- linaro-toolchain - lists.linaro.org

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107213: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, Sorry for this spurious notification, it seems we had a "disk full" issue on the build machine. You can ignore this error message. Christophe On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 03:06, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107213 > | Author: Jan Dubiec <jdx(a)o2.pl> > | Date: Thu Feb 27 22:42:20 2025 +0100 > | > | [PATCH] H8/300: PR target/109189 Silence -Wformat warnings on Windows > | > | This patch fixes annoying -Wformat warnings when gcc is built > | on Windows/MinGW64. Instead of %ld it uses HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC > | macro, just like many other targets do. > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 8371e7f240c gimple-fold: Fix a pasto in fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine [PR119030] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

6 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #107058: Failure on arm

by Jakub Jelinek

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:13:10PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/107058 > | Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Feb 25 13:31:29 2025 +0100 > | > | [PATCH] simplify-rtx: Fix up simplify_logical_relational_operation [PR119002] > | > | Hi! > | > | The following testcase is miscompiled on powerpc64le-linux starting with > | ... 45 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | af73228fdb2 Fortran: Fix detection of descriptor arrays in coarray [PR107635] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:07:45 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:1306:3: internal compiler error: in reverse_condition, at jump.cc:536 > | # 00:07:46 make[5]: *** [Makefile:587: floating_to_chars.lo] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[4]: *** [Makefile:797: all-recursive] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[3]: *** [Makefile:577: all-recursive] Error 1 > | # 00:07:46 make[2]: *** [Makefile:502: all] Error 2 > | # 00:07:46 make[1]: *** [Makefile:12256: all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2 > | # 00:07:46 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2 Wonder how is that possible, the patch uses REVERSE_CONDITION on GT and that is handled by both reverse_condition and reverse_condition_maybe_unordered. Can I ask for preprocessed source + cc1plus command line + what -march= etc. options one needs if it is just implied by configure, so that I can have a look in a cross-compiler? I really don't have access to 32-bit arm anymore. Jakub

6 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Fw: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #106762: Failure on aarch64

by James K. Lowden

Hello, I seem to have begun receiving CI/CD patch notifications from ci_notify(a)linaro.org. I don't understand them, and they might be premature. I don't want to ignore them, though, if they do matter. I am supplying a 100,000 line patch, roughly, to add a COBOL front-end to gcc. As of now, there is no libgcobol or gcc/cobol directory in the master branch. The supplied patch came most recently in 14 "easy pieces". To be applied successfully, the patches to the Python scripts that create those directories must be applied first. The URLs at the end of the mail come up 404. I suppose they are ephemeral. I haven't been able to look at a complete log to understand the basis of the report. The mail says to ask here, so here I be. Please advise. I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks, --jkl Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:10:38 +0000 (UTC) From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org To: jklowden(a)schemamania.org Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #106762: Failure on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106762 | Author: James K. Lowden <jklowden(a)schemamania.org> | Date: Tue Feb 18 18:37:13 2025 -0500 | | [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery | | From f89a50238de62b73d9fc44ee7226461650ab119d Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:19:10 PM EST | From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden(a)symas.com> | Date: Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:19:10 PM EST | ... 27 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 427386042f0 LoongArch: Use normal RTL pattern instead of UNSPEC for {x,}vsr{a,l}ri instructions Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:03:17 make[1]: *** [Makefile:4720: all-gcc] Error 2 | # 00:03:17 make: *** [Makefile:1063: all] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/ar… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3164/artifac… Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.

6 months, 3 weeks

3
4
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.41.9000-97-gad9c4c53611: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: | commit glibc-2.41.9000-97-gad9c4c53611 | Author: Carlos O'Donell <carlos(a)redhat.com> | Date: Thu Feb 13 14:27:55 2025 -0500 | | manual: Document setlogmask as MT-safe. | | setlogmask(3) was made MT-safe in glibc-2.33 with the fix for | bug 26100. | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | # FAILED | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:04:01 make[2]: *** [Makefile:90: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/manual/stamp-summary] Error 1 | # 00:04:01 make[1]: *** [Makefile:470: info] Error 2 | # 00:04:01 make: *** [Makefile:20: info] Error 2 | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # init_abe_sysroot: | 0 | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: | 1 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1515. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2500/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2497/artif… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ad9c4c536115ba38be3e…

6 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gcc: Failure on arm

by H.J. Lu

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:03 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-arm, after: > | 2 patches in gcc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106412 > | de53b4c527f [PATCH 2/2] x86: Fold sibcall targets into jump table > | 54322404f4b [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add a pass to fold tail call > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 2f33fa09aab Daily bump. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:05:34 make[2]: *** [Makefile:512: _mulsc3.o] Error 1 This is an arm bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118866 > | # 00:05:34 make[1]: *** [Makefile:14340: all-target-libgcc] Error 2 > | # 00:05:34 make: *** [Makefile:1062: all] Error 2 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/16438/artifa… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/3189/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

7 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #106352: Failure on aarch64

by H.J. Lu

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1:17 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. Which version of GCC is your IC using? My patch raises the minimum GCC version to 12.1. > In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: > | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106352 > | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Wed Feb 12 12:53:09 2025 +0800 > | > | [PATCH] Raise the minimum GCC version to 12.1 [BZ #32539] > | > | For all Linux distros with glibc 2.40 which I can find, GCC 14.2 is used > | to compile glibc 2.40: > | > | ... 52 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 392261a2b6 hurd: Replace char foo[1024] with string_t > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_glibc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/3634/a… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64-build/2468/artif… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

7 months

2
3
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-262-gcff0a460ae86: Failure on arm

by Nathan Chancellor

On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 10:30:18AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-262-gcff0a460ae86 > | Author: Bill Wendling <morbo(a)google.com> > | Date: Thu Jan 30 15:36:13 2025 -0800 > | > | [Clang][counted_by] Refactor __builtin_dynamic_object_size on FAMs (#122198) > | > | Refactoring of how __builtin_dynamic_object_size() is calculated for > | flexible array members (in preparation for adding support for the > | 'counted_by' attribute on pointers in structs). > | ... 86 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 22473 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 22474 > > Used configuration : > tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1541. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig-… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-stable-allyesconfig-… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cff0a460ae864505bc2a064c269ebe5… Thanks, I think Bill fixed this with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eb44aa0a94a8d4230c1c9a0c306af1… Cheers, Nathan

7 months

3
2
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-1026-ga5fc7c3ac153: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-1026-ga5fc7c3ac153 | Author: David Pagan <dave.pagan(a)amd.com> | Date: Thu Feb 6 12:41:10 2025 -0800 | | [clang][OpenMP] New OpenMP 6.0 assumption clause, 'no_openmp_constructs' (#125933) | | Add initial parsing/sema support for new assumption clause so clause can | be specified. For now, it's ignored, just like the others. | | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : | 1 Used configuration : tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1548. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3162/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/3161/artifac… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a5fc7c3ac153bddab7c9d3464f17037…

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-888-gdf1bee03de1c: 1 regressions 2 improvements on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Hi, The detected problem is probably caused by a precision error of floating-point arithmetic by the fast-math flag. No need to investigate. Sorry for the noise. Thanks. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: > | commit llvmorg-21-init-888-gdf1bee03de1c > | Author: Paul Carabas <paulcaraa(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Thu Feb 6 02:02:29 2025 +0200 > | > | [mlir] Add math to LLVM lowering support for missing trigonometric & hyperbolic ops (#125753) > | > | The patch adds support for math -> LLVM dialect lowering for TanOp, > | Sinh, Cosh, Tanh > > Produces 1 regressions 2 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0344 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0344/Fujitsu-Fortran-0344_1090.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0338 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0338/Fujitsu-Fortran-0338_0146.test > | ... and 2 more > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1547. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df1bee03de1cdc1505a4e9dde3ed064…

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Tom Eccles

Thanks for the email, The regression in 0688_0041 is expected and documented in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124019. Codegen for that test was already broken before my patch, we just got luckier with undefined behavior before my changes. The regression in 0688_0041 should go away after https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125307. Please do reach out if you have any questions, Tom ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2025 2:54 PM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; Tom Eccles <Tom.Eccles(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447: 1 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit llvmorg-21-init-302-gaeaafce46447 | Author: Tom Eccles <tom.eccles(a)arm.com> | Date: Fri Jan 31 09:35:26 2025 +0000 | | [mlir][OpenMP][flang] make private variable allocation implicit in omp.private (#124019) | | The intention of this work is to give MLIR->LLVMIR conversion freedom to | control how the private variable is allocated so that it can be | allocated on the stack in ordinary cases or as part of a structure used | ... 54 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0688 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0688/Fujitsu-Fortran-0688_0041.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1540. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/439/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/438/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aeaafce4644788963d9823067e46b50… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5595-g99b90c46110: 76 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5595-g99b90c46110 | Author: Andrew Carlotti <andrew.carlotti(a)arm.com> | Date: Thu Jan 30 19:14:46 2025 +0000 | | aarch64: Fix fp8 feature dependencies | | We agreed with LLVM that we shouldn't enforce the architectural | dependencies between fp8 muliplication features, so remove them. | | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 76 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/aarch64-sve2-acle-asm.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O0 -DSTREAMING_COMPATIBLE -DTEST_FULL (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O0 -DSTREAMING_COMPATIBLE -DTEST_OVERLOADS (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O2 -g -DTEST_FULL (test for excess errors) | FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve2/acle/asm/dot_lane_mf8.c -std=c++11 -O2 -g -DTEST_OVERLOADS (test for excess errors) | ... and 73 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1509. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/19… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=99b90c46110df…

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105574: 1 regressions 1 improvements on arm

by Siddhesh Poyarekar

Has the bisect somehow failed in this? It's highly unlikely that a test macro would cause an ICE, unless it somehow exposed a latent bug, which also seems very unlikely in this context. Sid On 2025-01-28 20:48, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/105574 > | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh(a)gotplt.org> > | Date: Tue Jan 28 12:43:50 2025 -0500 > | > | [PATCH v3] testsuite/118127: Pass fortran tests on ppc64le for IEEE128 long doubles > | > | Denormal behaviour is well defined for IEEE128 long doubles, so don't > | XFAIL some gfortran tests on ppc64le when configured with the IEEE128 > | long double ABI. > | ... 13 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 2abc555a80b Daily bump. > > Produces 1 regressions 1 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at config/arm/arm.md:7450) > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:7450) > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifa… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3358/artifact/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

7 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18802-gee99c4d4845d: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:55:49AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-18802-gee99c4d4845d > | Author: SivanShani-Arm <sivan.shani(a)arm.com> > | Date: Thu Jan 23 09:46:59 2025 +0000 > | > | [LLVM][Clang][AArch64] Implement AArch64 build attributes (#123990) > | > | - Added support for AArch64-specific build attributes. > | - Print AArch64 build attributes to assembly. > | - Emit AArch64 build attributes to ELF. > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 40 > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 25849 > > Used configuration : > tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodconfig > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1530. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodcon… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allmodcon… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee99c4d4845db66c4daa2373352133f… Thanks for the report, this change needs adaption on the kernel side: https://lore.kernel.org/20250124-arm64-handle-arm-attributes-in-linker-scri… Cheers, Nathan

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561: 1 regressions on aarch64

by Qadeer, Hafiz Abid

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] Thanks for bringing this to my notice. I have opened upstream issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123960 to track this. I am working on a fix and will update when a PR is opened. Thanks Abid ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 6:43 AM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: Qadeer, Hafiz Abid <HafizAbid.Qadeer(a)amd.com>; maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561: 1 regressions on aarch64 Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O0-debug, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-18360-gaf91372b7561 | Author: Abid Qadeer <haqadeer(a)amd.com> | Date: Mon Jan 20 12:03:59 2025 +0000 | | [flang][debug] Improve handling of cyclic derived types. (#122770) | | When `RecordType` is converted to corresponding `DIType`, we cache the | information to avoid doing the conversion again. | | ... 66 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0394 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0394/Fujitsu-Fortran-0394_0031.test | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O0 -g" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1528. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/383/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O0-debug-build/382/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/af91372b75613d5654e68d393477e86…

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5490-g50505c486ed: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-aarch64, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5490-g50505c486ed | Author: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> | Date: Tue Jan 21 10:48:02 2025 +0000 | | More updated translations Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | # build_abe linux: | # build_abe glibc: | # build_abe gdb: | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:36:56 make[2]: [Makefile:1835: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/largefile-config.h] Error 1 (ignored) | # 00:36:56 make[2]: [Makefile:1836: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/largefile-config.h] Error 1 (ignored) | # 00:47:24 make[7]: [Makefile:850: stamp-modules-bits] Error 1 (ignored) | # 02:07:45 make[2]: [/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:995: gnat-install-tools] Error 1 (ignored) | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 4 | # build_abe glibc: | 5 | # build_abe gdb: | 6 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1505. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/928/a… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-aarch64-build/927/a… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=50505c486ed26…

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

is anybody using QEMU's iwmmxt/xscale emulation for toolchain testing?

by Peter Maydell

Hi; I'm wondering if anybody is using QEMU's iwmmxt/xscale emulation for toolchain testing. (My suspicion is the answer is "no".) This emulation isn't enabled by default, so to use it you would have to explicitly select an iwmmxt capable CPU (with -cpu or the QEMU_CPU environment variable). The relevant CPU types are anything beginning "pxa" (pxa250, pxa255, pxa260, pxa261, pxa262, pxa270-a0, pxa270-a1, pxa270, pxa270-b0, pxa270-b1, pxa270-c0, pxa270-c5). The context for this is that I'm considering deprecate-and-drop for this emulation. (We already dropped all the system emulation of boards that use these CPUs, so the only thing remaining is their support via QEMU's user-mode emulation.) If there's still somebody using this then I'm OK keeping it in QEMU a bit longer, but if as I suspect it's all entirely unused then we might as well start the process of dropping it. (I'm aware that GCC is in the process of dropping its iwmmxt codegen support. I also didn't find anything particularly with a web search with examples of users using it.) thanks -- PMM

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-770-gc36fc507819: 189 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-770-gc36fc507819 | Author: Malte Skarupke <malteskarupke(a)fastmail.fm> | Date: Wed Dec 4 07:56:38 2024 -0500 | | nptl: Remove g_refs from condition variables | | This variable used to be needed to wait in group switching until all sleepers | have confirmed that they have woken. This is no longer needed. Nothing waits | on this variable so there is no need to track how many threads are currently | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 189 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running g++:g++.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ... | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 12 (test for warnings, line 11) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 17 (test for warnings, line 10) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 18 (test for warnings, line 11) | FAIL: g++.dg/analyzer/fanalyzer-show-events-in-system-headers-default.C -std=c++14 at line 19 (test for warnings, line 11) | ... and 192 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1504. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1823/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-arm-build/1822/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=c36fc50781995e6758ca…

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a: 9 regressions on aarch64

by Tom Eccles

Hi thanks for the report. I think it has already been fixed upstream by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122550<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122550?notification_referrer_id=N…>. Please let me know if this was not the case. Kind regards, Tom ________________________________ From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 10:57 PM To: ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com <ohno.yasuyuki(a)fujitsu.com>; itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com <itou.tetsuya(a)fujitsu.com>; t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com <t-kawashima(a)fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; Tom Eccles <Tom.Eccles(a)arm.com> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a: 9 regressions on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_vla-mpipeliner-stack_arrays, after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-17063-g303249c4490a | Author: Tom Eccles <tom.eccles(a)arm.com> | Date: Wed Jan 8 10:05:21 2025 +0000 | | [flang][StackArrays] track pointers through fir.convert (#121919) | | This does add a little computational complexity because now every | freemem operation has to be tested for every allocation. This could be | improved with some more memoisation but I think it is easier to read | ... 6 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 9 regressions: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0073 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0073/Fujitsu-Fortran-0073_0018.test | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0487 ... | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0487/Fujitsu-Fortran-0487_0035.test | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0487/Fujitsu-Fortran-0487_0036.test | ... and 7 more | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -mllvm -aarch64-enable-pipeliner -mllvm -pipeliner-mve-cg -DNDEBUG -fstack-arrays" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1515. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-neoverse_v1-sve_… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/303249c4490a7777a744d9afd449b64… IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

8 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-15150-gb3cba9be41bf: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Mel Chen

Hi, Florian Hahn and I landed 2 patches for fixing FindLastIV reductions idiom. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e528ac404e13ed2d952a2d83aaf838… https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3397950f2d21426c7520d114a125881… I think those can fix the issue you are facing. Please try them, and let me know if you still have regression on it. Mel On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:11 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla, after: > | commit llvmorg-20-init-15150-gb3cba9be41bf > | Author: Mel Chen <mel.chen(a)sifive.com> > | Date: Thu Dec 12 16:48:31 2024 +0800 > | > | [LoopVectorize] Vectorize select-cmp reduction pattern for > increasing integer induction variable (#67812) > | > | Consider the following loop: > | ``` > | int rdx = init; > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0365 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0365/Fujitsu-Fortran-0365_0185.test > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0365/Fujitsu-Fortran-0365_0186.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output > of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm > "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra" > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install > "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang" > -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++" > -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new" > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= > -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math > -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm > -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve > -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve > -msve-vector-bits=scalable -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm > -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -DNDEBUG" > -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu > "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1482. Please let us know if you > have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways > to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > make commands are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vla-build… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3cba9be41bfa89bc0ec212706c6028…

8 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 8 patches in glibc: Failure on aarch64

by Michael Jeanson

On 2025-01-09 12:16, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In glibc_build master-aarch64, after: > | 8 patches in glibc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/104425 > | b2d4876946 [PATCH v16 8/8] Linux: Update internal copy of '<sys/rseq.h>' > | cdd3e61830 [PATCH v16 7/8] nptl: Remove the rseq area from 'struct pthread' > | a673377e3d [PATCH v16 6/8] nptl: Move the rseq area to the 'extra TLS' block > | 86803776b0 [PATCH v16 5/8] nptl: Introduce <rseq-access.h> for RSEQ_* accessors > | 928c07fc09 [PATCH v16 4/8] nptl: add rtld_hidden_proto to __rseq_size and __rseq_offset > | ... and 3 more patches in glibc > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | e41aabcc93 tests: Verify inheritance of cpu affinity > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # init_abe_sysroot: > | 0 > | # build_abe glibc -- --disable install: > | # FAILED > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:00:59 ../csu/libc-tls.c:221:64: error: ‘TLS_TP_OFFSET’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘TLS_DTV_OFFSET’? > | # 00:00:59 make[2]: *** [/home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/sysd-rules:451: /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/builds/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc-glibc.git~master/csu/libc-tls.o] Error 1 > | # 00:00:59 make[1]: *** [Makefile:484: csu/subdir_lib] Error 2 > | # 00:00:59 make: *** [Makefile:20: all] Error 2 Is there a way to re-trigger this job on the current master branch without posting a new patchset? I sent this by mistake before Florian's TLS_TP_OFFSET patch was pushed to master but it is now. Thanks, Michael

8 months

2
1
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-5322-gfd7728c8a4a: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-5322-gfd7728c8a4a | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> | Date: Sun Jan 12 15:14:38 2025 +0800 | | ld: Update function prototypes for compilers defaulting to -std=gnu23 | | Since GCC 15 defaults to -std=gnu23, update function prototypes in linker | tests for compilers defaulting to -std=gnu23. | | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | Running ld:ld-vsb/vsb.exp ... | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC) | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset) | XPASS: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main, non PIC so) | XPASS: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC) | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1502. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_binutils--master-arm-build/9… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd7728c8a4aa7…

8 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in binutils: 1 regressions on aarch64

by H.J. Lu

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:42 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In binutils_check master-aarch64, after: > | 2 patches in binutils > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/104601 > | 795205673be [PATCH v3 2/4] ld: Document mixing IR and non-IR objects for -r > | a8d189da9d5 [PATCH v3 1/4] ld: Add lto and none-lto output support for ld -r > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 338e0b05d8f Fix grammar in "Debug Names" node of the manual > > Produces 1 regressions: > | Running ld:ld-plugin/plugin.exp ... > | FAIL: nm --plugin I can't reproduce it on cfarm185.cfarm.net: /home/hjl/build/binutils/build-aarch64-linux/ld/../binutils/nm-new --plugin /home/hjl/build/binutils/build-aarch64-linux/ld/.libs/libldtestplug2.so.0 /home/hjl/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c 00000000 T _func 00000000 T func PASS: nm --plugin It has GCC 13.3.1. I saw you were using GCC 11.4.0. Please try GCC 11.5.0. > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_binutils_check master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-precommit/233… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/2093/ar… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- H.J.

8 months

1
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6774-g740c84975ceb: Failure on arm

by Sam James

This is definitely https://gcc.gnu.org/PR118409 (indeed the ifcombine change). We had PR118417 too which I suspect is the same.

8 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-734-g93d0bfbe8f: 2 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-734-g93d0bfbe8f | Author: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson(a)efficios.com> | Date: Wed Jul 10 15:48:49 2024 -0400 | | nptl: Move the rseq area to the 'extra TLS' block | | Move the rseq area to the newly added 'extra TLS' block, this is the | last step in adding support for the rseq extended ABI. The size of the | rseq area is now dynamic and depends on the rseq features reported by | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 2 regressions: | Running glibc:elf ... | FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-extern-static | FAIL: elf/tst-tlsalign-static Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1497. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2302/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2301/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=93d0bfbe8ffa9c3dcbfc…

8 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-6566-g804e9d55d9e: 5 regressions on arm

by Sam James

This is being worked on at https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/328b6145af0d5c1d2c3fc5ef44cb7b74717…. See also https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/fcdbc863-3ad7-de56-6076-85948d03046…. thanks, sam

8 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain