April 2020 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH] KVM: selftests: Fix parameter order error in kvm_create_max_vcpus

by Tianjia Zhang

The parameter order of test_vcpu_creation() call is reversed here, this patch is adjusted to the correct order. Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang(a)linux.alibaba.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c index 6f38c3dc0d56..a7f3120b4409 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (kvm_max_vcpu_id > kvm_max_vcpus) test_vcpu_creation( - kvm_max_vcpu_id - kvm_max_vcpus, kvm_max_vcpus); + kvm_max_vcpus, kvm_max_vcpu_id - kvm_max_vcpus); return 0; } -- 2.17.1

5 years

1
0
0 0

next-20200405 kselftest results

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 5.6.0 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git branch: master git commit: 57021046c3316f8a6970506b09ec83337a4f5304 git describe: next-20200405 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/build/next-20200405 Regressions (compared to build next-20200404) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No regressions Fixes (compared to build next-20200404) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No fixes In total: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ran 0 total tests in the following environments and test suites. pass 0 fail 0 xfail 0 skip 0 Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan Test Suites ----------- Failures ------------------------------------------------------------------------ juno-r2: hi6220-hikey: i386: juno-r2-kasan: x86: x86-kasan: dragonboard-410c: x15: juno-r2-compat: Skips ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No skips -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

5 years

1
0
0 0

next-20200404 kselftest results

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 5.6.0 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git branch: master git commit: dff79597431045a775f2e5d4d9de31bfa0d32a34 git describe: next-20200404 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/build/next-20200404 Regressions (compared to build next-20200403) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No regressions Fixes (compared to build next-20200403) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No fixes In total: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ran 0 total tests in the following environments and test suites. pass 0 fail 0 xfail 0 skip 0 Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan Test Suites ----------- Failures ------------------------------------------------------------------------ i386: x86: hi6220-hikey: dragonboard-410c: x15: juno-r2: juno-r2-kasan: juno-r2-compat: x86-kasan: Skips ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No skips -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

5 years

1
0
0 0

next-20200403 kselftest results

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 5.6.0 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git branch: master git commit: 606b5dac8e15e82e5866fa59e675ca6a6b7276c0 git describe: next-20200403 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/build/next-20200403 Regressions (compared to build next-20200402) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No regressions Fixes (compared to build next-20200402) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No fixes In total: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ran 0 total tests in the following environments and test suites. pass 0 fail 0 xfail 0 skip 0 Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan Test Suites ----------- Failures ------------------------------------------------------------------------ x86: juno-r2: juno-r2-kasan: juno-r2-compat: dragonboard-410c: hi6220-hikey: i386: x15: x86-kasan: Skips ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No skips -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

5 years

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Always enable ftrace_enabled for ftrace testcases

by Xiao Yang

A lot of ftrace testcases get failure if ftrace_enabled is disabled by default because ftrace_enabled is a big on/off switch for the whole function tracer. Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy(a)cn.fujitsu.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions index 5d4550591ff9..54c18275bd7f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ +enable_ftrace() { # enable function tracer + echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled +} clear_trace() { # reset trace output echo > trace @@ -88,6 +91,7 @@ initialize_ftrace() { # Reset ftrace to initial-state # As the initial state, ftrace will be set to nop tracer, # no events, no triggers, no filters, no function filters, # no probes, and tracing on. + enable_ftrace disable_tracing reset_tracer reset_trigger -- 2.23.0

5 years

2
6
0 0

[PATCH][next] bpf: Test_verifier: fix spelling mistake "arithmatic" -> "arithmetic"

by Colin King

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com> There are a couple of spelling mistakes in two literal strings, fix them. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 4d0d09574bf4..a253a064e6e0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ .result = REJECT }, { - "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test1", + "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test1", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ .result = ACCEPT }, { - "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test2", + "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmetic. test2", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), -- 2.25.1

5 years

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/4] KUnit-KASAN Integration

by Patricia Alfonso

This patchset contains everything needed to integrate KASAN and KUnit. KUnit will be able to: (1) Fail tests when an unexpected KASAN error occurs (2) Pass tests when an expected KASAN error occurs Convert KASAN tests to KUnit with the exception of copy_user_test because KUnit is unable to test those. Add documentation on how to run the KASAN tests with KUnit and what to expect when running these tests. Depends on [1]. Changes since v2: - Due to Alan's changes in [1], KUnit can be built as a module. - The name of the tests that could not be run with KUnit has been changed to be more generic: test_kasan_module. - Documentation on how to run the new KASAN tests and what to expect when running them has been added. - Some variables and functions are now static. - Now save/restore panic_on_warn in a similar way to kasan_multi_shot and renamed the init/exit functions to be more generic to accommodate. - Due to [2] in kasan_strings, kasan_memchr, and kasan_memcmp will fail if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is enabled so return early and print message explaining this circumstance. - Changed preprocessor checks to C checks where applicable. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/1585313122-26441-1-git-send-email-a… [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206337 Patricia Alfonso (4): Add KUnit Struct to Current Task KUnit: KASAN Integration KASAN: Port KASAN Tests to KUnit KASAN: Testing Documentation Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 70 +++ include/kunit/test.h | 5 + include/linux/kasan.h | 6 + include/linux/sched.h | 4 + lib/Kconfig.kasan | 15 +- lib/Makefile | 3 +- lib/kunit/test.c | 13 +- lib/test_kasan.c | 686 +++++++++++++----------------- lib/test_kasan_module.c | 76 ++++ mm/kasan/report.c | 33 ++ 10 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 390 deletions(-) create mode 100644 lib/test_kasan_module.c -- 2.26.0.rc2.310.g2932bb562d-goog

5 years

3
10
0 0

[PATCH][next] kunit: fix dereference of suite before it has been null checked

by Colin King

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com> Currently pointer 'suite' is dereferenced when variable success is being initialized before the pointer is null checked. Fix this by only dereferencing suite after is has been null checked. Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference before null check") Fixes: e2219db280e3 ("kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com> --- lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c index 9214c493d8b7..05547642f37c 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c @@ -52,12 +52,13 @@ static void debugfs_print_result(struct seq_file *seq, static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) { struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private; - bool success = kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite); + bool success; struct kunit_case *test_case; if (!suite || !suite->log) return 0; + success = kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite); seq_printf(seq, "%s", suite->log); kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) -- 2.25.1

5 years

2
1
0 0

[PATCH 0/2] selftests: kvm: Introduce the mem_slot_test test

by Wainer dos Santos Moschetta

This series introduces a new KVM selftest (mem_slot_test) that goal is to verify memory slots can be added up to the maximum allowed. An extra slot is attempted which should occur on error. The patch 01 is needed so that the VM fd can be accessed from the test code (for the ioctl call attempting to add an extra slot). I ran the test successfully on x86_64, aarch64, and s390x. This is why it is enabled to build on those arches. Finally, I hope it is useful test! Wainer dos Santos Moschetta (2): selftests: kvm: Add vm_get_fd() in kvm_util selftests: kvm: Add mem_slot_test test tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 3 + .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mem_slot_test.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 102 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mem_slot_test.c -- 2.17.2

5 years

2
10
0 0

next-20200402 kselftest results

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ kernel: 5.6.0 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git git branch: master git commit: 17f166b56b2583b97f0f6612cfbbb7f99e6889bb git describe: next-20200402 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/build/next-20200402 Regressions (compared to build next-20200401) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No regressions Fixes (compared to build next-20200401) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No fixes In total: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ran 0 total tests in the following environments and test suites. pass 0 fail 0 xfail 0 skip 0 Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - x15 - arm - x86_64 - x86-kasan Test Suites ----------- Failures ------------------------------------------------------------------------ dragonboard-410c: juno-r2: i386: x86: juno-r2-kasan: juno-r2-compat: x86-kasan: x15: hi6220-hikey: Skips ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No skips -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

5 years

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror April 2020