Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: ensure fast64 integer types have 64 bits

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:18:00AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:

On 32bit platforms size_t is not enough to represent [u]int_fast64_t.

Fixes: 3e9fd4e9a1d5 ("tools/nolibc: add integer types and integer limit macros") Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh linux@weissschuh.net

---

Cc: Vincent Dagonneau v@vda.io

Note: We could also fall back to compiler-provided data like:

__UINT_FAST{8,16,32,64}_{TYPE,MIN,MAX}__

I'm fine with the way you did it. I'm wondering how we managed to miss this one given the tests in place!

Now queued, thank you Thomas. Willy