- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: add new KSM process and sysfs knobs

by David Hildenbrand

On 10.03.23 19:28, Stefan Roesch wrote: > This adds the general_profit KSM sysfs knob and the process profit metric > and process merge type knobs to ksm_stat. > > 1) split off pages_volatile function > > This splits off the pages_volatile function. The next patch will > use this function. > > 2) expose general_profit metric > > The documentation mentions a general profit metric, however this > metric is not calculated. In addition the formula depends on the size > of internal structures, which makes it more difficult for an > administrator to make the calculation. Adding the metric for a better > user experience. > > 3) document general_profit sysfs knob > > 4) calculate ksm process profit metric > > The ksm documentation mentions the process profit metric and how to > calculate it. This adds the calculation of the metric. > > 5) add ksm_merge_type() function > > This adds the ksm_merge_type function. The function returns the > merge type for the process. For madvise it returns "madvise", for > prctl it returns "process" and otherwise it returns "none". > > 6) mm: expose ksm process profit metric and merge type in ksm_stat > > This exposes the ksm process profit metric in /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat. > The name of the value is ksm_merge_type. The documentation mentions > the formula for the ksm process profit metric, however it does not > calculate it. In addition the formula depends on the size of internal > structures. So it makes sense to expose it. > > 7) document new procfs ksm knobs > Often, when you have to start making a list of things that a patch does, it might make sense to split some of the items into separate patches such that you can avoid lists and just explain in list-free text how the pieces in the patch fit together. I'd suggest splitting this patch into logical pieces. For example, separating the general profit calculation/exposure from the per-mm profit and the per-mm ksm type indication. > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230224044000.3084046-3-shr@devkernel.io > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr(a)devkernel.io> > Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme(a)gmail.com> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko(a)suse.com> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel(a)surriel.com> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> > --- [...] > KSM_ATTR_RO(pages_volatile); > > @@ -3280,6 +3305,21 @@ static ssize_t zero_pages_sharing_show(struct kobject *kobj, > } > KSM_ATTR_RO(zero_pages_sharing); > > +static ssize_t general_profit_show(struct kobject *kobj, > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + long general_profit; > + long all_rmap_items; > + > + all_rmap_items = ksm_max_page_sharing + ksm_pages_shared + > + ksm_pages_unshared + pages_volatile(); Are you sure you want to count a config knob (ksm_max_page_sharing) into that formula? I yet have to digest what this calculation implies, but it does feel odd. Further, maybe just avoid pages_volatile(). Expanding the formula (excluding ksm_max_page_sharing for now): all_rmap = ksm_pages_shared + ksm_pages_unshared + pages_volatile(); -> expand pages_volatile() (ignoring the < 0 case) all_rmap = ksm_pages_shared + ksm_pages_unshared + ksm_rmap_items - ksm_pages_shared - ksm_pages_sharing - ksm_pages_unshared; -> simplify all_rmap = ksm_rmap_items + ksm_pages_sharing; Or is the < 0 case relevant here? > + general_profit = ksm_pages_sharing * PAGE_SIZE - > + all_rmap_items * sizeof(struct ksm_rmap_item); > + > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%ld\n", general_profit); > +} > +KSM_ATTR_RO(general_profit); > + > static ssize_t stable_node_dups_show(struct kobject *kobj, > struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) > { > @@ -3345,6 +3385,7 @@ static struct attribute *ksm_attrs[] = { > &stable_node_dups_attr.attr, > &stable_node_chains_prune_millisecs_attr.attr, > &use_zero_pages_attr.attr, > + &general_profit_attr.attr, > NULL, > }; > The calculations (profit) don't include when KSM places the shared zeropage I guess. Accounting that per MM (and eventually globally) is in the works. [1] [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230328153852.26c2577e4bd921c371c47a7e@linux-… -- Thanks, David / dhildenb

2 years, 7 months

3
4
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests: xsk: Add tests for 8K and 9K frame sizes

by Kal Conley

Add tests: - RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME_SIZE: frame_size=8192 (aligned) - UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME_SIZE: frame_size=9000 (unaligned) Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <kal.conley(a)dectris.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c index 7eccf57a0ccc..86797de7fc50 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c @@ -1841,6 +1841,17 @@ static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test, enum test_mode mode, enum test_ pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, PKT_SIZE); testapp_validate_traffic(test); break; + case TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME: + if (!hugepages_present(test->ifobj_tx)) { + ksft_test_result_skip("No 2M huge pages present.\n"); + return; + } + test_spec_set_name(test, "RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME_SIZE"); + test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 8192; + test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 8192; + pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, PKT_SIZE); + testapp_validate_traffic(test); + break; case TEST_TYPE_RX_POLL: test->ifobj_rx->use_poll = true; test_spec_set_name(test, "POLL_RX"); @@ -1904,6 +1915,20 @@ static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test, enum test_mode mode, enum test_ if (!testapp_unaligned(test)) return; break; + case TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME: + if (!hugepages_present(test->ifobj_tx)) { + ksft_test_result_skip("No 2M huge pages present.\n"); + return; + } + test_spec_set_name(test, "UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME_SIZE"); + test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 9000; + test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 9000; + test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true; + test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true; + pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, PKT_SIZE); + test->ifobj_rx->pkt_stream->use_addr_for_fill = true; + testapp_validate_traffic(test); + break; case TEST_TYPE_HEADROOM: testapp_headroom(test); break; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h index 919327807a4e..7f52f737f5e9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h @@ -69,12 +69,14 @@ enum test_mode { enum test_type { TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION, TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_2K_FRAME, + TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME, TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_SINGLE_PKT, TEST_TYPE_RX_POLL, TEST_TYPE_TX_POLL, TEST_TYPE_POLL_RXQ_TMOUT, TEST_TYPE_POLL_TXQ_TMOUT, TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED, + TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME, TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC, TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC_2K_FRAME, TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC, -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] selftests: xsk: Use hugepages when umem->frame_size > PAGE_SIZE

by Kal Conley

HugeTLB UMEMs now support chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE. Set MAP_HUGETLB when frame_size > PAGE_SIZE for future tests. Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <kal.conley(a)dectris.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c index 5a9691e942de..7eccf57a0ccc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c @@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ static void thread_common_ops(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobject) void *bufs; int ret; - if (ifobject->umem->unaligned_mode) + if (ifobject->umem->frame_size > sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) || ifobject->umem->unaligned_mode) mmap_flags |= MAP_HUGETLB; if (ifobject->shared_umem) -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests: xsk: Add tests for 8K and 9K frame sizes

by Kal Conley

Add tests: - RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME_SIZE: frame_size=8192 (aligned) - UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME_SIZE: frame_size=9000 (unaligned) Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <kal.conley(a)dectris.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c index 7eccf57a0ccc..86797de7fc50 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c @@ -1841,6 +1841,17 @@ static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test, enum test_mode mode, enum test_ pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, PKT_SIZE); testapp_validate_traffic(test); break; + case TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME: + if (!hugepages_present(test->ifobj_tx)) { + ksft_test_result_skip("No 2M huge pages present.\n"); + return; + } + test_spec_set_name(test, "RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME_SIZE"); + test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 8192; + test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 8192; + pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, PKT_SIZE); + testapp_validate_traffic(test); + break; case TEST_TYPE_RX_POLL: test->ifobj_rx->use_poll = true; test_spec_set_name(test, "POLL_RX"); @@ -1904,6 +1915,20 @@ static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test, enum test_mode mode, enum test_ if (!testapp_unaligned(test)) return; break; + case TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME: + if (!hugepages_present(test->ifobj_tx)) { + ksft_test_result_skip("No 2M huge pages present.\n"); + return; + } + test_spec_set_name(test, "UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME_SIZE"); + test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 9000; + test->ifobj_rx->umem->frame_size = 9000; + test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true; + test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true; + pkt_stream_replace(test, DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, PKT_SIZE); + test->ifobj_rx->pkt_stream->use_addr_for_fill = true; + testapp_validate_traffic(test); + break; case TEST_TYPE_HEADROOM: testapp_headroom(test); break; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h index 919327807a4e..7f52f737f5e9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h @@ -69,12 +69,14 @@ enum test_mode { enum test_type { TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION, TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_2K_FRAME, + TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_8K_FRAME, TEST_TYPE_RUN_TO_COMPLETION_SINGLE_PKT, TEST_TYPE_RX_POLL, TEST_TYPE_TX_POLL, TEST_TYPE_POLL_RXQ_TMOUT, TEST_TYPE_POLL_TXQ_TMOUT, TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED, + TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_9K_FRAME, TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC, TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC_2K_FRAME, TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC, -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] selftests: xsk: Use hugepages when umem->frame_size > PAGE_SIZE

by Kal Conley

HugeTLB UMEMs now support chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE. Set MAP_HUGETLB when frame_size > PAGE_SIZE for future tests. Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <kal.conley(a)dectris.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c index 5a9691e942de..7eccf57a0ccc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c @@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ static void thread_common_ops(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobject) void *bufs; int ret; - if (ifobject->umem->unaligned_mode) + if (ifobject->umem->frame_size > sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) || ifobject->umem->unaligned_mode) mmap_flags |= MAP_HUGETLB; if (ifobject->shared_umem) -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 2/7] selftests: sigaltstack: fix -Wuninitialized

by Sasha Levin

From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 05107edc910135d27fe557267dc45be9630bf3dd ] Building sigaltstack with clang via: $ ARCH=x86 make LLVM=1 -C tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/ produces the following warning: warning: variable 'sp' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || ^~ Clang expects these to be declared at global scope; we've fixed this in the kernel proper by using the macro `current_stack_pointer`. This is defined in different headers for different target architectures, so just create a new header that defines the arch-specific register names for the stack pointer register, and define it for more targets (at least the ones that support current_stack_pointer/ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER). Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYsi3OOu7yCsMutpzKDnBMAzJBCPimBp86LhGBa0e… Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 7 +----- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..ea9bdf3a90b16 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#if __alpha__ +register unsigned long sp asm("$30"); +#elif __arm__ || __aarch64__ || __csky__ || __m68k__ || __mips__ || __riscv +register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); +#elif __i386__ +register unsigned long sp asm("esp"); +#elif __loongarch64 +register unsigned long sp asm("$sp"); +#elif __ppc__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r1"); +#elif __s390x__ +register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); +#elif __sh__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r15"); +#elif __x86_64__ +register unsigned long sp asm("rsp"); +#elif __XTENSA__ +register unsigned long sp asm("a1"); +#else +#error "implement current_stack_pointer equivalent" +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c index 228c2ae47687d..6069d97bf5063 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <errno.h> #include "../kselftest.h" +#include "current_stack_pointer.h" #ifndef SS_AUTODISARM #define SS_AUTODISARM (1U << 31) @@ -40,12 +41,6 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u) stack_t stk; struct stk_data *p; -#if __s390x__ - register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); -#else - register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); -#endif - if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || sp >= (unsigned long)sstack + SIGSTKSZ) { ksft_exit_fail_msg("SP is not on sigaltstack\n"); -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/8] selftests: sigaltstack: fix -Wuninitialized

by Sasha Levin

From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 05107edc910135d27fe557267dc45be9630bf3dd ] Building sigaltstack with clang via: $ ARCH=x86 make LLVM=1 -C tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/ produces the following warning: warning: variable 'sp' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || ^~ Clang expects these to be declared at global scope; we've fixed this in the kernel proper by using the macro `current_stack_pointer`. This is defined in different headers for different target architectures, so just create a new header that defines the arch-specific register names for the stack pointer register, and define it for more targets (at least the ones that support current_stack_pointer/ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER). Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYsi3OOu7yCsMutpzKDnBMAzJBCPimBp86LhGBa0e… Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 7 +----- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..ea9bdf3a90b16 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#if __alpha__ +register unsigned long sp asm("$30"); +#elif __arm__ || __aarch64__ || __csky__ || __m68k__ || __mips__ || __riscv +register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); +#elif __i386__ +register unsigned long sp asm("esp"); +#elif __loongarch64 +register unsigned long sp asm("$sp"); +#elif __ppc__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r1"); +#elif __s390x__ +register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); +#elif __sh__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r15"); +#elif __x86_64__ +register unsigned long sp asm("rsp"); +#elif __XTENSA__ +register unsigned long sp asm("a1"); +#else +#error "implement current_stack_pointer equivalent" +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c index 228c2ae47687d..6069d97bf5063 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <errno.h> #include "../kselftest.h" +#include "current_stack_pointer.h" #ifndef SS_AUTODISARM #define SS_AUTODISARM (1U << 31) @@ -40,12 +41,6 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u) stack_t stk; struct stk_data *p; -#if __s390x__ - register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); -#else - register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); -#endif - if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || sp >= (unsigned long)sstack + SIGSTKSZ) { ksft_exit_fail_msg("SP is not on sigaltstack\n"); -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 3/9] selftests: sigaltstack: fix -Wuninitialized

by Sasha Levin

From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 05107edc910135d27fe557267dc45be9630bf3dd ] Building sigaltstack with clang via: $ ARCH=x86 make LLVM=1 -C tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/ produces the following warning: warning: variable 'sp' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || ^~ Clang expects these to be declared at global scope; we've fixed this in the kernel proper by using the macro `current_stack_pointer`. This is defined in different headers for different target architectures, so just create a new header that defines the arch-specific register names for the stack pointer register, and define it for more targets (at least the ones that support current_stack_pointer/ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER). Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYsi3OOu7yCsMutpzKDnBMAzJBCPimBp86LhGBa0e… Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 7 +----- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..ea9bdf3a90b16 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#if __alpha__ +register unsigned long sp asm("$30"); +#elif __arm__ || __aarch64__ || __csky__ || __m68k__ || __mips__ || __riscv +register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); +#elif __i386__ +register unsigned long sp asm("esp"); +#elif __loongarch64 +register unsigned long sp asm("$sp"); +#elif __ppc__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r1"); +#elif __s390x__ +register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); +#elif __sh__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r15"); +#elif __x86_64__ +register unsigned long sp asm("rsp"); +#elif __XTENSA__ +register unsigned long sp asm("a1"); +#else +#error "implement current_stack_pointer equivalent" +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c index ad0f8df2ca0af..6e60545994916 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <errno.h> #include "../kselftest.h" +#include "current_stack_pointer.h" #ifndef SS_AUTODISARM #define SS_AUTODISARM (1U << 31) @@ -40,12 +41,6 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u) stack_t stk; struct stk_data *p; -#if __s390x__ - register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); -#else - register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); -#endif - if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || sp >= (unsigned long)sstack + SIGSTKSZ) { ksft_exit_fail_msg("SP is not on sigaltstack\n"); -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 3/9] selftests: sigaltstack: fix -Wuninitialized

by Sasha Levin

From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 05107edc910135d27fe557267dc45be9630bf3dd ] Building sigaltstack with clang via: $ ARCH=x86 make LLVM=1 -C tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/ produces the following warning: warning: variable 'sp' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || ^~ Clang expects these to be declared at global scope; we've fixed this in the kernel proper by using the macro `current_stack_pointer`. This is defined in different headers for different target architectures, so just create a new header that defines the arch-specific register names for the stack pointer register, and define it for more targets (at least the ones that support current_stack_pointer/ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER). Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYsi3OOu7yCsMutpzKDnBMAzJBCPimBp86LhGBa0e… Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 7 +----- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..ea9bdf3a90b16 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#if __alpha__ +register unsigned long sp asm("$30"); +#elif __arm__ || __aarch64__ || __csky__ || __m68k__ || __mips__ || __riscv +register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); +#elif __i386__ +register unsigned long sp asm("esp"); +#elif __loongarch64 +register unsigned long sp asm("$sp"); +#elif __ppc__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r1"); +#elif __s390x__ +register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); +#elif __sh__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r15"); +#elif __x86_64__ +register unsigned long sp asm("rsp"); +#elif __XTENSA__ +register unsigned long sp asm("a1"); +#else +#error "implement current_stack_pointer equivalent" +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c index 8934a3766d207..41646c22384a2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <errno.h> #include "../kselftest.h" +#include "current_stack_pointer.h" #ifndef SS_AUTODISARM #define SS_AUTODISARM (1U << 31) @@ -40,12 +41,6 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u) stack_t stk; struct stk_data *p; -#if __s390x__ - register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); -#else - register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); -#endif - if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || sp >= (unsigned long)sstack + SIGSTKSZ) { ksft_exit_fail_msg("SP is not on sigaltstack\n"); -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 04/11] selftests: sigaltstack: fix -Wuninitialized

by Sasha Levin

From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> [ Upstream commit 05107edc910135d27fe557267dc45be9630bf3dd ] Building sigaltstack with clang via: $ ARCH=x86 make LLVM=1 -C tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/ produces the following warning: warning: variable 'sp' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || ^~ Clang expects these to be declared at global scope; we've fixed this in the kernel proper by using the macro `current_stack_pointer`. This is defined in different headers for different target architectures, so just create a new header that defines the arch-specific register names for the stack pointer register, and define it for more targets (at least the ones that support current_stack_pointer/ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER). Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYsi3OOu7yCsMutpzKDnBMAzJBCPimBp86LhGBa0e… Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell(a)linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 7 +----- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..ea9bdf3a90b16 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/current_stack_pointer.h @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#if __alpha__ +register unsigned long sp asm("$30"); +#elif __arm__ || __aarch64__ || __csky__ || __m68k__ || __mips__ || __riscv +register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); +#elif __i386__ +register unsigned long sp asm("esp"); +#elif __loongarch64 +register unsigned long sp asm("$sp"); +#elif __ppc__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r1"); +#elif __s390x__ +register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); +#elif __sh__ +register unsigned long sp asm("r15"); +#elif __x86_64__ +register unsigned long sp asm("rsp"); +#elif __XTENSA__ +register unsigned long sp asm("a1"); +#else +#error "implement current_stack_pointer equivalent" +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c index c53b070755b65..98d37cb744fb2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include <sys/auxv.h> #include "../kselftest.h" +#include "current_stack_pointer.h" #ifndef SS_AUTODISARM #define SS_AUTODISARM (1U << 31) @@ -46,12 +47,6 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u) stack_t stk; struct stk_data *p; -#if __s390x__ - register unsigned long sp asm("%15"); -#else - register unsigned long sp asm("sp"); -#endif - if (sp < (unsigned long)sstack || sp >= (unsigned long)sstack + stack_size) { ksft_exit_fail_msg("SP is not on sigaltstack\n"); -- 2.39.2

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror