Hello David Ahern,
The patch acda655fefae: "selftests: Add nettest" from Aug 1, 2019,
leads to the following static checker warning:
./tools/testing/selftests/net/nettest.c:1690 main()
warn: unsigned 'tmp' is never less than zero.
./tools/testing/selftests/net/nettest.c
1680 case '1':
1681 args.has_expected_raddr = 1;
1682 if (convert_addr(&args, optarg,
1683 ADDR_TYPE_EXPECTED_REMOTE))
1684 return 1;
1685
1686 break;
1687 case '2':
1688 if (str_to_uint(optarg, 0, 0x7ffffff, &tmp) != 0) {
1689 tmp = get_ifidx(optarg);
1690 if (tmp < 0) {
"tmp" is unsigned so it can't be negative. Also all the callers assume
that get_ifidx() returns negatives on error but it looks like it really
returns zero on error so it's a bit unclear to me.
1691 fprintf(stderr,
1692 "Invalid device index\n");
1693 return 1;
1694 }
1695 }
1696 args.expected_ifindex = (int)tmp;
1697 break;
1698 case 'q':
1699 quiet = 1;
regards,
dan carpenter
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch(a)mellanox.com>
[ Upstream commit 1be79d89b7ae96e004911bd228ce8c2b5cc6415f ]
The TC filters used in the test do not work with veth devices because the
outer Ethertype is 802.1Q and not IPv4. The test passes with mlxsw
netdevs since the hardware always looks at "The first Ethertype that
does not point to either: VLAN, CNTAG or configurable Ethertype".
Fix this by matching on the VLAN ID instead, but on the ingress side.
The reason why this is not performed at egress is explained in the
commit cited below.
Fixes: 541ad323db3a ("selftests: forwarding: gre_multipath: Update next-hop statistics match criteria")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch(a)mellanox.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr(a)gmail.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/net/forwarding/gre_multipath.sh | 24 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/gre_multipath.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/gre_multipath.sh
index 37d7297e1cf8a..a8d8e8b3dc819 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/gre_multipath.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/gre_multipath.sh
@@ -93,18 +93,10 @@ sw1_create()
ip route add vrf v$ol1 192.0.2.16/28 \
nexthop dev g1a \
nexthop dev g1b
-
- tc qdisc add dev $ul1 clsact
- tc filter add dev $ul1 egress pref 111 prot ipv4 \
- flower dst_ip 192.0.2.66 action pass
- tc filter add dev $ul1 egress pref 222 prot ipv4 \
- flower dst_ip 192.0.2.82 action pass
}
sw1_destroy()
{
- tc qdisc del dev $ul1 clsact
-
ip route del vrf v$ol1 192.0.2.16/28
ip route del vrf v$ol1 192.0.2.82/32 via 192.0.2.146
@@ -139,10 +131,18 @@ sw2_create()
ip route add vrf v$ol2 192.0.2.0/28 \
nexthop dev g2a \
nexthop dev g2b
+
+ tc qdisc add dev $ul2 clsact
+ tc filter add dev $ul2 ingress pref 111 prot 802.1Q \
+ flower vlan_id 111 action pass
+ tc filter add dev $ul2 ingress pref 222 prot 802.1Q \
+ flower vlan_id 222 action pass
}
sw2_destroy()
{
+ tc qdisc del dev $ul2 clsact
+
ip route del vrf v$ol2 192.0.2.0/28
ip route del vrf v$ol2 192.0.2.81/32 via 192.0.2.145
@@ -215,15 +215,15 @@ multipath4_test()
nexthop dev g1a weight $weight1 \
nexthop dev g1b weight $weight2
- local t0_111=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul1 111 egress)
- local t0_222=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul1 222 egress)
+ local t0_111=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul2 111 ingress)
+ local t0_222=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul2 222 ingress)
ip vrf exec v$h1 \
$MZ $h1 -q -p 64 -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.18 \
-d 1msec -t udp "sp=1024,dp=0-32768"
- local t1_111=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul1 111 egress)
- local t1_222=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul1 222 egress)
+ local t1_111=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul2 111 ingress)
+ local t1_222=$(tc_rule_stats_get $ul2 222 ingress)
local d111=$((t1_111 - t0_111))
local d222=$((t1_222 - t0_222))
--
2.20.1
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii(a)linux.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit c8eee4135a456bc031d67cadc454e76880d1afd8 ]
"sendmsg6: rewrite IP & port (C)" fails on s390, because the code in
sendmsg_v6_prog() assumes that (ctx->user_ip6[0] & 0xFFFF) refers to
leading IPv6 address digits, which is not the case on big-endian
machines.
Since checking bitwise operations doesn't seem to be the point of the
test, replace two short comparisons with a single int comparison.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii(a)linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna(a)fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel(a)iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sendmsg6_prog.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sendmsg6_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sendmsg6_prog.c
index 5aeaa284fc474..a680628204108 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sendmsg6_prog.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sendmsg6_prog.c
@@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ int sendmsg_v6_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
}
/* Rewrite destination. */
- if ((ctx->user_ip6[0] & 0xFFFF) == bpf_htons(0xFACE) &&
- ctx->user_ip6[0] >> 16 == bpf_htons(0xB00C)) {
+ if (ctx->user_ip6[0] == bpf_htonl(0xFACEB00C)) {
ctx->user_ip6[0] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_0);
ctx->user_ip6[1] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_1);
ctx->user_ip6[2] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_2);
--
2.20.1