On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:20 AM Matthew Wilcox willy@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: Mike Rapoport rppt@linux.ibm.com
Account memory consumed by secretmem to memcg. The accounting is updated when the memory is actually allocated and freed.
I think this is wrong. It fails to account subsequent allocators from the same PMD. If you want to track like this, you need separate pools per memcg.
Are these secretmem pools shared between different jobs/memcgs?