October 2022 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH bpf v3 0/6] Fix bugs found by ASAN when running selftests

by Xu Kuohai

v3: - Fix error failure of case test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow exposed by this series v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221010070454.577433-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com - Rebase and fix conflict v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221009131830.395569-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Xu Kuohai (6): libbpf: Fix use-after-free in btf_dump_name_dups libbpf: Fix memory leak in parse_usdt_arg() selftests/bpf: Fix memory leak caused by not destroying skeleton selftest/bpf: Fix memory leak in kprobe_multi_test selftests/bpf: Fix error failure of case test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow selftest/bpf: Fix error usage of ASSERT_OK in xdp_adjust_tail.c tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 47 +++++++++++---- tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 59 +++++++++++-------- .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 17 +++--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c | 3 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 3 +- .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c | 7 ++- 6 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2

2 years, 2 months

2
14
0 0

Re: [PATCH -next v5 2/4] selftests/memory-hotplug: Restore memory before exit

by zhaogongyi

Hi Shuah, David, I am sorry for my slow response, I have submit a new patch to fix it. Please see: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kselftest/patch/20221011013926.2… Thanks, Gongyi > > On 10/10/22 00:54, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 08.10.22 03:40, zhaogongyi wrote: > > >> > >> Yes, online_memory_expect_success() already prints a warning, > remove > >> the warning in online_all_offline_memory() seems ok, > >> > >> My previous consideration was that one more log information would > make it easier to locate the wrong location. > > > > Let's keep it simple unless there is real reason to warn twice. > > > > zhaogongyi, > > Please note that I already applied the patches to linux-kselftest next for my > second pull request before the merge window. Please send the change > David requested in a separate patch on top of next as a fix. > > thanks, > -- Shuah

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/6] Add _opts variant for bpf_*_get_fd_by_id()

by Roberto Sassu

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu(a)huawei.com> Add the _opts variant for bpf_*_get_fd_by_id() functions, to be able to pass to the kernel more options, when requesting a fd of an eBPF object. Pass the options through a newly introduced structure, bpf_get_fd_by_id_opts, which currently contains open_flags (the other two members are for compatibility and for padding). open_flags allows the caller to request specific permissions to access a map (e.g. read-only). This is useful for example in the situation where a map is write-protected. Besides patches 2-6, which introduce the new variants and the data structure, patch 1 fixes the LIBBPF_1.0.0 declaration in libbpf.map. Changelog v1: - Don't CC stable kernel mailing list for patch 1 (suggested by Andrii) - Rename bpf_get_fd_opts struct to bpf_get_fd_by_id_opts (suggested by Andrii) - Move declaration of _opts variants after non-opts variants (suggested by Andrii) - Correctly initialize bpf_map_info, fix style issues, use map from skeleton, check valid fd in the test (suggested by Andrii) - Rename libbpf_get_fd_opts test to libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts Roberto Sassu (6): libbpf: Fix LIBBPF_1.0.0 declaration in libbpf.map libbpf: Introduce bpf_get_fd_by_id_opts and bpf_map_get_fd_by_id_opts() libbpf: Introduce bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id_opts() libbpf: Introduce bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id_opts() libbpf: Introduce bpf_link_get_fd_by_id_opts() selftests/bpf: Add tests for _opts variants of bpf_*_get_fd_by_id() tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 48 +++++++++- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 16 ++++ tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 1 + .../bpf/prog_tests/libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++ .../bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c | 36 ++++++++ 6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c -- 2.25.1

2 years, 2 months

3
9
0 0

Re: [PATCH -next v5 2/4] selftests/memory-hotplug: Restore memory before exit

by zhaogongyi

Hi! > > On 30.09.22 10:52, zhaogongyi wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> > >> On 30.09.22 08:35, Zhao Gongyi wrote: > >>> Some momory will be left in offline state when calling > >>> offline_memory_expect_fail() failed. Restore it before exit. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi(a)huawei.com> > >>> --- > >>> .../memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh | 21 > >> ++++++++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh > >> b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh > >>> index 1d87611a7d52..91a7457616bb 100755 > >>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh > >>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh > >>> @@ -134,6 +134,16 @@ offline_memory_expect_fail() > >>> return 0 > >>> } > >>> > >>> +online_all_offline_memory() > >>> +{ > >>> + for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do > >>> + if ! online_memory_expect_success $memory; then > >>> + echo "$FUNCNAME $memory: unexpected fail" >&2 > >> > >> Do we need that output? > > > > In my opinion, if online a memory node failed ,it should be a kernel bug > catched, so, I think the output here is needed. > > But online_memory_expect_success() already prints a warning, no? Yes, online_memory_expect_success() already prints a warning, remove the warning in online_all_offline_memory() seems ok, My previous consideration was that one more log information would make it easier to locate the wrong location. Best Regards, Gongyi

2 years, 2 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next 0/5] Fix bugs found by ASAN when running selftests

by Xu Kuohai

From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai(a)huawei.com> Xu Kuohai (5): libbpf: Fix use-after-free in btf_dump_name_dups libbpf: Fix memory leak in parse_usdt_arg() selftests/bpf: Fix memory leak caused by not destroying skeleton selftest/bpf: Fix memory leak in kprobe_multi_test selftest/bpf: Fix error usage of ASSERT_OK in xdp_adjust_tail.c tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 47 +++++++++++---- tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 59 +++++++++++-------- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 4 +- .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 17 +++--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c | 3 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 3 +- .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c | 6 +- 7 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

2 years, 2 months

2
6
0 0

[PATCH bpf v2 0/5] Fix bugs found by ASAN when running selftests

by Xu Kuohai

v2: - Rebase and fix conflict v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221009131830.395569-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.co… Xu Kuohai (5): libbpf: Fix use-after-free in btf_dump_name_dups libbpf: Fix memory leak in parse_usdt_arg() selftests/bpf: Fix memory leak caused by not destroying skeleton selftest/bpf: Fix memory leak in kprobe_multi_test selftest/bpf: Fix error usage of ASSERT_OK in xdp_adjust_tail.c tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 47 +++++++++++---- tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 59 +++++++++++-------- .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 17 +++--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c | 3 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 3 +- .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c | 6 +- 6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2

2 years, 2 months

1
5
0 0

[RESEND PATCH] selftests/kexec: fix build for ARCH=x86_64

by Ricardo Cañuelo

Handle the scenario where the build is launched with the ARCH envvar defined as x86_64. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kexec/Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kexec/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kexec/Makefile index 806a150648c3..67fe7a46cb62 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kexec/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kexec/Makefile @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only # Makefile for kexec tests -uname_M := $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not) -ARCH ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e s/i.86/x86/ -e s/x86_64/x86/) +ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not) +ARCH_PROCESSED := $(shell echo $(ARCH) | sed -e s/i.86/x86/ -e s/x86_64/x86/) -ifeq ($(ARCH),$(filter $(ARCH),x86 ppc64le)) +ifeq ($(ARCH_PROCESSED),$(filter $(ARCH_PROCESSED),x86 ppc64le)) TEST_PROGS := test_kexec_load.sh test_kexec_file_load.sh TEST_FILES := kexec_common_lib.sh -- 2.25.1

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[RESEND PATCH] selftests/intel_pstate: fix build for ARCH=x86_64

by Ricardo Cañuelo

Handle the scenario where the build is launched with the ARCH envvar defined as x86_64. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/Makefile index 39f0fa2a8fd6..05d66ef50c97 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/Makefile @@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE LDLIBS += -lm -uname_M := $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not) -ARCH ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e s/i.86/x86/ -e s/x86_64/x86/) +ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not) +ARCH_PROCESSED := $(shell echo $(ARCH) | sed -e s/i.86/x86/ -e s/x86_64/x86/) -ifeq (x86,$(ARCH)) +ifeq (x86,$(ARCH_PROCESSED)) TEST_GEN_FILES := msr aperf endif -- 2.25.1

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 65/73] bpf: Adjust kprobe_multi entry_ip for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT

by Sasha Levin

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa(a)kernel.org> [ Upstream commit c09eb2e578eb1668bbc84dc07e8d8bd6f04b9a02 ] Martynas reported bpf_get_func_ip returning +4 address when CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT option is enabled. When CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT is enabled we'll have endbr instruction at the function entry, which screws return value of bpf_get_func_ip() helper that should return the function address. There's short term workaround for kprobe_multi bpf program made by Alexei [1], but we need this fixup also for bpf_get_attach_cookie, that returns cookie based on the entry_ip value. Moving the fixup in the fprobe handler, so both bpf_get_func_ip and bpf_get_attach_cookie get expected function address when CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT option is enabled. Also renaming kprobe_multi_link_handler entry_ip argument to fentry_ip so it's clearer this is an ftrace __fentry__ ip. [1] commit 7f0059b58f02 ("selftests/bpf: Fix kprobe_multi test.") Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> Reported-by: Martynas Pumputis <m(a)lambda.lt> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220926153340.1621984-5-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 88589d74a892..af13fdf1d86c 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -1026,6 +1026,22 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_func_ip_proto_tracing = { .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, }; +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT +static unsigned long get_entry_ip(unsigned long fentry_ip) +{ + u32 instr; + + /* Being extra safe in here in case entry ip is on the page-edge. */ + if (get_kernel_nofault(instr, (u32 *) fentry_ip - 1)) + return fentry_ip; + if (is_endbr(instr)) + fentry_ip -= ENDBR_INSN_SIZE; + return fentry_ip; +} +#else +#define get_entry_ip(fentry_ip) fentry_ip +#endif + BPF_CALL_1(bpf_get_func_ip_kprobe, struct pt_regs *, regs) { struct kprobe *kp = kprobe_running(); @@ -2414,13 +2430,13 @@ kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *link, } static void -kprobe_multi_link_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long entry_ip, +kprobe_multi_link_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long fentry_ip, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *link; link = container_of(fp, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, fp); - kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, entry_ip, regs); + kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), regs); } static int symbols_cmp_r(const void *a, const void *b, const void *priv) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi.c index 08f95a8155d1..98c3399e15c0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi.c @@ -36,15 +36,13 @@ __u64 kretprobe_test6_result = 0; __u64 kretprobe_test7_result = 0; __u64 kretprobe_test8_result = 0; -extern bool CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT __kconfig __weak; - static void kprobe_multi_check(void *ctx, bool is_return) { if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid) return; __u64 cookie = test_cookie ? bpf_get_attach_cookie(ctx) : 0; - __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx) - (CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT ? 4 : 0); + __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx); #define SET(__var, __addr, __cookie) ({ \ if (((const void *) addr == __addr) && \ -- 2.35.1

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 56/73] selftests/bpf: Free the allocated resources after test case succeeds

by Sasha Levin

From: Hou Tao <houtao1(a)huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 103d002fb7d548fb1187e350f2b73788558128b9 ] Free the created fd or allocated bpf_object after test case succeeds, else there will be resource leaks. Spotted by using address sanitizer and checking the content of /proc/$pid/fd directory. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921070035.2016413-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c | 2 ++ .../bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c | 2 ++ .../bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 24 ++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c index 78c76496b14a..b595556315bc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #include <stdio.h> #include <errno.h> #include <string.h> +#include <unistd.h> #include <bpf/bpf.h> #include <bpf/libbpf.h> @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ static void __test_map_lookup_and_update_batch(bool is_pcpu) free(keys); free(values); free(visited); + close(map_fd); } static void array_map_batch_ops(void) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c index f807d53fd8dd..1230ccf90128 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #include <stdio.h> #include <errno.h> #include <string.h> +#include <unistd.h> #include <bpf/bpf.h> #include <bpf/libbpf.h> @@ -255,6 +256,7 @@ void __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(bool is_pcpu) free(visited); if (!is_pcpu) free(values); + close(map_fd); } void htab_map_batch_ops(void) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c index 87d07b596e17..b66d56ddb7ef 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include <errno.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <unistd.h> #include <bpf/bpf.h> #include <bpf/libbpf.h> @@ -150,4 +151,5 @@ void test_lpm_trie_map_batch_ops(void) free(keys); free(values); free(visited); + close(map_fd); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c index cbebfaa7c1e8..4d42ffea0038 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c @@ -658,13 +658,13 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) { struct bpf_map *bpf_map_rx, *bpf_map_tx, *bpf_map_msg, *bpf_map_break; int map_fd_msg = 0, map_fd_rx = 0, map_fd_tx = 0, map_fd_break; + struct bpf_object *parse_obj, *verdict_obj, *msg_obj; int ports[] = {50200, 50201, 50202, 50204}; int err, i, fd, udp, sfd[6] = {0xdeadbeef}; u8 buf[20] = {0x0, 0x5, 0x3, 0x2, 0x1, 0x0}; int parse_prog, verdict_prog, msg_prog; struct sockaddr_in addr; int one = 1, s, sc, rc; - struct bpf_object *obj; struct timeval to; __u32 key, value; pid_t pid[tasks]; @@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) i, udp); goto out_sockmap; } + close(udp); /* Test update without programs */ for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) { @@ -822,27 +823,27 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) /* Load SK_SKB program and Attach */ err = bpf_prog_test_load(SOCKMAP_PARSE_PROG, - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &obj, &parse_prog); + BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &parse_obj, &parse_prog); if (err) { printf("Failed to load SK_SKB parse prog\n"); goto out_sockmap; } err = bpf_prog_test_load(SOCKMAP_TCP_MSG_PROG, - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, &obj, &msg_prog); + BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, &msg_obj, &msg_prog); if (err) { printf("Failed to load SK_SKB msg prog\n"); goto out_sockmap; } err = bpf_prog_test_load(SOCKMAP_VERDICT_PROG, - BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &obj, &verdict_prog); + BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &verdict_obj, &verdict_prog); if (err) { printf("Failed to load SK_SKB verdict prog\n"); goto out_sockmap; } - bpf_map_rx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_rx"); + bpf_map_rx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_rx"); if (!bpf_map_rx) { printf("Failed to load map rx from verdict prog\n"); goto out_sockmap; @@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) goto out_sockmap; } - bpf_map_tx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_tx"); + bpf_map_tx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_tx"); if (!bpf_map_tx) { printf("Failed to load map tx from verdict prog\n"); goto out_sockmap; @@ -866,7 +867,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) goto out_sockmap; } - bpf_map_msg = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_msg"); + bpf_map_msg = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_msg"); if (!bpf_map_msg) { printf("Failed to load map msg from msg_verdict prog\n"); goto out_sockmap; @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) goto out_sockmap; } - bpf_map_break = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_break"); + bpf_map_break = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_break"); if (!bpf_map_break) { printf("Failed to load map tx from verdict prog\n"); goto out_sockmap; @@ -1124,7 +1125,9 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) } close(fd); close(map_fd_rx); - bpf_object__close(obj); + bpf_object__close(parse_obj); + bpf_object__close(msg_obj); + bpf_object__close(verdict_obj); return; out: for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) @@ -1282,8 +1285,11 @@ static void test_map_in_map(void) printf("Inner map mim.inner was not destroyed\n"); goto out_map_in_map; } + + close(fd); } + bpf_object__close(obj); return; out_map_in_map: -- 2.35.1

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror October 2022