On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 12:48:13PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 12:37:14PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:29:21PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
The __riscv_has_extension_likely() and __riscv_has_extension_unlikely() functions from the vendor_extensions.h can be used to simplify the standard extension checking code as well. Migrate those functions to cpufeature.h and reorganize the code in the file to use the functions.
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins charlie@rivosinc.com
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 78 +++++++++++++++++------------- arch/riscv/include/asm/vendor_extensions.h | 28 ----------- 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h index fedd479ccfd1..17896ec9ec11 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -98,59 +98,66 @@ extern bool riscv_isa_fallback; unsigned long riscv_isa_extension_base(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap); +#define EXT_ALL_VENDORS 0
It's not really "all vendors", it's standard. Otherwise, this seems all
This hooks up into the alternatives:
ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %l[l_yes]", %[vendor], %[ext], 1)
Yeah, I know what you're using it for, I just find the naming odd.
Where the "vendor" argument is supposed to be 0 if the alternative is applicable to all vendors. Is there a better way to convey this?
s/EXT_ALL_VENDORS/STANDARD_EXT/?