On 7/2/22 01:32, David Gow wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 2:17 AM Maíra Canal mairacanal@riseup.net wrote:
The Parameterized Testing example contains a compilation error, as the signature for the description helper function should be void(*)(struct sha1_test_case *, char *), so the struct should not be const. This is warned by Clang:
error: initialization of ‘void (*)(struct sha1_test_case *, char *)’ from incompatible pointer type ‘void (*)(const struct sha1_test_case *, char *)’ [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 33 | KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(sha1, cases, case_to_desc); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/kunit/test.h:1339:70: note: in definition of macro ‘KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM’ 1339 | void (*__get_desc)(typeof(__next), char *) = get_desc; \
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal mairacanal@riseup.net
Thanks for catching this. The change to the documentation looks good, but it may be better to change the array to be: const struct cases[] = { ... }
I missed that! Would you rather that I change it on a v2?
Best Regards, - Maíra Canal
That matches most of the existing uses of this, such as the mctp test, and encourages the use of const in cases (like the example) where it makes sense.
I'm okay with it either way, though: they're both valid.
Reviewed-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Cheers, -- David
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index d62a04255c2e..8e72fb277058 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ By reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a };
// Need a helper function to generate a name for each test case.
static void case_to_desc(const struct sha1_test_case *t, char *desc)
static void case_to_desc(struct sha1_test_case *t, char *desc) { strcpy(desc, t->str); }-- 2.36.1
--