21 Dec
2025
21 Dec
'25
2:59 p.m.
On Fri Dec 19, 2025 at 12:51 PM -03, David Ahern wrote:
On 12/19/25 7:51 AM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
It would probably require some work on the test but I think it could benefit from using two different network namespaces. Currently it is using PEER_NS and the default. I think avoiding the default one is beneficial for everyone as it ensures the state is clean and that the test won't interrupt the system connectivity.
Other tests already do that, e.g some tests in fib_tests.sh use ns1 and ns2 namespaces.
What do you all think?
agreed.
Thanks, I'll send a new version later on this week then!