On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:15 PM Miguel Ojeda miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 10:33 PM Tamir Duberstein tamird@gmail.com wrote:
This title is consistent with all other macros' documentation, regardless of the number of examples contained in their "Examples" sections.
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein tamird@gmail.com
I was going to say that I could take this one independently, but we already had #1 of:
https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240906164448.2268368-1-paddymills@proton.me/
I will take that one (which given the `checkpatch.pl` one got stalled, I should have taken it separately as I mentioned at some point).
Sounds good. I'll drop this one.