On 10/15, Christian Brauner wrote:
+static inline bool task_alive(struct pid *pid) +{
- bool alive = true;
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (!pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID))
alive = false;
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return alive;
+}
Well, the usage of rcu_read_lock/unlock looks confusing to me...
I mean, this helper does not need rcu lock at all. Except rcu_dereference_check() will complain.
static inline bool task_alive(struct pid *pid) { bool alive;
/* shut up rcu_dereference_check() */ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map); alive = !!pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID)); rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
return alive; }
looks more clear imo.
But in fact I'd suggest to simply use !hlist_empty(&pid->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID]) in pidfd_show_fdinfo() and do not add a new helper.
Oleg.