Hello,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:33:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
I think we can. You mean having a new "cpuset.cpus.isolated" cgroupfs file. So there will be one in the root cgroup that defines all the isolated CPUs one can have. It is then distributed down the hierarchy and can be claimed only if a cgroup becomes an "isolated" partition. There will be a slight
Yeah, that seems a lot more congruent with the typical pattern.
change in the semantics of an "isolated" partition, but I doubt there will be much users out there.
I haven't thought through it too hard but what prevents staying compatible with the current behavior?
If you are OK with this approach, I can modify my patch series to do that.
Thanks.