Problem: currently, if you remove something from your kunitconfig,
kunit.py will not regenerate the .config file.
The same thing happens if you did --kunitconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y [1]
and then ran again without it. Your new run will still have KASAN.
The reason is that kunit.py won't regenerate the .config file if it's a
superset of the kunitconfig. This speeds it up a bit for iterating.
This patch adds an additional check that forces kunit.py to regenerate
the .config file if the current kunitconfig doesn't match the previous
one.
What this means:
* deleting entries from .kunitconfig works as one would expect
* dropping a --kunitconfig_add also triggers a rebuild
* you can still edit .config directly to turn on new options
We implement this by creating a `last_used_kunitconfig` file in the
build directory (so .kunit, by default) after we generate the .config.
When comparing the kconfigs, we compare python sets, so duplicates and
permutations don't trip us up.
The majority of this patch is adding unit tests for the existing logic
and for the new case where `last_used_kunitconfig` differs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov@g…
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com>
---
Note: this patch is based on
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-1-dlatypov@g…
This patch will work without it, but there'll be a false merge conflict.
v1 -> v2:
* always regenerate if last_used_kunitconfig doesn't exist
* don't call os.remove() if last_used_kunitconfig doesn't exist
* add in get_old_kunitconfig_path() to match get_kunitconfig_path()
* s/_kconfig_changed/_kunitconfig_changed
---
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 8 ++---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 40 ++++++++++++++++------
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
index 1e00f9226f74..0a5e65540974 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ It'll warn you if you haven't included the dependencies of the options you're
using.
.. note::
- Note that removing something from the ``.kunitconfig`` will not trigger a
- rebuild of the ``.config`` file: the configuration is only updated if the
- ``.kunitconfig`` is not a subset of ``.config``. This means that you can use
- other tools (such as make menuconfig) to adjust other config options.
+ If you change the ``.kunitconfig``, kunit.py will trigger a rebuild of the
+ ``.config`` file. But you can edit the ``.config`` file directly or with
+ tools like ``make menuconfig O=.kunit``. As long as its a superset of
+ ``.kunitconfig``, kunit.py won't overwrite your changes.
Running the tests (KUnit Wrapper)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
index 350883672be0..12085e04a80c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import qemu_config
KCONFIG_PATH = '.config'
KUNITCONFIG_PATH = '.kunitconfig'
+OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'last_used_kunitconfig'
DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config'
BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config'
OUTFILE_PATH = 'test.log'
@@ -179,6 +180,9 @@ def get_kconfig_path(build_dir) -> str:
def get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) -> str:
return get_file_path(build_dir, KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
+def get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) -> str:
+ return get_file_path(build_dir, OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
+
def get_outfile_path(build_dir) -> str:
return get_file_path(build_dir, OUTFILE_PATH)
@@ -289,24 +293,38 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
except ConfigError as e:
logging.error(e)
return False
- return self.validate_config(build_dir)
+ if not self.validate_config(build_dir):
+ return False
+
+ old_path = get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir)
+ if os.path.exists(old_path):
+ os.remove(old_path) # write_to_file appends to the file
+ self._kconfig.write_to_file(old_path)
+ return True
+
+ def _kunitconfig_changed(self, build_dir: str) -> bool:
+ old_path = get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir)
+ if not os.path.exists(old_path):
+ return True
+
+ old_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(old_path)
+ return old_kconfig.entries() != self._kconfig.entries()
def build_reconfig(self, build_dir, make_options) -> bool:
"""Creates a new .config if it is not a subset of the .kunitconfig."""
kconfig_path = get_kconfig_path(build_dir)
- if os.path.exists(kconfig_path):
- existing_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path)
- self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
- if not self._kconfig.is_subset_of(existing_kconfig):
- print('Regenerating .config ...')
- os.remove(kconfig_path)
- return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
- else:
- return True
- else:
+ if not os.path.exists(kconfig_path):
print('Generating .config ...')
return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
+ existing_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path)
+ self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
+ if self._kconfig.is_subset_of(existing_kconfig) and not self._kunitconfig_changed(build_dir):
+ return True
+ print('Regenerating .config ...')
+ os.remove(kconfig_path)
+ return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
+
def build_kernel(self, alltests, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> bool:
try:
if alltests:
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 7e42a7c27987..572f133511aa 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -358,6 +358,51 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
with open(kunit_kernel.get_outfile_path(build_dir), 'rt') as outfile:
self.assertEqual(outfile.read(), 'hi\nbye\n', msg='Missing some output')
+ def test_build_reconfig_no_config(self):
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir:
+ with open(kunit_kernel.get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f:
+ f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
+
+ tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
+ mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
+
+ # Should generate the .config
+ self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[]))
+ mock_build_config.assert_called_once_with(build_dir, [])
+
+ def test_build_reconfig_existing_config(self):
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir:
+ # Existing .config is a superset, should not touch it
+ with open(kunit_kernel.get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f:
+ f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
+ with open(kunit_kernel.get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f:
+ f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
+ with open(kunit_kernel.get_kconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f:
+ f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
+
+ tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
+ mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
+
+ self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[]))
+ self.assertEqual(mock_build_config.call_count, 0)
+
+ def test_build_reconfig_remove_option(self):
+ with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir:
+ # We removed CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y from our .kunitconfig...
+ with open(kunit_kernel.get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f:
+ f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
+ with open(kunit_kernel.get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f:
+ f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
+ with open(kunit_kernel.get_kconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f:
+ f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
+
+ tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
+ mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
+
+ # ... so we should trigger a call to build_config()
+ self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[]))
+ mock_build_config.assert_called_once_with(build_dir, [])
+
# TODO: add more test cases.
--
2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
With the parser rework [1] and run_kernel() rework [2], this allows the
parser to print out test results incrementally.
Currently, that's held up by the fact that the LineStream eagerly
pre-fetches the next line when you call pop().
This blocks parse_test_result() from returning until the line *after*
the "ok 1 - test name" line is also printed.
One can see this with the following example:
$ (echo -e 'TAP version 14\n1..3\nok 1 - fake test'; sleep 2; echo -e 'ok 2 - fake test 2'; sleep 3; echo -e 'ok 3 - fake test 3') | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse
Before this patch [1]: there's a pause before 'fake test' is printed.
After this patch: 'fake test' is printed out immediately.
This patch also adds
* a unit test to verify LineStream's behavior directly
* a test case to ensure that it's lazily calling the generator
* an explicit exception for when users go beyond EOF
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211006170049.106852-1-dlatypov@go…
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211005011340.2826268-1-dlatypov@g…
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com>
---
v1 -> v2: rebase onto v7 of parser rewrite
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211007210324.707912-1-dlatypov@google.com/
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 22 ++++++++++----
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index f01fd565f978..82900a5f9ad6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -172,42 +172,51 @@ class TestCounts:
class LineStream:
"""
A class to represent the lines of kernel output.
- Provides a peek()/pop() interface over an iterator of
+ Provides a lazy peek()/pop() interface over an iterator of
(line#, text).
"""
_lines: Iterator[Tuple[int, str]]
_next: Tuple[int, str]
+ _need_next: bool
_done: bool
def __init__(self, lines: Iterator[Tuple[int, str]]):
"""Creates a new LineStream that wraps the given iterator."""
self._lines = lines
self._done = False
+ self._need_next = True
self._next = (0, '')
- self._get_next()
def _get_next(self) -> None:
- """Advances the LineSteam to the next line."""
+ """Advances the LineSteam to the next line, if necessary."""
+ if not self._need_next:
+ return
try:
self._next = next(self._lines)
except StopIteration:
self._done = True
+ finally:
+ self._need_next = False
def peek(self) -> str:
"""Returns the current line, without advancing the LineStream.
"""
+ self._get_next()
return self._next[1]
def pop(self) -> str:
"""Returns the current line and advances the LineStream to
the next line.
"""
- n = self._next
- self._get_next()
- return n[1]
+ s = self.peek()
+ if self._done:
+ raise ValueError(f'LineStream: going past EOF, last line was {s}')
+ self._need_next = True
+ return s
def __bool__(self) -> bool:
"""Returns True if stream has more lines."""
+ self._get_next()
return not self._done
# Only used by kunit_tool_test.py.
@@ -220,6 +229,7 @@ class LineStream:
def line_number(self) -> int:
"""Returns the line number of the current line."""
+ self._get_next()
return self._next[0]
# Parsing helper methods:
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 6648de1f9ceb..77e61b0a40e8 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -13,9 +13,10 @@ import tempfile, shutil # Handling test_tmpdir
import itertools
import json
+import os
import signal
import subprocess
-import os
+from typing import Iterable
import kunit_config
import kunit_parser
@@ -319,6 +320,45 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
result.status)
self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.test.subtests[0].name)
+def line_stream_from_strs(strs: Iterable[str]) -> kunit_parser.LineStream:
+ return kunit_parser.LineStream(enumerate(strs, start=1))
+
+class LineStreamTest(unittest.TestCase):
+
+ def test_basic(self):
+ stream = line_stream_from_strs(['hello', 'world'])
+
+ self.assertTrue(stream, msg='Should be more input')
+ self.assertEqual(stream.line_number(), 1)
+ self.assertEqual(stream.peek(), 'hello')
+ self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), 'hello')
+
+ self.assertTrue(stream, msg='Should be more input')
+ self.assertEqual(stream.line_number(), 2)
+ self.assertEqual(stream.peek(), 'world')
+ self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), 'world')
+
+ self.assertFalse(stream, msg='Should be no more input')
+ with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, 'LineStream: going past EOF'):
+ stream.pop()
+
+ def test_is_lazy(self):
+ called_times = 0
+ def generator():
+ nonlocal called_times
+ for i in range(1,5):
+ called_times += 1
+ yield called_times, str(called_times)
+
+ stream = kunit_parser.LineStream(generator())
+ self.assertEqual(called_times, 0)
+
+ self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), '1')
+ self.assertEqual(called_times, 1)
+
+ self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), '2')
+ self.assertEqual(called_times, 2)
+
class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
base-commit: e3c6457b588d83b7ecd40eb4bd6d95007020fbe4
--
2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog
The (K)TAP spec encourages test output to begin with a 'test plan': a
count of the number of tests being run of the form:
1..n
However, some test suites might not know the number of subtests in
advance (for example, KUnit's parameterised tests use a generator
function). In this case, it's not possible to print the test plan in
advance.
kunit_tool already parses test output which doesn't contain a plan, but
reports an error. Since we want to use nested subtests with KUnit
paramterised tests, remove this error.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com>
---
No changes since v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211028064154.2301049-1-davidgow@g…
Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211027013702.2039566-1-davidgow@g…
- No code changes.
- Added Daniel's Reviewed-by.
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 5 ++---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index 3355196d0515..50ded55c168c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ def parse_test_plan(lines: LineStream, test: Test) -> bool:
"""
Parses test plan line and stores the expected number of subtests in
test object. Reports an error if expected count is 0.
- Returns False and reports missing test plan error if fails to parse
- test plan.
+ Returns False and sets expected_count to None if there is no valid test
+ plan.
Accepted format:
- '1..[number of subtests]'
@@ -356,7 +356,6 @@ def parse_test_plan(lines: LineStream, test: Test) -> bool:
match = TEST_PLAN.match(lines.peek())
if not match:
test.expected_count = None
- test.add_error('missing plan line!')
return False
test.log.append(lines.pop())
expected_count = int(match.group(1))
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 9c4126731457..bc8793145713 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -191,7 +191,10 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(
kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(
file.readlines()))
- self.assertEqual(2, result.test.counts.errors)
+ # A missing test plan is not an error.
+ self.assertEqual(0, result.test.counts.errors)
+ # All tests should be accounted for.
+ self.assertEqual(10, result.test.counts.total())
self.assertEqual(
kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
result.status)
--
2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog
This formalizes the checks KUnit maintainers have been running (or in
other cases: forgetting to run).
This script also runs them all in parallel to minimize friction (pytype
can be fairly slow, but not slower than running kunit.py).
Example output:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
Waiting on 4 checks (kunit_tool_test.py, kunit smoke test, pytype, mypy)...
kunit_tool_test.py: PASSED
mypy: PASSED
pytype: PASSED
kunit smoke test: PASSED
On failure or timeout (5 minutes), it'll dump out the stdout/stderr.
E.g. adding in a type-checking error:
mypy: FAILED
> kunit.py:54: error: Name 'nonexistent_function' is not defined
> Found 1 error in 1 file (checked 8 source files)
mypy and pytype are two Python type-checkers and must be installed.
This file treats them as optional and will mark them as SKIPPED if not
installed.
This tool also runs `kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit` to run
KUnit's own KUnit tests and to verify KUnit kernel code and kunit.py
play nicely together.
It uses --build_dir=kunit_run_checks so as not to clobber the default
build_dir, which helps make it faster by reducing the need to rebuild,
esp. if you're been passing in --arch instead of using UML.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com>
---
tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py b/tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..4f32133ed77c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# This file runs some basic checks to verify kunit works.
+# It is only of interest if you're making changes to KUnit itself.
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2021, Google LLC.
+# Author: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com.com>
+
+from concurrent import futures
+import datetime
+import os
+import shutil
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import textwrap
+from typing import Dict, List, Sequence, Tuple
+
+ABS_TOOL_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__))
+TIMEOUT = datetime.timedelta(minutes=5).total_seconds()
+
+commands: Dict[str, Sequence[str]] = {
+ 'kunit_tool_test.py': ['./kunit_tool_test.py'],
+ 'kunit smoke test': ['./kunit.py', 'run', '--kunitconfig=lib/kunit', '--build_dir=kunit_run_checks'],
+ 'pytype': ['/bin/sh', '-c', 'pytype *.py'],
+ 'mypy': ['/bin/sh', '-c', 'mypy *.py'],
+}
+
+# The user might not have mypy or pytype installed, skip them if so.
+# Note: you can install both via `$ pip install mypy pytype`
+necessary_deps : Dict[str, str] = {
+ 'pytype': 'pytype',
+ 'mypy': 'mypy',
+}
+
+def main(argv: Sequence[str]) -> None:
+ if argv:
+ raise RuntimeError('This script takes no arguments')
+
+ future_to_name: Dict[futures.Future, str] = {}
+ executor = futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=len(commands))
+ for name, argv in commands.items():
+ if name in necessary_deps and shutil.which(necessary_deps[name]) is None:
+ print(f'{name}: SKIPPED, {necessary_deps[name]} not in $PATH')
+ continue
+ f = executor.submit(run_cmd, argv)
+ future_to_name[f] = name
+
+ has_failures = False
+ print(f'Waiting on {len(future_to_name)} checks ({", ".join(future_to_name.values())})...')
+ for f in futures.as_completed(future_to_name.keys()):
+ name = future_to_name[f]
+ ex = f.exception()
+ if not ex:
+ print(f'{name}: PASSED')
+ continue
+
+ has_failures = True
+ if isinstance(ex, subprocess.TimeoutExpired):
+ print(f'{name}: TIMED OUT')
+ elif isinstance(ex, subprocess.CalledProcessError):
+ print(f'{name}: FAILED')
+ else:
+ print('{name}: unexpected exception: {ex}')
+ continue
+
+ output = ex.output
+ if output:
+ print(textwrap.indent(output.decode(), '> '))
+ executor.shutdown()
+
+ if has_failures:
+ sys.exit(1)
+
+
+def run_cmd(argv: Sequence[str]):
+ subprocess.check_output(argv, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, cwd=ABS_TOOL_PATH, timeout=TIMEOUT)
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ main(sys.argv[1:])
base-commit: 52a5d80a2225e2d0b2a8f4656b76aead2a443b2a
--
2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog
KUnit does not have any first party support for "mocking".
The original RFC had some, but the code got dropped.
However, the documentation patches never got updated. This fixes that.
https://kunit.dev/mocking.html has a current writeup on the status quo
and will hopefully be eventually folded into the in-kernel
Documentation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com>
---
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst | 3 +--
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst | 3 +--
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
index b33ad72bcf0b..3006cadcf44a 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
@@ -12,5 +12,4 @@ following sections:
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst
- - documents all of the standard testing API excluding mocking
- or mocking related features.
+ - documents all of the standard testing API
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst
index aaa97f17e5b3..c5eca423e8b6 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst
@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
Test API
========
-This file documents all of the standard testing API excluding mocking or mocking
-related features.
+This file documents all of the standard testing API.
.. kernel-doc:: include/kunit/test.h
:internal:
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
index cacb35ec658d..7af7dec83646 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ KUnit - Unit Testing for the Linux Kernel
What is KUnit?
==============
-KUnit is a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel.
+KUnit is a lightweight unit testing framework for the Linux kernel.
KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and
Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test
base-commit: 2ab5d5e67f7ab2d2ecf67b8855ac65691f4e4b4d
--
2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog
The KUnit documentation was not very organized. There was little
information related to KUnit architecture and the importance of unit
testing.
Add some new pages, expand and reorganize the existing documentation.
Reword pages to make information and style more consistent.
Harinder Singh (7):
Documentation: KUnit: Rewrite main page
Documentation: KUnit: Rewrite getting started
Documentation: KUnit: Added KUnit Architecture
Documentation: kunit: Reorganize documentation related to running
tests
Documentation: KUnit: Rework writing page to focus on writing tests
Documentation: KUnit: Restyle Test Style and Nomenclature page
Documentation: KUnit: Restyled Frequently Asked Questions
.../dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst | 206 +++++++
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 73 ++-
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 165 ++---
.../kunit/kunit_suitememorydiagram.png | Bin 0 -> 24174 bytes
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst | 57 ++
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst | 247 ++++++++
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 195 +++---
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst | 101 ++--
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 570 ++++++++----------
9 files changed, 1028 insertions(+), 586 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst
create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit_suitememorydiagram.png
create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst
create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
base-commit: 4c388a8e740d3235a194f330c8ef327deef710f6
--
2.34.0.384.gca35af8252-goog