November 2022 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

by Adam Charachuta

Dzień dobry, zapoznałem się z Państwa ofertą i z przyjemnością przyznaję, że przyciąga uwagę i zachęca do dalszych rozmów. Pomyślałem, że może mógłbym mieć swój wkład w Państwa rozwój i pomóc dotrzeć z tą ofertą do większego grona odbiorców. Pozycjonuję strony www, dzięki czemu generują świetny ruch w sieci. Możemy porozmawiać w najbliższym czasie? Pozdrawiam Adam Charachuta

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

[PATCH linux-next] selftests/vm: calculate variables in correct order

by Joel Savitz

commit b5ba705c2608 ("selftests/vm: enable running select groups of tests") unintentionally reversed the ordering of some of the lines of run_vmtests.sh that calculate values based on system configuration. Importantly, $hpgsize_MB is determined from $hpgsize_KB, but this later value is not read from /proc/meminfo until later, causing userfaultfd tests to incorrectly fail since $half_ufd_size_MB will always be 0. Switch these statements around into proper order to fix the invocation of the userfaultfd tests that use $half_ufd_size_MB. Suggested-by: Nico Pache <npache(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Savitz <jsavitz(a)redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh index fff00bb77086..ce52e4f5ff21 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh @@ -82,16 +82,6 @@ test_selected() { fi } -# Simple hugetlbfs tests have a hardcoded minimum requirement of -# huge pages totaling 256MB (262144KB) in size. The userfaultfd -# hugetlb test requires a minimum of 2 * nr_cpus huge pages. Take -# both of these requirements into account and attempt to increase -# number of huge pages available. -nr_cpus=$(nproc) -hpgsize_MB=$((hpgsize_KB / 1024)) -half_ufd_size_MB=$((((nr_cpus * hpgsize_MB + 127) / 128) * 128)) -needmem_KB=$((half_ufd_size_MB * 2 * 1024)) - # get huge pagesize and freepages from /proc/meminfo while read -r name size unit; do if [ "$name" = "HugePages_Free:" ]; then @@ -102,6 +92,16 @@ while read -r name size unit; do fi done < /proc/meminfo +# Simple hugetlbfs tests have a hardcoded minimum requirement of +# huge pages totaling 256MB (262144KB) in size. The userfaultfd +# hugetlb test requires a minimum of 2 * nr_cpus huge pages. Take +# both of these requirements into account and attempt to increase +# number of huge pages available. +nr_cpus=$(nproc) +hpgsize_MB=$((hpgsize_KB / 1024)) +half_ufd_size_MB=$((((nr_cpus * hpgsize_MB + 127) / 128) * 128)) +needmem_KB=$((half_ufd_size_MB * 2 * 1024)) + # set proper nr_hugepages if [ -n "$freepgs" ] && [ -n "$hpgsize_KB" ]; then nr_hugepgs=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages) -- 2.31.1

2 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v5 0/3] Implement IOCTL to get and/or the clear info about PTEs

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Hello, This patch series implements IOCTL on the pagemap procfs file to get the information about the page table entries (PTEs). The following operations are supported in this ioctl: - Get the information if the pages are soft-dirty, file mapped, present or swapped. - Clear the soft-dirty PTE bit of the pages. - Get and clear the soft-dirty PTE bit of the pages atomically. Soft-dirty PTE bit of the memory pages can be read by using the pagemap procfs file. The soft-dirty PTE bit for the whole memory range of the process can be cleared by writing to the clear_refs file. There are other methods to mimic this information entirely in userspace with poor performance: - The mprotect syscall and SIGSEGV handler for bookkeeping - The userfaultfd syscall with the handler for bookkeeping Some benchmarks can be seen here[1]. This series adds features that weren't present earlier: - There is no atomic get soft-dirty PTE bit status and clear operation possible. - The soft-dirty PTE bit of only a part of memory cannot be cleared. Historically, soft-dirty PTE bit tracking has been used in the CRIU project. The procfs interface is enough for finding the soft-dirty bit status and clearing the soft-dirty bit of all the pages of a process. We have the use case where we need to track the soft-dirty PTE bit for only specific pages on demand. We need this tracking and clear mechanism of a region of memory while the process is running to emulate the getWriteWatch() syscall of Windows. This syscall is used by games to keep track of dirty pages to process only the dirty pages. The information related to pages if the page is file mapped, present and swapped is required for the CRIU project[2][3]. The addition of the required mask, any mask, excluded mask and return masks are also required for the CRIU project[2]. The IOCTL returns the addresses of the pages which match the specific masks. The page addresses are returned in struct page_region in a compact form. The max_pages is needed to support a use case where user only wants to get a specific number of pages. So there is no need to find all the pages of interest in the range when max_pages is specified. The IOCTL returns when the maximum number of the pages are found. The max_pages is optional. If max_pages is specified, it must be equal or greater than the vec_size. This restriction is needed to handle worse case when one page_region only contains info of one page and it cannot be compacted. This is needed to emulate the Windows getWriteWatch() syscall. Some non-dirty pages get marked as dirty because of the kernel's internal activity (such as VMA merging as soft-dirty bit difference isn't considered while deciding to merge VMAs). The dirty bit of the pages is stored in the VMA flags and in the per page flags. If any of these two bits are set, the page is considered to be soft dirty. Suppose you have cleared the soft dirty bit of half of VMA which will be done by splitting the VMA and clearing soft dirty bit flag in the half VMA and the pages in it. Now kernel may decide to merge the VMAs again. So the half VMA becomes dirty again. This splitting/merging costs performance. The application receives a lot of pages which aren't dirty in reality but marked as dirty. Performance is lost again here. Also sometimes user doesn't want the newly allocated memory to be marked as dirty. PAGEMAP_NO_REUSED_REGIONS flag solves both the problems. It is used to not depend on the soft dirty flag in the VMA flags. So VMA splitting and merging doesn't happen. It only depends on the soft dirty bit of the individual pages. Thus by using this flag, there may be a scenerio such that the new memory regions which are just created, doesn't look dirty when seen with the IOCTL, but look dirty when seen from procfs. This seems okay as the user of this flag know the implication of using it. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/54d4c322-cd6e-eefd-b161-2af2b56aae24@collabora… [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YyiDg79flhWoMDZB@gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221014134802.1361436-1-mdanylo@google.com/ Regards, Muhammad Usama Anjum Muhammad Usama Anjum (3): fs/proc/task_mmu: update functions to clear the soft-dirty PTE bit fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL to get and/or the clear info about PTEs selftests: vm: add pagemap ioctl tests fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 396 +++++++++++- include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 53 ++ tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 53 ++ tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 5 +- tools/testing/selftests/vm/pagemap_ioctl.c | 681 +++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 1156 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/pagemap_ioctl.c -- 2.30.2

2 years, 1 month

2
8
0 0

[PATCH] kselftest/arm64: fix array_size.cocci warning

by Kang Minchul

Use ARRAY_SIZE to fix the following coccicheck warnings: tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:341:20-21: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:35:20-21: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:168:20-21: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:72:20-21: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:369:25-26: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang(a)gmail.com> --- .../testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c index 75fc482d63b6..1dbbbd47dd50 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int check_buffer_by_byte(int mem_type, int mode) bool err; mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); - item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + item = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); for (i = 0; i < item; i++) { ptr = (char *)mte_allocate_memory(sizes[i], mem_type, 0, true); @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int check_buffer_underflow_by_byte(int mem_type, int mode, char *und_ptr = NULL; mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); - item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + item = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); for (i = 0; i < item; i++) { ptr = (char *)mte_allocate_memory_tag_range(sizes[i], mem_type, 0, underflow_range, 0); @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int check_buffer_overflow_by_byte(int mem_type, int mode, char *over_ptr = NULL; mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); - item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + item = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); for (i = 0; i < item; i++) { ptr = (char *)mte_allocate_memory_tag_range(sizes[i], mem_type, 0, 0, overflow_range); @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int check_buffer_by_block(int mem_type, int mode) int i, item, result = KSFT_PASS; mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); - item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + item = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid = false; for (i = 0; i < item; i++) { result = check_buffer_by_block_iterate(mem_type, mode, sizes[i]); @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static int check_memory_initial_tags(int mem_type, int mode, int mapping) { char *ptr; int run, fd; - int total = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + int total = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); for (run = 0; run < total; run++) { @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int err; size_t page_size = getpagesize(); - int item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + int item = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); sizes[item - 3] = page_size - 1; sizes[item - 2] = page_size; -- 2.34.1

2 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v1] kselftest/arm64: Remove validation of extra_context from TODO

by Mark Brown

When fixing up support for extra_context in the signal handling tests I didn't notice that there is a TODO file in the directory which lists this as a thing to be done. Since it's been done remove it from the list. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/TODO | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/TODO b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/TODO index 110ff9fd195d..1f7fba8194fe 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/TODO +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/TODO @@ -1,2 +1 @@ - Validate that register contents are saved and restored as expected. -- Support and validate extra_context. base-commit: 9abf2313adc1ca1b6180c508c25f22f9395cc780 -- 2.30.2

2 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v1] kselftest/arm64: Print ASCII version of unknown signal frame magic values

by Mark Brown

The signal magic values are supposed to be allocated as somewhat meaningful ASCII so if we encounter a bad magic value print the any alphanumeric characters we find in it as well as the hex value to aid debuggability. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> --- .../arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c | 21 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c index e1c625b20ac4..d2eda7b5de26 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 /* Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited */ + +#include <ctype.h> +#include <string.h> + #include "testcases.h" struct _aarch64_ctx *get_header(struct _aarch64_ctx *head, uint32_t magic, @@ -109,7 +113,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err) bool terminated = false; size_t offs = 0; int flags = 0; - int new_flags; + int new_flags, i; struct extra_context *extra = NULL; struct sve_context *sve = NULL; struct za_context *za = NULL; @@ -117,6 +121,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err) (struct _aarch64_ctx *)uc->uc_mcontext.__reserved; void *extra_data = NULL; size_t extra_sz = 0; + char magic[4]; if (!err) return false; @@ -194,11 +199,19 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err) /* * A still unknown Magic: potentially freshly added * to the Kernel code and still unknown to the - * tests. + * tests. Magic numbers are supposed to be allocated + * as somewhat meaningful ASCII strings so try to + * print as such as well as the raw number. */ + memcpy(magic, &head->magic, sizeof(magic)); + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(magic); i++) + if (!isalnum(magic[i])) + magic[i] = '?'; + fprintf(stdout, - "SKIP Unknown MAGIC: 0x%X - Is KSFT arm64/signal up to date ?\n", - head->magic); + "SKIP Unknown MAGIC: 0x%X (%c%c%c%c) - Is KSFT arm64/signal up to date ?\n", + head->magic, + magic[3], magic[2], magic[1], magic[0]); break; } base-commit: 30a0b95b1335e12efef89dd78518ed3e4a71a763 -- 2.30.2

2 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v1 0/2] kselftest/arm64: fp-stress output clarity improvements

by Mark Brown

This series provides a couple of improvements to the output of fp-stress, making it easier to follow what's going on and our application of the timeout a bit more even. Mark Brown (2): kselftest/arm64: Check that all children are producing output in fp-stress kselftest/arm64: Provide progress messages when signalling children tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) base-commit: 9abf2313adc1ca1b6180c508c25f22f9395cc780 -- 2.30.2

2 years, 1 month

2
3
0 0

Re: [PATCH v2] [RFC] selftests: alsa - add PCM test

by Mark Brown

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 12:59:14PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > This initial code does a simple sample transfer tests. By default, > all PCM devices are detected and tested with short and long > buffering parameters for 4 seconds. If the sample transfer timing > is not in a +-100ms boundary, the test fails. Only the interleaved > buffering scheme is supported in this version. Oh, thanks for picking this up - something like this has been on my mind for ages! This should probably be copied to Shuah and the kselftest list as well, I've added them. This looks basically good to me, I've got a bunch of comments below but I'm not sure any of them except possibly the one about not putting values in the configuration file by default should block getting this merged so: Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> > The configuration may be modified with the configuration files. > A specific hardware configuration is detected and activated > using the sysfs regex matching. This allows to use the DMI string > (/sys/class/dmi/id/* tree) or any other system parameters > exposed in sysfs for the matching for the CI automation. > The configuration file may also specify the PCM device list to detect > the missing PCM devices. > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/alsa/alsa-local.h > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/alsa/conf.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/alsa/conf.d/Lenovo_ThinkPad_P1_Gen2.conf > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c This is a bit unusual for kselftest and might create a bit of churn but does seem sensible and reasonable to me, it's on the edge of what kselftest usually covers but seems close enough in scope. I worry a bit about ending up needing to add a config fragment as a result but perhaps we can get away without. > index 000000000000..0a83f35d43eb > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/conf.d/Lenovo_ThinkPad_P1_Gen2.conf > + pcm.0.0 { > + PLAYBACK { > + test.time1 { > + access RW_INTERLEAVED # can be omitted - default > + format S16_LE # can be omitted - default > + rate 48000 # can be omitted - default > + channels 2 # can be omitted - default > + period_size 512 > + buffer_size 4096 I think it'd be better to leave these commented by default, especially if/once we improve the enumeration. That way the coverage will default to whatever the tool does by default on the system (including any checking of constraints for example). I guess we might want to add a way of saying "here's what I expect the constraints to be" but that's very much future work. > +#ifdef SND_LIB_VER > +#if SND_LIB_VERSION >= SND_LIB_VER(1, 2, 6) > +#define LIB_HAS_LOAD_STRING > +#endif > +#endif > + > +#ifndef LIB_HAS_LOAD_STRING > +static int snd_config_load_string(snd_config_t **config, const char *s, > + size_t size) > +{ This is also in mixer-test, we should pull it into a helper library too. Something that could be done separately/incrementally. > + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > + > + snd_pcm_drain(handle); > + ms = timestamp_diff_ms(&tstamp); > + if (ms < 3900 || ms > 4100) { It feels like the runtime might be usefully parameterised here - there's a tradeoff with detecting inaccurate clocks and runtime that people might want to make. > + ksft_set_plan(num_missing + num_pcms * TESTS_PER_PCM); > + for (pcm = pcm_missing; pcm != NULL; pcm = pcm->next) { > + ksft_test_result(false, "test.missing.%d.%d.%d.%s\n", > + pcm->card, pcm->device, pcm->subdevice, > + snd_pcm_stream_name(pcm->stream)); > + } We don't seem to report a successful test.missing anywhere like find_pcms() so if we ever hit a test.missing then it'll look like a new test, old test runs won't have logged the failure. That can change how people look at any failures that crop up, "it's new and never worked" is different to "this used to work" and people are likely to just be running kselftest rather than specifically know this test. It'd be better if we counted the cards in the config and used that for our expected number of test.missings, logging cards that we find here as well. > + for (pcm = pcm_list; pcm != NULL; pcm = pcm->next) { > + test_pcm_time1(pcm, "test.time1", "S16_LE", 48000, 2, 512, 4096); > + test_pcm_time1(pcm, "test.time2", "S16_LE", 48000, 2, 24000, 192000); > + } It does feel like especially in the case where no configuration is specified we should be eumerating what the card can do and both potentially doing more tests (though there's obviously an execution time tradeoff with going overboard there) and skipping configurations that the card never claimed to support in the first place. In particular I'm expecting we'll see some cards that only do either 44.1kHz or 48kHz and will get spurious fails by default, and I'd like to see coverage of mono playback on cards that claim to support it because I suspect there's a bunch of them that don't actually do the right thing. Like I say most of this could be done incrementally if we decide it needs to get done at all though, we shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of good.

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Greeting

by Mr.Abraham

My Greeting, Did you receive the letter i sent to you. Please answer me. Regard, Mr.Abraham

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: [PATCH v4 15/17] iommufd: Add a selftest

by Nicolin Chen

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:49:08PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c > +TEST_F(iommufd, cmd_length) > +{ > +#define TEST_LENGTH(_struct, _ioctl) \ > + { \ > + struct { \ > + struct _struct cmd; \ > + uint8_t extra; \ > + } cmd = { .cmd = { .size = sizeof(struct _struct) - 1 }, \ > + .extra = UINT8_MAX }; \ > + int old_errno; \ > + int rc; \ > + \ > + EXPECT_ERRNO(EOPNOTSUPP, ioctl(self->fd, _ioctl, &cmd)); \ I guess it should be EINVAL corresponding to updated kernel code? > +TEST_F(iommufd, cmd_ex_fail) > +{ > + struct { > + struct iommu_destroy cmd; > + __u64 future; > + } cmd = { .cmd = { .size = sizeof(cmd), .id = 0 } }; > + > + /* object id is invalid and command is longer */ > + EXPECT_ERRNO(ENOENT, ioctl(self->fd, IOMMU_DESTROY, &cmd)); > + /* future area is non-zero */ > + cmd.future = 1; > + EXPECT_ERRNO(E2BIG, ioctl(self->fd, IOMMU_DESTROY, &cmd)); > + /* Original command "works" */ > + cmd.cmd.size = sizeof(cmd.cmd); > + EXPECT_ERRNO(ENOENT, ioctl(self->fd, IOMMU_DESTROY, &cmd)); > + /* Short command fails */ > + cmd.cmd.size = sizeof(cmd.cmd) - 1; > + EXPECT_ERRNO(EOPNOTSUPP, ioctl(self->fd, IOMMU_DESTROY, &cmd)); Ditto > +TEST_HARNESS_MAIN > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c > +static void fail_nth_first(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, > + struct fail_nth_state *nth_state) > +{ > + char buf[300]; > + > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/proc/self/task/%u/fail-nth", gettid()); Not sure what's missing, I have a build error at gettid. Copying a solution from tools/perf/jvmti/jvmti_agent.c file, can fix with: ------------------------------ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c index 99eaa9f32e0b..7704b3a754d3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #define __EXPORTED_HEADERS__ #include <linux/vfio.h> +#include <syscall.h> /* for gettid() */ #include "iommufd_utils.h" @@ -84,6 +85,13 @@ struct fail_nth_state { unsigned int iteration; }; +#ifndef HAVE_GETTID +static inline pid_t gettid(void) +{ + return (pid_t)syscall(__NR_gettid); +} +#endif + static void fail_nth_first(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, struct fail_nth_state *nth_state) { ------------------------------

2 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror November 2022