On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 12:58, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: | 4 patches in gcc | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/103420 | 3a8cf3dce8f [PATCH 4/4] aarch64: Add mf8 data movement intrinsics | afa8fb3b8b4 [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Add missing makefile dependency | 7120f3c23db [PATCH 2/4] aarch64: Use mf8 instead of f8 in builtin definitions | 0cc75ba5a1a [PATCH 1/4] aarch64: Macroise simd_type definitions | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | b117201385d testsuite: Fix toplevel-asm-1.c failure for riscv
Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | 1
Hi Richard,
Since the message is not very clear, your patches break the build. The log contains these errors: aarch64-sve2.md: In function ‘insn_code maybe_code_for_aarch64_cm(rtx_code, machine_mode, int, int)’: aarch64-sve2.md:7205:12: error: ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le_vec_concatz_be’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le’? (and many other similar entries)
HTH
Christophe
Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 *configure and test flags:* --target aarch64-linux-gnu
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/15212/art... Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/2917/artifact...
Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.
Christophe Lyon christophe.lyon@linaro.org writes:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 12:58, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: | 4 patches in gcc | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/103420 | 3a8cf3dce8f [PATCH 4/4] aarch64: Add mf8 data movement intrinsics | afa8fb3b8b4 [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Add missing makefile dependency | 7120f3c23db [PATCH 2/4] aarch64: Use mf8 instead of f8 in builtin definitions | 0cc75ba5a1a [PATCH 1/4] aarch64: Macroise simd_type definitions | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | b117201385d testsuite: Fix toplevel-asm-1.c failure for riscv
Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | # FAILED | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe gcc: | 1
Hi Richard,
Since the message is not very clear, your patches break the build. The log contains these errors: aarch64-sve2.md: In function ‘insn_code maybe_code_for_aarch64_cm(rtx_code, machine_mode, int, int)’: aarch64-sve2.md:7205:12: error: ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le_vec_concatz_be’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le’? (and many other similar entries)
HTH
Yeah, this is expected. The series relies on a previous one that hasn't been approved yet, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/672008.html
for details.
Thanks, Richard
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
-
Christophe Lyon -
Richard Sandiford