1 Feb
2026
1 Feb
'26
7:26 a.m.
On Jan 31, 2026, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
| regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/crypto-vsha1cq_u32.c scan-assembler-times | vdup.32\tq[0-9]+, (?:r[0-9]+|d[0-9]+\[[0-9]+\]) 4 | | fixes.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/crypto-vsha1cq_u32.c scan-assembler-times | vdup.32\tq[0-9]+, r[0-9]+ 4
That looks like still the same failure, but since the pattern is textually different, it is no longer recognized as the same test point. Unfortunately, the code this test run of yours generates doesn't match the new pattern either. I guess the pattern will need to be extended further.
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/
Free Software Activist FSFLA co-founder GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity.
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!