On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 02:22:11PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
The recent commit 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir") broke compilation against libbpf if it is installed on the system, and $INCLUDEDIR/bpf is not in the include path.
Since having the bpf/ subdir of $INCLUDEDIR in the include path has never been a requirement for building against libbpf before, this needs to be fixed. One option is to just revert the offending commit and figure out a different way to achieve what it aims for.
The offending commit has been in the tree for a week. So I applied Andrii's revert of that change. It reintroduced the build dependency issue, but we lived with it for long time, so we can take time to fix it cleanly. I suggest to focus on that build dependency first.
However, this series takes a different approach: Changing all in-tree users of libbpf to consistently use a bpf/ prefix in #include directives for header files from libbpf.
I'm not sure it's a good idea. It feels nice, but think of a message we're sending to everyone. We will get spamed with question: does bpf community require all libbpf users to use bpf/ prefix ? What should be our answer? Require or recommend? If require.. what for? It works as-is. If recommend then why suddenly we're changing all files in selftests and samples? There is no good answer here. I think we should leave the things as-is. And fix build dep differently.
Patches 1-3 are still worth doing.