Linux-kselftest-mirror September 2019

linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org

83 participants
84 discussions

[PATCH v3] kunit: fix failure to build without printk

by Brendan Higgins

Previously KUnit assumed that printk would always be present, which is not a valid assumption to make. Fix that by removing call to vprintk_emit, and calling printk directly. This fixes a build error[1] reported by Randy. For context this change comes after much discussion. My first stab[2] at this was just to make the KUnit logging code compile out; however, it was agreed that if we were going to use vprintk_emit, then vprintk_emit should provide a no-op stub, which lead to my second attempt[3]. In response to me trying to stub out vprintk_emit, Sergey Senozhatsky suggested a way for me to remove our usage of vprintk_emit, which led to my third attempt at solving this[4]. In my previous version of this patch[4], I completely removed vprintk_emit, as suggested by Sergey; however, there was a bit of debate over whether Sergey's solution was the best. The debate arose due to Sergey's version resulting in a checkpatch warning, which resulted in a debate over correct printk usage. Joe Perches offered an alternative fix which was somewhat less far reaching than what Sergey had suggested and importantly relied on continuing to use %pV. Much of the debated centered around whether %pV should be widely used, and whether Sergey's version would result in object size bloat. Ultimately, we decided to go with Sergey's version. Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap(a)infradead.org> Link[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/c7229254-0d90-d90e-f3df-5b6d6fc0b51… Link[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190827174932.44177-1-brendanhiggi… Link[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190827234835.234473-1-brendanhigg… Link[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20190828093143.163302-1-brendanhigg… Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work(a)gmail.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe(a)perches.com> Cc: Tim.Bird(a)sony.com Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap(a)infradead.org> # build-tested Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek(a)suse.com> --- Sorry for the long commit message, but given the long discussion (and some of the confusion that occurred in the discussion), it seemed appropriate to summarize the discussion around this patch up to this point (especially since one of the proposed patches was under a separate patch subject). No changes have been made to this patch since v2, other than the commit log. --- include/kunit/test.h | 11 ++++----- kunit/test.c | 57 +++++--------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 8b7eb03d4971..efad2eacd6ba 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -339,9 +339,8 @@ static inline void *kunit_kzalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test); -void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, - const struct kunit *test, - const char *fmt, ...); +#define kunit_print_level(KERN_LEVEL, test, fmt, ...) \ + printk(KERN_LEVEL "\t# %s: " fmt, (test)->name, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * kunit_info() - Prints an INFO level message associated with @test. @@ -353,7 +352,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, * Takes a variable number of format parameters just like printk(). */ #define kunit_info(test, fmt, ...) \ - kunit_printk(KERN_INFO, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + kunit_print_level(KERN_INFO, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * kunit_warn() - Prints a WARN level message associated with @test. @@ -364,7 +363,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, * Prints a warning level message. */ #define kunit_warn(test, fmt, ...) \ - kunit_printk(KERN_WARNING, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + kunit_print_level(KERN_WARNING, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * kunit_err() - Prints an ERROR level message associated with @test. @@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, * Prints an error level message. */ #define kunit_err(test, fmt, ...) \ - kunit_printk(KERN_ERR, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + kunit_print_level(KERN_ERR, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * KUNIT_SUCCEED() - A no-op expectation. Only exists for code clarity. diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c index b2ca9b94c353..c83c0fa59cbd 100644 --- a/kunit/test.c +++ b/kunit/test.c @@ -16,36 +16,12 @@ static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false); } -static int kunit_vprintk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, va_list args) -{ - return vprintk_emit(0, level, NULL, 0, fmt, args); -} - -static int kunit_printk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, ...) -{ - va_list args; - int ret; - - va_start(args, fmt); - ret = kunit_vprintk_emit(level, fmt, args); - va_end(args); - - return ret; -} - -static void kunit_vprintk(const struct kunit *test, - const char *level, - struct va_format *vaf) -{ - kunit_printk_emit(level[1] - '0', "\t# %s: %pV", test->name, vaf); -} - static void kunit_print_tap_version(void) { static bool kunit_has_printed_tap_version; if (!kunit_has_printed_tap_version) { - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "TAP version 14\n"); + pr_info("TAP version 14\n"); kunit_has_printed_tap_version = true; } } @@ -64,10 +40,8 @@ static size_t kunit_test_cases_len(struct kunit_case *test_cases) static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) { kunit_print_tap_version(); - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name); - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, - "\t1..%zd\n", - kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases)); + pr_info("\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name); + pr_info("\t1..%zd\n", kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases)); } static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent, @@ -87,9 +61,7 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent, else ok_not_ok = "not ok"; - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, - "%s%s %zd - %s\n", - indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description); + pr_info("%s%s %zd - %s\n", indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description); } static bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) @@ -133,11 +105,11 @@ static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test, kunit_err(test, "Could not allocate buffer, dumping stream:\n"); list_for_each_entry(fragment, &stream->fragments, node) { - kunit_err(test, fragment->fragment); + kunit_err(test, "%s", fragment->fragment); } kunit_err(test, "\n"); } else { - kunit_err(test, buf); + kunit_err(test, "%s", buf); kunit_kfree(test, buf); } } @@ -504,20 +476,3 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test) kunit_resource_free(test, resource); } } - -void kunit_printk(const char *level, - const struct kunit *test, - const char *fmt, ...) -{ - struct va_format vaf; - va_list args; - - va_start(args, fmt); - - vaf.fmt = fmt; - vaf.va = &args; - - kunit_vprintk(test, level, &vaf); - - va_end(args); -} -- 2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog

5 years, 1 month

Automated Testing devroom at FOSDEM 2020 poll

by Anders Roxell

Hello everyone, We are planning to put together a Automated Testing devroom at FOSDEM 2020 [1] and would like to see if there is any interest in attending such an event. If we're not able to put together a set of talks that fills up a (half) day we shouldn't apply for a devroom. We have a few people prepared to give talks if the devroom happens. We would like to know your interest in attending (or, better yet, make a proposal to speak or for a discussion session) before 16 September. Cheers, Anders [1] https://fosdem.org/2020/

5 years, 1 month

next-20190902 kselftest results

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 5.3.0-rc6 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git branch: master git commit: b5f466091e130caaf0735976648f72bd5e09aa84 git describe: next-20190902 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/build/next-20190902 Regressions (compared to build next-20190830) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No regressions Fixes (compared to build next-20190830) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No fixes In total: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ran 12 total tests in the following environments and test suites. pass 0 fail 12 xfail 0 skip 0 Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - arm - x86_64 Test Suites ----------- * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597 * boot-lkft-kselftests-vsyscall-mode-native-master-597 * boot-lkft-kselftests-vsyscall-mode-none-master-597 Failures ------------------------------------------------------------------------ x86: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/x86 * boot-lkft-kselftests-vsyscall-mode-none-master-597/x86 * boot-lkft-kselftests-vsyscall-mode-native-master-597/x86 i386: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/x86 qemu_arm: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/qemu-arm qemu_x86_64: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/qemu dragonboard-410c: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/dragonboard-410c x15: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/x15 qemu_arm64: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/qemu-arm hi6220-hikey: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/hi6220-hikey-r2 qemu_i386: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/qemu juno-r2: * boot-lkft-kselftests-master-597/juno-r2 Skips ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No skips -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

5 years, 1 month

[PATCH v2] kunit: fix failure to build without printk

by Brendan Higgins

Previously KUnit assumed that printk would always be present, which is not a valid assumption to make. Fix that by removing call to vprintk_emit, and calling printk directly. Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap(a)infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/0352fae9-564f-4a97-715a-fabe016259d… Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> --- include/kunit/test.h | 11 ++++----- kunit/test.c | 57 +++++--------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 8b7eb03d4971..efad2eacd6ba 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -339,9 +339,8 @@ static inline void *kunit_kzalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test); -void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, - const struct kunit *test, - const char *fmt, ...); +#define kunit_print_level(KERN_LEVEL, test, fmt, ...) \ + printk(KERN_LEVEL "\t# %s: " fmt, (test)->name, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * kunit_info() - Prints an INFO level message associated with @test. @@ -353,7 +352,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, * Takes a variable number of format parameters just like printk(). */ #define kunit_info(test, fmt, ...) \ - kunit_printk(KERN_INFO, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + kunit_print_level(KERN_INFO, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * kunit_warn() - Prints a WARN level message associated with @test. @@ -364,7 +363,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, * Prints a warning level message. */ #define kunit_warn(test, fmt, ...) \ - kunit_printk(KERN_WARNING, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + kunit_print_level(KERN_WARNING, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * kunit_err() - Prints an ERROR level message associated with @test. @@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ void __printf(3, 4) kunit_printk(const char *level, * Prints an error level message. */ #define kunit_err(test, fmt, ...) \ - kunit_printk(KERN_ERR, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) + kunit_print_level(KERN_ERR, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) /** * KUNIT_SUCCEED() - A no-op expectation. Only exists for code clarity. diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c index b2ca9b94c353..c83c0fa59cbd 100644 --- a/kunit/test.c +++ b/kunit/test.c @@ -16,36 +16,12 @@ static void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false); } -static int kunit_vprintk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, va_list args) -{ - return vprintk_emit(0, level, NULL, 0, fmt, args); -} - -static int kunit_printk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, ...) -{ - va_list args; - int ret; - - va_start(args, fmt); - ret = kunit_vprintk_emit(level, fmt, args); - va_end(args); - - return ret; -} - -static void kunit_vprintk(const struct kunit *test, - const char *level, - struct va_format *vaf) -{ - kunit_printk_emit(level[1] - '0', "\t# %s: %pV", test->name, vaf); -} - static void kunit_print_tap_version(void) { static bool kunit_has_printed_tap_version; if (!kunit_has_printed_tap_version) { - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "TAP version 14\n"); + pr_info("TAP version 14\n"); kunit_has_printed_tap_version = true; } } @@ -64,10 +40,8 @@ static size_t kunit_test_cases_len(struct kunit_case *test_cases) static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) { kunit_print_tap_version(); - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, "\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name); - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, - "\t1..%zd\n", - kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases)); + pr_info("\t# Subtest: %s\n", suite->name); + pr_info("\t1..%zd\n", kunit_test_cases_len(suite->test_cases)); } static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent, @@ -87,9 +61,7 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(bool should_indent, else ok_not_ok = "not ok"; - kunit_printk_emit(LOGLEVEL_INFO, - "%s%s %zd - %s\n", - indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description); + pr_info("%s%s %zd - %s\n", indent, ok_not_ok, test_number, description); } static bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) @@ -133,11 +105,11 @@ static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test, kunit_err(test, "Could not allocate buffer, dumping stream:\n"); list_for_each_entry(fragment, &stream->fragments, node) { - kunit_err(test, fragment->fragment); + kunit_err(test, "%s", fragment->fragment); } kunit_err(test, "\n"); } else { - kunit_err(test, buf); + kunit_err(test, "%s", buf); kunit_kfree(test, buf); } } @@ -504,20 +476,3 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test) kunit_resource_free(test, resource); } } - -void kunit_printk(const char *level, - const struct kunit *test, - const char *fmt, ...) -{ - struct va_format vaf; - va_list args; - - va_start(args, fmt); - - vaf.fmt = fmt; - vaf.va = &args; - - kunit_vprintk(test, level, &vaf); - - va_end(args); -} -- 2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog

5 years, 1 month

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror September 2019