- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 08/21] selftests: kvm: Fix the segment descriptor layout to match the actual layout

by Sasha Levin

From: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit df11f7dd5834146defa448acba097e8d7703cc42 ] Fix the layout of 'struct desc64' to match the layout described in the SDM Vol 3, Chapter 3 "Protected-Mode Memory Management", section 3.4.5 "Segment Descriptors", Figure 3-8 "Segment Descriptor". The test added later in this series relies on this and crashes if this layout is not correct. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <graf(a)amazon.com> Message-Id: <20201012194716.3950330-2-aaronlewis(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h index 82b7fe16a8242..0a65e7bb5249e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct gpr64_regs { struct desc64 { uint16_t limit0; uint16_t base0; - unsigned base1:8, s:1, type:4, dpl:2, p:1; + unsigned base1:8, type:4, s:1, dpl:2, p:1; unsigned limit1:4, avl:1, l:1, db:1, g:1, base2:8; uint32_t base3; uint32_t zero1; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c index f6eb34eaa0d22..1ccf6c9b3476d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c @@ -392,11 +392,12 @@ static void kvm_seg_fill_gdt_64bit(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_segment *segp) desc->limit0 = segp->limit & 0xFFFF; desc->base0 = segp->base & 0xFFFF; desc->base1 = segp->base >> 16; - desc->s = segp->s; desc->type = segp->type; + desc->s = segp->s; desc->dpl = segp->dpl; desc->p = segp->present; desc->limit1 = segp->limit >> 16; + desc->avl = segp->avl; desc->l = segp->l; desc->db = segp->db; desc->g = segp->g; -- 2.27.0

5 years

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas

by Mike Rapoport

From: Mike Rapoport <rppt(a)linux.ibm.com> Hi, This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly required for the basic usage and can be easily added later either with or without CMA. v6 changes: * Silence the warning about missing syscall, thanks to Qian Cai * Replace spaces with tabs in Kconfig additions, per Randy * Add a selftest. v5 changes: * rebase on v5.9-rc5 * drop boot time memory reservation patch v4 changes: * rebase on v5.9-rc1 * Do not redefine PMD_PAGE_ORDER in fs/dax.c, thanks Kirill * Make secret mappings exclusive by default and only require flags to memfd_secret() system call for uncached mappings, thanks again Kirill :) v3 changes: * Squash kernel-parameters.txt update into the commit that added the command line option. * Make uncached mode explicitly selectable by architectures. For now enable it only on x86. v2 changes: * Follow Michael's suggestion and name the new system call 'memfd_secret' * Add kernel-parameters documentation about the boot option * Fix i386-tinyconfig regression reported by the kbuild bot. CONFIG_SECRETMEM now depends on !EMBEDDED to disable it on small systems from one side and still make it available unconditionally on architectures that support SET_DIRECT_MAP. The file descriptor backing secret memory mappings is created using a dedicated memfd_secret system call The desired protection mode for the memory is configured using flags parameter of the system call. The mmap() of the file descriptor created with memfd_secret() will create a "secret" memory mapping. The pages in that mapping will be marked as not present in the direct map and will have desired protection bits set in the user page table. For instance, current implementation allows uncached mappings. Although normally Linux userspace mappings are protected from other users, such secret mappings are useful for environments where a hostile tenant is trying to trick the kernel into giving them access to other tenants mappings. Additionally, the secret mappings may be used as a mean to protect guest memory in a virtual machine host. For demonstration of secret memory usage we've created a userspace library [1] that does two things: the first is act as a preloader for openssl to redirect all the OPENSSL_malloc calls to secret memory meaning any secret keys get automatically protected this way and the other thing it does is expose the API to the user who needs it. We anticipate that a lot of the use cases would be like the openssl one: many toolkits that deal with secret keys already have special handling for the memory to try to give them greater protection, so this would simply be pluggable into the toolkits without any need for user application modification. I've hesitated whether to continue to use new flags to memfd_create() or to add a new system call and I've decided to use a new system call after I've started to look into man pages update. There would have been two completely independent descriptions and I think it would have been very confusing. Hiding secret memory mappings behind an anonymous file allows (ab)use of the page cache for tracking pages allocated for the "secret" mappings as well as using address_space_operations for e.g. page migration callbacks. The anonymous file may be also used implicitly, like hugetlb files, to implement mmap(MAP_SECRET) and use the secret memory areas with "native" mm ABIs in the future. As the fragmentation of the direct map was one of the major concerns raised during the previous postings, I've added an amortizing cache of PMD-size pages to each file descriptor that is used as an allocation pool for the secret memory areas. v5: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200916073539.3552-1-rppt@kernel.org v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200818141554.13945-1-rppt@kernel.org v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200804095035.18778-1-rppt@kernel.org v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200727162935.31714-1-rppt@kernel.org v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200720092435.17469-1-rppt@kernel.org Mike Rapoport (6): mm: add definition of PMD_PAGE_ORDER mmap: make mlock_future_check() global mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant mm: secretmem: use PMD-size pages to amortize direct map fragmentation secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2) arch/Kconfig | 7 + arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h | 2 + arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h | 1 + arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + fs/dax.c | 11 +- include/linux/pgtable.h | 3 + include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 7 +- include/uapi/linux/magic.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/secretmem.h | 8 + kernel/sys_ni.c | 2 + mm/Kconfig | 4 + mm/Makefile | 1 + mm/internal.h | 3 + mm/mmap.c | 5 +- mm/secretmem.c | 333 ++++++++++++++++++++++ scripts/checksyscalls.sh | 4 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 17 ++ 25 files changed, 703 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/secretmem.h create mode 100644 mm/secretmem.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c -- 2.28.0

5 years

14
56
0 0

[PATCH v22 00/12] Landlock LSM

by Mickaël Salaün

Hi, Can you please consider to merge this into the tree? This new patch series improves documentation, cleans up comments, renames ARCH_EPHEMERAL_STATES to ARCH_EPHEMERAL_INODES and removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_CHROOT. The SLOC count is 1183 for security/landlock/ and 1657 for tools/testing/selftest/landlock/ . Test coverage for security/landlock/ is 95.2% of lines. The code not covered only deals with internal kernel errors (e.g. memory allocation) and race conditions. The compiled documentation is available here: https://landlock.io/linux-doc/landlock-v22/userspace-api/landlock.html This series can be applied on top of v5.10-rc1 . This can be tested with CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK and CONFIG_SAMPLE_LANDLOCK. This patch series can be found in a Git repository here: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/commits/landlock-v22 I would really appreciate constructive comments on this patch series. # Landlock LSM The goal of Landlock is to enable to restrict ambient rights (e.g. global filesystem access) for a set of processes. Because Landlock is a stackable LSM [1], it makes possible to create safe security sandboxes as new security layers in addition to the existing system-wide access-controls. This kind of sandbox is expected to help mitigate the security impact of bugs or unexpected/malicious behaviors in user-space applications. Landlock empowers any process, including unprivileged ones, to securely restrict themselves. Landlock is inspired by seccomp-bpf but instead of filtering syscalls and their raw arguments, a Landlock rule can restrict the use of kernel objects like file hierarchies, according to the kernel semantic. Landlock also takes inspiration from other OS sandbox mechanisms: XNU Sandbox, FreeBSD Capsicum or OpenBSD Pledge/Unveil. In this current form, Landlock misses some access-control features. This enables to minimize this patch series and ease review. This series still addresses multiple use cases, especially with the combined use of seccomp-bpf: applications with built-in sandboxing, init systems, security sandbox tools and security-oriented APIs [2]. Previous version: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201008153103.1155388-1-mic@digikod.net/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/50db058a-7dde-441b-a7f9-f6837fe8b69f@schaufler… [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f646e1c7-33cf-333f-070c-0a40ad0468cd@digikod.n… Casey Schaufler (1): LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Mickaël Salaün (11): landlock: Add object management landlock: Add ruleset and domain management landlock: Set up the security framework and manage credentials landlock: Add ptrace restrictions fs,security: Add sb_delete hook landlock: Support filesystem access-control landlock: Add syscall implementations arch: Wire up Landlock syscalls selftests/landlock: Add user space tests samples/landlock: Add a sandbox manager example landlock: Add user and kernel documentation Documentation/security/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/security/landlock.rst | 79 + Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 259 +++ MAINTAINERS | 13 + arch/Kconfig | 7 + arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/arm/tools/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h | 6 + arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/microblaze/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl | 3 + arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl | 3 + arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 3 + arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + arch/um/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 3 + arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 3 + arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 + fs/super.c | 1 + include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 1 + include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 3 + include/linux/security.h | 4 + include/linux/syscalls.h | 7 + include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 8 +- include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 128 ++ kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 + samples/Kconfig | 7 + samples/Makefile | 1 + samples/landlock/.gitignore | 1 + samples/landlock/Makefile | 15 + samples/landlock/sandboxer.c | 219 +++ security/Kconfig | 11 +- security/Makefile | 2 + security/landlock/Kconfig | 19 + security/landlock/Makefile | 4 + security/landlock/common.h | 20 + security/landlock/cred.c | 46 + security/landlock/cred.h | 58 + security/landlock/fs.c | 604 ++++++ security/landlock/fs.h | 60 + security/landlock/object.c | 66 + security/landlock/object.h | 91 + security/landlock/ptrace.c | 120 ++ security/landlock/ptrace.h | 14 + security/landlock/ruleset.c | 350 ++++ security/landlock/ruleset.h | 157 ++ security/landlock/setup.c | 40 + security/landlock/setup.h | 18 + security/landlock/syscall.c | 427 +++++ security/security.c | 51 +- security/selinux/hooks.c | 58 +- security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 6 + security/selinux/ss/services.c | 3 +- security/smack/smack.h | 6 + security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 35 +- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/landlock/.gitignore | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/landlock/Makefile | 24 + tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c | 117 ++ tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h | 113 ++ tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 1675 +++++++++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 307 +++ tools/testing/selftests/landlock/true.c | 5 + 71 files changed, 5255 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/security/landlock.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/landlock.h create mode 100644 samples/landlock/.gitignore create mode 100644 samples/landlock/Makefile create mode 100644 samples/landlock/sandboxer.c create mode 100644 security/landlock/Kconfig create mode 100644 security/landlock/Makefile create mode 100644 security/landlock/common.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/cred.c create mode 100644 security/landlock/cred.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/fs.c create mode 100644 security/landlock/fs.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/object.c create mode 100644 security/landlock/object.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/ptrace.c create mode 100644 security/landlock/ptrace.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/ruleset.c create mode 100644 security/landlock/ruleset.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/setup.c create mode 100644 security/landlock/setup.h create mode 100644 security/landlock/syscall.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/common.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/landlock/true.c base-commit: 3650b228f83adda7e5ee532e2b90429c03f7b9ec -- 2.28.0

5 years

4
36
0 0

[PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix error return code in run_getsockopt_test()

by Wang Hai

Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. Fixes: 65b4414a05eb ("selftests/bpf: add sockopt test that exercises BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38(a)huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c index 29188d6f5c8d..51fac975b316 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_multi.c @@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ static int run_getsockopt_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int cg_parent, */ buf = 0x40; - if (setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_IP, IP_TOS, &buf, 1) < 0) { + err = setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_IP, IP_TOS, &buf, 1); + if (err < 0) { log_err("Failed to call setsockopt(IP_TOS)"); goto detach; } -- 2.17.1

5 years

2
1
0 0

checking for "config" file existence.

by Jeffrin Jose T

hello, i wrote a small program to check for the existence of "config" files for testing projects under kselftest framework. chmod 755 test_config.py This file should be located in "tools/testing/selftests" This can be run as "./test_config.py" -- software engineer rajagiri school of engineering and technology - autonomous

5 years

2
2
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/2] dma-mapping: provide a benchmark for streaming DMA mapping

by Barry Song

Nowadays, there are increasing requirements to benchmark the performance of dma_map and dma_unmap particually while the device is attached to an IOMMU. This patchset provides the benchmark infrastruture for streaming DMA mapping. The architecture of the code is pretty much similar with GUP benchmark: * mm/gup_benchmark.c provides kernel interface; * tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c provides user program to call the interface provided by mm/gup_benchmark.c. In our case, kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c is like mm/gup_benchmark.c; tools/testing/selftests/dma/dma_map_benchmark.c is like tools/testing/ selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c A major difference with GUP benchmark is DMA_MAP benchmark needs to run on a device. Considering one board with below devices and IOMMUs device A ------- IOMMU 1 device B ------- IOMMU 2 device C ------- non-IOMMU Different devices might attach to different IOMMU or non-IOMMU. To make benchmark run, we can either * create a virtual device and hack the kernel code to attach the virtual device to IOMMU1, IOMMU2 or non-IOMMU. * use the existing driver_override mechinism, unbind device A,B, OR c from their original driver and bind A to dma_map_benchmark platform driver or pci driver for benchmarking. In this patchset, I prefer to use the driver_override and avoid the ugly hack in kernel. We can dynamically switch device behind different IOMMUs to get the performance of IOMMU or non-IOMMU. -v3: * fix build issues reported by 0day kernel test robot -v2: * add PCI support; v1 supported platform devices only * replace ssleep by msleep_interruptible() to permit users to exit benchmark before it is completed * many changes according to Robin's suggestions, thanks! Robin - add standard deviation output to reflect the worst case - check users' parameters strictly like the number of threads - make cache dirty before dma_map - fix unpaired dma_map_page and dma_unmap_single; - remove redundant "long long" before ktime_to_ns(); - use devm_add_action() Barry Song (2): dma-mapping: add benchmark support for streaming DMA APIs selftests/dma: add test application for DMA_MAP_BENCHMARK MAINTAINERS | 6 + kernel/dma/Kconfig | 8 + kernel/dma/Makefile | 1 + kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c | 296 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/dma/Makefile | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/dma/config | 1 + .../testing/selftests/dma/dma_map_benchmark.c | 87 +++++ 7 files changed, 405 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/dma/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/dma/config create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/dma/dma_map_benchmark.c -- 2.25.1

5 years

4
11
0 0

[PATCH v7 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing

by Arpitha Raghunandan

Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit. This approach requires the creation of a test case using the KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a generator function as input. This generator function should return the next parameter given the previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators based on arrays. Generators may also optionally provide a human-readable description of parameters, which is displayed where available. Note, currently the result of each parameter run is displayed in diagnostic lines, and only the overall test case output summarizes TAP-compliant success or failure of all parameter runs. In future, when supported by kunit-tool, these can be turned into subsubtest outputs. Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi(a)gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver(a)google.com> --- Changes v6->v7: - Clarify commit message. - Introduce ability to optionally generate descriptions for parameters; if no description is provided, we'll still print 'param-N'. - Change diagnostic line format to: # <test-case-name>: <ok|not ok> N - [<param description>] Changes v5->v6: - Fix alignment to maintain consistency Changes v4->v5: - Update kernel-doc comments. - Use const void* for generator return and prev value types. - Add kernel-doc comment for KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM. - Rework parameterized test case execution strategy: each parameter is executed as if it was its own test case, with its own test initialization and cleanup (init and exit are called, etc.). However, we cannot add new test cases per TAP protocol once we have already started execution. Instead, log the result of each parameter run as a diagnostic comment. Changes v3->v4: - Rename kunit variables - Rename generator function helper macro - Add documentation for generator approach - Display test case name in case of failure along with param index Changes v2->v3: - Modifictaion of generator macro and method Changes v1->v2: - Use of a generator method to access test case parameters Changes v6->v7: - Clarify commit message. - Introduce ability to optionally generate descriptions for parameters; if no description is provided, we'll still print 'param-N'. - Change diagnostic line format to: # <test-case-name>: <ok|not ok> N - [<param description>] - Before execution of parameterized test case, count number of parameters and display number of parameters. Currently also as a diagnostic line, but this may be used in future to generate a subsubtest plan. A requirement of this change is that generators must generate a deterministic number of parameters. Changes v5->v6: - Fix alignment to maintain consistency Changes v4->v5: - Update kernel-doc comments. - Use const void* for generator return and prev value types. - Add kernel-doc comment for KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM. - Rework parameterized test case execution strategy: each parameter is executed as if it was its own test case, with its own test initialization and cleanup (init and exit are called, etc.). However, we cannot add new test cases per TAP protocol once we have already started execution. Instead, log the result of each parameter run as a diagnostic comment. Changes v3->v4: - Rename kunit variables - Rename generator function helper macro - Add documentation for generator approach - Display test case name in case of failure along with param index Changes v2->v3: - Modifictaion of generator macro and method Changes v1->v2: - Use of a generator method to access test case parameters include/kunit/test.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index db1b0ae666c4..cf5f33b1c890 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ struct kunit; /* Size of log associated with test. */ #define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE 512 +/* Maximum size of parameter description string. */ +#define KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE 64 + /* * TAP specifies subtest stream indentation of 4 spaces, 8 spaces for a * sub-subtest. See the "Subtests" section in @@ -107,6 +110,7 @@ struct kunit; * * @run_case: the function representing the actual test case. * @name: the name of the test case. + * @generate_params: the generator function for parameterized tests. * * A test case is a function with the signature, * ``void (*)(struct kunit *)`` @@ -141,6 +145,7 @@ struct kunit; struct kunit_case { void (*run_case)(struct kunit *test); const char *name; + const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc); /* private: internal use only. */ bool success; @@ -163,6 +168,27 @@ static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(bool status) */ #define KUNIT_CASE(test_name) { .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name } +/** + * KUNIT_CASE_PARAM - A helper for creation a parameterized &struct kunit_case + * + * @test_name: a reference to a test case function. + * @gen_params: a reference to a parameter generator function. + * + * The generator function:: + * + * const void* gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc) + * + * is used to lazily generate a series of arbitrarily typed values that fit into + * a void*. The argument @prev is the previously returned value, which should be + * used to derive the next value; @prev is set to NULL on the initial generator + * call. When no more values are available, the generator must return NULL. + * Optionally write a string into @desc (size of KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE) + * describing the parameter. + */ +#define KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_name, gen_params) \ + { .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name, \ + .generate_params = gen_params } + /** * struct kunit_suite - describes a related collection of &struct kunit_case * @@ -208,6 +234,10 @@ struct kunit { const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ char *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */ struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; + /* param_value is the current parameter value for a test case. */ + const void *param_value; + /* param_index stores the index of the parameter in parameterized tests. */ + int param_index; /* * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a * test case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple @@ -1742,4 +1772,25 @@ do { \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__) +/** + * KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM() - Define test parameter generator from an array. + * @name: prefix for the test parameter generator function. + * @array: array of test parameters. + * @get_desc: function to convert param to description; NULL to use default + * + * Define function @name_gen_params which uses @array to generate parameters. + */ +#define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(name, array, get_desc) \ + static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc) \ + { \ + typeof((array)[0]) * __next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array); \ + if (__next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array))) { \ + void (*__get_desc)(typeof(__next), char *) = get_desc; \ + if (__get_desc) \ + __get_desc(__next, desc); \ + return __next; \ + } \ + return NULL; \ + } + #endif /* _KUNIT_TEST_H */ diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 750704abe89a..ec9494e914ef 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -325,39 +325,72 @@ static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data) * occur in a test case and reports them as failures. */ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite, - struct kunit_case *test_case) + struct kunit_case *test_case, + struct kunit *test) { struct kunit_try_catch_context context; struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch; - struct kunit test; - kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name, test_case->log); - try_catch = &test.try_catch; + kunit_init_test(test, test_case->name, test_case->log); + try_catch = &test->try_catch; kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, - &test, + test, kunit_try_run_case, kunit_catch_run_case); - context.test = &test; + context.test = test; context.suite = suite; context.test_case = test_case; kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context); - test_case->success = test.success; - - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->success, - kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), - test_case->name); + test_case->success = test->success; } int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) { + char param_desc[KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE]; struct kunit_case *test_case; kunit_print_subtest_start(suite); - kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) - kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case); + kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { + struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 }; + bool test_success = true; + + if (test_case->generate_params) { + /* Get initial param. */ + param_desc[0] = '\0'; + test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc); + } + + do { + kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); + test_success &= test_case->success; + + if (test_case->generate_params) { + if (param_desc[0] == '\0') { + snprintf(param_desc, sizeof(param_desc), + "param-%d", test.param_index); + } + + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "# %s: %s %d - %s", + test_case->name, + kunit_status_to_string(test.success), + test.param_index + 1, param_desc); + + /* Get next param. */ + param_desc[0] = '\0'; + test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc); + test.param_index++; + } + } while (test.param_value); + + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success, + kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), + test_case->name); + } kunit_print_subtest_end(suite); -- 2.25.1

5 years

2
4
0 0

[PATCH v6 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing

by Arpitha Raghunandan

Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit. This approach requires the creation of a test case using the KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that accepts a generator function as input. This generator function should return the next parameter given the previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators. Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi(a)gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver(a)google.com> --- Changes v5->v6: - Fix alignment to maintain consistency Changes v4->v5: - Update kernel-doc comments. - Use const void* for generator return and prev value types. - Add kernel-doc comment for KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM. - Rework parameterized test case execution strategy: each parameter is executed as if it was its own test case, with its own test initialization and cleanup (init and exit are called, etc.). However, we cannot add new test cases per TAP protocol once we have already started execution. Instead, log the result of each parameter run as a diagnostic comment. Changes v3->v4: - Rename kunit variables - Rename generator function helper macro - Add documentation for generator approach - Display test case name in case of failure along with param index Changes v2->v3: - Modifictaion of generator macro and method Changes v1->v2: - Use of a generator method to access test case parameters include/kunit/test.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index db1b0ae666c4..16616d3974f9 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct kunit; * * @run_case: the function representing the actual test case. * @name: the name of the test case. + * @generate_params: the generator function for parameterized tests. * * A test case is a function with the signature, * ``void (*)(struct kunit *)`` @@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ struct kunit; struct kunit_case { void (*run_case)(struct kunit *test); const char *name; + const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev); /* private: internal use only. */ bool success; @@ -163,6 +165,22 @@ static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(bool status) */ #define KUNIT_CASE(test_name) { .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name } +/** + * KUNIT_CASE_PARAM - A helper for creation a parameterized &struct kunit_case + * + * @test_name: a reference to a test case function. + * @gen_params: a reference to a parameter generator function. + * + * The generator function ``const void* gen_params(const void *prev)`` is used + * to lazily generate a series of arbitrarily typed values that fit into a + * void*. The argument @prev is the previously returned value, which should be + * used to derive the next value; @prev is set to NULL on the initial generator + * call. When no more values are available, the generator must return NULL. + */ +#define KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_name, gen_params) \ + { .run_case = test_name, .name = #test_name, \ + .generate_params = gen_params } + /** * struct kunit_suite - describes a related collection of &struct kunit_case * @@ -208,6 +226,10 @@ struct kunit { const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ char *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */ struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; + /* param_value is the current parameter value for a test case. */ + const void *param_value; + /* param_index stores the index of the parameter in parameterized tests. */ + int param_index; /* * success starts as true, and may only be set to false during a * test case; thus, it is safe to update this across multiple @@ -1742,4 +1764,18 @@ do { \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__) +/** + * KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM() - Define test parameter generator from an array. + * @name: prefix for the test parameter generator function. + * @array: array of test parameters. + * + * Define function @name_gen_params which uses @array to generate parameters. + */ +#define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(name, array) \ + static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev) \ + { \ + typeof((array)[0]) * __next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array); \ + return __next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array)) ? __next : NULL; \ + } + #endif /* _KUNIT_TEST_H */ diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 750704abe89a..329fee9e0634 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -325,29 +325,25 @@ static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data) * occur in a test case and reports them as failures. */ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite, - struct kunit_case *test_case) + struct kunit_case *test_case, + struct kunit *test) { struct kunit_try_catch_context context; struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch; - struct kunit test; - kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name, test_case->log); - try_catch = &test.try_catch; + kunit_init_test(test, test_case->name, test_case->log); + try_catch = &test->try_catch; kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, - &test, + test, kunit_try_run_case, kunit_catch_run_case); - context.test = &test; + context.test = test; context.suite = suite; context.test_case = test_case; kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context); - test_case->success = test.success; - - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->success, - kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), - test_case->name); + test_case->success = test->success; } int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) @@ -356,8 +352,32 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_print_subtest_start(suite); - kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) - kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case); + kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { + struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 }; + bool test_success = true; + + if (test_case->generate_params) + test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL); + + do { + kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); + test_success &= test_case->success; + + if (test_case->generate_params) { + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "# %s: param-%d %s", + test_case->name, test.param_index, + kunit_status_to_string(test.success)); + test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value); + test.param_index++; + } + } while (test.param_value); + + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success, + kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), + test_case->name); + } kunit_print_subtest_end(suite); -- 2.25.1

5 years

4
22
0 0

[net-next,v2,0/5] seg6: add support for SRv6 End.DT4 behavior

by Andrea Mayer

This patchset provides support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior. The SRv6 End.DT4 is used to implement multi-tenant IPv4 L3 VPN. It decapsulates the received packets and performs IPv4 routing lookup in the routing table of the tenant. The SRv6 End.DT4 Linux implementation leverages a VRF device. The SRv6 End.DT4 is defined in the SRv6 Network Programming [1]. - Patch 1/5 is needed to solve a pre-existing issue with tunneled packets when a sniffer is attached; - Patch 2/5 improves the management of the seg6local attributes used by the SRv6 behaviors; - Patch 3/5 introduces two callbacks used for customizing the creation/destruction of a SRv6 behavior; - Patch 4/5 is the core patch that adds support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior; - Patch 5/5 adds the selftest for SRv6 End.DT4 behavior. I would like to thank David Ahern for his support during the development of this patch set. Comments, suggestions and improvements are very welcome! Thanks, Andrea Mayer v2 no changes made: resubmitted after false build report. v1 improve comments; add new patch 2/5 titled: seg6: improve management of behavior attributes seg6: add support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior - remove the inline keyword in the definition of fib6_config_get_net(). selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior - add check for the vrf sysctl [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming Andrea Mayer (5): vrf: add mac header for tunneled packets when sniffer is attached seg6: improve management of behavior attributes seg6: add callbacks for customizing the creation/destruction of a behavior seg6: add support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior drivers/net/vrf.c | 78 ++- net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 370 ++++++++++++- .../selftests/net/srv6_end_dt4_l3vpn_test.sh | 494 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 927 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_dt4_l3vpn_test.sh -- 2.20.1

5 years

4
26
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 26/55] wireguard: selftests: check that route_me_harder packets use the right sk

by Sasha Levin

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason(a)zx2c4.com> [ Upstream commit af8afcf1fdd5f365f70e2386c2d8c7a1abd853d7 ] If netfilter changes the packet mark, the packet is rerouted. The ip_route_me_harder family of functions fails to use the right sk, opting to instead use skb->sk, resulting in a routing loop when used with tunnels. With the next change fixing this issue in netfilter, test for the relevant condition inside our test suite, since wireguard was where the bug was discovered. Reported-by: Chen Minqiang <ptpt52(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason(a)zx2c4.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo(a)netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh | 8 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh index d77f4829f1e07..74c69b75f6f5a 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh @@ -316,6 +316,14 @@ pp sleep 3 n2 ping -W 1 -c 1 192.168.241.1 n1 wg set wg0 peer "$pub2" persistent-keepalive 0 +# Test that sk_bound_dev_if works +n1 ping -I wg0 -c 1 -W 1 192.168.241.2 +# What about when the mark changes and the packet must be rerouted? +n1 iptables -t mangle -I OUTPUT -j MARK --set-xmark 1 +n1 ping -c 1 -W 1 192.168.241.2 # First the boring case +n1 ping -I wg0 -c 1 -W 1 192.168.241.2 # Then the sk_bound_dev_if case +n1 iptables -t mangle -D OUTPUT -j MARK --set-xmark 1 + # Test that onion routing works, even when it loops n1 wg set wg0 peer "$pub3" allowed-ips 192.168.242.2/32 endpoint 192.168.241.2:5 ip1 addr add 192.168.242.1/24 dev wg0 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config index d531de13c95b0..4eecb432a66c1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/qemu/kernel.config @@ -18,10 +18,12 @@ CONFIG_NF_NAT=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_NAT=y CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=y +CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MARK=y CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4=y CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4=y CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=y CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=y +CONFIG_IP_NF_MANGLE=y CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT=y CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y -- 2.27.0

5 years

3
3
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror