Hi Charlie,
On 21/04/2024 03:04, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
This loop is supposed to check if ext->subset_ext_ids[j] is valid, rather than if ext->subset_ext_ids[i] is valid, before setting the extension id ext->subset_ext_ids[j] in isainfo->isa.
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins charlie@rivosinc.com Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley conor.dooley@microchip.com Fixes: 0d8295ed975b ("riscv: add ISA extension parsing for scalar crypto")
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c index 48874aac4871..b537731cadef 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static int __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_ext_list(unsigned long *isa2hwcap) if (ext->subset_ext_size) { for (int j = 0; j < ext->subset_ext_size; j++) {
if (riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->subset_ext_ids[i]))
if (riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->subset_ext_ids[j])) set_bit(ext->subset_ext_ids[j], isainfo->isa); } }
I think this should go into -fixes, let's check with Palmer if he wants to take this patch only or if you should send the patch on its own.
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Thanks,
Alex