- linaro-toolchain - lists.linaro.org

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 4 patches in glibc: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Florian Weimer

* ci notify: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In glibc_check master-arm after: > > | 4 patches in glibc > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/96984 > | 11d52d986b elf: Reorder audit events in dlcose to match _dl_fini (bug 32066) > | 7b2cd1e545 elf: Call la_objclose for proxy link maps in _dl_fini (bug 32065) > | 0f79eb4a6f elf: Signal la_objopen for the proxy link map in dlmopen (bug 31985) > | f26a9b6323 elf: Always write audit log to elf/tst-audit23.out > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 96d0bf98ca Add support/ code for checking file contents > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === glibc tests === > > Running glibc:elf ... > FAIL: elf/tst-audit23 Adhemerval, does elf/tst-audit23.out now show more details? Thanks, Florian

10 months, 1 week

2
3
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-4274-g9ccf82543d50: FAIL: 8 regressions: 2 improvements on aarch64

by David Spickett

We saw problems with this on the bots, and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50a02e7c68f964c5d8338369746c849… fixed the issue there.

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3083-gbcb33b12370: FAIL: 1 regressions on master-thumb_m0_soft_eabi

by Bernd Edlinger

Hi, Can you check if this patch fixes the regressions? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661245.html Thanks Bernd. On 8/23/24 01:57, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1318 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m0 soft after: > > | commit gcc-15-3083-gbcb33b12370 > | Author: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger(a)hotmail.de> > | Date: Fri Aug 16 12:26:27 2024 +0200 > | > | Do not emit a redundant DW_TAG_lexical_block for inlined subroutines > | > | While this already works correctly for the case when an inlined > | subroutine contains only one subrange, a redundant DW_TAG_lexical_block > | is still emitted when the subroutine has multiple blocks. > | > | Fixes: ac02e5b75451 ("re PR debug/37801 (DWARF output for inlined functions > | ... 11 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf2.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c scan-assembler-times DW_AT_ranges 2 > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv6s-m -mtune=cortex-m0 -mfloat-abi=soft -mfpu=auto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/bcb33b1237042e9540a905d9de19219f87… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc > ** master-thumb_m0_soft_eabi > *** FAIL: 1 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea…

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3087-gb07f8a30115: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Andrew Pinski (QUIC)

> -----Original Message----- > From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 10:30 AM > To: rguenth(a)gcc.gnu.org > Cc: gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org; Andrew Pinski (QUIC) > <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3087-gb07f8a30115: FAIL: 2 > regressions on aarch64 > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems > related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If > you have any questions, please follow up on linaro- > toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg > channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary > logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you > need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be > happy to help. > > We track this report status in > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1317 , please let us > know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have > a fix. I have filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116463 for the failure (which was a missed optimization even before the patch; the detection of vector complex multiply is very sensitive in changes to the IR differences). Thanks, Andrew Pinski > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-3087-gb07f8a30115 > | Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > | Date: Wed Aug 21 17:41:38 2024 -0700 > | > | fold: Fix `a * 1j` if a has side effects [PR116454] > | > | The problem here was a missing save_expr around arg0 > since > | it is used twice, once in REALPART_EXPR and once in > IMAGPART_EXPR. > | Thia adds the save_expr and reformats the code slightly > so it is a > | little easier to understand. It excludes the case when arg0 > is > | a COMPLEX_EXPR since in that case we'll end up with the > distinct > | ... 19 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 2 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/vect/complex/complex.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-mls-double.c > scan-tree-dump vect "Found COMPLEX_FMA" > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-mls-float.c > scan-tree-dump vect "Found COMPLEX_FMA" > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64- > build/2486/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as > configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64- > build/2486/artifact/artifacts/notify/ > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64- > build/2486/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--- > ----------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug > environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check-- > master-aarch64-build/2486/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check-- > master-aarch64-build/2485/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git- > us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/b07f8a301158e53717b8688cc8ea > 430b6f02574c/tcwg_gcc_check/master- > aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc- > mirror/gcc/commit/b07f8a301158e53717b8688cc8ea430b6f0 > 2574c > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 2 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/b07f8a301158e53717b8688cc8ea > 430b6f02574c/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/details.txt > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master- > aarch64-build/2486/artifact/artifacts

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2986-gcd2f394418b: Failure on aarch64

by Andrew Pinski (QUIC)

This is already recorded as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116409 . I am about to submit a v2 of the patch to fix this too. > -----Original Message----- > From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:34 AM > To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > Cc: gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2986-gcd2f394418b: Failure > on aarch64 > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems > related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If > you have any questions, please follow up on linaro- > toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg > channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary > logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you > need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be > happy to help. > > We track this report status in > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1316 , please let us > know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have > a fix. > > In master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-2986-gcd2f394418b > | Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > | Date: Sat Apr 20 00:13:12 2024 -0700 > | > | PHIOPT: move factor_out_conditional_operation over to > use gimple_match_op > | > | To start working on more with expressions with more > than one operand, converting > | over to use gimple_match_op is needed. > | The added side-effect here is > factor_out_conditional_operation can now support > | builtins/internal calls that has one operand without any > extra code added. > | > | ... 20 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > 1 > # build_abe gcc: > 2 > # build_abe linux: > 4 > # build_abe glibc: > # FAILED > # build_abe gdb: > # First few build errors in logs: > # 00:02:13 ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_hypot.c:146:1: > internal compiler error: in factor_out_conditional_operation, > at tree-ssa-phiopt.cc:407 # 00:02:13 make[2]: *** > [/home/tcwg- > buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/builds/aarch64- > unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc- > glibc.git~master/sysd-rules:553: /home/tcwg- > buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/builds/aarch64- > unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc- > glibc.git~master/math/e_hypot.o] Error 1 # 00:02:13 make[1]: > *** [Makefile:484: math/others] Error 2 # 00:02:13 make: *** > [Makefile:9: all] Error 2 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > 1 > # build_abe gcc: > 2 > # build_abe linux: > 4 > # build_abe glibc: > 5 > # build_abe gdb: > 6 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_native_build master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--- > ----------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug > environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master- > aarch64-build/747/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master- > aarch64-build/746/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git- > us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/cd2f394418be0cc15d05c97ed725 > 67f2f5e15172/tcwg_gnu_native_build/master- > aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc- > mirror/gcc/commit/cd2f394418be0cc15d05c97ed72567f2f5e1 > 5172 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_native_build > ** master-aarch64 > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/cd2f394418be0cc15d05c97ed725 > 67f2f5e15172/tcwg_gnu_native_build/master- > aarch64/details.txt > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master- > aarch64-build/747/artifact/artifacts

10 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Fwd: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main)

by David Blaikie

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: David Blaikie <dblaikie(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM Subject: Re: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main) To: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> Cc: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> This bot seems to be sending fail-mail when it's already red. My understanding was that fail mail only went out on green->red transitions. Is that understanding incorrect? Should this be reconfigured to match that understanding/not send fail mail when it's already red? On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:10 PM <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder > clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage while building clang. > > Full details are available at: > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/943 > > Worker for this Build: linaro-g3-02 > Blamelist: > David Blaikie <dblaikie(a)gmail.com> > > BUILD FAILED: failed test (failure) > > Step 18 (test-suite) failure: test (failure) > ... > [ 24%] Built target > gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_1_f90 > cd > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression > && > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/stage2.install/bin/llvm-size > --format=sysv > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression/gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90 > > > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression/gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90.size > make[2]: Leaving directory > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build' > [ 24%] Built target > gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90 > make[1]: Leaving directory > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build' > make: *** [Makefile:136: all] Error 2 > 2024-07-25 23:09:27 INFO: Testing... > 2024-07-25 23:09:27 INFO: Execute: > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/stage1/bin/llvm-lit > -v -j 32 > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build > -o > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/outputqee5waec.json > -- Testing: 9770 tests, 32 workers -- > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026.test (1 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028.test (2 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367.test (3 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40.test (4 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366.test (5 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030.test (6 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699.test (7 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368.test (8 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031.test (9 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39.test (10 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39' > is missing > ******************** > > Sincerely, > LLVM Buildbot > >

11 months

2
6
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-3996-g6ae8a30d44f: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1312 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-3996-g6ae8a30d44f | Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich(a)suse.com> | Date: Fri Aug 9 11:59:31 2024 +0200 | | gas: have scrubber retain more whitespace | | According to the description of the state machine, the expectation | appears to be that (leaving aside labels) any insn mnemonic or | directive would be followed by a comma separated list of operands. That | may have been true very long ago, but the latest with the advent of more | elaborate macros this isn't rhe case anymore. Neither macro parameters | ... 26 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 8104 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 9328 # linux build successful: all # linux boot successful: boot The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=6ae8a30d44f01… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui…

11 months

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-60-g07972839108: FAIL: 18 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1309 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-arm after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-60-g07972839108 | Author: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann(a)inria.fr> | Date: Thu Jul 25 16:38:08 2024 +0200 | | added inputs giving large errors on x86_64 for new C23 functions | | These functions are exp10m1, exp2m1, log10p1, log2p1. | Also regenerated ulps on x86_64. | | For each format, there are 4 values, one for each rounding mode. | (For the intel96 format, there are 8 values, 4 for Intel hardware, | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 18 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:math ... FAIL: math/test-double-exp10m1 FAIL: math/test-double-exp2m1 FAIL: math/test-double-log10p1 FAIL: math/test-float-exp10m1 FAIL: math/test-float-exp2m1 FAIL: math/test-float-log10p1 FAIL: math/test-float32-exp10m1 ... and 12 more entries You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/797… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=07972839108495245d8b… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc ** master-arm *** FAIL: 18 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799…

11 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-1360-ga42e515e3a9f: Failure on aarch64

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Julian, Your patch below breaks Flang build [on aarch64]. Would you please investigate? The interesting log is at https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact… . Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 5, 2024, at 16:56, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1306 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-1360-ga42e515e3a9f > | Author: Julian Brown <julian.brown(a)amd.com> > | Date: Mon Aug 5 12:37:07 2024 +0100 > | > | [OpenMP] OpenMP 5.1 "assume" directive parsing support (#92731) > | > | This is a minimal patch to support parsing for "omp assume" directives. > | These are meant to be hints to a compiler's optimisers: as such, it is > | legitimate (if not very useful) to ignore them. The patch builds on top > | of the existing support for "omp assumes" directives (note spelling!). > | > | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : > # FAILED > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : > 1 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/172/artifact… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a42e515e3a9f3bb4e44389c097b8910… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_flang_build > ** main-aarch64 > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2414-g2d105efd6f60: FAIL: 3 regressions on aarch64

by Sam James

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any > questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org > mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite > Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our > CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1305 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-2414-g2d105efd6f60 > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Tue Jul 30 17:10:01 2024 +0100 > | > | testsuite: fix whitespace in dg-do assemble directive > | > | * gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c: Fix whitespace in dg directive. > > FAIL: 3 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/simd/simd.exp ... > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tsmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tummla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tusmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > [...] Thanks. The test has been broken since it was added. Filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR116207.

11 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-943-g366eade911b5: FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements on aarch64

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Leandro, Our Flang CI is running in test mode, and it already catches regressions! > On Aug 1, 2024, at 01:27, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1300 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-943-g366eade911b5 > | Author: Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori(a)linaro.org> > | Date: Wed Jul 31 14:39:06 2024 -0300 > | > | [flang][OpenMP] Reland Fix copyprivate semantic checks (#95799) (#101009) > | > | There are some cases in which variables used in OpenMP constructs > | are predetermined as private. The semantic checks for copyprivate > | were not handling those cases. > | > | Besides that, shared symbols were not being properly represented > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements > > regressions.sum: > === test-suite tests === > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0141 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0141/Fujitsu-Fortran-0141_0019.test This means that after your patch the test that could not compile before, now compiles, but fails to run correctly. This is an improvement. > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0153 ... > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0234.test > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0235.test > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0237.test These tests go the other way -- they used to fail at runtime before, but now they fail to compile. > > ... and 5 more entries > > improvements.sum: > === test-suite tests === > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0141 ... > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0141/Fujitsu-Fortran-0141_0019.test > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0153 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0237.test > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0234.test > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0235.test > > ... and 5 more entries Please investigate, and let me know if you need any help in reproducing or troubleshooting these. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/366eade911b54878c9cc1835d2544fb… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_flang_test > ** main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld > *** FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…

11 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #94612: Failure on aarch64

by Tobias Burnus

Hi all, what should I do with this – I have no idea what artifacts are nor is it clear to me when looking at the webpage. Tobias ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/94612 > | Author: Tobias Burnus <tburnus(a)baylibre.com> > | Date: Fri Jul 26 20:05:43 2024 +0200 > | > | libgomp: Fix declare target link with offset array-section mapping [PR116107] > | > | The main idea of 'link' is to permit putting only a subset of a > | huge array on the device. Well, in order to make this work properly, > | it requires that one can map an array section, which does not > | start with the first element. > | > | ... 28 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 6d79d53eed8 Match: Support .SAT_SUB with IMM op for form 1-4 > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 2 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/7257/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2370/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

11 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a: Failure on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Andi, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/musttail6.C (test for excess errors) It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 26, 2024, at 19:38, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1299 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a > | Author: Andi Kleen <ak(a)linux.intel.com> > | Date: Tue Jan 23 23:54:56 2024 -0800 > | > | Add tests for C/C++ musttail attributes > | > | Some adopted from the existing C musttail plugin tests. > | Also extends the ability to query the sibcall capabilities of the > | target. > | > | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 4 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2459/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba3… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/ar…

11 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748: Failure on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Jason, For this one the regressions are: === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 09:28, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1301 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748 > | Author: Jason Merrill <jason(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986] > | > | Here the call to e() makes us decide to check d() for escalation at EOF, but > | while checking it we try to fold_immediate 0_c, and get confused by the > | template trees. Let's not mess with escalation for function templates. > | > | PR c++/115986 > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 3 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2471/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab9… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/ar…

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-488-g65361ff80c18: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1291 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-488-g65361ff80c18 | Author: Christudasan Devadasan <christudasan.devadasan(a)amd.com> | Date: Fri Jul 26 20:03:45 2024 +0530 | | [AMDGPU] Use SubtargetPredicate instead of OtherPredicates for subtarget predication. (#100715) FAIL: 2 regressions regressions.sum: === test-suite tests === Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0291 ... FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0291/Fujitsu-Fortran-0291_0008.test Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0338 ... FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0338/Fujitsu-Fortran-0338_0061.test You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/5/… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65361ff80c18b5920eb45091ff39c1d… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_flang_test ** main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla *** FAIL: 2 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/…

11 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d: Failure on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Jason, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/abi/arm_rtti1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-assembler _ZNKSt9type_infoeqERKS_ It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 05:55, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1300 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d > | Author: Jason Merrill <jason(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Jul 26 15:10:50 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: improve C++ testsuite default versions > | > | I wanted to add more cases to the setting of std_list in g++-dg.exp, but > | didn't want to do a full scan through the file for each case. So this patch > | improves that in two ways: first, by extracting all interesting lines on a > | single pass; second, by generating the list more flexibly: now we test every > | version mentioned explicitly in the testcase, plus a few more if fewer than > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 1 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2466/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/ar…

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gdb: Failure on aarch64

by Simon Marchi

On 2024-07-27 03:34, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gdb_check master-aarch64 after: > > | 2 patches in gdb > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/94605 > | 9aca4cc6ec5 gdb: pass inferior to gdbarch_update_p > | f3b21ad781e gdb: pass inferior to target_current_description > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | ced7ecee432 Automatic date update in version.in > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: > 0 > # 1 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/2974/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-build/1474/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. Hello, Could you help me understand what failed? Simon

11 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-19-init-18145-g1f6f97e2b64a: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 02:12:58PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1287 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig after: > > | commit llvmorg-19-init-18145-g1f6f97e2b64a > | Author: Bill Wendling <5993918+bwendling(a)users.noreply.github.com> > | Date: Thu Jul 18 22:11:56 2024 +0000 > | > | [Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (#99574) > | > | Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct > | defined within another struct has the same semantics as if it were > | defined outside of the struct. So there's no need to look into > | RecordDecls that aren't a field. > | > | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe binutils: > -9 > # build_kernel_llvm: > -5 > # build_abe qemu: > -2 > # linux_n_obj: > 22903 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe binutils: > -9 > # build_kernel_llvm: > -5 > # build_abe qemu: > -2 > # linux_n_obj: > 22904 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyescon… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyescon… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f6f97e2b64a9c4c51712d32b53e07d… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_kernel > ** llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyescon… This should be fixed with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6db5f4fd2a287de9d20adc7a44cfcc6…. Cheers, Nathan

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2192-g0c5c0c959c2e: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1297 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig after: | commit gcc-15-2192-g0c5c0c959c2e | Author: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina(a)arm.com> | Date: Mon Jul 22 10:28:19 2024 +0100 | | AArch64: implement TARGET_VECTORIZE_CONDITIONAL_OPERATION_IS_EXPENSIVE [PR115531]. | | This implements the new target hook indicating that for AArch64 when possible | we prefer masked operations for any type vs doing LOAD + SELECT or | SELECT + STORE. | | Thanks, | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 662 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 669 # linux build successful: all # linux boot successful: boot The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnocon… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnocon… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/0c5c0c959c2e592b84739f19ca771fa69e… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnocon…

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-2-g4dc22baa84b: FAIL: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1295 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In glibc_check master-arm after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-2-g4dc22baa84b | Author: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann(a)inria.fr> | Date: Mon Jul 22 08:54:23 2024 +0200 | | This patch adds larger ulp errors for the log2p1 function. | | Changes in v2: | - added larger error for long double on AMD reported by Adhemerval | (https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2024-June/157755.html) | | Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> FAIL: 6 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:math ... FAIL: math/test-double-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float32-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float32x-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float64-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-ldouble-log2p1 You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_glibc_check master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1583/artifact/… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4dc22baa84bdb4111c0a… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_glibc_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 6 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/…

11 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2110-g71b31690a7c5: Failure on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1294 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig after: | commit gcc-15-2110-g71b31690a7c5 | Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford(a)arm.com> | Date: Wed Jul 17 19:38:11 2024 +0100 | | rtl-ssa: Fix split_clobber_group [PR115928] | | One of the goals of the rtl-ssa representation was to allow a | group of consecutive clobbers to be skipped in constant time, | with amortised sublinear insertion and deletion. This involves | putting consecutive clobbers in groups. Splitting or joining | groups would be linear if we had to update every clobber on | ... 21 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 0 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 7865 # linux build successful: all # linux boot successful: boot The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig-build/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig-build/… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/71b31690a7c52413496e91bcc5ee4c68af… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig-build/…

11 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2165-g01c095ab77f8: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Sam James

FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116003.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116003.c:4:1: sorry, unimplemented: '_BitInt(5)' is not supported on this target /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116003.c:8:1: sorry, unimplemented: '_BitInt(129)' is not supported on this target /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116003.c:11:5: sorry, unimplemented: '_BitInt(128)' is not supported on this target I think it needs dg-do compile { target bitint }.

11 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2026-g44c9403ed183: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1282 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig after: | commit gcc-15-2026-g44c9403ed183 | Author: Alejandro Colomar <alx(a)kernel.org> | Date: Sat Jun 29 15:10:43 2024 +0200 | | c, objc: Add -Wunterminated-string-initialization | | Warn about the following: | | char s[3] = "foo"; | | Initializing a char array with a string literal of the same length as | ... 63 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 24546 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 24548 The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig-… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig-… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/44c9403ed1833ae71a59e84f9e37af3182… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig-…

11 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Paul Richard Thomas

Hi there, You detected a failure in gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90: PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O0 execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O1 execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O2 execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer ...snip... PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer ...snip... PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -g execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -Os (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -Os execution test The stop message in the full log indicates a numeric error in the first test. I am unable to reproduce the error. Adding deallocation of all the allocated variables (which I should have done in the first place) and running valgrind with -s shows no errors and no memory loss. I find it odd that it should fail once at -O1 and not at -O2 and higher. Can you provide me with any insights; eg, by rerunning the testcase outside of the dejagnu framework? Thank you for doing this testing, by the way, even if the failure is a bit obscure at the moment. Best regards Paul

1 year

2
6
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in binutils: Failure on arm

by Ulf Samuelsson

I get this problem when the CI is building a patchset for the binutils with my patches. The patchset consists of 7 patches, and I suspect that this error message is generated when only part of the 7 patches are applied. Could this be true? They are interdependent, so there is no way to reorder the patches to make this work if not all the patches are applied. Den 2024-07-07 kl. 02:47, skrev ci_notify(a)linaro.org: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In binutils_build master-arm after: > > | 2 patches in binutils > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/93436 > | dd57e0ed6f6 ldgram.y: Add ASCII parsing > | 304119944bb ldlex.l: Add ASCII token > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 85a67d0a39a Automatic date update in version.in > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > # FAILED > # First few build errors in logs: > # 00:01:58 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/binutils.git~master/ld/ldgram.y:711:21: error: too many arguments to function ‘lang_add_string’ > # 00:01:58 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/binutils.git~master/ld/ldgram.y:717:19: error: too many arguments to function ‘lang_add_string’ > # 00:01:58 make[4]: *** [Makefile:2290: ldgram.o] Error 1 > # 00:01:58 make[3]: *** [Makefile:1903: all-recursive] Error 1 > # 00:01:58 make[2]: *** [Makefile:1092: all] Error 2 > # 00:01:58 make[1]: *** [Makefile:8044: all-ld] Error 2 > # 00:01:58 make: *** [Makefile:1028: all] Error 2 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > 1 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_binutils_build master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/2298/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-build/1304/artifa… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson

1 year

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain