On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 5:05 PM Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:10:55 -0700 Kalesh Singh kaleshsingh@google.com wrote:
fwiw, there's nothing in the above which is usable in a [0/N] overview.
While useful, the "what changed since the previous version" info isn't a suitable thing to carry in the permanent kernel record - it's short-term treansient stuff, not helpful to someone who is looking at the patchset in 2029.
Similarly, the "how it was tested" material is also useful, but it becomes irrelevant as soon as the code hits linux-next and mainline.
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the feedback. Do you mean the cover letter was not needed in this case or that it lacked enough context?
The latter. As I've split up the series, please put together some words to describe the remaining 6 patches if/when resending.
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for clarifying. I'll make sure to fix that when resending.
--Kalesh
Thanks.