On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 09:36:26AM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
It seems that there is no reason not to support 32-bit architectures; doing so requires a bit of rework with respect to cookies handling, however, as the current code implicitly assumes that sizeof(long) == sizeof(u64).
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov esyr@redhat.com
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 17 ++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 9c041be..a93a54f 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -2435,16 +2435,12 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr struct bpf_link_primer link_primer; void __user *ucookies; unsigned long *addrs;
- u32 flags, cnt, size;
- u32 flags, cnt, size, cookies_size; void __user *uaddrs; u64 *cookies = NULL; void __user *usyms; int err;
- /* no support for 32bit archs yet */
- if (sizeof(u64) != sizeof(void *))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI) return -EINVAL;
@@ -2454,6 +2450,7 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr uaddrs = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.kprobe_multi.addrs); usyms = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.kprobe_multi.syms);
- ucookies = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.kprobe_multi.cookies); if (!!uaddrs == !!usyms) return -EINVAL;
@@ -2461,8 +2458,11 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr if (!cnt) return -EINVAL;
- if (check_mul_overflow(cnt, (u32)sizeof(*addrs), &size))
- if (check_mul_overflow(cnt, (u32)sizeof(*addrs), &size) ||
(ucookies &&
return -EOVERFLOW;check_mul_overflow(cnt, (u32)sizeof(*cookies), &cookies_size))) {
- } addrs = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); if (!addrs) return -ENOMEM;
@@ -2486,14 +2486,13 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr goto error; }
- ucookies = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.kprobe_multi.cookies); if (ucookies) {
could we check all that in here? so the ucookies checks are on the one place.. also you would not need cookies_size
jirka
cookies = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cookies) { err = -ENOMEM; goto error; }cookies = kvmalloc(cookies_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (copy_from_user(cookies, ucookies, size)) {
}if (copy_from_user(cookies, ucookies, cookies_size)) { err = -EFAULT; goto error;
-- 2.1.4