Hi David,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v5.13-rc3 next-20210526] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/David-Gow/kunit-Support-skipped-tes... base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git ad9f25d338605d26acedcaf3ba5fab5ca26f1c10 config: x86_64-randconfig-r025-20210526 (attached as .config) compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 99155e913e9bad5f7f8a247f8bb3a3ff3da74af1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/83c919857a4ca319ed69d6feaf3d5b5325db... git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review David-Gow/kunit-Support-skipped-tests/20210526-161324 git checkout 83c919857a4ca319ed69d6feaf3d5b5325dbdc29 # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:458:2: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (__left) *' (aka 'enum kunit_status *') and 'typeof (__right) *' (aka 'int *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1320:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:957:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION' KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:947:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:858:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION(test, \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:834:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' ((void)__typecheck(__left, __right)); \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/minmax.h:20:28: note: expanded from macro '__typecheck' (!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1))) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:459:2: error: array initializer must be an initializer list or string literal KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, ""); ^ include/kunit/test.h:1502:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ' KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) ^ include/kunit/test.h:1218:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_ASSERTION' KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1211:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1188:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION' typeof(left) __left = (left); \ ^ lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:466:2: error: array initializer must be an initializer list or string literal KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "Accepts format string: YES"); ^ include/kunit/test.h:1502:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ' KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) ^ include/kunit/test.h:1218:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_ASSERTION' KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1211:2: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1188:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION' typeof(left) __left = (left); \ ^ 1 warning and 2 errors generated.
vim +458 lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
450 451 static void kunit_status_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test) 452 { 453 struct kunit fake; 454 455 kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL); 456 457 /* Before: Should be SUCCESS with no comment. */
458 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS);
459 KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, ""); 460 461 /* Mark the test as skipped. */ 462 kunit_mark_skipped(&fake, "Accepts format string: %s", "YES"); 463 464 /* After: Should be SKIPPED with our comment. */ 465 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SKIPPED); 466 KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "Accepts format string: YES"); 467 } 468
--- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org