On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Maxime Ripard mripard@kernel.org wrote:
[ ...]
And singling out DRM because it regularly allegedly breaks things on xtensa or m68k and claiming we're not taking CI seriously because of it is completely ridiculous. If the all the subsystems were taking CI as seriously as DRM, we would be in a much better place.
FWIW:
$ git grep CONFIG_DRM arch/xtensa/ arch/m68k/ arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM=y arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=y arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU=y arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM=y arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VGEM=y arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU=y
If that isn't supported, it might really make sense to declare that CONFIG_DRM depends on !xtensa and !m68k.
Guenter