Has the bisect somehow failed in this? It's highly unlikely that a test macro would cause an ICE, unless it somehow exposed a latent bug, which also seems very unlikely in this context.
Sid
On 2025-01-28 20:48, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In gcc_check master-arm, after: | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/105574 | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh@gotplt.org | Date: Tue Jan 28 12:43:50 2025 -0500 | | [PATCH v3] testsuite/118127: Pass fortran tests on ppc64le for IEEE128 long doubles | | Denormal behaviour is well defined for IEEE128 long doubles, so don't | XFAIL some gfortran tests on ppc64le when configured with the IEEE128 | long double ABI. | ... 13 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 2abc555a80b Daily bump.
Produces 1 regressions 1 improvements: | | regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at config/arm/arm.md:7450) | | improvements.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:7450)
Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifac... Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3358/artifact/art...
Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.
Hi Siddhesh,
The reason that the notification was sent is because a pre-existing test failure was renamed from ...
| FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:74
... to ...
| FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at config/arm/arm.md:7450)
I don't see any immediate reason why your patch would cause a test to get renamed, so we'll investigate.
-- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org
On Jan 29, 2025, at 14:52, Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh@gotplt.org wrote:
Has the bisect somehow failed in this? It's highly unlikely that a test macro would cause an ICE, unless it somehow exposed a latent bug, which also seems very unlikely in this context.
Sid
On 2025-01-28 20:48, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In gcc_check master-arm, after: | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/105574 | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh@gotplt.org | Date: Tue Jan 28 12:43:50 2025 -0500 | | [PATCH v3] testsuite/118127: Pass fortran tests on ppc64le for IEEE128 long doubles | | Denormal behaviour is well defined for IEEE128 long doubles, so don't | XFAIL some gfortran tests on ppc64le when configured with the IEEE128 | long double ABI. | ... 13 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 2abc555a80b Daily bump. Produces 1 regressions 1 improvements: | | regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at config/arm/arm.md:7450) | | improvements.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.dg/pr41123.c (internal compiler error: in gen_movsf, at /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:7450) Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10965/artifac... Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3358/artifact/art... Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-leave@lists.linaro.org
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
-
Maxim Kuvyrkov -
Siddhesh Poyarekar