On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org wrote:
Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.
As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other architectures.
That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real topic for bikeshedding is the name. - Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name? - Do we want to include the architecture in the name? Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?
Cc: Rob Herring robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org Cc: Brendan Higgins brendan.higgins@linux.dev Cc: David Gow davidgow@google.com Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org
.../bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..dfe6da4796e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+title: KUnit
+maintainers:
- Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
- David Gow davidgow@google.com
+description:
- KUnit board used to unit test the Linux kernel in User Mode Linux (UML).
+properties:
- $nodename:
- const: "/"
- compatible:
- const: linux,kunit
+additionalProperties: true
+...
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/ https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git