Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or the kernel: Image", "sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary: console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9", "sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux from SemiHosting", "sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],
Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or thekernel: Image",
"sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary:console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9",
"sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux fromSemiHosting",
"sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
Thanks Tyler.
We were using it for the generic firmware validation where one of the bl3 images is uefi. I have my trial setup in our staging. So if there is something which you want us to try, I will be able to upgrade the staging and try it. So please do give us a shout anytime.
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 22:30 To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or the kernel: Image", "sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary: console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9", "sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux from SemiHosting", "sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],
Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker tyler.baker@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or thekernel: Image",
"sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary:console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9",
"sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux fromSemiHosting",
"sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
Sorry Tyler, I should have copied the entire snippet. I already do have that defined
{ "command": "deploy_linaro_image", "parameters": { "bootloadertype": "uefi", "hwpack": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/hwpack_linaro-vexpress...", "rootfs": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/linaro-image-minimal-g..." } },
Attaching my full json for ref. Also the lava log output.
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 22:38 To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org> wrote: Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or the kernel: Image", "sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary: console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9", "sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux from SemiHosting", "sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],
Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
The log file and job def are targeted at the base model? Not a foundation?
I modified the job def a bit and it's booting for me on the base model:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6261/definition
On 20 February 2014 14:45, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Sorry Tyler,
I should have copied the entire snippet. I already do have that defined
{ "command": "deploy_linaro_image", "parameters": { "bootloadertype": "uefi", "hwpack": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/hwpack_linaro-vexpress... ",
"rootfs": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/linaro-image-minimal-g... "
} },Attaching my full json for ref. Also the lava log output.
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
*From:* Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] *Sent:* 20 February 2014 22:38
*To:* Basil Eljuse *Cc:* Linaro Validation *Subject:* Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker tyler.baker@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or thekernel: Image",
"sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary:console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9",
"sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux fromSemiHosting",
"sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
Hi Tyler,
The below is bit of 'misnomer', Dean just had the device name labelled incorrectly.
"device_type": "ARM-rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a",
The actual model invocation happening is indeed Foundation_v8.
For base model, both AEM and Cortex, the boot_cmds worked perfectly as in indicated earlier. It was only for foundation I could see no response to any of my boot commands in json file ):
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 23:17 To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
The log file and job def are targeted at the base model? Not a foundation?
I modified the job def a bit and it's booting for me on the base model:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6261/definition
On 20 February 2014 14:45, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Sorry Tyler, I should have copied the entire snippet. I already do have that defined
{ "command": "deploy_linaro_image", "parameters": { "bootloadertype": "uefi", "hwpack": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/hwpack_linaro-vexpress...", "rootfs": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/linaro-image-minimal-g..." } },
Attaching my full json for ref. Also the lava log output.
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 22:38
To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org> wrote: Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or the kernel: Image", "sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary: console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9", "sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux from SemiHosting", "sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],
Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
Ah ok. :)
Can you confirm you have these value set in your foundation configuration?
bootloader_prompt = Start:
interrupt_boot_prompt = The default boot selection will start in
On 20 February 2014 15:26, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hi Tyler,
The below is bit of 'misnomer', Dean just had the device name labelled incorrectly.
"device_type": "ARM-rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a",
The actual model invocation happening is indeed Foundation_v8.
For base model, both AEM and Cortex, the boot_cmds worked perfectly as in indicated earlier. It was only for foundation I could see no response to any of my boot commands in json file ):
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
*From:* Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] *Sent:* 20 February 2014 23:17
*To:* Basil Eljuse *Cc:* Linaro Validation *Subject:* Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
The log file and job def are targeted at the base model? Not a foundation?
I modified the job def a bit and it's booting for me on the base model:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6261/definition
On 20 February 2014 14:45, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Sorry Tyler,
I should have copied the entire snippet. I already do have that defined
{ "command": "deploy_linaro_image", "parameters": { "bootloadertype": "uefi", "hwpack": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/hwpack_linaro-vexpress... ",
"rootfs": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/linaro-image-minimal-g... "
} },Attaching my full json for ref. Also the lava log output.
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
*From:* Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] *Sent:* 20 February 2014 22:38
*To:* Basil Eljuse *Cc:* Linaro Validation *Subject:* Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker tyler.baker@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or thekernel: Image",
"sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary:console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9",
"sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux fromSemiHosting",
"sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
Hi Tyler,
Both were *not* defined.
I added them now in the device_type/ARM-rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf
UEFI firmware (version origin/edk2-next built at 15:09:15 on Feb 20 2014) [2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[0m[35m[40m [0m[37m[40mThe default boot selection will start in 10 seconds 9 seconds 8 seconds 7 seconds 6 seconds 5 seconds 4 seconds 3 seconds 2 seconds 1 seconds ERROR: Did not find initrd image. [1] Linux from SemiHosting [2] Shell [3] Boot Manager Start:
I looked in the basemodel device config can could see
interrupt_boot_command = b
So tried replacing interrupt_boot_prompt = The default boot selection will start in with that too, but in vain
Would I have to restart the lava service to have the change take effect?
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 23:30 To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Ah ok. :)
Can you confirm you have these value set in your foundation configuration?
bootloader_prompt = Start:
interrupt_boot_prompt = The default boot selection will start in
On 20 February 2014 15:26, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hi Tyler,
The below is bit of 'misnomer', Dean just had the device name labelled incorrectly.
"device_type": "ARM-rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a",
The actual model invocation happening is indeed Foundation_v8.
For base model, both AEM and Cortex, the boot_cmds worked perfectly as in indicated earlier. It was only for foundation I could see no response to any of my boot commands in json file ):
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 23:17
To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
The log file and job def are targeted at the base model? Not a foundation?
I modified the job def a bit and it's booting for me on the base model:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6261/definition
On 20 February 2014 14:45, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Sorry Tyler, I should have copied the entire snippet. I already do have that defined
{ "command": "deploy_linaro_image", "parameters": { "bootloadertype": "uefi", "hwpack": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/hwpack_linaro-vexpress...", "rootfs": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/linaro-image-minimal-g..." } },
Attaching my full json for ref. Also the lava log output.
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 22:38
To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org> wrote: Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or the kernel: Image", "sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary: console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9", "sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux from SemiHosting", "sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],
Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
Would you mind sending me your device_type/ARM-rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf config?
On 20 February 2014 15:53, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hi Tyler,
Both were **not** defined.
I added them now in the device_type/ARM-rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf
UEFI firmware (version origin/edk2-next built at 15:09:15 on Feb 20 2014)
[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[0m[35m[40m
[0m[37m[40mThe default boot selection will start in 10 seconds 9 seconds
8 seconds 7 seconds 6 seconds 5 seconds 4 seconds 3 seconds 2 seconds 1 secondsERROR: Did not find initrd image.
[1] Linux from SemiHosting
[2] Shell
[3] Boot Manager
Start:
I looked in the basemodel device config can could see
interrupt_boot_command = b
So tried replacing interrupt_boot_prompt = The default boot selection will start in with that too, but in vain
Would I have to restart the lava service to have the change take effect?
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
*From:* Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] *Sent:* 20 February 2014 23:30
*To:* Basil Eljuse *Cc:* Linaro Validation *Subject:* Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Ah ok. :)
Can you confirm you have these value set in your foundation configuration?
bootloader_prompt = Start:
interrupt_boot_prompt = The default boot selection will start in
On 20 February 2014 15:26, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hi Tyler,
The below is bit of 'misnomer', Dean just had the device name labelled incorrectly.
"device_type": "ARM-rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a",
The actual model invocation happening is indeed Foundation_v8.
For base model, both AEM and Cortex, the boot_cmds worked perfectly as in indicated earlier. It was only for foundation I could see no response to any of my boot commands in json file ):
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
*From:* Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] *Sent:* 20 February 2014 23:17
*To:* Basil Eljuse *Cc:* Linaro Validation *Subject:* Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
The log file and job def are targeted at the base model? Not a foundation?
I modified the job def a bit and it's booting for me on the base model:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6261/definition
On 20 February 2014 14:45, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Sorry Tyler,
I should have copied the entire snippet. I already do have that defined
{ "command": "deploy_linaro_image", "parameters": { "bootloadertype": "uefi", "hwpack": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/hwpack_linaro-vexpress... ",
"rootfs": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/linaro-image-minimal-g... "
} },Attaching my full json for ref. Also the lava log output.
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
*From:* Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] *Sent:* 20 February 2014 22:38
*To:* Basil Eljuse *Cc:* Linaro Validation *Subject:* Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker tyler.baker@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or thekernel: Image",
"sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary:console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9",
"sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux fromSemiHosting",
"sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks
Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
--
Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
Attaching the same...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 21 February 2014 00:02 To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Would you mind sending me your device_type/ARM-rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf config?
On 20 February 2014 15:53, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hi Tyler,
Both were *not* defined.
I added them now in the device_type/ARM-rtsm_foundation-armv8.conf
UEFI firmware (version origin/edk2-next built at 15:09:15 on Feb 20 2014) [2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[2J[01;01H[=3h[2J[01;01H[0m[35m[40m [0m[37m[40mThe default boot selection will start in 10 seconds 9 seconds 8 seconds 7 seconds 6 seconds 5 seconds 4 seconds 3 seconds 2 seconds 1 seconds
ERROR: Did not find initrd image. [1] Linux from SemiHosting [2] Shell [3] Boot Manager Start:
I looked in the basemodel device config can could see
interrupt_boot_command = b
So tried replacing interrupt_boot_prompt = The default boot selection will start in with that too, but in vain
Would I have to restart the lava service to have the change take effect?
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 23:30
To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Ah ok. :)
Can you confirm you have these value set in your foundation configuration?
bootloader_prompt = Start:
interrupt_boot_prompt = The default boot selection will start in
On 20 February 2014 15:26, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hi Tyler,
The below is bit of 'misnomer', Dean just had the device name labelled incorrectly.
"device_type": "ARM-rtsm_fvp_base-aemv8a",
The actual model invocation happening is indeed Foundation_v8.
For base model, both AEM and Cortex, the boot_cmds worked perfectly as in indicated earlier. It was only for foundation I could see no response to any of my boot commands in json file ):
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 23:17
To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
The log file and job def are targeted at the base model? Not a foundation?
I modified the job def a bit and it's booting for me on the base model:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6261/definition
On 20 February 2014 14:45, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Sorry Tyler, I should have copied the entire snippet. I already do have that defined
{ "command": "deploy_linaro_image", "parameters": { "bootloadertype": "uefi", "hwpack": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/hwpack_linaro-vexpress...", "rootfs": "http://releases.linaro.org/14.01/openembedded/aarch64/linaro-image-minimal-g..." } },
Attaching my full json for ref. Also the lava log output.
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
From: Tyler Baker [mailto:tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org] Sent: 20 February 2014 22:38
To: Basil Eljuse Cc: Linaro Validation Subject: Re: [Linaro-validation] Any known issues with boot_cmds support on foundation models...
Hi Basil,
After reviewing the code if you add the parameter "bootloadertype" to uefi in the deployment action similar to this example:
http://community.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6139/definition
LAVA will attempt to issue your boot_cmds.
Let me know!
On 20 February 2014 14:30, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.orgmailto:tyler.baker@linaro.org> wrote: Hi Basil,
We have never had to use UEFI on the Foundation model before, so no boot_cmds are used. I'm working on some of the fastmodel issues today, and will have a look at what it will take to support UEFI.
Cheers,
On 20 February 2014 14:20, Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.commailto:Basil.Eljuse@arm.com> wrote: Hello All,
I am able to successfully use the following boot_cmds option in Base model instances. However if I use the same on foundation model it does not work.
It comes to the uefi menu option and is not seem to issue any of my boot commands as defined in the json file.
Is it possible that for foundation models the boot_cmds option is not supported?
My json fragment is
"boot_cmds": [ "sendline 3", "expect Choice:", "sendline 2", "expect Update entry:", "sendline 1", "expect File path of the EFI Application or the kernel: Image", "sendline \n", "expect Keep the initrd: [y/n]", "sendline n", "expect Arguments to pass to the binary: console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk=pl011,0x1c090000 debug user_debug=31 loglevel=9", "sendline \b9 root=/dev/vda2 rw", "expect Description for this new Entry: Linux from SemiHosting", "sendline \n", "expect Choice:", "sendline 5", "expect Start:", "sendline 1" ],
Any confirmation would be great!
Thanks Basil Eljuse...
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.orgmailto:linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
-- Tyler Baker Technical Architect, LAVA Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org
-
Basil Eljuse -
Tyler Baker