On Thu, Aug 14, 2025, Sagi Shahar wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:53 PM Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote:
But Sean, if you want to save some time I think we can just accelerate this other reviewing. As far as new-fangled features, having this upstream is important even for that, because we are currently having to keep these tests plus follow on tests in sync across various development branches. So yea, it's time to get this over the line.
Yes please. The unspoken threat in my response is that at some point I will just start NAKing KVM TDX patches :-D
I'm making good progress and the massive refactor is mostly complete. I believe I should have the patches ready to review next week.
I'm also thinking that it would be easier if I split the series in 2 or possibly 3 patchset. The first one including the setup code and the basic lifecycle test and then the rest of the tests with possibly the guest_memfd tests in a separate series. What do you think?
Yes, please. Even if we end up having to tweak a few APIs when the fancier tests come along, I think it'll be easier and faster overall to hammer out the core support first.