On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 05:45:21PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 1:18 AM Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com wrote:
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE | KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(mode),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sstatus),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sie),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(stvec),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sscratch),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sepc),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(scause),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(stval),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sip),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(satp),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(scounteren),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(frequency),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(time),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(compare),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER | KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state),KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_A,KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_C,KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_D,KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_F,KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_H,KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_I,KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_M,I think all the above should have the size KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG. Please also test with a 32-bit host.
Hi Andrew,
Just noticed the RISC-V 32-bit kvm selftests was not supported currently.
Oh, right.
Even though I tried to remove the below check for 32-bit, there were still many warning and error messages during compiling. It seems 32-bit KVM selftests was not supported either for ARM/x86. Do we have a plan to support it on risc-v?
No plan and, if there was, it would be super low priority. So for stuff like using KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG, we'll just have to try and get it right without testing. If somebody adds 32-bit support to these tests someday, then, hopefully, it'll just work (I'm allowed one overly optimistic comment per day).
Thanks, drew