
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after:
> | commit llvmorg-22-init-11449-ga6181dc84b79
> | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com>
> | Date: Thu Oct 16 12:20:53 2025 -0700
> |
> | [flang] Refine checks for NULL() in expressions (#163655)
> |
> | Fix a false positive "NULL can't be an operand here" error message
> | arising in a defined generic interface for an intrinsic operator (==)
> | with multiple spellings.
> | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 3 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0573 ...
> | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0001.test
> | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0002.test
> | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0009.test
> | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled
>
> Used configuration :
> * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
> * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite"
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2097. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/
>
> Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/…
>
> Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a6181dc84b79dd368c7a43ef4f6f164…
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 3:22 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please
> find some details below.
>
> In master-aarch64, after:
> | commit gcc-16-3093-gc7de7ddbfae
> | Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com>
> | Date: Sun Jun 8 10:51:02 2025 -0700
> |
> | forwprop: Change optimize_agr_copyprop into forward walk instead
> of backwards
> |
> | While thinking about how to implement the rest of the copy prop
> and makes sure not
> | to introduce some compile time problems, optimize_agr_copyprop
> should be changed
> | into a forwproping rather than looking backwards.
> | ... 10 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 1 regression:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running acats:chapter c4 ...
> | FAIL: c41303a
>
> Used configuration :
> *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc master-aarch64
> *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on
> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
>
> We track this bug report under
> https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1648. Please let us know if you
> have a fix.
>
I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121494 and will be
looking into later tonight or tomorrow. It also happens on s390x which
gives me a hint of where to start to try to reproduce it on x86_64.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on
> linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways
> to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> *
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and
> make commands are in
> *
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> *
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2…
>
> Current build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2…
> Reference build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build :
> https://gitlab.com/Linaro/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/sha1…
>
> Full commit : See in git+ssh://linaroci@gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
Dear Linaro Team,
I am looking for advice on how to reproduce a flang-arm64-windows-msvc LLVM
build bot failure. I hope I ended up in the right place here.
I had to revert a PR (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783)
that broke the flang-arm64-windows-msvc LLVM build bot in the morning due
to some tablegen-related problem. I did prepare a reland PR (
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151125) that addresses a
potential issue. However, since I did not see any other build bot failures
and since I was not able to reproduce the problem locally, I wonder if
there is a way to run the build bot on my reland PR? Alternatively, hints
on how to reproduce the problem locally on a x86 Linux machine would be
appreciated.
Best,
Tobias
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: LLVM Continuous Integration <notifications(a)github.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [llvm/llvm-project] [mlir][llvm] Add intrinsic arg and result
attribute support (PR #150783)
To: llvm/llvm-project <llvm-project(a)noreply.github.com>
Cc: Tobias Gysi <tobias.gysi(a)nextsilicon.com>, State change <
state_change(a)noreply.github.com>
*llvm-ci* left a comment (llvm/llvm-project#150783)
<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783#issuecomment-3131154498>
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder flang-arm64-windows-msvc
running on linaro-armv8-windows-msvc-01 while building mlir at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-mlir".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/207/builds/4441
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
Step 6 (test-build-unified-tree-check-mlir) failure: test (failure)
******************** TEST 'MLIR ::
Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir'
FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\mlir-opt.exe
C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir
-one-shot-bufferize="bufferize-function-boundaries test-analysis-only"
-split-input-file |
c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe
C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir
# executed command:
'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\mlir-opt.exe'
'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir'
'-one-shot-bufferize=bufferize-function-boundaries test-analysis-only'
-split-input-file
# .---command stderr------------
# | Assertion failed: implArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface &&
"`::mlir::CallOpInterface` expected its base interface
`::mlir::ArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface` to be registered", file
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/CallInterfaces.h.inc,
line 122
# | PLEASE submit a bug report to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash
backtrace.
# | Stack dump:
# | 0. Program arguments:
c:\\users\\tcwg\\llvm-worker\\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\\build\\bin\\mlir-opt.exe
C:\\Users\\tcwg\\llvm-worker\\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\\llvm-project\\mlir\\test\\Dialect\\Bufferization\\Transforms\\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir
"-one-shot-bufferize=bufferize-function-boundaries test-analysis-only"
-split-input-file
# | Exception Code: 0xC000001D
# | #0 0x00007ff60737543c
(c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\mlir-opt.exe+0x1af543c)
# | #1 0x00007ffff958ae50 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll+0x7ae50)
# | #2 0xff61fffff958ba5c
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d
# executed command:
'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe'
'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir'
# .---command stderr------------
# | C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir:23:17:
error: CHECK-LABEL: expected string not found in input
# | // CHECK-LABEL: func @extract_slice_fun(
# | ^
# | <stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
# | module {
# | ^
# | <stdin>:1:3: note: possible intended match here
# | module {
# | ^
# |
# | Input file: <stdin>
# | Check file:
C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir
# |
# | -dump-input=help explains the following input dump.
# |
# | Input was:
# | <<<<<<
# | 1: module {
# | label:23'0 X~~~~~~~~ error: no match found
# | label:23'1 ? possible intended match
# | 2: }
# | label:23'0 ~~
# | 3:
# | label:23'0 ~
# | 4: // -----
# | label:23'0 ~~~~~~~~~
# | >>>>>>
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 1
...
Step 7 (test-build-unified-tree-check-flang) failure: test (failure)
******************** TEST 'Flang :: Intrinsics/math-codegen.fir'
FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
split-file C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\flang\test\Intrinsics\math-codegen.fir
C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp
# executed command: split-file
'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\flang\test\Intrinsics\math-codegen.fir'
'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp'
# RUN: at line 5
fir-opt C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir
--fir-to-llvm-ir="target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" |
c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe
C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir
# executed command: fir-opt
'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir'
--fir-to-llvm-ir=target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
# .---command stderr------------
# | Assertion failed: implArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface &&
"`::mlir::CallOpInterface` expected its base interface
`::mlir::ArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface` to be registered", file
C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/CallInterfaces.h.inc,
line 122
# | PLEASE submit a bug report to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash
backtrace.
# | Stack dump:
# | 0. Program arguments: fir-opt
C:\\Users\\tcwg\\llvm-worker\\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\\build\\tools\\flang\\test\\Intrinsics\\Output\\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir
--fir-to-llvm-ir=target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
# | Exception Code: 0xC000001D
# | #0 0x00007ff777271f54
mlir::detail::FallbackTypeIDResolver::registerImplicitTypeID(class
llvm::StringRef)
(c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\fir-opt.exe+0x1331f54)
# | #1 0x00007ffff958ae50 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll+0x7ae50)
# | #2 0xdd54fffff958ba5c
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d
# executed command:
'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe'
'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir'
# .---command stderr------------
# | FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty.
# | FileCheck command line:
c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe
C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 2
--
********************
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783#issuecomment-3131154498>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABW7H2HANJOPE6QLHGYKBD33K…>
.
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message
ID: <llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783/c3131154498(a)github.com>
--
This e-mail message and any attachments thereto are intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any retransmission, dissemination, copying or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please contact the
sender immediately and delete the materials and information from your
device and system and confirm the deletion by reply e-mail.
Hi,
Probably this failure is a false detection caused by a floating-point precision error in fast-math. Please ignore the mail. We'll update the test.
I apologize for the false detection.
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after:
> | commit llvmorg-22-init-6462-g35b22764e26a
> | Author: Hassnaa Hamdi <hassnaa.hamdi(a)arm.com>
> | Date: Thu Sep 4 19:31:30 2025 +0100
> |
> | [LV][AArch64] Prefer epilogue with fixed-width over scalable VF. (#155546)
> |
> | In case of equal costs Prefer epilogue with fixed-width over scalable VF.
> | That is helpful in cases like post-LTO vectorization where epilogue with
> | fixed-width VF can be removed when we eventually know that the trip count
> | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 1 regression:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0136 ...
> | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0136/Fujitsu-Fortran-0136_0012.test
> | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one
>
> Used configuration :
> * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
> * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite"
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2090. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/
>
> Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/…
>
> Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35b22764e26aa02ef3ad849bb449bf7…
I'd like to apologize for causing these regressions. Below
I've copied out the relevant parts from the logs. To me it
looks like _Xv is a reserved identifier.
I'll prepare a patch to fix the issue.
On 9/9/25 6:54 AM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote:
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In arm-eabi cortex-m3 softfp, after:
> | commit gcc-16-3649-gc440b585ba3
> | Author: Luc Grosheintz <luc.grosheintz(a)gmail.com>
> | Date: Thu Sep 4 14:20:28 2025 +0200
> |
> | libstdc++: Implement constant_wrapper, cw from P2781R9.
> |
> | This is a partial implementation of P2781R9. It adds std::cw and
> | std::constant_wrapper, but doesn't modify __integral_constant_like for
> | span/mdspan.
> | ... 25 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 4 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running g++:g++.old-deja/old-deja.exp ...
> | FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb39.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
Code:
4651: template<_CwFixedValue _Xv, typename>
4652: struct constant_wrapper : _CwOperators
4653: {
Compiler error:
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:4651:26:
error: expected '>' before numeric constant
My guess is that _Xv is a reserved name. It's not on the list
of common bad identifiers [1], but it's the only guess I have.
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/source_code_style.html
> | FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb54.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
Same as above.
> | UNRESOLVED: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb54.C -std=c++26 compilation failed to produce executable
Same as above.
> | FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.warn/iomanip.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)
Same as above.
> Used configuration :
> *CI config* tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv7-m -mtune=cortex-m3 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=auto
> *configure and test flags:* --target arm-eabi --disable-multilib --with-mode=thumb --with-cpu=cortex-m3 --with-float=softfp --target_board=-mthumb/-march=armv7-m/-mtune=cortex-m3/-mfloat-abi=softfp/-mfpu=auto qemu_cpu=cortex-m3
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1676. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_…
>
> Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_…
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/s…
>
> Full commit : See in git+ssh://linaroci@gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
Thanks for the report. There is also an LLVM issue tracking this. I commented there: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/157763#issuecomment-3273773003
The test is violating F2023 C15121 that is not properly enforced by flang semantics but that lowering now relies on.
Although we will likely improve LEN lowering which would have the side effect of working around the segfault in the specific case of 0727_0008, I think we will enforce C15121 in a manner that will reject it.
See The LLVM link for more details and suggestion on how to fix the test.
Jean Perier
-----Original Message-----
From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2025 6:12 AM
To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com
Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org; Jean Perier <jperier(a)nvidia.com>
Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-6821-ga103b9b207f6: 1 regression on aarch64
[You don't often get email from ci_notify(a)linaro.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after:
| commit llvmorg-22-init-6821-ga103b9b207f6
| Author: jeanPerier <jperier(a)nvidia.com>
| Date: Mon Sep 8 12:07:37 2025 +0200
|
| [flang][lowering] fix vector subscripts in character elemental procedures (#156661)
|
| Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/145151
|
| Character elemental procedures require evaluating the result
| ... 22 lines of the commit log omitted.
Produces 1 regression:
|
| regressions.sum:
| Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0727 ...
| FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0727/Fujitsu-Fortran-0727_0008.test
| # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one
Used configuration :
* Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
* Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite"
We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2088. Please let us know if you have a fix.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/1378…
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/1378…
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/1378…
Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/1378…
Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/1377…
Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/…
Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a103b9b207f67e0afbaf41647a56a4c…
Hi,
These errors are caused by incorrect test programs. Please ignore the mail. We'll update the tests.
I apologize for the false detection.
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after:
> | commit llvmorg-22-init-6056-g89f53af3fffe
> | Author: Yingwei Zheng <dtcxzyw2333(a)gmail.com>
> | Date: Tue Sep 2 21:41:02 2025 +0800
> |
> | [ConstraintElim] Use constraints from bounded memory accesses (#155253)
> |
> | This patch removes bound checks that are dominated by bounded memory
> | accesses. For example, if we have an array `int A[5]` and `A[idx]` is
> | performed successfully, we know that `idx u< 5` after the load.
> | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 3 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0094 ...
> | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0094/Fujitsu-C-0094_0040.test
> | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0137 ...
> | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0137/Fujitsu-C-0137_0280.test
> | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0170 ...
> | ... and 1 more
> | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one
>
> Used configuration :
> * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
> * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite"
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2086. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/
>
> Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/…
>
> Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/89f53af3fffed3e41167fbb7bc10d48…