From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit d538ddb97e066571e4fc58b832f40739621b42bb ]
The openat2 test suite fails on ARM64 because the definition of
O_LARGEFILE is different on ARM64. Fix the problem by defining
the correct O_LARGEFILE definition on ARM64.
"openat2 unexpectedly returned # 3['.../tools/testing/selftests/openat2']
with 208000 (!= 208000)
not ok 102 openat2 with incompatible flags (O_PATH | O_LARGEFILE) fails
with -22 (Invalid argument)"
Fixed change log to improve formatting and clarity:
Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner(a)ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
index b386367c606b..5354cef55c6c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
@@ -22,7 +22,11 @@
* XXX: This is wrong on {mips, parisc, powerpc, sparc}.
*/
#undef O_LARGEFILE
+#ifdef __aarch64__
+#define O_LARGEFILE 0x20000
+#else
#define O_LARGEFILE 0x8000
+#endif
struct open_how_ext {
struct open_how inner;
--
2.30.2
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit d538ddb97e066571e4fc58b832f40739621b42bb ]
The openat2 test suite fails on ARM64 because the definition of
O_LARGEFILE is different on ARM64. Fix the problem by defining
the correct O_LARGEFILE definition on ARM64.
"openat2 unexpectedly returned # 3['.../tools/testing/selftests/openat2']
with 208000 (!= 208000)
not ok 102 openat2 with incompatible flags (O_PATH | O_LARGEFILE) fails
with -22 (Invalid argument)"
Fixed change log to improve formatting and clarity:
Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner(a)ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
index 381d874cce99..300af824b07b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
@@ -22,7 +22,11 @@
* XXX: This is wrong on {mips, parisc, powerpc, sparc}.
*/
#undef O_LARGEFILE
+#ifdef __aarch64__
+#define O_LARGEFILE 0x20000
+#else
#define O_LARGEFILE 0x8000
+#endif
struct open_how_ext {
struct open_how inner;
--
2.30.2
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit d538ddb97e066571e4fc58b832f40739621b42bb ]
The openat2 test suite fails on ARM64 because the definition of
O_LARGEFILE is different on ARM64. Fix the problem by defining
the correct O_LARGEFILE definition on ARM64.
"openat2 unexpectedly returned # 3['.../tools/testing/selftests/openat2']
with 208000 (!= 208000)
not ok 102 openat2 with incompatible flags (O_PATH | O_LARGEFILE) fails
with -22 (Invalid argument)"
Fixed change log to improve formatting and clarity:
Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar(a)cyphar.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner(a)ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
index d7ec1e7da0d0..1bddbe934204 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
@@ -22,7 +22,11 @@
* XXX: This is wrong on {mips, parisc, powerpc, sparc}.
*/
#undef O_LARGEFILE
+#ifdef __aarch64__
+#define O_LARGEFILE 0x20000
+#else
#define O_LARGEFILE 0x8000
+#endif
struct open_how_ext {
struct open_how inner;
--
2.30.2
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ]
0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
-------------------
# selftests: bpf: test_maps
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
# Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
# selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
# nr_cpus:8
-------------------
Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.
In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving(a)fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 96c6238a4a1f..3f503ad37a2b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(int tasks, void *data)
FD_ZERO(&w);
FD_SET(sfd[3], &w);
- to.tv_sec = 1;
+ to.tv_sec = 30;
to.tv_usec = 0;
s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to);
if (s == -1) {
--
2.30.2
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ]
0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
-------------------
# selftests: bpf: test_maps
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
# Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
# selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
# nr_cpus:8
-------------------
Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.
In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving(a)fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 4e202217fae1..87ba89df9802 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(int tasks, void *data)
FD_ZERO(&w);
FD_SET(sfd[3], &w);
- to.tv_sec = 1;
+ to.tv_sec = 30;
to.tv_usec = 0;
s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to);
if (s == -1) {
--
2.30.2
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ]
0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
-------------------
# selftests: bpf: test_maps
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
# Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
# selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
# nr_cpus:8
-------------------
Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.
In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving(a)fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index 1c4219ceced2..45c7a55f0b8b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
FD_ZERO(&w);
FD_SET(sfd[3], &w);
- to.tv_sec = 1;
+ to.tv_sec = 30;
to.tv_usec = 0;
s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to);
if (s == -1) {
--
2.30.2