Re: [PATCH v7 06/24] goldish_pipe: rename local pin_user_pages() routine

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:

+static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page,

• 	      unsigned long last_page,
  

• 	      unsigned int last_page_size,
  

• 	      int is_write,
  

• 	      struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
  

• 	      unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)
  

Why not goldfish_pin_pages? Normally we put the module / subsystem in front.

Also can we get this queued up for 5.5 to get some trivial changes out of the way?