- linaro-toolchain - lists.linaro.org

Fwd: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main)

by David Blaikie

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: David Blaikie <dblaikie(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM Subject: Re: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main) To: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> Cc: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> This bot seems to be sending fail-mail when it's already red. My understanding was that fail mail only went out on green->red transitions. Is that understanding incorrect? Should this be reconfigured to match that understanding/not send fail mail when it's already red? On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:10 PM <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder > clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage while building clang. > > Full details are available at: > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/943 > > Worker for this Build: linaro-g3-02 > Blamelist: > David Blaikie <dblaikie(a)gmail.com> > > BUILD FAILED: failed test (failure) > > Step 18 (test-suite) failure: test (failure) > ... > [ 24%] Built target > gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_1_f90 > cd > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression > && > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/stage2.install/bin/llvm-size > --format=sysv > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression/gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90 > > > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression/gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90.size > make[2]: Leaving directory > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build' > [ 24%] Built target > gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90 > make[1]: Leaving directory > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build' > make: *** [Makefile:136: all] Error 2 > 2024-07-25 23:09:27 INFO: Testing... > 2024-07-25 23:09:27 INFO: Execute: > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/stage1/bin/llvm-lit > -v -j 32 > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build > -o > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/outputqee5waec.json > -- Testing: 9770 tests, 32 workers -- > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026.test (1 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028.test (2 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367.test (3 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40.test (4 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366.test (5 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030.test (6 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699.test (7 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368.test (8 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031.test (9 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39.test (10 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39' > is missing > ******************** > > Sincerely, > LLVM Buildbot > >

10 months, 3 weeks

2
6
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-3996-g6ae8a30d44f: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1312 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-3996-g6ae8a30d44f | Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich(a)suse.com> | Date: Fri Aug 9 11:59:31 2024 +0200 | | gas: have scrubber retain more whitespace | | According to the description of the state machine, the expectation | appears to be that (leaving aside labels) any insn mnemonic or | directive would be followed by a comma separated list of operands. That | may have been true very long ago, but the latest with the advent of more | elaborate macros this isn't rhe case anymore. Neither macro parameters | ... 26 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 8104 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 9328 # linux build successful: all # linux boot successful: boot The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=6ae8a30d44f01… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui…

10 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-60-g07972839108: FAIL: 18 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1309 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-arm after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-60-g07972839108 | Author: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann(a)inria.fr> | Date: Thu Jul 25 16:38:08 2024 +0200 | | added inputs giving large errors on x86_64 for new C23 functions | | These functions are exp10m1, exp2m1, log10p1, log2p1. | Also regenerated ulps on x86_64. | | For each format, there are 4 values, one for each rounding mode. | (For the intel96 format, there are 8 values, 4 for Intel hardware, | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 18 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:math ... FAIL: math/test-double-exp10m1 FAIL: math/test-double-exp2m1 FAIL: math/test-double-log10p1 FAIL: math/test-float-exp10m1 FAIL: math/test-float-exp2m1 FAIL: math/test-float-log10p1 FAIL: math/test-float32-exp10m1 ... and 12 more entries You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/797… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=07972839108495245d8b… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc ** master-arm *** FAIL: 18 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799…

10 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-1360-ga42e515e3a9f: Failure on aarch64

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Julian, Your patch below breaks Flang build [on aarch64]. Would you please investigate? The interesting log is at https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact… . Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 5, 2024, at 16:56, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1306 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-1360-ga42e515e3a9f > | Author: Julian Brown <julian.brown(a)amd.com> > | Date: Mon Aug 5 12:37:07 2024 +0100 > | > | [OpenMP] OpenMP 5.1 "assume" directive parsing support (#92731) > | > | This is a minimal patch to support parsing for "omp assume" directives. > | These are meant to be hints to a compiler's optimisers: as such, it is > | legitimate (if not very useful) to ignore them. The patch builds on top > | of the existing support for "omp assumes" directives (note spelling!). > | > | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : > # FAILED > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : > 1 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/172/artifact… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a42e515e3a9f3bb4e44389c097b8910… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_flang_build > ** main-aarch64 > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact…

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2414-g2d105efd6f60: FAIL: 3 regressions on aarch64

by Sam James

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any > questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org > mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite > Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our > CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1305 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-2414-g2d105efd6f60 > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Tue Jul 30 17:10:01 2024 +0100 > | > | testsuite: fix whitespace in dg-do assemble directive > | > | * gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c: Fix whitespace in dg directive. > > FAIL: 3 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/simd/simd.exp ... > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tsmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tummla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tusmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > [...] Thanks. The test has been broken since it was added. Filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR116207.

11 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-943-g366eade911b5: FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements on aarch64

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Leandro, Our Flang CI is running in test mode, and it already catches regressions! > On Aug 1, 2024, at 01:27, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1300 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-943-g366eade911b5 > | Author: Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori(a)linaro.org> > | Date: Wed Jul 31 14:39:06 2024 -0300 > | > | [flang][OpenMP] Reland Fix copyprivate semantic checks (#95799) (#101009) > | > | There are some cases in which variables used in OpenMP constructs > | are predetermined as private. The semantic checks for copyprivate > | were not handling those cases. > | > | Besides that, shared symbols were not being properly represented > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements > > regressions.sum: > === test-suite tests === > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0141 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0141/Fujitsu-Fortran-0141_0019.test This means that after your patch the test that could not compile before, now compiles, but fails to run correctly. This is an improvement. > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0153 ... > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0234.test > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0235.test > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0237.test These tests go the other way -- they used to fail at runtime before, but now they fail to compile. > > ... and 5 more entries > > improvements.sum: > === test-suite tests === > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0141 ... > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0141/Fujitsu-Fortran-0141_0019.test > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0153 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0237.test > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0234.test > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0235.test > > ... and 5 more entries Please investigate, and let me know if you need any help in reproducing or troubleshooting these. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/366eade911b54878c9cc1835d2544fb… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_flang_test > ** main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld > *** FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…

11 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #94612: Failure on aarch64

by Tobias Burnus

Hi all, what should I do with this – I have no idea what artifacts are nor is it clear to me when looking at the webpage. Tobias ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/94612 > | Author: Tobias Burnus <tburnus(a)baylibre.com> > | Date: Fri Jul 26 20:05:43 2024 +0200 > | > | libgomp: Fix declare target link with offset array-section mapping [PR116107] > | > | The main idea of 'link' is to permit putting only a subset of a > | huge array on the device. Well, in order to make this work properly, > | it requires that one can map an array section, which does not > | start with the first element. > | > | ... 28 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 6d79d53eed8 Match: Support .SAT_SUB with IMM op for form 1-4 > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 2 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/7257/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2370/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

11 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a: Failure on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Andi, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/musttail6.C (test for excess errors) It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 26, 2024, at 19:38, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1299 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2233-g8d1af8f904a > | Author: Andi Kleen <ak(a)linux.intel.com> > | Date: Tue Jan 23 23:54:56 2024 -0800 > | > | Add tests for C/C++ musttail attributes > | > | Some adopted from the existing C musttail plugin tests. > | Also extends the ability to query the sibcall capabilities of the > | target. > | > | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 4 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2459/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/8d1af8f904a0c08656d976cbf8ca56dba3… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2460/artifact/ar…

11 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748: Failure on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Jason, For this one the regressions are: === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 09:28, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1301 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2362-ga9e9f772c748 > | Author: Jason Merrill <jason(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986] > | > | Here the call to e() makes us decide to check d() for escalation at EOF, but > | while checking it we try to fold_immediate 0_c, and get confused by the > | template trees. Let's not mess with escalation for function templates. > | > | PR c++/115986 > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 3 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2471/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab9… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2472/artifact/ar…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-488-g65361ff80c18: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1291 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla after: | commit llvmorg-20-init-488-g65361ff80c18 | Author: Christudasan Devadasan <christudasan.devadasan(a)amd.com> | Date: Fri Jul 26 20:03:45 2024 +0530 | | [AMDGPU] Use SubtargetPredicate instead of OtherPredicates for subtarget predication. (#100715) FAIL: 2 regressions regressions.sum: === test-suite tests === Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0291 ... FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0291/Fujitsu-Fortran-0291_0008.test Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0338 ... FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0338/Fujitsu-Fortran-0338_0061.test You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/5/… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65361ff80c18b5920eb45091ff39c1d… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_flang_test ** main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla *** FAIL: 2 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-O3-sve_vla-build/8/…

11 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d: Failure on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Jason, The regression is ... === g++ tests === Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/abi/arm_rtti1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-assembler _ZNKSt9type_infoeqERKS_ It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jul 28, 2024, at 05:55, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1300 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4d > | Author: Jason Merrill <jason(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Fri Jul 26 15:10:50 2024 -0400 > | > | c++: improve C++ testsuite default versions > | > | I wanted to add more cases to the setting of std_list in g++-dg.exp, but > | didn't want to do a full scan through the file for each case. So this patch > | improves that in two ways: first, by extracting all interesting lines on a > | single pass; second, by generating the list more flexibly: now we test every > | version mentioned explicitly in the testcase, plus a few more if fewer than > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > # 1 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gcc: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gcc --: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2466/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2468/artifact/ar…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gdb: Failure on aarch64

by Simon Marchi

On 2024-07-27 03:34, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gdb_check master-aarch64 after: > > | 2 patches in gdb > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/94605 > | 9aca4cc6ec5 gdb: pass inferior to gdbarch_update_p > | f3b21ad781e gdb: pass inferior to target_current_description > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | ced7ecee432 Automatic date update in version.in > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: > 0 > # 1 regressions > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe gdb -- --prefix /usr --disable install: > -2 > # build_abe dejagnu: > -1 > # build_abe check_gdb -- --set check_buffer_workaround=gdb-read1: > 0 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/2974/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-build/1474/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. Hello, Could you help me understand what failed? Simon

11 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-19-init-18145-g1f6f97e2b64a: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 02:12:58PM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1287 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig after: > > | commit llvmorg-19-init-18145-g1f6f97e2b64a > | Author: Bill Wendling <5993918+bwendling(a)users.noreply.github.com> > | Date: Thu Jul 18 22:11:56 2024 +0000 > | > | [Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (#99574) > | > | Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct > | defined within another struct has the same semantics as if it were > | defined outside of the struct. So there's no need to look into > | RecordDecls that aren't a field. > | > | ... 4 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe binutils: > -9 > # build_kernel_llvm: > -5 > # build_abe qemu: > -2 > # linux_n_obj: > 22903 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # build_abe binutils: > -9 > # build_kernel_llvm: > -5 > # build_abe qemu: > -2 > # linux_n_obj: > 22904 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyescon… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyescon… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f6f97e2b64a9c4c51712d32b53e07d… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_kernel > ** llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyescon… This should be fixed with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6db5f4fd2a287de9d20adc7a44cfcc6…. Cheers, Nathan

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2192-g0c5c0c959c2e: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1297 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig after: | commit gcc-15-2192-g0c5c0c959c2e | Author: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina(a)arm.com> | Date: Mon Jul 22 10:28:19 2024 +0100 | | AArch64: implement TARGET_VECTORIZE_CONDITIONAL_OPERATION_IS_EXPENSIVE [PR115531]. | | This implements the new target hook indicating that for AArch64 when possible | we prefer masked operations for any type vs doing LOAD + SELECT or | SELECT + STORE. | | Thanks, | ... 16 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 662 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 669 # linux build successful: all # linux boot successful: boot The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnocon… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnocon… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/0c5c0c959c2e592b84739f19ca771fa69e… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnoconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-mainline-allnocon…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-2-g4dc22baa84b: FAIL: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1295 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In glibc_check master-arm after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-2-g4dc22baa84b | Author: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann(a)inria.fr> | Date: Mon Jul 22 08:54:23 2024 +0200 | | This patch adds larger ulp errors for the log2p1 function. | | Changes in v2: | - added larger error for long double on AMD reported by Adhemerval | (https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2024-June/157755.html) | | Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> FAIL: 6 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:math ... FAIL: math/test-double-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float32-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float32x-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-float64-log2p1 FAIL: math/test-ldouble-log2p1 You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_glibc_check master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1583/artifact/… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4dc22baa84bdb4111c0a… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_glibc_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 6 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/1585/artifact/…

11 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2110-g71b31690a7c5: Failure on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1294 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig after: | commit gcc-15-2110-g71b31690a7c5 | Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford(a)arm.com> | Date: Wed Jul 17 19:38:11 2024 +0100 | | rtl-ssa: Fix split_clobber_group [PR115928] | | One of the goals of the rtl-ssa representation was to allow a | group of consecutive clobbers to be skipped in constant time, | with amortised sublinear insertion and deletion. This involves | putting consecutive clobbers in groups. Splitting or joining | groups would be linear if we had to update every clobber on | ... 21 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 0 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 7865 # linux build successful: all # linux boot successful: boot The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig-build/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig-build/… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/71b31690a7c52413496e91bcc5ee4c68af… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-arm-next-defconfig-build/…

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2165-g01c095ab77f8: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Sam James

FAIL: gcc.dg/pr116003.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116003.c:4:1: sorry, unimplemented: '_BitInt(5)' is not supported on this target /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116003.c:8:1: sorry, unimplemented: '_BitInt(129)' is not supported on this target /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_5/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116003.c:11:5: sorry, unimplemented: '_BitInt(128)' is not supported on this target I think it needs dg-do compile { target bitint }.

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2026-g44c9403ed183: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1282 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig after: | commit gcc-15-2026-g44c9403ed183 | Author: Alejandro Colomar <alx(a)kernel.org> | Date: Sat Jun 29 15:10:43 2024 +0200 | | c, objc: Add -Wunterminated-string-initialization | | Warn about the following: | | char s[3] = "foo"; | | Initializing a char array with a string literal of the same length as | ... 63 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 24546 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 24548 The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig-… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig-… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/44c9403ed1833ae71a59e84f9e37af3182… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-allmodconfig-…

11 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #93154: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Paul Richard Thomas

Hi there, You detected a failure in gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90: PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O0 execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O1 execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O2 execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer ...snip... PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer ...snip... PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -O3 -g execution test PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -Os (test for excess errors) PASS: gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 -Os execution test The stop message in the full log indicates a numeric error in the first test. I am unable to reproduce the error. Adding deallocation of all the allocated variables (which I should have done in the first place) and running valgrind with -s shows no errors and no memory loss. I find it odd that it should fail once at -O1 and not at -O2 and higher. Can you provide me with any insights; eg, by rerunning the testcase outside of the dejagnu framework? Thank you for doing this testing, by the way, even if the failure is a bit obscure at the moment. Best regards Paul

11 months, 3 weeks

2
6
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in binutils: Failure on arm

by Ulf Samuelsson

I get this problem when the CI is building a patchset for the binutils with my patches. The patchset consists of 7 patches, and I suspect that this error message is generated when only part of the 7 patches are applied. Could this be true? They are interdependent, so there is no way to reorder the patches to make this work if not all the patches are applied. Den 2024-07-07 kl. 02:47, skrev ci_notify(a)linaro.org: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In binutils_build master-arm after: > > | 2 patches in binutils > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/93436 > | dd57e0ed6f6 ldgram.y: Add ASCII parsing > | 304119944bb ldlex.l: Add ASCII token > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 85a67d0a39a Automatic date update in version.in > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > # FAILED > # First few build errors in logs: > # 00:01:58 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/binutils.git~master/ld/ldgram.y:711:21: error: too many arguments to function ‘lang_add_string’ > # 00:01:58 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/binutils.git~master/ld/ldgram.y:717:19: error: too many arguments to function ‘lang_add_string’ > # 00:01:58 make[4]: *** [Makefile:2290: ldgram.o] Error 1 > # 00:01:58 make[3]: *** [Makefile:1903: all-recursive] Error 1 > # 00:01:58 make[2]: *** [Makefile:1092: all] Error 2 > # 00:01:58 make[1]: *** [Makefile:8044: all-ld] Error 2 > # 00:01:58 make: *** [Makefile:1028: all] Error 2 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > 1 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_binutils_build master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/2298/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-build/1304/artifa… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson

11 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

C++ standard library for build bot clang-armv8-lld-2stage

by mingmingl

Greetings! This is Mingming and I'm an LLVM contributor. I have received a lot of useful code review feedback from aarch64 experts. Thank you for all of that! I'm writing to report a failure ( https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/122/builds/150) on buildbot clang-armv8-lld-2stage triggered by my recent patch. The issue seems to stem from the C++ standard libraries not being configured in the buildbot environment. While using a c-style header is a workaround (which pr 97245 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97245> did), @petrhosek reminded me that it would be good to inform maintainers so they can take a look, which makes sense to me. Could someone please assist in resolving this configuration problem? Thank you in advance and let me know if I miss anything. Thanks, Mingming

12 months

3
4
0 0

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 28 Jun

by Peter Maydell

Progress: * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - patch-review queue has filled up again; reviewed at least some patches ready for an arm pullreq - another KVM Forum PC meeting * QEMU-530 [QEMU ARMv9.5 Baseline CPU for TCG] - realized that FEAT_AFP means we need to refactor our FPCR/FPSR implementation, because it adds new AArch64-only bits that aren't visible in the AArch32 FPSCR format. (QEMU for historical reasons implemented FPCR and FPSR as masked views of FPSCR; now we need to switch to having FPSCR be a view of the FPCR/FPSR data.) Wrote the necessary refactoring and sent patchseries out for review. -- PMM

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Release structures on function return

by Jørgen Kvalsvik

I think we need to revert this. I got this email from linaro/gcc-regressions: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-1649-g19f630e6ae8d: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64 regressions.sum: === gcc tests === Running gcc:gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp ... FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-23.c (internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:910) FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-23.c (test for excess errors) This did not reproduce on my machine, but I took a quick look at the hash-map implementation. hash_map.put calls hash_table.find_slot_with_hash, which calls hash_table.expand, which does move+destroy. auto_vec is not really move-aware which leads to a double-free. The fix is either to make auto_vec move-aware (and more like C++'s std::vector) or revert this patch and apply the original version with an explicit release. OK? Thanks, Jørgen On 6/25/24 12:23, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> The value vec objects are destroyed on exit, but release still needs to >> be called explicitly. >> >> gcc/ChangeLog: >> >> * tree-profile.cc (find_conditions): Release vectors before >> return. > I wonder if you turn > hash_map<int_hash<unsigned, 0>, vec<basic_block>> exprs; > to > hash_map<int_hash<unsigned, 0>, auto_vec<basic_block>> exprs; > Won't hash_map destructor take care of this by itself? > > Honza >> --- >> gcc/tree-profile.cc | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/gcc/tree-profile.cc b/gcc/tree-profile.cc >> index e4bb689cef5..18f48e8d04e 100644 >> --- a/gcc/tree-profile.cc >> +++ b/gcc/tree-profile.cc >> @@ -919,6 +919,9 @@ find_conditions (struct function *fn) >> if (!have_post_dom) >> free_dominance_info (fn, CDI_POST_DOMINATORS); >> >> + for (auto expr : exprs) >> + expr.second.release (); >> + >> cov->m_masks.safe_grow_cleared (2 * cov->m_index.last ()); >> const size_t length = cov_length (cov); >> for (size_t i = 0; i != length; i++) >> -- >> 2.39.2 >>

1 year

1
0
0 0

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf5: FAIL: 4 regressions on aarch64

by Surya Kumari Jangala

Hi, I am looking into these regressions. Regards, Surya On 26/06/24 7:51 am, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1270 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf5 > | Author: Surya Kumari Jangala <jskumari(a)linux.ibm.com> > | Date: Tue Jun 25 08:37:49 2024 -0500 > | > | ira: Scale save/restore costs of callee save registers with block frequency > | > | In assign_hard_reg(), when computing the costs of the hard registers, the > | cost of saving/restoring a callee-save hard register in prolog/epilog is > | taken into consideration. However, this cost is not scaled with the entry > | block frequency. Without scaling, the cost of saving/restoring is quite > | small and this can result in a callee-save register being chosen by > | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 4 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/cpy_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve -moverride=tune=none check-function-bodies dup_x0_m > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/pr10474.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing shrink-wrapping" > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ... > ... and 5 more entries > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifac… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2234/artifac… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 4 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifac…

1 year

1
0
0 0

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-3611-g057a2b4c4b5: FAIL: 5 regressions on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1271 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In binutils_check master-aarch64 after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-3611-g057a2b4c4b5 | Author: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Jun 26 13:17:25 2024 +0100 | | Revert: 35fd2ddeb1d90f1750401cfb6d01fe055656b88d | | PR 20814 FAIL: 5 regressions regressions.sum: === ld tests === Running ld:ld-plugin/libdep.exp ... ERROR: can't read "libdep": no such variable FAIL: libdep test - could not locate libdep plugin ERROR: tcl error sourcing ld-plugin/libdep.exp. ERROR: tcl error code TCL READ VARNAME UNRESOLVED: testcase ld-plugin/libdep.exp' aborted due to Tcl error You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/1290/ar… The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/1290/ar… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/1290/ar… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_binutils_check master-aarch64 -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/1290/ar… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/1288/ar… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=057a2b4c4b57e… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_binutils_check ** master-aarch64 *** FAIL: 5 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64-build/1290/ar…

1 year

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain