On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 12:01:25PM +0000, Yong-Xuan Wang wrote:
Update the get-reg-list test to test the Svadu Extension is available for guest OS.
Signed-off-by: Yong-Xuan Wang yongxuan.wang@sifive.com
.../testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c index 9f99ea42f45f..972538d76f48 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR: case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI: case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM:
- case KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVADU: return true; /* AIA registers are always available when Ssaia can't be disabled */ case KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_AIA | KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_AIA_REG(siselect):
@@ -340,6 +341,7 @@ static const char *isa_ext_id_to_str(__u64 id) "KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR", "KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI", "KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM",
"KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVADU",if (reg_off >= ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_isa_ext_reg_name)) { @@ -700,6 +702,10 @@ static __u64 fp_d_regs[] = { KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_D, }; +static __u64 svadu_regs[] = {
- KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVADU,
+};
#define BASE_SUBLIST \ {"base", .regs = base_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(base_regs), \ .skips_set = base_skips_set, .skips_set_n = ARRAY_SIZE(base_skips_set),} @@ -739,6 +745,9 @@ static __u64 fp_d_regs[] = { #define FP_D_REGS_SUBLIST \ {"fp_d", .feature = KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_D, .regs = fp_d_regs, \ .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(fp_d_regs),} +#define SVADU_REGS_SUBLIST \
- {"svadu", .feature = KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVADU, .regs = svadu_regs, \
.regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(svadu_regs),}static struct vcpu_reg_list h_config = { .sublists = { @@ -876,6 +885,14 @@ static struct vcpu_reg_list fp_d_config = { }, }; +static struct vcpu_reg_list svadu_config = {
- .sublists = {
- BASE_SUBLIST,
- SVADU_REGS_SUBLIST,
- {0},
- },
+};
struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = { &h_config, &zicbom_config, @@ -894,5 +911,6 @@ struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = { &aia_config, &fp_f_config, &fp_d_config,
- &svadu_config,
}; int vcpu_configs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu_configs); -- 2.17.1
We should rebase this on [1] since it changes sublist management.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231128145357.413321-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com/
Thanks, drew