On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 14:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Dmitry Safonov dima@arista.com Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 17:26:55 +0100
Well, I think, I'll rework my patches set according to critics and separate compat xfrm layer. I've already a selftest to check that
32/64
bit xfrm works - so the most time-taking part is done.
The way you've done the compat structures using __packed is only going to work on x86, just FYI.
Thanks for pointing, so I'll probably cover it under something like HAS_COMPAT_XFRM. (if there isn't any better idea).
The "32-bit alignment for 64-bit objects" thing x86 has is very much not universal amongst ABIs having 32-bit and 64-bit variants.